Long time con artist James Dobson has died
and is now most likely residing in the pits of hell. He was a hate
monger and cheap and trashy TV stations used to air his "Focus on the
Family" b.s. as part of early morning 'news' programming. He was an
awful man who spread his hatred non-stop.
ILB
7 minutes ago
James
Dobson was one of the most influential people in my decade long
decoupling from the church and my faith. His message was 90% OT, 10%
Jesus. His brand (and it was nothing if not a brand) of Christianity
helped usher out millions of Gen Xers who were raised in the faith but
left.
B*******
51 minutes ago
If
there is a god, he is god's problem now, and not ours. He was truly a
divisive person in this country and will not be missed by many of us.
D*******
1 hour ago
Not
sure this guy is gonna make it through the pearly gates. I think a guy
with horns will be welcoming Dobson to a really warm place!!!!
Clayton Strickland
36 minutes ago
That's great news.
Norm Kleve
42 minutes ago
He was a racist and bigot. He won't be missed by truly moral people.
Brock Tanner
43 minutes ago
A man who single-handedly is responsible for the abuse of millions of children. No tears here.
Mark P
58 minutes ago
Surely Satan is excited to see him again.
Anon
1 hour ago
I didn't even know this ancient child abuse advocate was still alive up until today. Good riddance.
Thursday, August 21, 2025. Chump and his national security stooges
are giving us new grounds for impeachment, Chump's fading in the polls, a
judge rebukes Chump for his efforts to distract from his failure to
release the Epstein files, Chump continues his war on immigrants, and
much more.
We have a lot to cover regarding Chump's war on immigrants but let's start with polling. Alex Henderson reports:
Trump,
according to the Miami Herald, won 32 percent of Hispanic voters in
2020; in 2024, that number increased to 46 percent — much to the
frustration of Democratic strategists.
But according to the Herald's Brendan Rascius, polls are showing his approval among Latinos falling.
In an article published on August 19, Rascius cites polling data from Reuters/Ipsos poll,
The Hill and Gallup and explains, "Conducted over six days in August,
the (Reuters/Ipsos) poll found 40 percent of respondents approve of
Trump's job performance so far. This figure, while the lowest recorded
since Trump's inauguration, is unchanged from July. But it is down 7
points from January, when a record-high 47 percent of Americans approved
of Trump."
Trump's inroads among Latinos, Rascius
notes, helped him win the 2024 election. But now, according to Rascius,
"About one-third of Hispanic respondents, 32 percent, said they approved
of Trump's job performance, on par with a previous low recorded this
year. By comparison, the president's approval rating among Hispanic
adults stood at 34 percent in April and 37 percent in January, marking a
5-point decline, according to The Hill."
On the same day a new poll by The Economist/YouGov showed Donald Trump’s disapproval rating hitting a new high,
the president took time to post this on social media: “The Smithsonian
is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our
Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden
have been.”
How bad slavery
was? I’m not quite sure what that implies, but suffice it to say the new
poll didn’t find “See less about how slavery was bad” to be a priority
for American voters watching the costs of beef and vegetables skyrocket.
And a Pew Research Center survey released Aug. 14
showed that just 38% of Americans approve of Trump's performance as
president, with significant majorities disapproving of his signature
"One Big Beautiful Bill," his approach to tariffs and changes he has
made to the federal government.
Americans
dislike just about everything Trump brags about. And the more he touts
what he sees as major accomplishments, the less America likes them – and
him.
Journalist
Tara Pameri said Tuesday President Donald Trump and his administration
are "pushing deadlines back" when it comes to the documents related to
convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, only giving out "small pieces to
appease their base."
During an appearance on
CNN Tuesday, Palmeri, who has been reporting on the Epstein controversy,
said, "I would think that these documents are going to be very limited.
I obviously would love to see all of the gigabytes that they’re holding
on to: The evidence, the surveillance, the photos that I’ve been told
of from senior law enforcement sources that they are holding on to."
She
continued: "But, as you have heard and see from your own reporters and
reporting, they are kicking this down — they’re kicking the can down the
road. They’re pushing deadlines back. They’re releasing limited amounts
of files, and we just know that this is —this is happening in private."
She
added that these should be public hearings where everyone is called on
to speak, including FBI director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi,
and even Trump.
"If they’re calling the former
president, Bill Clinton — they should be calling him [Trump] as well,
since he’s also in the files. So I just think, this just seems like
they’re giving out small pieces to appease their base, but really, they
need to come clean right now," Palmeri said.
She added that former labor secretary Alex Acosta’s deputy, Marie Villafana, would be "an excellent person to call."
They
should call Villafana but, please note, they won't even Alex Acosta and
he's the one who gave Epstein the sweetheart deal -- the one that
Ghislaine Maxwell's new deal is starting to look a lot like -- and Chump
gave Maxwell her sweetheart deal. Matthew Chapman notes:
House
Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) has moved forward with a
plan to partially release information from the Jeffrey Epstein sex
trafficking case — but House Democrats, including ranking member Robert
Garcia (D-CA), are not satisfied with this limited production.
And
furthermore, Garcia told MSNBC's "The Weeknight" panel on Tuesday,
they've left out a massively important witness from all this: President
Donald Trump's former Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, who as a former
federal prosecutor, helped Epstein escape justice in the first place.
"James
Comer's spokesperson, responded today to you," said anchor Eugene
Daniels. "They said, you're trying to invent a crisis where none exists.
And at the end, they said former Attorney General Bill Barr testified
that he never saw any evidence suggesting President Trump committed a
crime. Now, they have been very specific about committing a crime, but
are they lying in that statement based on what you heard?"
"Without
actually commenting on exactly that statement, I will say that's a very
— that's a very creative crafting of a statement," said Garcia. "And I
think that if they have nothing to hide, they should release the
complete transcript or video of the Bill Barr deposition. So let's do
that and let's let the American public make their own judgments."
Letting
the American people make their own judgment? Donald Chump would rather
do some actual work than let that happen. And, as Lawrence O'Donnell
noted last night, Chump does not like to work.
Especially not on a day when a court exposes him as a liar.
As
Lawrence noted, the moment Chump was in hot water over not releasing
the Epstein files as he'd promised to do, suddenly Chump tried to
distract by calling for the Grand Jury transcripts to be released.
Lawrence called that out immediately noting that it was a kick-the-can
tactic because Grand Jury testimony does not get released. Chump was
hoping his announcement would make the Epstein story go away and that
when verdicts emerged on releasing the testimony, everyone would be
focused on something else. Chump did manage to delay but public
attention has not waned. Yesterday the third verdict on this from a
judge came out.
Each judge cited longstanding grand jury secrecy rules and concluded
that the government did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions
under federal law that could justify making them public.
They also
noted that the Justice Department has voluminous records related to
Epstein that aren't covered by grand jury secrecy rules. Berman wrote
that the scant information contained in around 70 pages of Epstein grand
jury transcripts "pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative
information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice,"
which he said totals around 100,000 pages.
"The Government is the
logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the
Epstein Files," Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the Justice
Department's refusal to release additional records. He said the request
to release grand jury records "appears to be a 'diversion' from the
breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession."
The Justice Department had informed Berman that the only witness to
testify before the Epstein grand jury was an FBI agent who, the judge
noted, "had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose
testimony was mostly hearsay." The rest of the grand jury presentation
consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow and a call log.
Berman noted that
the Justice Department's files on Epstein dwarf those stemming from the
grand jury. Proceedings before grand juries are typically kept secret.
"A
significant and compelling reason to reject the Government's position
in this litigation is that the Government has already undertaken a
comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and, not surprisingly,
has assembled a 'trove' of Epstein documents, interviews, and exhibits.
And, the Government committed that it would share its Epstein
investigation materials with the public," Berman wrote.
"The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure
to the public of the Epstein Files. By comparison, the instant grand
jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of
the Epstein files in the Government's possession," Berman wrote, quoting
a decision by another judge in New York who denied the government's move
to unseal material in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's
co-conspirator who is serving a 20-year sentence on sex-trafficking
charges.
"The information contained in the Epstein grand jury
transcripts pales in comparison to the Epstein investigation information
and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice," he concluded.
For more on this, you can stream Nicole Wallace's report . . .
. . . and Ari Mebler's report.
As
the judge noted, this was a distraction. And Chump's efforts to change
the topic have not gone unnoticed by the people nor is this story going
away.
Shame on Gov. Mike DeWine for sending
our Ohio National Guard to Washington, D.C. at the whim of our
president, who has conjured up another "emergency" in our country.
President Donald Trump has accomplished one thing by doing this. No one is mentioning the Epstein files.
Gov. DeWine, don't be complicit. Bring the Guard home.
Prosecutors
[led by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and then-Palm Beach County State
Attorney Barry Krischer] intentionally kept the victims and their
lawyers in the dark because they knew these young women would never
allow such a sweetheart deal to stand.
Let’s
be clear — this was not just negligence. It was a betrayal. By cutting
this backroom deal in secrecy, the government told these girls their
pain didn’t matter, their voices didn’t matter, and their futures didn’t
matter.
They were victimized once by Epstein and Maxwell, and then victimized again by their own government. Enough with the excuses.
The
victims deserve better, and the public deserves the truth. Release the
files, expose the liars, and the truth for the world to see what
actually happened.
A
six-year-old girl and her mother, who were seeking asylum in the United
States, have been deported to Ecuador after being arrested in New York
City and held in immigration detention for a week.
The
second-grade student went to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement
check-in appointment with her mother and older brother in lower
Manhattan on August 12 when they were detained by federal agents.
New
York officials confirmed that the young girl and her mother, who had
been living in Queens, were deported on Tuesday morning. The girl’s
19-year-old brother is still locked up in an immigration detention
center in New Jersey.
The case of another New
York City public school student being targeted has drawn renewed
scrutiny and outrage over the practice of arresting immigrants at
routine check-in appointments and court hearings.
The
child’s arrest appears to be the first known ICE arrest of a New Yorker
under the age of 18 during Donald Trump’s administration.
New
York City schools saw increased enrollment driven, in part, by families
who had sought asylum during the Biden administration. New York Gov.
Kathy Hochul weighed in on the family’s behalf, and school officials are
working to assure students that schools will remain a welcoming place.
“She
had no power to decide which country she would be living,” said Astrid
Avedissian, a lawyer for one of the student's siblings, who is 16. "She
had no power to decide which border she would be crossing."
[. . .]
On
Aug. 19, New York City Councilmember Shekar Krishnan and state
Assemblymember Catalina Cruz, both representatives in Queens, confirmed
the student and her mother were deported. ICE records show her brother,
Manuel, 19, is still in custody.
"Deporting a
6-year-old child two weeks before she is supposed to start school,
separating her and her mother from their family, is cruel," Krishnan and
Cruz said in a joint statement. "It is a shameful stain on our
country's history and conscience."
A
Colombian man seeking asylum was arrested by federal agents while
attending a routine immigration appointment in Tennessee, his girlfriend
told Newsweek.
Morgan Bowser, 28, said
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained her partner,
John Ever Pineda Calderón, 35, a hotel renovation worker seeking asylum,
inside the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) Office in
Memphis.
Bowser said she was waiting in the parking lot as the arrest unfolded on August 7 around 10 a.m.
An
ISAP appointment is a scheduled check-in that immigrants are required
to attend while their immigration cases are being processed.
Bowser,
who described waiting for hours without knowing what had happened to
Calderón, said she was left heartbroken after receiving a call from him
confirming he had been detained and transferred.
These are horrible stories. They go against democracy, they go against what we're supposed to value in the United States. David Kurtz (TPM) notes:
I
usually cast President Trump’s anti-immigrant mass deportation agenda
as a rule of law story. But it is of course so much more than that. It
is fundamentally a story about racism, xenophobia, and othering. It’s
about preying on our fears, differences, and prejudices to create a
villainous foe whom he can easily vanquish in repeated set-pieces. It’s
about letting loose the worst of our impulses to heighten and sustain
divisions among us.
The mass
deportation agenda is just one part of a larger agenda in which white
Americans are fronted as the real America and everyone else is
second-class, unless they individually demonstrate in lavish ways a high
enough degree of fealty to Donald Trump.
It’s
against this backdrop that much of this week’s news is taking place:
Trump’s minimizing of chattel slavery; the federalization of D.C. police
and the deployment of red state national guards to a plurality Black
city; the phasing out of support for non-native English speakers in
school; new hoops for legal immigrants to jump through; and a gauntlet
of other indignities and slights that preference white citizens.
[. . .]
The
mass deportation agenda is just one part of a larger agenda in which
white Americans are fronted as the real America and everyone else is
second-class, unless they individually demonstrate in lavish ways a high
enough degree of fealty to Donald Trump.
It’s
against this backdrop that much of this week’s news is taking place:
Trump’s minimizing of chattel slavery; the federalization of D.C. police
and the deployment of red state national guards to a plurality Black
city; the phasing out of support for non-native English speakers in
school; new hoops for legal immigrants to jump through; and a gauntlet
of other indignities and slights that preference white citizens.
Students
are attacked -- college students and children -- and mothers are
attacked -- even nursing mothers have been separated from their
children, the elderly are attacked, an immigrant who was a police
officer gets attacked, the list is endless. It's not about
immigration. Dan Gooding (NEWSWEEK) reports:
A
Los Angeles teacher whose student was detained by federal agents while
he walked his dog has told Newsweek that she believes mistaken bounty
hunters plucked him off the street.
Lizette
Becerra, who works within the Los Angeles Unified School District
(LAUSD), visited Benjamin Marcelo Guerrero-Cruz, 18, in Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention on Sunday.
"For
about seven days, he could not change, he was in his pajama shorts and
slippers. He couldn't bathe. He couldn't brush his teeth. He was
sleeping next to a toilet where he had to wake up every time someone
went so that he wouldn't get urinated on," Becerra said.
"It
wasn't until Saturday morning that he was finally able to shower and
was issued clothes," she said, adding that he told her he lost weight,
as well.
[. . .]
Guerrero-Cruz
is currently being held in the Adelanto Detention Facility, on the edge
of Victorville outside of L.A. Before that, Becerra said, he had been
moved between two other facilities in the city itself since his arrest
around two weeks ago.
"He says about 15 men,
plain clothes with vests that said: 'Immigration Police' on them, in
three SUVs, came up to him and just grabbed him and started calling him
by another name," Becerra said, adding that the teen tried to tell the
men he was not the person they were looking for.
ICE
has carried out their thug tactics with no real oversight. Chump has
given them powers they've never had before and these are thugs. They're
the worst of the worst. Most probably couldn't get into the military
(or, in some cases, back into the military) without a conduct waiver. Melissa Gira Grant (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes:
The beatdown in broad daylight in Washington, D.C., on Saturday was caught on video.
Two masked men in tactical vests grappled with a delivery worker. One
tased him, and he fell to the ground. A third man piled on, and then a
fourth, a fifth, and a sixth, all in similar vests with faces covered.
Pinning the worker face down on the pavement, agents tased him again and
punched him repeatedly in the head. “Get the f**k out of this city!” a
bystander’s voice yelled out at the masked men. “Why are you guys here?”
The masked men’s vests only identified them as “police,” as is often the
case with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and later, their
arrest—in the upscale Logan Circle neighborhood—was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security. It was part of the escalation in the federal law enforcement occupation ordered
by Trump, with multiple agencies patrolling neighborhoods, stopping
residents at checkpoints, and making arrests. Throughout, these federal
agents have met opposition from countless bystanders and witnesses, who record them, jeer at them, and demand they leave their city.
In that sense, nothing about the assault on Saturday stood out so
much as it captured all these dynamics in the span of three minutes. It
laid bare too how this takeover of an American city—the nation’s
capital, no less—has been brewing in the far-right imagination for a
long time. “You guys are ruining the country,” said
one of the bystanders to the masked agents, and one of them responded,
“Liberals already ruined it.” Once, it was far-right groups who flooded
cities in the summertime, in masks and tactical vests, looking for a
fight; now, those groups have no need to be in the streets, with ICE and
other federal agents carrying out their mission for them. As one Proud
Boy organizer said
at a Portland, Oregon, rally in 2018, “For all the illegals trying to
jump over our border, we should be smashing their heads into the
concrete.”
What we are seeing now flows from those dramatic street
confrontations, brought on by groups such as Patriot Prayer and the
Proud Boys nearly a decade ago, when they made Portland their target and
Patriot Prayer leader Joey Gibson pledged,
“The stench-covered and liberal-occupied streets of Portland will be
CLEANSED.” Gibson was running as a Republican for the Washington state
Senate at the time, and the Portland Police Bureau was in close contact
with Patriot Prayer organizers, as reporting by Willamette Weekexposed. The police regarded them as “much more mainstream” than leftist counterprotesters, arresting more of the latter than Proud Boys or Patriot Prayer members—even as the far-right groups were advocating the murder of immigrants and leftists.
[. . .]
Seeing how ICE in particular have conducted themselves over the last few
months, some people have feared that the masked agents Trump has
unleashed might be the same people he pardoned for their involvement in
the January 6 insurrection. Had they now infiltrated or been secretly hired into ICE and other agencies? A former assistant ICE director told
Slate in July that he was “very worried” that “Proud Boys and other
insurrectionists and hoodlums” would be hired at ICE, because, “What
self-respecting person who wants a meaningful career in law enforcement
would go to work [for Enforcement and Removal Operations] right now?
Union
del Barrio, a migrant advocacy organization with offices throughout
Southern California and New York City, says it has trained hundreds of
teachers on how to intervene and interact with federal immigration
agents who might be trying to detain a student or parent near a school.
On
Tuesday morning, some members of Union del Barrio, some of whom are
also teachers from across San Diego County, staged an educational
campaign outside Lincoln High School, handing out flyers to parents as
they dropped off their children.
“What this is
really about is showing solidarity to the familias, to the students, to
ensure they feel there’s a community behind them, that they are welcomed
here and they should be coming to school in spite of with this threat
of ICE coming to schools and drop-offs,” said Erendira Ramirez, educator
and member of Union del Barrio.
A
Sheraton hotel in Louisiana has been used by immigration officials to
hold people who are being deported, in what appears to be a
contradiction of a position Sheraton’s parent company, Marriott, took in
2019 when it said its properties would not be used in cooperation with
Ice.
The Intercept first reported
that the hotel, located on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria, Louisiana,
near a major deportation hub and airport used by Ice, had been used by
immigration officials earlier this month to hold a father and his
teenage son for four days after their arrest in New York. They were then
deported to Ecuador. The Intercept cited phone-tracking evidence that
had been shared with the publication and was later seen by the Guardian.
The
evidence corroborates the account of a source with knowledge of hotel
operations in Alexandria, who told the Guardian that they believed the
venue had been used to detain immigrant families and unaccompanied
children since it was renovated in late 2023. The source observed Ice
contractors known to assist in the transfer of unaccompanied minors
operating at the Sheraton as recently as June of this year.
The source added that other hotels in the area have also been used to hold immigrant families.
It
is not clear whether Marriott has a formal contract with Ice or what
the company knows about Ice’s use of the Sheraton in Alexandria. In one case that emerged last year,
Marriott sued a New York-based franchise after the hotel entered a
partnership with the city for it to be used as an immigrant shelter,
saying it had done so without Marriott’s consent.
Marriott needs to immediately clarify what took place. And we need to support those who refuse to let ICE rip them off. Jacob Gardenswartz (SCRIPP NEWS) informs:
A
growing number of U.S. corporations and pop culture artists are
publicly distancing themselves from the Department of Homeland Security
and criticizing the agency for utilizing their content in posts and
branding aimed at immigration enforcement activities and new officer
recruitment.
In
recent weeks, companies including INDYCAR, Penske Truck Rental and Ford
Motor Company have all said that their content was used by DHS without
permission or in violation of company policies. Popular bands and
artists including Semisonic, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club (BRMC), Jess
Glynne, Thomas Kinkade and Morgan Weistling have similarly asked DHS to
stop using their work or take down posts.
Reached
by Scripps News, a DHS spokesperson declined to answer questions about
the process by which DHS identifies and clears intellectual property,
nor would the official state how the agency is responding to the
companies’ criticisms. The agency said in a statement only that, “DHS
will continue using every tool at its disposal to keep the American
people informed as our agents work to Make America Safe Again.”
There are thousands of horror stories about ICE attacking people. But? Some horror stories prompt no tears from many of us. Billal Rahman (NEWSWEEK) reports on someone whining when they got what they deserved:
A
United States combat veteran and Trump voter has told Newsweek his wife
was detained by federal immigration agents at the Nogales port of entry
while attempting to renew her in-country travel permit.
Eddie
J. Rosa, 43, a USPS electronics technician and veteran of the U.S.
Marine Corps, U.S. Army Reserves, and the Ohio National Guard, said his
wife, Mireya Alexandra Blancarte Marquez, was arrested on August 11.
Rosa goes on to whine:
Rosa,
who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom,
described his wife being handcuffed, perp-walked, and paraded in front
of the public "like a common criminal."
"My
wife has absolutely no criminal record of any kind in this country or
Mexico. As a fervent believer in our constitutional republic, I felt
violated and disrespected," Rosa told Newsweek in a statement.
You got what you deserved, stop whining you little cry baby.
Please
note, if he was decrying his vote now and calling Chump out? Okay, he
made a mistake in voting for Chump and realizes that. Live and learn,
let's work together. But that's not the case. He says he doesn't
regret his vote for Chump. So he'd vote for him again. This is the
signature policy Chump's second administration will be remembered for.
If you support Chump now -- even though your wife's been taken into
custody and you've been humiliated -- you got what you deserve. If FAFO
doesn't bring you to your senses, do the country a favor and STFU
because you're too stupid for a conversation in the public square.
We were talking about conduct
waivers earlier and that makes me wonder if Loose Lips Hegseth is still
using weight wavers? People who are not physically fit getting into the
US military on a waiver for their weight. (They're called medical
waivers, but I'm referring to the ones granted specifically to
candidates who should not qualify due to their weight.) Hegseth's in the
news. He and all the security post holders should be in the news.
Trashy Garbage (Trina's name for Tulsi Gabbard) is not qualified for her
post as the head of DNI. That post was created post-9/11 to protect
Americans. It's a highly important job and she's not qualified. We've
noted from the day after Hegseth was nominated to be Secretary of
Defense that he wasn't qualified. No one holding a post that's supposed
to protect Americans is qualified. And that's a serious issue.
Let's do Tulsi and we'll then go onto Pete. Callum Sutherland (TIME) reports, "The
Trump Administration has revoked the security clearances of 37 current
and former U.S. government officials. Director of National Intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard publicly shared a memo confirming the revocation and the
reasoning behind it, stating that it was carried out under the direction
of President Donald Trump." This being the unqualified Tulsi, things
were, of course, a bit more complicated. Ewan Palmer (DAILY BEAST) explains:
Tulsi
Gabbard may have broken the law by publicly identifying dozens of
current and former officials while revoking their security clearances,
according to a national security lawyer.
Gabbard
revealed that 37 people have been targeted in the clearance purge
ordered by President Trump, accusing them without evidence of
“politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified
intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional
egregious violations of tradecraft standards.”
Gabbard
made the announcement—which comes after Trump stripped the security
clearance of his political opponents—by posting a memo from her office
on X. The list of 37 individuals targeted includes intelligence
officials who concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential
election, as well as those accused by far-right activist Laura Loomer of
lacking loyalty to Trump, according to Axios.
Mark
Zaid, an attorney who represents intelligence officers and who is suing
the Trump administration to have his own stripped security clearance
restored, suggested Gabbard may have landed herself in legal trouble by
making the memo public.
Oh,
Trashy Garbage, couldn't you even get that right? Seriously. And is
this really the time -- when Chump has staffed his administration with
so many inept people in security positions -- for them to be purging
experienced officials? Doesn't that put us even more at risk? Another
9/11 could happen. If happens under Chump's watch, we'll all have to
face the reality of just how unqualified he and his appointees were.
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth’s security requirements are so extensive that it
is placing a strain on the U.S. Army’s Criminal Investigation Division,
according to a report.
The Washington Post
reports that the CID, which is responsible for protecting top Pentagon
officials as well as serving as the Army’s law enforcment arm, has been
forced to draft agents who would otherwise be investigating criminal
offenses concerning members of the Armed Forces to help watch over
Hegseth’s family and their properties in D.C., Minnesota and Tennessee.
“I’ve never seen this many security teams for one guy,” one official told the newspaper. “Nobody has.”
The CID reportedly maintains around 1,500 agents in total, around 150 of whom are typically assigned to VIP security details.
But
since Hegseth took office in January, the number shifted over into
personal protection roles has risen to between 400 and 500, according to
two differing estimates the paper received.
One
CID official quoted by the Post expressed their frustration with the
situation by saying agents were being prevented from “doing what we are
supposed to be doing” in order to “sit on luggage” or “sit in the cars
on the driveway.”
Others complained of having to shepherd the secretary’s children to school or patrol the perimeter of his properties.
“It
is literally taking away from [CID’s] law enforcement mission,” they
said. “You are taking hundreds of people out of the field to provide
this level of protection.”
Are
we surprised that the little coward who hid behind his Mommy during his
confirmation process would turn out to be the biggest coward in the
administration and demand multiple guards to protect him? The
candy asses of the administration need extra protection. And planes!
Don't forget they all seem to need their own personal plane. Yeah, we're talking Kristi Noem. In addition, Kelly Rissman (INDEPENDENT) reports:
Homeland
Security Secretary Kristi Noem blamed the media for her decision to
move to a rent-free military home, a space usually reserved for the top
Coast Guard official.
Speaking on Fox News’
Hannity on Monday evening, Noem argued that she had to leave her
apartment in the Navy Yard neighborhood of Washington, D.C. because of
the threats she’d received after news organizations published details
about her two-bedroom condo.
The Daily
Mail first reported she was living at a Navy Yard condo in April and
published photos outside the building. Last week, the Washington Post
revealed that the Homeland Security secretary pays no rent at her new
living arrangement: Quarters 1 at the Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling in
D.C., used to house the Coast Guard Commandant.
What
a bunch of wasteful, corrupt, idiotic so-called public servants. If a
terrorist attack takes place on US soil, we should all remember how
security officals were doing everything but their jobs and draining our
intelligence resources. We should especially remember this reported by AP yesterday:
The
Office of the Director of National Intelligence will dramatically
reduce its workforce and cut its budget by more than $700 million
annually, the Trump administration announced Wednesday.
Director
of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement, “Over the
last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the
intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks
of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of
intelligence.”
Again, an attack
on US soil could take place during Chump's administration -- especially
the way he antagonizes so many other countries. If it does, the first
points we all need to remember is that (a) unqualified people are
serving in security posts in this administration, (b) they have diverted
needed resources for their own comfort and (c) they've cut our
intelligence budget and our intelligence workforce. There is no excuse
for this. Second set of points should include that these three steps
are high crimes and misdemeanors and grounds to impeach Chump.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Alex Padilla's office:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla
(D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Rules and Administration
Committee and California’s former Secretary of State, issued the
following statement after President Trump attacked mail-in voting and
America’s election systems:
“Donald Trump is now taking advice on voter suppression from a
murderous dictator who rigs elections, jails political opponents, and
persecutes dissent. Trump knows the MAGA agenda is unpopular: raising
your grocery prices and hiking up your health care premiums, all while
handing out tax breaks to billionaires. So he’s resorting to desperate
schemes to cling to power.
“Even his preferred news outlets, Newsmax and Fox News, have
been forced to answer for pushing conspiracies about voting machines.
They admitted what Trump won’t — he lost the 2020 election, and mail-in
voting is secure. Fortunately, Trump doesn’t have the power to
unilaterally end mail-in voting. But Congress must stand up for free and
fair elections as he continues his assault on our democracy.”
As I've noted before, I do not
want the Ten Commandments posted in schools. I do not want my children
receiving any religious instruction at their public school. We selected
our church before we got married. We are raising our children in that
church. We go to Sunday school, we go to evening services on Sundays
and Wednesdays. I do not need a school educating my children on their
religion. And I do not want it. So I'm happy with the latest news. Haajrah Gilani (Houston Chronicle) reports:
A
federal judge in San Antonio temporarily halted a Texas law that would
require public schools to post the Ten Commandments in every classroom
by siding with a group of families who claimed the requirement harmed
their children's religious development.
U.S.
District Judge Fred Biery, an appointee of former president Bill
Clinton, issued the decision two days after the case's first hearing
concluded. Biery's ruling concluded that children could be treated
negatively by peers if perceived as "the other," and that the law passes
the line into coercion.
"Ultimately, in matters of
conscience, faith, beliefs and the soul, most people are Garbo-esque,"
Biery wrote, referencing a line from actress Greta Garbo in a 1932
movie. "They just want to be left alone, neither proselytized nor
ostracized, including what occurs to their children in government-run
schools."
Exactly.
And don't pretend that all religions -- even all Christian religions --
would be treated fairly in public school by educators. Some would look
down on Christian Scientists (they don't believe in medicine -- I'm
noting the extreme reaction, not factual), Pentecostals (they speak in
tongues!), Jehovah Witnesses (they're cheap and don't celebrate
birthdays!) . . . We all have the right to choose a religion we believe
in. We also all have the right to choose not to worship. That alone
is reason enough not to drag religion into public schools. But when we
address the reality that some religions -- even among Christians faiths
-- get elevated over others, we're in a dangerous area. I trust my
kids' teachers to educate on subjects like English, math, science, etc.
But we take care of our religious education in our church.
Wednesday, August 20, 2025. Chump continues his war on immigrants while
shedding protections for survivors of domestic abuse, hate monger Kim
Davis tries to lure the Supreme Court into her lair, Hillary Clinton
predicts the Supreme Court will overturn marriage equality, although
Zohran Mamdani has thousands of online supporters it appears none of
them can step up and defend him from attacks, the Epstein scandal is not
going away and one MSNBC video report on YOUTUBE has collected almost
half-a-million views in less than 12 hours, and much more.
I don't know how much more
the nation can take. I'm serious. There are stories I ignore here
because it's just too much. Usually, it's a column by someone insisting
we've passed the point of no return. Maybe we have. Don't know how
that observation helps us? I agree we're at the breaking point. And I
bring that up for a reason. Erin Keller (INDEPENDENT) reports:
A
Massachusetts bookstore is stepping in to help LGBTQ couples tie the
knot as the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether to hear a case that
could impact same-sex marriage rights.
All She Wrote Books
in Somerville, Massachusetts, announced it will host an LGBTQ “wedding
marathon” on August 30 from 1 to 5 p.m., under the banner “Love Can’t
Wait Another Day.” The event will offer multiple couples the chance to
marry “without the cost or delay of a traditional wedding,” according to
the shop’s Instagram post.
We can’t believe it’s
come to this, but the clock could be ticking on LGBTQIA+ marriage
rights,” the bookshop wrote online. “We’re not interested in waiting to
see what happens, and neither is our community. That’s why we’re
creating space for folks to say ‘I do’ ASAP.”
Owner
Christina Pascucci-Ciampa is rolling out in-store packages for the
wedding marathon. The $500 package includes a private one-hour ceremony
with a Justice of the Peace, professional photos, cupcakes, an optional
toast with bubbly, a wedding gift from the store, and guidance on
replicating legal documents should the right to equal marriage be
overturned.
Couples can bring up to 12 guests to witness their vows, or opt for a more intimate ceremony for just the two of them.
“What matters is making it official while we still can,” Pascucci-Ciampa wrote.
Couples
interested in participating are encouraged to reserve their spot in
advance and must obtain a marriage license before the event. Information
on marriage licenses in Somerville is available through the city’s
official resources.
On July 24, former Kentucky
county clerk Kim Davis filed a petition with the SCOTUS, requesting it
to overturn the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized
same-sex marriage nationwide.
Kim
Davis is the noted trash who got butt hurt last week over Sally Field's
son Sam calling her exactly what she is. She's ugly, if you've never
seen her.
Looks like she needs a bath. Maybe even to be dipped for ticks and
fleas. Definitely needs to cut that ugly hair.
Looks like no one -- man or woman -- has touched -- or ever would touch
-- her.
She's like the freaky Esmeralda in EDWARD SCISSORHANDS.
2016
Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton says she believes the Supreme Court is poised to overturn its
landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which effectively legalized
same-sex marriage nationwide, and that unmarried same-sex couples “ought
to consider” tying the knot.
“American
voters, and to some extent the American media, don’t understand how
many years the Republicans have been working in order to get us to this
point,” Clinton told Fox News host Jessica Tarlov on Friday in a
wide-ranging interview on “Raging Moderates,” the podcast Tarlov
co-hosts with Scott Galloway.
“It took 50
years to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Clinton said. “The Supreme Court will
hear a case about gay marriage; my prediction is they will do to gay
marriage what they did to abortion — they will send it back to the
states.”
“Anybody in a committed relationship
out there in the LGBTQ community, you ought to consider getting married
because I don’t think they’ll undo existing marriages, but I fear they
will undo the national right,” she said.
Even if the Supreme Court did take the case, [Chris] Geidner said he didn’t
think a case like Davis’ would provide sufficient legal reasoning to
overturn same-sex marriage entirely. Rather, he said that a successful
religious freedom or free speech challenge to Obergefell would
do other “bad things,” like hollow out civil protections or public
accommodations for same-sex couples, essentially inconveniencing or
endangering LGBTQ+ couples but not outright denying them the right to a
marriage license.
Gay legal journalist Joseph Mark Stern agrees somewhat with Geidner’s take. In recent Bluesky posts about Davis’ case, Stern wrote,
“Recent panic that the Supreme Court might soon overturn marriage
equality is unwarranted—the justices are highly unlikely to take up the
case that has people worried. And this freak-out risks diverting
attention away from the court’s subtler, ongoing attack on gay rights.”
“At this Supreme Court, the biggest realistic threat to gay rights
isn’t outright reversal of Obergefell, but the ongoing abridgment of gay
equality in the name of religious liberty and free speech,” Stern added.
“The Supreme Court has also weaponized the First Amendment to legalize
discrimination against same-sex couples in public accommodations, a
project that will expand in the coming years.”
Clinton was correct when she said that, if Obergefell were to be overturned, then the right to same-sex marriage would fall back to the states.
In 2022, then-President Joe Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act (RMA),
a law that repealed the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and
required the federal and state governments to recognize same-sex
marriages that occur in states where they are legal.
Currently, 25 states have both laws and constitutional amendments
banning same-sex marriage, five have just statutes banning it, and five
others have just constitutional amendments banning it.
If this happened, a battle between pro- and anti-marriage states
could emerge. Republican attorneys general and legislatures in states
with same-sex marriage bans could argue that they should be exempt from
having to recognize same-sex marriages from states where such marriages
are legal.
John Roberts can rot in hell if the Court overturns
Obergefell. He will have destroyed the Supreme Court if that happens.
It is under his watch that the Court has fallen among the public. He
is the Chief Justice and he is directly responsible. Gallup:
At
48%, the proportion of Americans who have a great deal or fair amount
of trust in the federal government’s judicial branch is statistically
similar to the 2022 record low (47%) and 2023 (49%) ratings. Before
2022, trust in the judicial branch had never been below the majority
level and typically exceeded 60%.
The 13-point decline in trust that occurred between 2020 and 2021
followed Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court and its decision
to allow a strict Texas abortion law to stand. The seven-point drop from
2021 to 2022 came after the court handed down the Dobbs decision that
overturned Roe v. Wade’s finding of constitutional protections for
abortion rights.
This
is on John Roberts, Chief Justice. His leadership and his actions have
allowed this huge loss of confidence in the institution of the Court to
take place. There's no excuse for it. And it was his job, as Chief
Justice, to hector and lecture his peers about precedent and rule of
law. But he didn't. Like Jonathan Turley, Roberts has turned out to be
just another racist hate monger.
And he is responsible for where we are now. Instead of working to save the Court, he has destroyed it.
If
marriage equality is overturned, the Court's reputation will fall even
further and they will have made it clear that they do not stand for
equality and fairness but they are an idealogical nightmare that crafts a
decision based upon something other than the law.
Non
poli sci people may not understand the importance of this moment in
time. Poli sci-ers should get it. I predicted here the rise of ISIS in
Iraq before it happened. I warned over and over for months that it was
going to happen. Not because I'm a psychic but because the Iraqi
people had a prime minister who shouldn't have been prime minister (he
didn't win the election) and bit by bit a system exposed that could
nothing to help them.
Right now, Republican nut
jobs have control of the House and Senate and the White House. The
only institution possibly standing is the Supreme Court.
Roberts better protect the Court and its image or he's asking for a Civil War in this country.
Any political model will warn that this is where the complete fall of trust in the Supreme Court ends.
New
York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani has faced heavy
criticism for his foreign policy views, which many see as beyond the
role of a mayor. He led the Democratic primary, gaining strong support
from younger progressive voters. However, Mamdani has encountered
opposition from the Indian American community, with critics claiming he
has acted as an opportunistic politician.
British
political commentator Douglas Murray believes Mamdani is aiming to get
into power by promising New Yorkers things that he cannot bring. He
argued that Mamdani has failed to address things that New Yorkers need.
Murray
stated, “His position as a so-called Democratic socialist, would make
sure that New York, which has been suffering for so many years now with a
brain drain, talent drain, money train, money drain would simply go
down even further.”
How about you leave the fairy tales to Mother Goose, Roger Anderson, you damn liar.
So
we know that Zohran is a Democratic Socialist. That is how you spell
it by the way. Roger couldn't even figure that out. Who is Douglas
Murray? Roger thinks he's worth listening to. But he doesn't tell you
who he is because Roger knows if he did that . . . no one would listen.
Because no one really cares what a British neoconservative thinks about
a politician in NYC.
This
is how they work to defeat Zohran. They lie. They lie and if caught
might offer an apology. Jonathan Turley, the fat f**k with the cod
liver oil face, decided to lie about Zohran this month. Called out on his lie, he
immediately wanted the world to then know, oops! I confused him with
another Muslim! Mahmoud Khalil! No one in their right mind would confuse NY Assembly Person Zohran
Mamdani with the grad student activist Chump targeted named Mahmoud
Khalil. The names are very different, their backgrounds are very
different, their heritage is very different. Turley tried a cheap shot,
got called on it and rushed to pretend it was an error.
Roger
Anderson, big fat liar, writes a 452 word piece on Zohran's campaign
that relies on one source -- a British neoconservative. None of the 452
words bothers to note that Zohran is currently riding high in the
polls.
Assembly
Member Zohran Mamdani leads the field in the race for New
York City mayor, according to a new poll of registered voters conducted
by AARP New York and Gotham Polling& Analytics. In the initial
ballot test, Mamdani received 41.8% support, followed by former Governor
Andrew Cuomo (23.4%), Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa (16.5%),
Mayor Eric Adams (8.8%), and other candidates (1.6%), with 7.9%
undecided.
According
to the poll, Mamdani secures just over half of Democrats (51.6%), while
Cuomo captures nearly a quarter (24%). The rest of the field remains in
single digits. Among Republicans, Sliwa gets over half the vote, with
Cuomo and Adams splitting much of the remainder.
The poll also
explored a unique set of “drop-out” scenarios to assess how the race
would shift if one or more candidates were to exit. In every scenario
tested, Mamdani maintains a commanding lead over the remaining
contenders. Notable shifts included:
If Cuomo drops: Mamdani rises to 48.4%, leading Sliwa by 27.6 points.
If Adams drops: Mamdani leads Cuomo by 14.0 points (42.6% to 28.6%).
If Sliwa drops: Mamdani leads Cuomo by 16.8 points (45.1% to 28.3%).
Head-to-head with Sliwa (Cuomo, Adams, Walden drop): Mamdani leads by 22.9 points (44.3% to 21.4%).
Head-to-head with Adams (Cuomo, Sliwa, Walden drop): Mamdani leads by 24.4 points (44.4% to 20.0%).
Head-to-head with Cuomo (Adams, Sliwa, Walden drop): Mamdani leads by 11.0 points (42.0% to 31.0%).
Undecided Voters In
a head-to-head matchup between Mamdani and Cuomo, 27% of voters remain
undecided. This bloc is mainly made up of older New Yorkers split
between Democrats and Republicans, making it a pivotal group that could
tip the balance of the race.
That's
only one poll but all the polling puts Zohran in the lead. Lies?
That's the tool to destroy him. Jonathan Turley got a pass on his lie.
I may be the first one to note it on the left. He got away with it.
He should have gotten the online equivalent of having his face smashed
through glass for lying like he did. Now he's emboldened and thinks he
can get away with it again and, if caught, just do another 'woopsie!'
Roger Anderson needs to be called out universally. Brit boy the
neoconservative is not a trusted or objective source. To pretend you're
'reporting' on Zohran's campaign and only serve up that idiot is to
demonstrate that you're not a reporter but you are someone trying to
work out a grudge.
These sort of things need
to be called out and called out immediately. I'm not talking about by
the campaign, I'm talking about by the media -- especially by so-called
left media.
Otherwise, just sit back and watch Zohran go down in the polls as these attacks on him multiply.
Former
Attorney General Bill Barr gave a deposition to the House Oversight
Committee and he did not clear Donald Chump on any Epstein connections
and/or entanglements. Lawrence O'Donnell noted that in the opening of
his program last night. (This video has over 391,000 streams, FYI.)
And then he discussed it and other Epstein details with US House Rep Robert Garcia.
Garcia states the GOP spin is false and states that the Committee needs to release the deposition to the public.
However,
when it comes to Chump's friends Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell,
nothing is open to the public -- not Epstein's client list, not how
Maxwell got moved to Camp Fed in Texas this month, nothing is open to
the public. Everything is done behind closed doors -- like Bob Barr's
deposition.
MSNBC’s Ari Melber
addressed the ongoing scandal with Nancy Erika Smith and John Flannery
yesterday, reviewing basics and putting together a timeline.
Released a little over 12 hours ago, the video already has over 488,000 streams.
A
federal judge in Manhattan has ordered the immediate release of a gay
asylum seeker from Jamaica, finding that ICE violated his right to due
process.
U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres ordered the agency to release Rickardo Anthony Kelly, 40, more than two weeks after he was detained while waiting for his asylum hearing
at a courthouse accompanied by his attorney. Agents reportedly offered
him $1,000 to self-deport, and apprehended him when he refused.
"In
light of the undisputed facts, there is no doubt that [ICE's] ongoing
detention of [Kelly] with no process at all, much less prior notice, no
showing of changed circumstances, or an opportunity to respond, violates
his due process rights," Torres wrote in her ruling, issued Friday.
Kelly said in his initial writ of habeas corpus petition that
he came to the U.S. on a tourist visa in 2021 shortly after he was the
victim of a violent attack motivated by his sexual orientation, during
which he was shot ten times. He warned that deporting him to Jamaica
would put him at risk, and that keeping him in custody could cause him
to experience “severe and quite possibly fatal” medical complications as
a diabetic.
Kelly described the conditions of the ICE facility he
was detained at as “unconscionable,” “inhumane,” and “horrific.” He
claimed he was kept in a room with nearly 100 other detainees that had
only three toilets, no doors, and no showers, and that he was not
provided with “clean clothes, toiletries, or any other way to maintain
basic hygiene.”
It's one horror story after another. We've noted the six year old girl in New York already this week.
Immigration
agents reportedly detained a 6-year-old girl, her teenage brother and
her mother at a Manhattan immigration court last week.
The
family, originally from Ecuador, had appeared for a routine check-in at
26 Federal Plaza when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents
took them into custody on August 12, according to CBS News.
[. . .]
The
mother, identified as Martha, arrived in the U.S. with her daughter
Dayra and 19-year-old son Manuel after fleeing violence in their home
country, according to immigration advocates who spoke with CBS News.
Dayra attends PS 89, the Jose Peralta School of Dreamers in Queens, according to NBC 4 New York.
Mariposa
Benitez, founder of the advocacy group Mi Tlalli, said families like
Martha's seek safety after fleeing dangerous situations abroad but face
further trauma when detained in this manner.
Shortly
after the detention, the family was separated and transferred to
different facilities, according to CBS News. Martha and her young
daughter were transported to a detention center in Dilley, Texas, while
Manuel was taken to Delaney Hall in Newark, New Jersey, the outlet
reported.
More than 20 state attorneys
general have filed suit against the Department of Justice (DOJ),
alleging the Trump administration is unlawfully seeking to withhold
critical funds for crime victims from states and nonprofits deemed
noncompliant with its draconian immigration enforcement efforts.
The lawsuit, filed
in federal district court in Rhode Island on Monday, centers on three
notices that DOJ posted last month for funding allocated by a
decades-old law called the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA). As I previously reported for Mother Jones, those funds have long been a critical source of support for organizations including domestic violence shelters, rape crisis centers, and child advocacy centers,
which use the money to run emergency shelters and hotlines and provide
therapy services, legal advocacy, and court accompaniment to abused
people, particularly women and children. Another bucket of VOCA funding
also goes directly to crime victims, who can use the funds for pay for
services including mental health counseling, funeral expenses, and
clean-ups of crime scenes.
But under the Trump administration, this year’s round of $1.9 billion in funding comes with strings attached: It stipulates that grantees may not
use the funds for any program or activity that, in DOJ’s opinion,
“violates (or promotes or facilitates the violation of) federal
immigration law…or impedes or hinders” enforcement.
While the funding announcements do not clarify what, exactly, would
constitute such violations, the intent seems clear: Trump’s DOJ wants to
essentially force states and the programs they fund to grant the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE), unfettered access to the victims they
serve—conditions that the lawsuit calls “unprecedented.”
"Playing politics with the lives of people who have suffered so greatly
is reckless, it is cruel, and in this case—it is illegal,” said New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, the lead plaintiff, in a statement.
Advocates for crime victims say that, if enacted, these conditions
could have a chilling effect on immigrant survivors of violence, who may
avoid seeking help for fear of being deported. “One huge barrier for
victims to leave an abusive situation is fear of their abusers reporting
them to immigration, which is a real threat, even when the survivor has
a path to lawful status,” Carmen McDonald, executive director of
Survivor Justice Center, a Los Angeles organization that supports
immigrant survivors of domestic violence, told me. “This will continue
to cause victims to be unsafe at home and have devastating impacts for
survivors.”
He is a failure. He has destroyed this
country in every way you can imagine. And, yes, that includes the
economy. His attack on DC is destroying the DC economy as we speak. Peter Wade (ROLLING STONE) explains:
Donald
Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to the nation's capital and
forcing a federal law enforcement takeover of the Metropolitan Police
Department is not only terrorizing residents and workers, it's also
harming local businesses. Washington, D.C., restaurants are experiencing
significant drops in reservations, and bars are seeing fewer customers.
Online
reservations for D.C. restaurants plunged more than 25 percent in the
days immediately after Trump announced the takeover of D.C. police for
the first time in the country's history, according to OpenTable data, WUSA 9's Jordan Fischer reported.
Trump
announced the authoritarian occupation on Monday, and OpenTable
reservations decreased by 16 percent compared to the same day last year.
By Tuesday, reservations were down 27 percent. By Wednesday, that
number rose to 31 percent.
Before
the president federalized D.C. law enforcement, the area had enjoyed 11
consecutive months of improvements in reservations.
The Advocate described the crackdown as "an economic and cultural crisis" after speaking to LGBTQ+ bar owners.
Bar owner Dave Perruzza said that Friday night felt "like a desert."
"Thursdays
are all local, but Fridays and Saturdays we get people from out of
town, and we just had none of them. It was awful," he explained.
Perruzza said he had lost $7,000 in a single night.
"That's not sustainable," he insisted.
None of Chump's actions are sustainable. The country needs a reboot nd we have got to deliver that in the 2026 mid-terms. Tara Suter (THE HILL) notes:
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Sunday dismissed Trump’s recent crackdown on the nation’s capitol as a “stunt.”
“What’s
happening here in Washington, D.C., is just a stunt. Donald Trump
didn’t like the fact that the walls were closing in on him, that his own
base was questioning why he wouldn’t release the Epstein files, why he
was protecting very powerful people,” Murphy told NBC News’s Kristen
Welker on “Meet the Press.”
It
is a stunt and was meant to stop people talking about the Epstein
scandal. The stunt is harming the economy and the Epstein scandal
remaings in the news. Adam Gabbatt (GUARDIAN) notes:
The
Democratic US congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland issued a statement
saying Trump’s decision to send the military into the nation’s capital
was meant to distract the public from the president’s “close friendship”
with the late convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey
Epstein.
Raskin’s statement
also alluded to broken promises from the Trump administration to fully
divulge all files pertaining to the prosecutions of Epstein and his
associate, the convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.
“The
only emergency here is a lawless president experiencing a growing
public relations emergency because of his … stubborn refusal to release
the Epstein file despite his promise to do so,” Raskin’s statement said.
Other
Democrats echoed the sentiment that Trump’s move was an attempt to
distract from criticism over Epstein and an economy that was struggling
amid the passage of his congressional agenda bill, which included a
historic $1tn cut to Medicaid.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
Murray demands all apportionment data be published online as court order requires
Murray: “It’s clear now why Vought and Trump have
fought so hard to prevent this information from being public: they have
used this process to secretly and illegally exert even more control
over funding approved by Congress, freezing key investments from going
out the door for agencies to conduct critical work and help the American
people.”
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, issued the
following statement after the Trump administration was forced to put a key spending transparency website
back online after breaking the law to take it down so that it could
hide how it’s executing spending laws from the American people.
In March, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), headed by Director Russ Vought, illegally took down the apportionments website that it is required by law to maintain. Earlier this month, a federal circuit court unanimously ruled
that the administration must restore the website and publicly post all
apportionment data that has been hidden from public view over the last
few months. Late Friday, OMB finally relented in its months-long fight
to continue breaking the law to hide this information—restoring the
website and beginning to post some of the apportionments it’s hidden
from public view for months.
“Every time any member of this administration tries to claim
they are being transparent, remember that they spent months illegally
hiding how they were spending your taxpayer dollars. Unfortunately for
Russ Vought and President Trump, the law is very clear—and now that a
federal appeals court has unanimously ruled they must restore the
spending transparency website, the site is back online.
“It should never have required months in court for this
administration to begin complying with a truly basic and straightforward
transparency requirement. OMB must now ensure every last bit of this
important budget data that has been hidden is promptly made public, as
the court has ordered, and that the data is posted within days, as the
law requires, going forward.
“It’s clear now why Vought and Trump have fought so hard to
prevent this information from being public: they have used this process
to secretly and illegally exert even more control over funding approved
by Congress, freezing key investments from going out the door for
agencies to conduct critical work and help the American people.”
Background on Apportionments
Apportionments are legally binding budget decisions issued by OMB
under title 31 of the U.S. Code. These documents are final, decisional,
and legally binding on agencies, and officials found responsible for
violating an apportionment from OMB may be subject to administrative
discipline, including suspension without pay and termination. What’s
more, the knowing and willful violation of an apportionment carries with
it criminal penalties under the Antideficiency Act.
The bipartisan fiscal year 2022 appropriations spending law
established a requirement for OMB to publicly post in an accessible
format all approved apportionments within two business days, along with
any footnotes and an explanation for those footnotes. In the following
fiscal year spending law, Congress made those requirements permanent.
Those bipartisan requirements were carried out over the last three years
without incident—which allowed lawmakers and the public to track OMB’s
legal-binding budget decisions.
Background on Russ Vought’s Weaponization of the Apportionment Process
In late March, however, Vought illegally pulled the website down without any explanation—and adamantly refused
to restore it, despite bipartisan calls for Vought and OMB to simply
follow the law and adhere to this common sense requirement.
Vought’s decision to yank the website offline immediately raised
questions about what exactly he and the president were seeking to hide
in preventing the American people—and lawmakers responsible for
conducting oversight—from accessing this information about how OMB is
spending taxpayer dollars. Notably, Vought—a key architect of Project
2025—has long contended that political appointees like himself should
have more say in how OMB operates and should exercise significantly more
control over federal funding. Over the last many months, Vought has
taken sweeping steps to exercise more control—and notably, in President
Trump’s first term, OMB illegally used the apportionment process to cut
off security assistance for Ukraine, which, of course, was the basis for
Trump’s first impeachment.
Earlier this month, public reporting began to shed light on why Trump and Vought have obscured this data from public view. Reportsshowed OMB had used the apportionment process to block the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from accessing roughly $15 billion
in funding provided for lifesaving research into treatments and
cures—and then quickly reversed course after the blockage was made
public. Just days later, reports
also showed that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
prevented the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from
spending large chunks of funding for mission critical work that it is
required to conduct. Senator Murray slammedboth actions—and
called for the Trump administration to stop improperly choking off
funding approved by Congress and to finally restore the website so the
American people have visibility into OMB’s actions.
The apportionments that have so far been made public now that the
website has been put back online make clear that Vought and OMB have
been using the apportionment process to exert even more control over
federal spending and to choke off key funds provided by Congress on a
bipartisan basis for all kinds of essential programs that working people
and communities nationwide count on every day.