Mission Accomplished…
And now after doing a lot of other running around I’m back home snuggled up, minding my business and eating wings and watching Christmas movies.
Pics coming soon!
If I had to express my deep sense of dislocation about this political moment and the national mood, I’d put it this way: I feel like the murder of a healthcare CEO probably has wider support than *actual* single payer healthcare.
Friday, December 13, 2024. Nancy Mace is the new Jussie, Donald's
breaks campaign promises before even being sworn in, and much more.
We should probably start with nut job Naomi Wolf. Her
out of shape body gets fatter and fatter and apparently so does her
brain. But we're not going to.
I
really wanted Kamala Harris to win the presidency. I wanted that for
democracy and to save our country. I also wanted to write in depth
about media failures from 2016 forward that enabled Donald Trump. I
don't think I can write about that now. With Kamala in the White House,
we'd be at a different place and could shine an honest light on
multiple issues.
Nut job
Naomi is part of the media problem, however, and we can carve out a
small sliver of our planned topic -- Ava and I -- by focusing on the dim
wit. If you've seen the Tweet -- and a number of you e-mailing have --
just know we'll address it at THIRD.
Now
it's time to plea for money. From time to time, in the past, I would
note PACIFICA RADIO or BUZZFLASH and encourage people to donate if they
could.
Clearly, most of those groups just stole our money. And they walked away from the Iraq War. After using it as a fundraiser.
So I stopped noting things like that in 2008.
But
I think I've found an issue that we really need to dig into our pockets
on. If you can't, that's fine, like I used to say back when we'd do
this. I'd honestly prefer us to do this on June 28th. But that's a
long way off. Now I'm not going to ask you to donate to any media --
independent or 'independent' -- because all they did was waste our
money.
What I'd like us to do is to focus on helping one person. They are in need.
I'd like us to all buy a Christmas gift -- or Hanukkah or Winter Solstice or Kwanza or whatever -- for someone.
Elon Musk.
Wait -- wait. Hear me out.
Elon
does not wear under shirts. He insists upon wearing paper thin
shirts. And I'm sorry but I am just sick to death of having his MOOBS
(Man Boobs) in my face when I'm just trying to follow the news. He
needs a bra. I think it need to be something more than a training bra
because he's really getting stacked. He looks a bit more curvy than
Susan ("Medea") Benjamin so I'd guess maybe a 34C or a 34D would best
fit him.
I
know he has the money to buy these himself. But he hasn't. And I was
thinking that maybe he was refusing to face reality. But discussing
this with a number of people, we kept coming back to our first bras.
And how it was kind of intimidating -- maybe even scary.
So that means we need to help him.
You
can buy wireless, you can buy one with hooks in the front or hooks in
the back or any color you want. And then put it in an envelope
Please hold for Elon Musk
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20500
It
would be such a relief for Elon and mean so much to him. So this
giving season, give generously to the man with the ever increasing
MOOBS. Let's fill up his chest of drawers with bras now that we know his
chest won't stop filling out.
Now
let's turn to TV. FOX's new series ALMANAC is in trouble. The hour
long drama was set to premiere next year and the setting was Elbert,
Colorado and the premise was local MAGAs form their own recording
industry in an attempt to revive minstrel music. The main character,
Vira Hazel Slutsky did a screw rap version of "Old Black Joe" and wasn't
getting residuals so she shot the label head. The fate of the show is
now, however, in doubt. In real life, the actress playing Vira Hazel
Slutsky staged an attack and cried in public about it. Now she's going
to have to leave the show because no one can trust her.
Oops! She's not on TV, she's in Congress. Which means she can stage her own attack and suffer no consequences.
Yes, we're talking about transphobe Nancy Mace. WIKIPEDIA:
On November 18, 2024, Mace introduced a resolution to ban transgender people from using bathrooms other than those of their sex assigned at birth at the U.S. Capitol, in anticipation of the swearing in of Sarah McBride, who is the first trans person elected to Congress.[119][120] Mace
described McBride as a "biological man trying to force himself into
women's spaces" and as a "guy in a skirt", later following this up by
saying "It's offensive that a man in a skirt thinks that he's my equal".[119][121] She confirmed that McBride was "absolutely" the target of her bathroom resolution.[122] Talking to Leland Vittert, Mace announced that she will "fight like hell" to exclude McBride from women's restrooms on the Capitol.[123] Mace's 2024 House resolution prevents McBride from using "single-sex facilities".
H. RES. 1579 entitled, "Prohibiting Members, officers, and employees of
the House from using single-sex facilities other than those
corresponding to their biological sex, and for other purposes."[124][125]Mary Miller and Matt Rosendale co-sponsored her bathroom resolution.[126] Two days later, Mace announced a new national resolution to ban "biological men from women's spaces on all federal property."[127] As some trans activists were protesting her bill, Mace referred to the trans activists using the slurs [. . .] resulting in her posts on some social media being flagged for hateful content.[128][129][130][131]
Then, this week, Tuesday, December 10th an encounter took place in public. Here's how Nancy wrote up her encounter:
I
was physically accosted at the Capitol tonight by a pro-tr*ns man. One
new brace for my wrist and some ice for my arm and it’ll heal just
fine.
The Capitol police arrested the guy.
Your tr*ns violence and threats on my life will only make me double down. FAFO.
She went and reported the person to the police.
All
that drama and not a Subway sandwich in sight which is all the more
surprising since it turns out Nancy lied about the encounter. Some
people just need attention and they'll do anything to get it -- like
Nancy who'll play the victim her entire life.
Eyewitnesses who watched the interaction between Representative Nancy Mace and
James McIntyre are questioning the congresswoman's claims about being
assaulted, describing instead a scene where McIntyre was just shaking
her hand.
Lisa Dickson, a veteran advocate for foster youth from Ohio, wrote in a Facebook post,
"I want to express deep disappointment in the fact that Congresswoman
Nancy Mace came to a national foster youth event, told participating
youth that it was a safe space — and literally had one of them arrested
by Capital police for simply shaking her hand and asking about trans
rights."
But three witnesses at the scene have contradicted her claims,
telling The Imprint and The Hill that McIntyre merely shook Mace's hand
at a Foster Youth Caucus reception and asked her to support the rights
of transgender people. Mace, who co-chairs the congressional Caucus on
Foster Youth, spoke at the reception, telling attendees she looked
forward to working with them.
"James
[McIntyre] met her by the door where people could see her and him to
say, 'trans youth are in foster care and they need your support,' and
gave a handshake and then walked back to his seat and sat down," one
witness told The Hill, describing it as a "pretty normal interaction."
"I
think James took that seriously," Hinkle said, describing how they and
others watched McIntyre, who co-founded Foster Care Alumni of America’s
Illinois chapter, approach Mace after she spoke and reached out his
hand.
"They
shake hands, and James says, 'Trans youth are also foster youth, and
they need your support.' And then sat down," Hinkle said.
Shortly
after Mace left with a congressional staffer, Hinkle said, the staffer
came back into the room and approached McIntyre, asking for his name and
the message he had for Mace.
Several
minutes later, Hinkle said, U.S. Capitol Police began arriving outside
the event. Capitol Police said in Tuesday’s statement that officers
later arrested McIntyre after an investigative interview.
"I
watched that interaction happen, and I saw a handshake and a
conversation and a very normal thing for an advocate to come to D.C. and
do," Hinkle said. “She didn’t even seem to have, like, that big of a
reaction to him. She just sort of made, like, almost like a tiny shock
face, and then she left the room.”
Mace also shared a photo of herself wearing an arm sling and a brace on social media Thursday. The photo was immediately ridiculed by Natalie Johnson, a former Mace staffer, who called it “a pathetic ploy for attention.”
“This
is the same woman who told staff, myself included, during Jan. 6 that
she wanted to get ‘punched in the face’ by a rioter so she could get on
TV,” Johnson said on X, formerly Twitter.
Before
we move on, let's emphasize something. Jussie Smollett lied about
being attacked and his career ended. EMPIRE let him go from the show.
I'm not saying that shouldn't have happened. It should have. But a
member of Congress fakes an attack and we won't see Republicans line up
to demand her resignation. She'll stay in office and continue to lie.
Trump said in his Person of the Year interview that lowering grocery prices is "very hard."
He said that high food prices were part of why he won the election.
Some economists think Trump's economic plans, like tariffs and deportations, will be inflationary.
President-elect Donald Trump didn't commit to being able to lower grocery pri
ces in his Person of the Year interview with Time Magazine, after flagging the issue as an important part of his win.
As
a candidate, Donald Trump campaigned—and won—this year on the promise
he would lower prices for Americans angry after the COVID pandemic’s
inflation brought steep price increases, but now he’s backtracking,
saying he’s not sure he will actually be able to fulfill those vows.
Outrage at Trump, and the people who voted for him based on that pledge,
was palpable on Thursday.
As recently as Sunday, MSNBC reports, Trump insisted, “We’re going to bring those prices way down.”
On Monday, Fox News reported: “Pointing to high grocery prices, Trump says, ‘I won an election based on that'”
But in his TIME magazine
“Person of the Year” interview, Trump suggested he might not be able to
lower prices as he promised to do. Appearing to remove himself from the
equation, he declared: “It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up.
You know, it’s very hard.”
Sam Stein of The Bulwark and MSNBC noted via
social media, “’Prices will come down,’ Trump told voters during a
speech last week laying out his vision for a return to the White House.
‘You just watch: They’ll come down, and they’ll come down fast, not only
with insurance, with everything.'”
Not even sworn in
yet and he's already making excuses for not keeping a campaign promise
-- that has to be some sort of a record.
President-elect Trump’s mass deportation proposals threaten to gut the U.S. economy, shrinking growth and the labor force while juicing inflation, according to a report released Thursday by Democrats in the Congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC).
Sourcing data from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the report found that deporting 8.3 million immigrants
in the country illegally would reduce GDP by 7.4 percent and reduce
employment by 7 percent by 2028, likely resulting in zero overall growth
throughout Trump’s second term.
Trump
has proposed deporting all such immigrants in the United States —
currently an estimated 11 million — and millions more currently
protected by humanitarian programs such as Temporary Protected Status,
who could lack legal status if those programs were cut.
According
to an American Immigration Council (AIC) estimate sourced by the JEC
report, deporting at a clip of 1 million people per year — echoing a proposal by
Vice President-elect JD Vance to “start with 1 million” — could
generate a 4.2 percent to 6.8 percent loss in GDP. The U.S. economy
shrank by 4.3 percent during the Great Recession, the report’s authors
noted.
“Trump’s
plan to deport millions of immigrants does absolutely nothing to
address the core problems driving our broken immigration system.
Instead, all it will do is raise grocery prices, destroy jobs, and
shrink the economy. His immigration policy is reckless and would cause
irreparable harm to our economy,” JEC Chair Sen. Martin Heinrich
(D-N.M.) said.
Which brings us back to yesterday's point. If we can survive the next four years, MAGA will do itself in.
As
Ashford and Simpson sing, "Times Will Be Good Again" (they wrote the
song and it first shows up on their classic album STREET OPERA). Or at
least good again for those of us lucky enough to survive. As Betty
noted this week in "Chicago's the first city targeted," not even in the White House yet but already they've decided who will be targeted firs: Chicago.
A lot of people are going to suffer.
And
we need to keep our heads right now. We do not have a lot of friends
in the media. We have liars who tell us that it's over for the
Democratic Party -- unless we move to the right. Ana Marie Cox has a
piece at THE NEW REPUBLIC on how we need to learn from MAGA.
Huh?
No,
we don't. But more to the point, Ana Marie -- who did a gossip blog
years ago -- never understood politics, was a hack at TIME magazine and
has never been right about anything political.
We need to grasp that. We need to be very diligent about the media we consume.
Jonny
Stewart wants to talk about the election with . . . Mark Cuban. I
don't have any beef with Cuban but we are not on the same page
politically. More to the point, it's further proof of how useless Jon
Stewart truly is -- and it's yet another example of another White man being brought on Jon's show to discuss . . . nothing of value.
Cuban's not an activist, he's not a scholar. He's also not really
impacted -- wealth will shield him. It's amazing that Jon wants to talk
the election and the direction of the party with someone making the
same generic talking points.
It's even more amazing that Jon wants to try to pass that off as information.
This is not helping anyone and Jon needs to take a hard look at what he's doing as opposed to what he thinks he's doing.
As
the race to lead the Democratic National Committee ramps up, a range of
factions is jockeying to shape the priorities of the next leader after a
disappointing presidential election.
But
looming over the internal party debate is a more fundamental question:
Just how much power does a DNC chair have to change the direction of the
party?
“There’s
no savior that’s coming in to save the DNC,” said one candidate for
chair, Ken Martin, who argued the DNC is part of a “larger ecosystem of
organizations that are fighting for economic and social justice.”
A key role for the DNC chair, he added, is to take the lead in bringing those groups together.
The
DNC chair contest is expected to become more formalized Thursday, when
the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee is set to meet in Washington to go
over the rules and procedures for the Feb. 1 election.
At
least four candidates have already declared they are running: Martin, a
DNC vice chair who also leads the Minnesota party; Ben Wikler, chairman
of the Wisconsin party; Martin O’Malley, the former commissioner of the
Social Security Administration and Maryland governor; and James
Skoufis, a New York state senator from a battleground district.
Remember
that whomever gets the job needs organizing and leadership skills. It
would also help if they had a little understanding of the 2024 election
-- including that there was no landslide for Trump, none at all.
In the real world, Senator Patty Murray's office issued the following:
Murray discusses how bipartisan
overhaul she negotiated has simplified FAFSA, expanded aid
eligibility—and shares update on law’s implementation
Washington state lags in FAFSA
completion rates; in 2023, WA left $65 million in Pell Grants on the
table by not completing the FAFSA
Senator Murray:
“Take advantage of every penny of federal grants available to you. Fill
the FAFSA out—it’s quick, it’s easy, and thousands of dollars in federal
grants could be just ten minutes away.”
***WATCH: Senator Murray discusses FAFSA form that is now live***
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), urged Washington state students and families to complete the
Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form, which is now live,
to take full advantage of the federal grants, assistance, and loans
available to them to pursue a higher education. Senator Murray discussed
how the new FAFSA form is easier and quicker to complete than ever and
how more aid is now available to more students—thanks to the bipartisan FAFSA Simplification Act
she negotiated and got signed into law in 2020. The law overhauled the
financial aid application process, simplified the FAFSA form for
students and families, and significantly expanded eligibility for
federal aid. She also provided an update on implementation of the law.
“Here’s what high school seniors, college students, and
families across Washington state should know: the FAFSA form for the
upcoming school year is available now and you should get it done as soon as possible,” said Senator Murray. “Filling out the FAFSA is the only way to unlock federal grants, assistance, and loans to help you get
a higher education. Whether you’re looking to get a four-year degree or
to head to community or technical college, fill the FAFSA out! And now,
thanks to the bipartisan reforms I worked hard to make happen, the form
is shorter and quicker than ever.”
“Unfortunately, our state has lagged behind in filling out
the FAFSA—and that means not taking advantage of federal aid that they
qualified for,” Murray continued. “In 2023, Washington
state left $65 million in Pell Grants on the table because no one
applied for them—so let’s turn that around! That’s the message I want
to get across today: take advantage of every penny of federal grants
available to you. Fill the FAFSA out—it’s quick, it’s easy, and
thousands of dollars in federal grants could be just ten minutes away.”
Washington state still has one of the lowest FAFSA completion rates in the nation. In 2023, students in Washington state left $65 million in Pell Grants on the table by not completing the FAFSA.
Significantly expands who is eligible to receive Pell Grants and the maximum award;
Significantly simplifies the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA);
Makes the financial aid process easier to navigate for students experiencing homelessness and students formerly in foster care.
Restores Pell Grant eligibility for students who have been defrauded, students with drug-related offenses, and more.
Senator Murray hasled
oversight efforts of implementation of the new, simplified FAFSA and
has continued to stay in close contact with the Department of Education
to ensure the new form works for students and families. The draft
Senate Fiscal Year 2025 spending bill,
authored and negotiated by Murray, which funds the Department of
Education, includes an additional $100 million for the administration of
student aid programs—the funding would support a wide range of
activities, including implementation of the FAFSA. The bill also directs
the Department of Education to undertake various activities related to
the FAFSA, including conducting outreach to students who have
uncompleted FAFSA applications, providing weekly updates to Congress on
FAFSA implementation, and correcting errors that have made it difficult
for unaccompanied homeless youth to access the FAFSA application.
Senator Murray’s funding bill passed out of the Senate Appropriations
Committee 25-3—and she is now working to get it signed into law.
Senator Murray’s full comments, as delivered, are below:
“My siblings and I all were able to pursue a higher education thanks to federal support.
“So I personally know just how important it is. And that is why I
have been so focused throughout my career on making sure students can
get the federal support they need to make it through higher education.
“Today, one of the first steps many kids take to make that dream a
reality is filling out the form called FAFSA, which is how they get
access to funding for higher education through the federal government.
“Now, for many, many years, the application was daunting. Many,
many questions. Very complex to fill out. You had to import your tax
information.
“And I’ve always believed there’s no reason for what should be a
first step on the path to a higher education to become the first
stumbling block. And I wasn’t the only person who thought that.
“So I set out to make the form a whole lot easier and quicker to fill
out. And I worked with my Republican counterpart on the Senate
Education Committee—and together we passed a bipartisan bill to
streamline the FAFSA—and to rework the financial aid formula so that we
could get more aid to more students, including, of course, in Washington
state.
“The rollout of the new form and the overhaul I negotiated last year was rocky—to say the very least.
“So I’ve had to continue to work with the Department to push them to
address the incredibly frustrating problems that students and families
were experiencing.
“Now, many of those major kinks have been addressed, and I am much
more optimistic about where things stand this year, and going forward.
“So I’m going to keep making sure it works well—but bottom line: students can expect a much smoother, easier process.
“And despite the challenges over the last year—we are already seeing more students get more aid, which is exactly why I pushed so hard to reform this process.
“We know now that, nationwide, 10% more students are on track to receive Pell Grants—not loans, Pell Grants—this school year than last year.
“And in Washington state, over 12% more students are now
eligible for Pell Grants than just a year ago. Which means more people
will be able to get federal grants so they can get a higher education.
“This is really important for students and families across our state
to take advantage so that they can get access to the federal money to
open those doors to higher education and it will be available for them
immediately.
“So here’s what high school seniors, college students, and families
across Washington state should know: the FAFSA form for the upcoming
school year is available now and you should get it done as soon as possible!
It’ll just take 10-15 minutes, as little as 18-20 questions—done with
it, and you will know whether you are eligible and whether you can be
eligible for financial aid.
“Even if you think you may not be eligible for financial aid, it is
worth taking a few minutes to fill out that form and find out. And I
think many students will be very surprised to learn they are eligible to
get additional support—especially with the expanded aid that we helped
to get.
“Filling out the FAFSA is the only way to unlock federal grants, assistance, and loans to help you get a higher education.
“Whether you’re looking to get a four-year degree or to head to community or technical college, fill the FAFSA out!
“And now, thanks to the bipartisan reforms I worked hard to make happen, the form is shorter and quicker.
“Instead of over a hundred questions, it’s now down to as few as 88. So it’ll only take you about 10 minutes to fill it out.
“So I encourage anyone thinking about going to college, community
college, or technical school next year—or who will be returning—to take a
few minutes and get the FAFSA done.
“Unfortunately, our state has lagged behind in filling out the
FAFSA—and that means not taking advantage of federal aid that they
qualified for.
“In fact, in 2023, Washington state left $65 million in Pell Grants
on the table because no one applied for them—so let’s turn that around!
“That’s the message I want to get across today: take advantage of
every penny of federal grants available to you. Fill the FAFSA out—it’s
quick, it’s easy, and thousands of dollars in federal grants could be
just ten minutes away.
“And know that I am working hard to make sure students and families
and people who work in higher education know this form is out there.
Let’s get it done. Let’s make sure everyone gets access to higher
education that qualifies.”
###
That's probably the case in every state so take her advice to heart.
Thursday, December 11, 2024. We know so very little when we don't know
our history and we can fall for a lot of lies as a result. The next
four years will be rough and tough but what's awful on the Dem side is
the liars who want to push the party to the right and lie to people to
try to get them to go along with a rightward push. All that and Aaron
Mate finally gets the attention he's earned.
Once upon a time, politicians refrained from using slurs to describe
members of minority groups. Instead, they expressed their hatred through
euphemism and impersonal fearmongering, lest they be deemed
uncivilized. For public officials, it seemed like enough to pass
discriminatory laws and promote negative stereotypes—they didn’t need to
name-call too.
That era is over. Last
week, a group of trans-rights activists staged a sit-in at the Capitol
to protest a resolution, proposed by South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace,
that would prohibit transgender women from using women’s restrooms in
the building. After a few of them were arrested for protesting, Mace
herself headed down to the offices of the U.S. Capitol Police to make a video at the scene.
Here’s
how Mace explained the situation: “Some tr—y protesters showed up at
the Capitol today to protest my bathroom bill.” To make sure no viewers
would miss the slur, Mace posted it with subtitles.
Mace
read it like a throwaway line, but it was clearly calculated. Her
Republican peers in the House have already made a practice of calling
transgender people—including their soon-to-be colleague, incoming
transgender Rep. Sarah McBride—by the wrong pronouns
and names. If Mace wanted to be the national face of keeping trans
people out of bathrooms, she had to go further. So she used a slur.
Later that day, she did it again.
Her escalation marks a new stage of U.S. anti-transgender politics. When
the current backlash against trans visibility began, about five years
ago, right-wing politicians limited their rhetoric mostly to fantasies
of protection: protecting trans children from medical therapies,
protecting cisgender children from being beaten in sports, and
protecting all children from malicious abusers in bathrooms.
Conservatives have since expanded their pearl-clutching to transgender
adults—but often, it’s still under that same guise of protection.
Medicaid shouldn’t pay for gender-affirming care for anyone, they
said—unless patients jump through a series of arduous and time-consuming
hoops—because it protects against future regret.
However disingenuous all this was, it still suggested that most
right-wing politicians considered it politically smart to refrain from
trashing trans people in extreme ways.
Her escalation marks a new stage of U.S. anti-transgender politics. When
the current backlash against trans visibility began, about five years
ago, right-wing politicians limited their rhetoric mostly to fantasies
of protection: protecting trans children from medical therapies,
protecting cisgender children from being beaten in sports, and
protecting all children from malicious abusers in bathrooms.
Conservatives have since expanded their pearl-clutching to transgender
adults—but often, it’s still under that same guise of protection.
Medicaid shouldn’t pay for gender-affirming care for anyone, they
said—unless patients jump through a series of arduous and time-consuming
hoops—because it protects against future regret.
However disingenuous all this was, it still suggested that most
right-wing politicians considered it politically smart to refrain from
trashing trans people in extreme ways.
Nancy Mace and her kind are disgusting.
As Ruth notes, we're in for "A world of hurt"
on January 20th. And we're there for a number of reasons including the
racism and sexism in the media (including Amy Goodman's DEMOCRACY NOW!
and Katrina vanden Heuvel's THE NATION).
48 and 49%.
What's that?
AP's
current toll for the US presidential election. Kamala's at 48% and
Satan's at 49%. There are a few more votes still to be counted. When
we repeatedly note that here, it's not saying, "She can still win!" We
don't elect the president by popular vote. We need to. We need to do
away with the electoral college. But we haven't. We've made no move on
-- even when Hillary won the popular vote in 2016 but lost the
presidency.
You want to increase voter turnout? Make voting matter.
It
doesn't matter with the electoral college. I voted knowing Kamala
would carry my state. When you know that, your vote doesn't really
matter. If every vote mattered in the US presidential elections, you
would probably get a higher turnout. Instead, we're left with the
reality that we know our state will go this or that way -- know that in
many states -- so why bother voting? Life's busy, life's tough, we all
are short on enjoyment time, why vote if you already know the outcome.
So
that's us in California, that's Texas that will go GOP, that's this
state and that state. Only in the swing states does your vote really
matter. Popular vote determining the president would most likely
increase voter turnout across the country.
But the reason we note those totals over and over since the election is because it's reality.
As opposed to what the media told you immediately after the election and continues to attempt to lie about.
And
they do that for a number of reasons including the right-wing tilt of
the media. It's not a left wing tilt. It used to be a centrist tilt
but it's gone on over to the right-wing.
Trump has no mandate. He has no landslide.
Now if most Americans grasped that -- especially Democratic voters -- it would harm a lot of people.
Like?
US House Rep Seth Moulton for one. Senator Mark Warner for another -- see Rebecca's "old man mark warner needs to retire already."
People like that -- lazy fat asses who would just as soon sell their
own mothers to get a vote -- who want to lie because they don't want to
have to fight to defend women's rights, or LGBTQ+ rights, or Civil
Rights, or human life for that matter. They're cowards and they're
liars. And they will destroy the Democratic Party given the chance.
Simon Rosenberg. E-mails come in insisting that I have him all wrong.
No, I don't.
He may be a progressive today or pose as one. I have no idea.
When
I bring him up, I'm talking about what he did in 2004 and 2005 right
after that election. That's when he insulted Black women, that's when
he was pushing for Dems to stop supporting ROE V WADE and abortion
rights, that's when he rallied against LGBTQ+ rights.
He's done a 180, you say? I doubt that very seriously. WIKIPEDIA:
Simon Rosenberg (born October 23, 1963) is a Democratic political strategist and blogger. He was the founder of New Democrat Network (NDN), a centrist think tank and advocacy group based in Washington, D.C.[1]
According to the 2015 book How to Hack a Party Line: The Democrats and Silicon Valley, Rosenberg and NDN were instrumental in shifting control of the Democratic Party away from labor unions and toward Silicon Valley businesses.[2] Rosenberg
said in 1999, "Our problem as a party is that the biggest source of our
venture capital now comes from labor, which is a group that's becoming
less and less important, and representing less and less of a percentage
of American voters. [...] We have to replace labor's investment in the
party with investment from another source, and hopefully from a source
that's growing."[2]
That's
who you're wasting your time defending. NDN was the DLC made over. It
was a right-leaning, Joe Lieberman hand-holding group of trash.
He
waited until March of this year to shut it down. Now I felt sorry for
him in 2004. He seemed gay and he was publicly gay hating, so I felt
sorry for him. Closet cases can be so pathetic. But even that bit of
sympathy didn't stop me from calling him out.
Rachel Maddow called him out as well. I'm not remembering a lot of others calling him out.
Simon
was running for DNC chair (he would drop out of the race in February
2005 and tell his few supporters to back Howard Dean).
We see the same garbage over and over.
REUTERS notes, "The job of DNC chair is largely administrative and involves logistics
and fundraising. But focus on who will next fill the role has grown
given the breadth of the Democrats' losses and urgent calls from some party members
for a complete reset." The first sentence is about the duties of the
chair. Again, we need to make sure the person going in has the skills
required. That's all the jobs about.
After the
2004 election, Simon went around insisting Dems needed to move further
to the right and you might have thought this would result in his being
called out. Very few bothered to call him out. We did. And after John
Kerry lost to Bully Boy Bush, people lied to get what they wanted --
they wanted to push the Democratic Party further to the right.
And
that's what the continued nonsense of 'oh, we lost the voters!' is
about. It was a close election. We needed better turnout. Turnout was
depressed and suppressed by all the attack pieces posted at THE NATION,
all the segments trashing Kamala at DEMOCRACY NOW!, not one article
praising Kamala by THE PROGRESSIVE or IN THESE TIMES. These are outlets
that beg us for money and they used their space to tear down Kamala
Harris. Nothing she did was good enough. Donald Trump was elected
because of that.
No one should be giving a
dime to DEMOCRACY NOW!, THE NATION, THE PROGRESSIVE, IN THESE TIMES and
so many other crap-ass outlets. A friend at THE NATION begged this week
for an article on trans issues to be highlighted here. I replied,
"Sure, and you can go back in a time machine and remove all those attack
pieces on Kamala, right? Including the interns editorial that Kamala
didn't deserve anyone's vote?"
What
we need to focus on is turnout for 2028. What we need to focus on is
how to respond -- and respond rapidly -- to attacks on our candidate --
especially when these attacks come from outlets that depend upon our
money to stay afloat. Always begging us to send money. Only a damn
fool would send money to Amy Goodman or THE NATION et al right now.
Only a damn fool.
There were plenty of damn
fools on the 'left' who attacked Kamala non-stop. She wasn't supporting
Lina Khan! That's what the whores would say. And then they'd tell you
that even JD Vance supports Lina Kahn! And attack Kamala and build up
Trump. They did it -- from the 'left.'
POST-LEFT WATCH wonders:
They lied and they lie. And they think we're going to forget. We're not forgetting anymore than we're forgiving.
They built up Satan and they built up grifter Jill Stein. Where is Jill these days?
Exactly. She's a grifter, she's a fake ass.
We'll go out with an example of another fake ass.
For now, I pray that we survive the next four years.
The
world of liars today who keep trying to water down the Democratic Party
instead of strengthening it, they also fail to impart some basic
wisdom.
If we do make it to 2028, the Democrats are very likely to win regardless of whom they nominated.
When the GOP embraces hate, America grows tired of them very quickly.
They wear out their welcome.
They
preach hate and they pursue programs and policies that the American
people are against -- even if it takes them a while to figure that out.
And
if you'll watch, even though the new Congress isn't sworn in yet nor is
Satan, you can see the signs as to why the American people are going to
turn against the GOP. For example? Aliss Higham (NEWSWEEK) reports:
Republican Congressman Mark Alford has touted raising the retirement age to help cut federal government costs.
"I think there's a
way, when people are living longer, they're retiring later, then on the
front end, we can move that retirement age back a little bit," Alford
said. The current full retirement age is 67 for those born in 1960 or
later, and is the earliest age at which workers can begin getting Social
Security benefits without any financial penalty for claiming early.
Alford
said the "$36 trillion" national debt and its interest payments is
"unsustainable," with a whittling down of government spending required
to "right the ship."
So to deliver even more tax cuts for the obscenely rich, the GOP is gearing up to raise the retirement age. Or take this from Jeff Schogol (TASK & PURPOSE):
A growing chorus is calling for cuts to Veteran Affairs disability
benefits as a way to save federal dollars — a move that ignores the very
real costs of two decades of war, and could cause irreparable harm to
generations of veterans, experts warn.
The most recent call for cuts is a widely criticized opinion article in The Economist
on Nov. 28 that described veterans’ disability benefits as “absurdly
generous.” Experts told Task & Purpose that the essay is
representative of widespread public misperceptions that threaten to
reduce veterans’ compensation for service-connected health conditions.
The Economist piece echoes an argument made by the Washington Post’s editorial board last year that limiting disability payments to veterans would help get America’s financial house in order.
These arguments may now have a real chance of becoming law.
Policies laid out in Project 2025,
touted as a blueprint for a second Donald Trump term, would revamp the
Department of Veterans of Affairs with proposals to increase
privatization, narrow the eligibility criteria for health benefits and
replace civil service-style employees with political appointees in its
ranks. Produced by the Heritage Foundation think tank in Washington,
D.C., the policy guide states that a growing number of health conditions
that qualify for VA disability are “tenuously related or wholly
unrelated to military service.”
In mid-November, President-elect
Donald Trump has tappedRussell T. Vought, one of the key players in
Project 2025, to lead the Office of Management and Budget, a powerful
federal post that oversees government spending.
And then there are the efforts to repaint insurrectionists as heroes.
You've got Public Citizen noting:
Washington, D.C. — Today, President-elect Donald J. Trump declared on his social media platform
that, “Any person or company investing ONE BILLION DOLLARS, OR MORE, in
the United States of America, will receive fully expedited approvals
and permits, including, but in no way limited to, all Environmental
approvals.”
Tyson Slocum, Energy Program Director at Public Citizen, issued the following statement in response:
“The President has no authority
whatsoever to waive statutory public health and safety protections based
upon a dollar value of capital investment. Trump’s claim deserves
ridicule for being so outlandishly illegal and wrong, and it will not
come to pass, no matter what Trump fantasizes.
“However, the statement does
highlight Trump’s utter disregard for protecting the environment or
human health and the imminent peril that he and his cronies will push
policies that jeopardize health, safety and planetary well-being.
“Of special importance, Public Citizen has noted Trump’s efforts to use national security designations to force bailouts of coal power plants
during his firm term — which Trump may seek to expand to all domestic
oil and gas production, transportation, and export, especially with
Trump’s declaration that his Interior Secretary nominee Doug Burgum
would have a seat on the National Security Council.
“This, along with other moves the
administration is likely to take starting January 20, offers a more
realistic and insidious Trump scheme to allow Big Oil to sidestep an
array of environmental laws by designating domestic fossil fuel
production and export as essential for national security.”
These are not things you can support and then run easily for re-election.
Let's
get some humor in here. Trashy FOX "NEWS" and the gutter rats on it
did an insulting segment on First Lady Jill Biden where they insisted
that Jill was attracted to Satan Trump. No woman is attracted to Satan
Trump which is why his current wife got a redo on the prenup. From
Marcia's "Top 10 reasons Jill Biden would never be interested in Trump:"
1) She's never been a chubby chaser, let alone someone to run after the morbidly obese.
2)
While Trump's never minded sporting lipstick on his collar, Jill knows
damn well that orange foundation Trump wears will burn a hole through
fabric.
3) His halitosis.
4) He farts with each step he takes.
5) She believes in marriage.
6) Hooking up with a rapist has never been on her bingo card.
7) She believes in and supports education.
8)
Long ago, as a teenager, she made the decision to never couple with a
man whose boobs were bigger than her own. As David Bautista has noted, Trump "has jugs, like
Dolly Parton."
9) While she enjoys primates and animal documentaries, she has no desire to mate with an orangutang.
10) A bad boy might be intriguing but a traitor is a buzz kill.
Let's not another fake ass poser. Aaron Mate of Mate-Taibi-Halper-and-Scum.
At long last, Aaron Mate is finally getting the attention he's always craved. Speaking of I Need Attention Benjamin . . .
Susan
Benjamin who goes by the stage name Medea. Actors have stage names and
we all know that there's nothing real about Susan. There she is with
registered sex offender, convicted pedophile Scott Ritter. You stand
with Ritter, you stand with trash.
Here's the
backstory on Susan's current problems. CODEPINK represents as a
women's group. Don't dig too deep into those roots. Jodi who is the
money behindf the project -- which is why she was able to marshal the
group against John Edwards, Hillary Clinton and others seeking the 2008
Democratic Party presidential nomination (Jodi supported Barack and was,
in fact, a bundler for Barack -- a detail that proved most embarrassing
for Jodi when discovered in the summer of 2008 after she had deployed
CODEPINK to bird dog Barack's opponents) -- Anyway, Jodi's the money of
the group and she's gotten rather tired of Susan Benjamin's cozying up
to Scott Ritter. It's bad for donations and it's bad for the brand.
And when Susan announced she would be speaking at the faux Rage Against
the War Machine, it appalled members of CODEPINK because they don't
understand why anyone would be part of event featuring a convicted
pedophile. So, faced with a huge rebellion within the ranks, Jodi had
to tell Susan "NO!" Now, a few years later, Susan's taken the stage
with Ritter and it's causing Jodi more problems. Things were so much
easier for Jodi when she was just bungling her duties working for
then-Governor Jerry Brown. So Susan's being told, yet again, to pipe
down or find her way to the exit door.
It's
Jodi's own fault for letting 72 year old Susan Benjamin remain the face
of the group. I can remember as far back as 2005 when CODEPINK was
facing criticism for being all White and all middle aged. They're still
basically all White and Susa is still holding the mike.