Anthony Perkins was an actor most noted for playing Norman Bates in Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho. In that film, Norman kills Janet Leigh at the beginning though we think it may have been Norman's mother. By the film's end, we learn his mother has been dead this whole time and that's Norman dressing as her.
It was a huge hit. He had hits prior to Psycho but it changed the landscape for him. He would continue to play bad guys. For a lot of us, especially in the African-American community, we first caught Tony in Diana Ross' Mahogany where he plays the fashion photographer who screams "Show me death!" at her over and over as he refuses to watch the road while they're in the car (he's supposed to be driving). Mahogany was a successful film (don't believe Crapapedia -- Diana was on the box office list for actors that year -- the first African-American woman to make the list with Lady Sings The Blues and she made it again for Mahogany) as was Murder On The Orient Express. But Norman made him infamous and no other film did that nor was he ever able to shake Norman.
Tony didn't live an easy life and it doesn't make for an easy read. Ryan Murphy's did Hollywood for Netflix -- a limited episode series. And in it, via reimagining, he was able to give Rock Hudson a happy ending -- Rock falls in love and is out in the fifties. I'd love it if something like that had happened. It didn't. Tony's life is even sadder.
He betrays Tab Hunter, betrays, belittle and attacks him. And Tab was supposed to be the love of his life. They were together in the fifties. He even stole a role from Tab when they were a couple. Tab had done a play on TV called Fear Strikes Out. His studio -- and Tab was a big box office star -- was Paramount which decided to turn the property into a film. And Tab assumed he'd be the lead. Tony and his agent campaigned for Tony to get the role. Nothing was ever said about this to Tab who only found out after Tony was cast in the role.
Prior to that, Tony was so paranoid about being exposed that he would worry about a car parked in his driveway overnight and go through all of these measures for them to 'accidentally' meet.
He had many affairs as well as many pick ups (Kerry X is only one of the male prostitutes who pops up in the book). In the 70s, he makes Judge Roy Bean with Paul Newman (another closeted actor) and ends up telling the world -- in the 80s -- that Victoria Principal, also in the film, took his 'virginity' on the film. People who knew him laughed at that since he had not been a virgin prior to Victoria, though he had not slept with women. He was forty years old at the time.
Then he felt the need to get married.
He saw a quack. C.I.'s written about that awful woman over the years. Her name was Mildred Newman. She 'cured' many men of homosexuality. Joel Schumacher, the director of St. Elmo's Fire, The Client, etc, was one of the wise ones who refused her pressure. But she treated Paul Newman, who was bisexual prior to her 'treatment' and many other actors that read gay to this day. I'm thinking of one in particular who is 85-years-old and still in the closet. Will he come out before he dies? No.
She's really the villain of the story and the book would be better if that was not hinted at but declared out right. The book was published before the quack died.
Had she not pressured Tony, had she not done electroshock on him to 'cure' him, his life would have been better. Instead, he had a sham marriage. The book doesn't say that. He married Berry Berenson in 1973. She was the mousy sister of actress Marisa Berenson who is probably best known today for the film Cabaret and the TV movie Playing For Time (she stars in that with Vanessa Redgrave, they are Jews held in a Nazi concentration camp). Tony and Berry were married until his death, from AIDS, in 1992. They had two sons.
To the public, on PEOPLE magazine no less, Tony found 80s fame by declaring he was gay but Mildred -- and Victoria Principal -- had cured him. Now he was in the second decade of his marriage and so happy, happy, happy.
He wasn't. He was still propositioning men.
That's not a bad thing. The bad thing was he was forced into pretending not to be gay.
He already had internalized homophobia because of the time period he was raised in and his various insecurities. Tab Hunter was raised in that same period. Tab managed to find great happiness at the end of his life. He came out publicly in 2005. But he never hid from his friends and never got into a sham marriage. He did marry, in 2013, Allan Glaser. The two met in 1983 and were together until Tab's death in 2018.
Mildred Newman is an evil woman. If the book were written today, they'd hopefully make this very clear. Maybe not? Paul Newman's dead but there are others -- like the now 85 year old actor she 'cured' -- who don't want to be known as gay.
Anthony Perkins was so good as Norman that people saw him as a freak and that's what he was cast as repeatedly after the film. He was very effective in some of the films -- such as Mahogany and, I would argue, Crimes of Passion with Kathleen Turner (not a great film, but the two of them are amazing in it).
But Norman was a stunted boy and that's what Tony became onscreen. He was unable to grow up onscreen. And he wasn't able to dig deep. How much that resulted from the charade he had to act offscreen due to the 'therapy' of Mildred Newman is anyone's guess.
But I would say it had a lot to do with it.
With a better therapist, he could have been who he was and not sneaking around to be with men while acting happily married to a woman.
A better therapist might have been able to cure him of his homophobia. He's got to have been the most homophobic gay man of the 20th century -- the way Glenn Greenwald is the most homophobic one of the 21st century.
And he was homophobic his own life, all through it. He and Stephen Sondheim were friends -- while Tony was being 'cured' by Mildred Newman, Sondheim was coming out. Sondheim wrote or co-wrote the songs for Gypsy, West Side Story, Sunday In The Park With George and many more. The two worked together to write the script to The Last Of Sheila. Richard Benjamin (who?) played the gay character in it and the part is very homophobic. Makes me wonder why an actor would take a role like that to begin with (why?). You don't suppose, just speculating here, that Richard is gay and hiding to this day in the closet? I mean, he didn't see the quack (did he?) and get 'cured,' right?
At any rate, they lie and they lie again. I have a subscription to Vanity Fair and I dig in the archives from time to time. I loathe Peter Biskin -- he's overrated and such a little -- I can't think of a word disgusting enough.
Tony died in 1992. In 2000, Biskind wrote this article about the passing of agent and well known racist Sue Mengers:
In 1967, Preminger was directing Hurry Sundown, and Mengers was trying to sell him on one of her male clients. Preminger was a liberal, famous for openly employing blacklisted writer Dalton Trumbo on Exodus. As she recalls, “He said to me, ‘Miss Mengers, your client is a fairy!’ Of course he was, but I said, ‘Oh, Mr. Preminger, that’s not true—I’ve been to bed with him.’ I would go that far, yes. I wish I could say he gave the guy the part, but he didn’t. He may have broken the blacklist, but gay was verboten in movies.”
The unnamed client? Anthony Perkins. Exactly why, in 2000, after Tony's been dead for 18 years, and Otto Preminger died in 1986, was Vanity Fair unwilling to put Tony's name to the anecdote about him that Sue told? They found the anecdote interesting enough to write it up, they just didn't want to attach Anthony Perkins' name to it.
Split Image is worth reading. That said, it's a story that needs to be retold from a more frank and modern perspective. Do we have to wait for the 85-year-old closet case to die before we can get honest?
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is facing growing calls to recuse himself from a case that could hamstring Congress' ability to enact a federal wealth tax, a policy that progressive lawmakers and economists say is needed to rein in out-of-control inequality.
Late last week, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter urging Chief Justice John Roberts to "take appropriate steps to ensure that Justice Alito will recuse himself" from Moore v. United States, which the Supreme Court recently agreed to take up.
The lawmakers' demand was prompted by a friendly interview that Alito gave to The Wall Street Journal's opinion section, which in June allowed the right-wing justice to get out in front of a ProPublicastory on his luxury trip with billionaire hedge fund titan Paul Singer.
The interview late last month was conducted in part by David Rivkin Jr., an attorney who is representing the plaintiffs in Moore v. United States. The case, which is mentioned in passing in the Journal's write-up of the Alito interview, concerns whether unrealized gains such as stock appreciation can be subject to federal taxation.
Unrealized gains are currently untaxed in the U.S., allowing
billionaires such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk to accumulate massive fortunes
while paying little to nothing in federal income taxes.
Supporters of the Moore plaintiffs, who are specifically challenging an obscure foreign earnings provision in the 2017 Republican tax law, have encouraged the Supreme Court to explicitly address the constitutionality of wealth taxes in its ruling.
"This case presents the court with an ideal opportunity to clarify that taxes on unrealized gains, such as wealth taxes, are direct taxes that are unconstitutional if not apportioned among the states," the right-wing Manhattan Institute argued in a May amicus brief. (Proponents of a tax on unrealized gains, such as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), have expressed confidence that such a tax is constitutional.)
The Manhattan Institute is chaired by Singer, whose private jet flew Alito to an Alaska fishing trip that the justice did not disclose.
"Alito needs to recuse himself from the case deciding the constitutionality of a wealth tax," Americans for Tax Fairness, a progressive advocacy group, said Wednesday. "First he accepted lavish gifts from billionaires and failed to disclose them. Then he gave a buddy-buddy interview to one of the case's anti-wealth tax lawyers. Enough."
The report, published under the headline, “Clarence Thomas’ 38 Vacations: The Other Billionaires Who Have Treated the Supreme Court Justice to Luxury Travel,” is a devastating exposure of corruption and criminality.
The report declares:
Thomas has secretly reaped the benefits from a network of wealthy and well-connected patrons that is far more extensive than previously understood…
During his three decades on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas has enjoyed steady access to a lifestyle most Americans can only imagine. A cadre of industry titans and ultrawealthy executives have treated him to far-flung vacations aboard their yachts, ushered him into the premium suites at sporting events and sent their private jets to fetch him including, on more than one occasion, an entire 737.
The gifts include “at least 38 destination vacations, including a previously unreported voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas.” This is better than one expensive vacation every year of Thomas’s 32 years on the court. In addition, there were “26 private jet flights, plus an additional eight by helicopter; a dozen VIP passes to professional and college sporting events, typically perched in the skybox; two stays at luxury resorts in Florida and Jamaica; and one standing invitation to an uber-exclusive golf club overlooking the Atlantic coast.”
These trips were largely unreported, either by the corporate media or by Thomas himself in his annual financial filings with the court. Pro Publica observes, “Thomas appears to have violated the law by failing to disclose flights, yacht cruises and expensive sports tickets, according to ethics experts.”
At least four billionaires, representing several sectors of the US economy, have been identified as sponsors of Thomas. There may be others, but these four, as profiled by the New York Times and Pro Publica, include:
- Harlan Crow, heir to the commercial real estate giant Trammell Crow, founded by his father, which became the largest US owner of real estate. Harlan Crow controls the family holding company, Crow Holdings, with assets of $20 billion.
- David Sokol, oil and finance executive, who made his initial fortune at Berkshire Hathaway, the massive investment firm founded and headed by Warren Buffett, before resigning in disgrace over an insider trading scandal.
- The late H. Wayne Huizenga, whose fortune derived from Waste Management, the leading waste disposal firm in North America, Auto Nation, once the largest auto dealer, and Blockbuster video. He also owned at one point or another most of the professional sports teams in Miami, Florida.
- Paul Novelly, oil executive, whose family owns the billion-dollar independent Apex Oil and several other oil industry firms, most involved in trading and storing heavy oil products, including fuel oil and asphalt.
What these billionaires have in common, besides enormous wealth, is an extreme right-wing political perspective, opposing any restriction on the capitalist market and any effort to provide state support for working people whose jobs and living standards have been devastated by market forces.
They were not “personal friends” of Thomas, as the justice claimed of Crow when his financial ties with the real estate mogul was brought to light by Pro Publica earlier this year. All four began their relationships with Thomas only after he had become a Supreme Court justice in 1991, when he was in a position to reinforce the drastic shift to the right in the high court which was already under way.
Thomas occasionally reported trips and gifts from Crow, but never for any of the other three, although these relationships were extraordinarily lucrative as well.
Stand Up America is a progressive advocacy organization with over two million community members across the country. Focused on grassroots advocacy to strengthen our democracy and oppose Trump's corrupt agenda, Stand Up America has driven over 600,000 phone calls to Congress and mobilized tens of thousands of protestors across the country.
+ One of RFK Jr.’s super PACs has been paying thousands to a xenophobic outlet called Creative Destruction Media that blasts out alarums about the threat of “Black and brown invaders” with a “primitive culture”. Not much of a surprise there. Last month, RFK Jr stood with the big irrigators in Arizona who are sucking the Colorado River dry and smeared immigrants for stepping on their arugula plantations….
+ Which imperial family’s disintegration has been more complete: the Windsors, Kennedys or Cuomos? According to a story in the NYT this week, Madeline Cuomo, the sister of former NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, worked with a pro-Cuomo group called We Decide New York, Inc. to smear and intimidate women who had accused Cuomo of sexual harassment.
+ DeSantis auditioning for the Joker in the next Batman reboot?
+ Is it any wonder he’s campaign is in free fall? DeSantis is now polling less than half of the support from people who pick a candidate not named Trump.
+ DeSantis, who was billed as the political Ken doll for the Moms of Liberty demographic, is now polling at 11% nationally among GOP women.
+ In a desperate effort to reverse his slide into political oblivion, DeSantis used his autocratic powers as Florida governor to remove the elected state attorney in Orlando, a black reformist prosecutor named Monique Worrell, saying she’d been weak on criminal prosecutions. Worrell responded by saying, “I am your duly elected state attorney and nothing done by a weak dictator can change that.” Meanwhile, DeSantis has taken no action against the DA of Jacksonville, despite the fact the city has the highest murder rate in Florida. Of course, he’s white and a Republican.
+ This latest action has means that DeSantis has nullified the electoral decisions of more than 15.5 percent of the voters in the state, leaving 3.3 million Floridians without their elected choice of prosecutor.
+ Here’s DeSantis defending his plan for death squads on the southern border:
+ “These people in Iraq at the time, they all looked the same.” This is certainly calls out for a deeper probe into DeSantis’ time in Fallujah, as well as Guantanamo.
Long story short: The DeSantis-signed bill barring schools from offering "instruction" in gender or sexual orientation, dubbed the "don't say gay law" by critics, made it impossible for teachers to address very basic ideas like "sexuality is a part of the life experience." Rather than offer a substandard program, the College Board was forced to pull the AP classes, which many students could use for college credit, from the schools.
In response to the bad press, the GOP-controlled Florida government went into heavy spin mode, releasing a letter claiming the AP Psychology course can be "taught in its entirety," but only "in a manner that is age and developmentally appropriate." This was widely — and falsely — reported in the press as a "reversal," with even LGBTQ-oriented sites getting caught up in the hype. Thankfully, the team at Popular Information was on hand to debunk the lie, pointing out that the "developmentally appropriate" language is a poison pill that amounts to a de facto ban on the AP Psychology course.
Luckily, the Washington Post quickly updated the story with the correct information, under the headline "Florida schools drop AP Psychology after state says it violates the law."
All this confusion is very much by design. The mixed messages coming from Republican leaders on what is and isn't allowed in schools serves a larger purpose: making it so impossible for teachers to do their jobs that they give up even trying.
In some cases, teachers leave the profession or move to a less hostile state to work. In others, it's more a quiet-quitting, as the limitations force teachers to offer a substandard education to their students, out of fear that actually challenging kids to learn will cross some legal line that will land teachers in serious trouble. Either way, children in red states are losing access to quality education.
Education in Florida has been ravaged by book banning for the last year under the “don’t say gay” law as well as other laws that allow parents to object to almost anything in curriculums. In fact, according to the Parental Rights in Education law, Diaz is inviting any Florida educator to lose his or her job—or worse—by verbally recommending “Romeo and Juliet” to a student or including it in a curriculum.
The confusion and fear sown in Florida’s educational standards are a part of the wrecking operation by far-right groups such as Moms for Liberty and their would-be Il Duce, Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis. A small Evangelical Christian and fascist-minded constituency has lit the bonfire of book banning in Florida’s schools and in those of other American states.
As the WSWS noted in April:
The numbers and types of books that have been removed from Florida schools are truly staggering. In February, in Martin County, Florida, over 80 works, by authors such as Toni Morrison, James Patterson and Jodi Picoult, were removed from elementary school libraries at the request of a single parent, who wrote that these works had no “serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for students.”
The parent, Julie Marshall, is the head of the local chapter of Moms for Liberty.
“One of the books removed, Picoult’s novel The Storyteller (2013), is a bestseller that tells the story of the granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor who meets a former SS officer. “Banning The Storyteller is shocking,” Picoult told the Washington Post, “as it is about the Holocaust and has never been banned before.” This ban recalls the censorship of the graphic novel Maus in Tennessee, an action with distinct overtones of anti-Semitism.
“When one parent in Pinellas County [Florida] complained that Morrison’s first novel, The Bluest Eye (1970), had a rape scene in it, the principal of the local high school banned it, and it was subsequently banned in the entire county. In February over 100 high school students protested the decision.”
Recent banning also includes a graphic novel based on the diary of Holocaust victim Anne Frank, which “was removed from the library at Vero Beach High School in Florida after a complaint from one parent.”
The crusade against culture is not simply one of exclusion, but of active historical falsification. Last month Florida’s State Board of Education approved standards for African American history curriculums that include such historical revisionism as the claim that slavery gave black people a “personal benefit” because they “developed skills,” and that a racist pogrom against blacks in Ocoee, Florida, in 1920 included “acts of violence perpetrated against and by African Americans.”
This week, Ron DeSantis, now a candidate for the presidential nomination of the Republican Party, reinforced his fascist credentials by telling the media that the standards are “probably going to show some of the folks [i.e., slaves] that eventually parlayed, you know, being a blacksmith into doing things later in life.”
This is little more than a rephrase of the South Carolina senator and arch-defender of slavery John C. Calhoun’s notorious 1837 speech before Congress, arguing that African American slaves “had attained a condition so civilized and so improved, not only physically but morally and intellectually … in the course of a few generations it has grown up under the fostering care of our institutions, as reviled as they have been, to its present comparative civilized condition.”
A Civil War was fought to destroy the “fostering care” of those institutions, and it is a marker of the decline of political culture under capitalism that DeSantis can openly echo the reactionary sentiments of the slaveowners.
The book banning, restrictions on Shakespeare and the teaching that slavery was a positive good serve to wipe away all that is progressive and enlightened in world culture and American history and to teach subservience, conformity and worship of authority to a generation of young people now coming into struggle against war, climate change and the very fascism with which the Republicans, with the acquiescence of the Democrats, are poisoning the cultural air.
The materials include videos, magazines and books that in some cases disparage the Black Lives Matter movement, deny that police unfairly target Blacks, question the impact of human use of fossil fuels on the environment, and call out “climate alarmism.” There are videos on “How to Embrace Your Femininity” and “How to Embrace Your Masculinity,” one on “How to Be a Rational Patriot” that says the United States was founded on “Judeo-Christian values,” and one under the categories of “Life Lessons and “Judeo-Christian values” called “How to Learn to Forgive.” Topics covered under the PragerU Kids banner are divided into categories for grades K-2, 3-5 and 6+ and are wide-ranging, including financial literacy, history, civics, character development and life lessons.
The move by the Florida Department of Education is the latest in the DeSantis administration’s efforts to dictate what teachers can say about specific topics. Laws now forbid teachers from discussing sexual orientation and gender identity and restrict what they can say about race and racism in the United States. The department banned an Advanced Placement (AP) class on African American studies and threw the use of an AP class on psychology into question because of discussions of race and gender, respectively. It has also censored textbooks and instructional materials, removing material it says is leftist indoctrination.
PragerU was founded in 2009 by conservative talk show host Dennis Prager and screenwriter/producer Allen Estrin and is promoted as being in the “mind-changing business.” It offers 2,600 videos on its YouTube channel and other materials on its website that it says are aimed at “promoting pro-American values,” some of which have been challenged by historians for accuracy.
“What slavery was really about was separating families, about mutilating humans and even raping their wives,” said Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, who is also running for president. “It was just devastating. So I would hope that every person in our country — and certainly running for president — would appreciate that.”
But DeSantis is continuing to defend the standards. In a recent NBC interview this week, the governor stated that enslaved people “developed skills in spite of slavery, not because of slavery,” adding that “it was them showing resourcefulness and then using those skills once slavery ended.”
In the interview, DeSantis also defended the steps his administration has taken in the past year to overhaul various aspects of that state’s education system. “We’ve been involved in education, not indoctrination,” he said. “Those standards were not political at all.”
The controversy is the latest in a string of education-related fights for DeSantis, including the state’s rejection of the AP African American History course, the dismantling of the state’s tenure system, and the conservative takeover of the small New College of Florida. With each move, DeSantis has attempted to model what he would do nationally as president.
Teachers who use the materials “will not be reprimanded, cannot be pushed back on about it, we are approved on the curriculum”, said Jill Simonian, director of outreach at PragerU Kids, the youth arm of the organization. “More states are following. Florida – I’m applauding. This is step in the right direction.”
“The U.S. Armed Forces allows that discrimination to live on in the discharge papers carried by LGBTQ+ veterans, denying them privacy, benefits, and pride in their service,” reads the class action lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of five veterans.
Veterans who were discharged under “don’t ask don’t tell” for their actual or perceived sexual orientation often received discharge paperwork that identifies their sexuality as the reason for their discharge, according to Tuesday’s lawsuit. The discharge papers, known as DD214s, also burden veterans “with discharge rankings below honorable” and bar them from reenlisting.
“Discharge paperwork bearing these markers carries the legacy of the anti-LGBTQ+ policies that the military has now disavowed,” the lawsuit says.
