Saturday, March 19, 2016

Bernie Tweets

  • Our campaign is being called the most serious threat to establishment politics in a generation. They ain’t seen nothing yet.
  • It's important that we come together in our communities to organize for the change we want to see.
  • We don't have millionaires and billionaires to bundle money from their rich friends. We have you.
  • I will lead the effort for comprehensive immigration reform and a path toward citizenship.


  • This campaign is gaining momentum because we are listening to the pain . They want real change!




  • I'm putting those up here because Bernie's in a fight against Hillary and when Hillary wins we all lose.


    This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"



    Thursday, March 17, 2016.  Chaos and violence continue, the Islamic State takes credit for a plane crash,  Moqtada al-Sadr's followers get ready to turn out in Baghdad, what might a Hillary Clinton presidency mean, and much more.


    In the United States, the battle for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues with War Hawk Hillary Clinton competing with Senator Bernie Sanders.  Tuesday saw Clinton win four primaries.


    Which doesn't mean the race is over.






  • .: It is absurd to say we should rally behind a candidate when only half the country has voted



  • Though some are calling for the issue to be wrapped up, those who remember Hillary staying in through June of 2008 realize she'll look like a real hypocrite should she or her staff begin floating that Sanders should drop out now.


    There's also the fact that he drives the enthusiasm in the race while she brings with her a certain boredom.








    And there is the fact that she's married to Bill Clinton.


    Bill Clinton who cheated on her when he was governor of Arkansas and when he was president of the United States.

    One of the affairs, with Monica Lewinsky, resulted in impeachment (but no removal from office).

    Once a cheater, always a cheater.

    So what might a Hillary Clinton presidency look like on the evening news?



    Andrea Mitchell:  Good evening, I'm Andrea Mitchell and this is NBC NIGHTLY NEWS WITH LESTER HOLT.  Lester is off tonight.  Our top story?  Former president Bill Clinton refuses to vacate the White House.  First up, we go to NBC analyst and host of MEET THE PRESS Chuck Todd. Chuck?

    Chuck Todd: Andrea, they're calling it 14 Days of Do-Nothing.


    Andrea Mitchell: Who's calling it that, Chuck?


    Chuck Todd: Just me, so far, but I'm really hoping this catchs on.   It was 14 days ago that the world learned of Bill Clinton's affair with actress Bernadette Troy.  The scandal continues because of the inaction on the part of the White House and, today, Ms. Troy's announcement today that she will be selling copies of a sex tape with First Gentleman Bill Clinton.


    Andrea Mitchell:  Now is this 'alleged sex tape' or has anyone actually viewed it?


    Chuck Todd:  Thus far, no one has viewed it.  At midnight, it will begin selling and streaming at iTunes and Amazon.  


    Andrea Mitchell:  And there has been no response as of yet to the announcement or the affair.  Thank you, Chuck.  We'll come back to Chuck later in the program but for now we go to NBC News correspondent Michelle Kosinski who was at the White House earlier today when President Hillary Clinton was joined by UK Prime Minister David Cameron to address the issue of Iran's nuclear program.  But the only questions were about Bernadette Troy.  Michelle?


    Michelle Kosinski:  You are correct on that, Andrea.  Finally facing a group of reporters, President Clinton was on the White House lawn this afternoon.  The press was told that she would speak and then Mr. Cameron would make a few remarks.  There would be no questions.  Someone, Andrea, forgot we have a free press.


    Footage of President Hillary Clinton and David Cameron standing at a podium. 

    President Hillary Clinton: And so it is for this reason that we are giving Iran an ultmatium.  They have until midnight --

    Reporter 1:  What about the sex tape!

    Reporter 2:  Have you seen the sex tape, Madam President!

    Reporter 3:  Are you and the First Gentleman sharing the same bedroom still!

    Reporter 4:  Do you forgive him?


    Michelle Kosinski:  President Clinton's remarks on Iran were a footnote to today's event.  Clearly, America wants to know what is going on.  More to the point, they want an answer to that lonely cry: "Do you forgive him?"  Back to you, Andrea.  


    Andrea Mitchell: Thank you, Michelle, for that report.  To grasp what it all means, we go back to NBC news analyst Chuck Todd.  Chuck, you heard Michelle's report.  What do you make of it?


    Chuck Todd:  Clearly on Day 14 of Do-Nothing, the American people want answers.  They need answers.  Remember, this is not the first time Bill Clinton has cheated on the president.  But this is the first time it's happened -- or known to have happened -- since Hillary Clinton was sworn in as president.  


    Andrea Mitchell:  And what does it mean exactly?


    Chuck Todd: Exactly?  My sources say that this was more than just a Lewinski -- much more.  There was penetration --


    Andrea Mitchell: No, Chuck, what does it mean for the country?


    Chuck Todd: I think what the American people are asking is, "Do you forgive him?"  Does President Clinton forgive her husband Bill?


    Andrea Mitchell: Thank you for breaking that down, Chuck.  We now go to entertainment correspondent and TODAY SHOW host Savannah Guthrie.  Savannah, the whole country still wants to know who Bernadine Troy is?


    Savannah Guthrie:  Well, Andrea, Bernadette Troy in Meadville, Pennsylvania in 1988 and went on to a notable career with an episode of DONNY!, a background player on BEST TIME EVER WITH NEIL PATRICK HARRIS! and contributions to many other shows that ended with an exclamation point.  Troy is possibly most recognized for her work with Tom Beregon on infomercials.

    Andrea Mitchell: So she is acclaimed in her field?

    Savannah Guthrie:  Yes, that is correct.  One observer said, and I'm quoting, "Bernadette is like a young Charo or Joey Heatheron before the drugs."


    Chuck Todd: I said that!  Andrea, I said that.


    Andrea Mitchell:  NBC News analyst Chuck Todd.  Chuck, I understand that you are now being cited as an expert on this topic?


    Chuck Todd:  Yes, Andrea that is correct.  Now --



    Andrea Mitchell:  Excuse me, Chuck, we have Richard Engel standing by.  NBC News chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel.  Richard, are you there?


    Richard Engel: Yes, Andrea, I am there or, rather, I am here in downtown Baghdad where protests are breaking out across the region and the root cause of it may be the latest affair of former president Bill Clinton.  In Tehran, the protesters carried signs stating "YANKEE DEVIL WATCH WHERE YOU POKE THAT THING" while in Damascus some signs proclaimed, "YANKEE DEVIL STOP YOUR FORNICATION."

    Andrea Mitchell: And, Richard, I understand that some foreign governments are watching this situation very closely.  

    Richard Engel:  Well in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, leader Kim Jong Un has said that President Hillary Clinton has been bloodied on the world stage insisting that her paralysis on the issue of her marriage is reflective of her larger failure to act on the world stage.  He declared today, and I quote, "Yankee devil Hillary is weak and now is the time to destroy the United States."

    Andrea Mitchell:  Chuck, analysis?


    Chuck Todd:  It would appear President Clinton is being seen as a, quote, "Yankee devil."


    Andrea Mitchell:  Insight!  We'll be right back after these commercial messages.



    In DC today, Secretary of State John Kerry felt the need to speak.

    Felt the need?


    He was under a Congressional order to make a decision by Thursday the 17th as to whether or not the Islamic State was committing genocide.


    Looking like an idiot by waiting until the last minute, Kerry compounded his doofus image by wearing a green tie that was an eye sore and didn't go with the black suit he was wearing.  It was a tired, washed out green.


    We get it, John, you're part Irish.  You can note that with a little lapel pin on St. Patrick's Day, you don't have to wear an ugly tie while holding a news conference.


    John declared the Islamic State "responsible for genocide against groups in areas under its control, including Yezidis, Christians, and Shia Muslims," insisted it was "genocidal by self-proclamation, by ideology, and by actions – in what it says, what it believes, and what it does" and maintained the Islamic State "is also responsible for crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing directed at these same groups and in some cases also against Sunni Muslims, Kurds, and other minorities."


    It was a wordy speech but one bereft of poetry or insight despite the months he had to prepare for it.


    The reaction to the speech?

    A lot of panning.


    For example:






  • Today I wished I be in 's press conference to throw my shoes on his face just like the old days




  • Reactions also included that John Kerry announcing this new status required that certain actions kick in:





  • Since you've denoted ISIS as genocidal, Secretary , why won't the US take in more Syrian & Iraqi refugees for sanctuary?





  • How many Syrian & Iraqi refugees will you accept, President ? Labels like "genocide" come with humanitarian obligations.





  • Meanwhile, John continued to stroke the Shi'ite administration of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi despite the fact that Sunnis continue to be targeted by many Shi'ite militias -- al-Abadi has folded these militias into the official Iraqi forces.







  • MP: militias have kidnapped 1400 civilian men fleeing Anbar. They are being held & tortured south of Baghdad.





  • Meanwhile Moqtada al-Sadr, movement leader and Shi'ite cleric, is calling on his followers to turn out in Baghdad.  STRATFOR describes it as follows:


    Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr has organized a sit-in that will take place March 18 near Baghdad's Green Zone. The objective of the protest, like many before it, is to end government corruption and replace members of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's Cabinet with technocrat ministers. Widely viewed as a symbol of resistance to Western intervention in Iraq, al-Sadr has significant influence over Shiite public opinion. Because al-Sadr's political coalition lacks the parliamentary votes to disapprove new Cabinet members, he has turned to protest to gain leverage with the government. Previously, al-Sadr had given the government 45 days to implement various reforms. 
    During the 11 days of planned protest — set to end on the day of the reform deadline — 15,000-20,000 registered protesters will take turns occupying tents near the Green Zone's three gates. During a phone conversation with the Iraqi president, al-Sadr stressed that the sit-in is a tool to pressure the government, and both sides emphasized the need to maintain order during the protest.



    Hamdi Alkhshali and Ralph Ellis (CNN) report that an Iraqi military plane carrying five people crashed on Wednesday in nothern Iraq and that the Islamic State is claiming they shot the plane down.  REUTERS shares a photo of what is said to be the wreckage -- the photo was taken in Hawija.



    Hawija is home to the notorious massacre of a few years back, the April 23, 2013 massacre of a sit-in in Hawija which resulted from the Iraqi security forces storming in on the orders of then prime minister Nouri al-Maliki and slaughtering citizens.  Alsumaria noted Kirkuk's Department of Health (Hawija is in Kirkuk)  announced 50 activists died and 110 were injured in the assault.   AFP reported the death toll eventually (as some wounded died) rose to 53 dead.   UNICEF noted that the dead included 8 children (twelve more were injured).


    If indeed the Islamic State did down the Iraqi military plane, it will be seen by some as a highly symbolic action/victory as a result of/response to the 2013 massacre.  It also refutes some of John Kerry's boasts in today's speech.



    Today, the US Defense Dept announced/bragged:



    Strikes in Iraq
    Attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 20 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of Iraq’s government:

    -- Near Baghdadi, a strike destroyed an ISIL weapons cache.

    -- Near Rutbah, a strike struck a large ISIL tactical unit.

    -- Near Beiji, a strike struck a large ISIL tactical unit.

    -- Near Fallujah, a strike struck a large ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL staging area and an ISIL mortar position.

    -- Near Hit, four strikes struck two ISIL weapon factories and destroyed an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL bomb and an ISIL supply cache.

    -- Near Kirkuk, a strike destroyed an ISIL machine gun position.

    -- Near Kisik, two strikes destroyed three ISIL beddown locations and four ISIL assembly areas.

    -- Near Mosul, nine strikes struck seven ISIL propaganda sites and two ISIL manufacturing factories.


    Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target.






     

    Thursday, March 17, 2016

    Sad souls

    Why does a Hillary sweep depress us all?

    Because it's here.

    The biggest War Hawk in the race -- and that includes the GOP.

    Hillary is for war and more war.

    ANd it's just really depressing to watch someone like that win.

    It's also upsetting to see the same sites that took her down in 2008 now rush to prop her up.

    DAILY KOS called her a racist in 2008.

    Did they mean it?

    They probably did.

    Then why don't they care now?

    Because they have always been one of the most racist sites online which is why they have had such a small following among African-Americans.

    In 2008, Iraq mattered.

    In 2016, she can get the nomination despite voting for the war, supporting it and lying about it.

    (Lying? For starters she publicly came out against the surge but then, as Robert Gates revealed in his book, told him she only did that for political reasons.)

    She can't be trusted.

    And to see a destructive liar like her win primary after primary makes a body sick.


    This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"




    Tuesday, March 15, 2016.  Chaos and violence continue, Hillary Clinton lies again about Iraq, David Brock's Bordello tries to spin for Hillary, and much more.



    Noted War Hawk and increasingly overweight politician Hillary Clinton has won at least three primaries tonight -- change that to apparently four.

    But she's still the ugly War Hawk whose husband publicly cheated on her repeatedly.


    And, yes, that is an issue.


    Bill cheats.

    It was one thing for her to stand by him as First Lady.

    What would the world think of a president who allowed their spouse to cheat on them?

    Again, Bill cheats.

    This is not the past.


    So, if Hillary gets the nomination and then the presidency, what happens when one of Bill's affairs explodes?


    Does she walk away from him?

    Or does she stand on the world stage humiliated -- the leader of the free world with egg on her face?


    It's a question that has to be asked considering her marriage and what she would represent on the world stage.


    Hillary will never be anyone's first choice.

    But she will always be a War Hawk.

    Last week, she was hugging fellow War Hawk George W. Bush.



    Thanks Hillary for your vote on Iraq! U & 28 other Democrats. Ah, those were the days! Bi-partisanship (pic:3/11/16)

     
     
     



    They look so happy together, her chins waving in the breeze, same breeze fluffing whatever's left of his hairline.


    She showed up Monday night on MSNBC's HARDBALL to yet again lie about why she voted for the Iraq War.  Excerpt.



    Chris Matthews:  Were you smart about Iraq?  Endorsing the president's position on Iraq?  Did you believe ever that Saddam Hussein -- when you had a chance to vote to authorize that war in Iraq -- did you ever believe Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons?

    Hillary Clinton:  I did.

    Chris Matthews: Who told you?

    Hillary Clinton: Well I know at the end of the [my husband's] Clinton administration there was a strong sense that he was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program.  And I like to remind people that at the end of the 90s there was a sense of the Congress passed that my opponent [Senator] Bernie Sanders voted for basically talking about regime change in Iraq --

    Chris Matthews:  That was neocon stuff.

    [Cross talk]

    Hillary Clinton: Bernie Sanders voted for it!

    Chris Matthews:  Why --

    Hillary Clinton:  Chris, I'm just telling you.  That was the prevailing opinion.  And look, I've said it was a mistake

    Chris Matthews:  I want to know about the facts.  Because if you were told by someone that he had nuclear weapons, they weren't telling the truth because Mike Morrell, who was the chief CIA briefer on the subject told me on my show that they never told anybody because they had no evidence that they had nuclear weapons.  So who, if it wasn't the CIA told you that they had nuclear weapons?

    Hillary Clinton:  Well what was going on was a continuing intensive inspection program.  Remember Hans Blix?

    Chris Matthews:  I remember it all.

    Hillary Clinton:  And Hans Blix and his team of inspectors were trying to get to the bottom of this.  Now here's what was misleading is that Saddam Hussein could have ended it immediately.  He could have said come anywhere, look anywhere, we have nothing.  But he didn't choose to do that.  And so inspectors were racing to get to all the sites --

    Chris Matthews:  Yeah.

    Hillary Clinton:  -- because they were worried because remember, at the end of the first Gulf War, we did find evidence of a nuclear weapons program.  Then we had a number of years where we were flying a no-fly zone  over Iraq and where we saw him diverting a lot of money not just into building palaces but building, we thought, programs.

    Chris Matthews:  In the fall of 2002, Dick Cheney said Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons even though the CIA never told him that.

    Hillary Clinton:  Well --

    Chris Matthews:  No, the question is was Donald Trump right when he said they lied?

    Hillary Clinton:  Well you know, I think that -- What Mike Hayden and others have said was an intelligence failure.  Now I don't know --

    Chris Matthews:  Yeah but they never said they had nuclear weapons.  How could it be a 'failure'?

    Hillary Clinton:  They led some people to believe that --

    Chris Matthews:  Yeah, but not with evidence. You didn't have evidence did you?

    Hillary Clinton:  We had -- What we had -- what I had, let me speak for myself --

    Chris Matthews:  You never had evidence of nuclear weapons.

    Hillary Clinton:  No.  But that was because the inspection program had not been completed and where I stood was I believed George W. Bush when he said we are going to let the inspectors finish the job.  This vote will give me the leverage, he claimed, to make sure that happens.  Read Hans Blix's book --

    Chris Matthews:  Why did you trust George W.?

    Hillary Clinton:  Well, you know, I-I thought that using diplomacy -- which seemed to me was what he was offering -- made a lot of sense.


    She's lying yet again.

    She can only lie, that's all she has to offer.

    She never objected when Bully Boy Bush refused to let the inspectors finish their job.

    She's a liar.

    But let's let her have her lie -- Bully Boy Bush tricked her!!!!!!

    How stupid do you have to be to get tricked by George W. Bush?

    How stupid do you have to be?


    This is Bully Boy Bush who couldn't get the quote right, "Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me . . . I won't get fooled again!"

    The quote is fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.

    The fool here would be Hillary Clinton.

    If that's how she wants to play -- tricked by the idiot Bush -- then she's the fool.


    Michael Moore noted the Iraq section of the interview.



  • Matthews: "We have 100K people dead in iraq. Why do u keep wanting to do regime change? What's in your thinking - just knock off leaders?"


  • Tonight Chris Matthews asked Clinton 3 times who told u Iraq had WMD. She wouldn't answer. Evaded truth again by invoking 9/11. Shame again.

  • There was much more to the HARDBALL interview.  Philip Weiss (MONDO WEISS) notes:

    “Part of what certainly influenced me” to support the Iraq war was George Bush pledging billions to rebuild New York after 9/11 a year before her vote, Hillary Clinton said last night. The comment is getting a lot of attention: folks are asking whether Hillary Clinton got bribed to support the Iraq war.


    Francesca Chambers (DAILY MAIL) notes another aspect of the interview:


    Hillary Clinton claimed during a town hall that its unfair to compare her vote for the Iraq War to her support for forced regime change in Libya because 'we didn't lose a single person' in the latter country. 
    The statement ignores the terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012 that killed four Americans, including American Ambassador Chris Stevens, while she was secretary of state.
    Clinton's regime change record came up during an interview with Chris Matthews yesterday evening on MSNBC in the context of the Democratic presidential race and Bernie Sanders' opposition to U.S. involvement in both conflicts.
    The four Americans known to be killed* were Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Chris Stevens.
    *Known to be killed?
    Hillary has offered Congressional testimony of meeting with other victims of the attack in a military hospital and some of them dying.
    It's Congressional testimony -- in an open forum -- and no one ever wants to question her on that.
    Even though she's a serial liar who repeatedly gets caught lying.
    Her latest lie ("we didn't lose a single person") has generated strong responses such as this Tweet:
    That bitch already forgot Clinton:Libya not like Iraq because 'we didn't lose a single person'
     
     
     





    Over at David Brock's Bordello, professional whores Tyler Cherry, Nick Fernandez and Bobby Lewis try all forms of positions to try to make believe Hillary was not forgetting Benghazi, just speaking of the conflict.


    David's service boys should close their mouths and legs and probably bathe in something stronger than soap to get rid of the crabs.



    They're lying and whoring.

    Reality, Barack didn't put US boots on the ground in the battle.

    Hillary knows that.

    So her self-praise that "we didn't lose" a person in Libya?


    Her concern should be with the people of Libya.

    She supported war on Libya and she should be concerned about what the support brought.


    As for her little whore David Brock, no one believes a word that comes out of David Brock's Bordello.


    And not everyone is as quick as Brock to strip off their ethics.


    Some reaction on Twitter includes:




  • Nothing is more weaselly than US pols who voted for the Iraq War blaming their choice on "intelligence failure," unless they mean their own.


  • Bob Graham, one of few senators who actually read CIA report on WMD in Iraq, changed his vote to NO after reading it









  • Oh my god, just home from an event, seeing Hillary openly admit she had no evidence of WMD in Iraq & that her vote was a favor trade with W.


  • Says a woman who voted in favor of the Iraq War.


  • We can ask women in Iraq and Syria if they have benefited from Hillary's interventionist policies






  • Today, the US Defense Dept announced/bragged:


    Strikes in Iraq
    Rocket artillery and attack, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft conducted 14 strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of the Iraqi government:
    -- Near Huwayjah, a strike suppressed an ISIL mortar position.
    -- Near Hit, four strikes struck a large ISIL tactical unit and an ISIL improvised weapons factory, destroying four ISIL fighting positions and suppressing an ISIL rocket position.
    -- Near Kirkuk, two strikes destroyed an ISIL heavy machine gun and an ISIL fighting position and suppressed an ISIL fighting position.
    -- Near Mosul, four strikes struck an ISIL training camp and two ISIL improvised explosive device factories and destroyed four ISIL assembly areas.
    -- Near Qayyarah, a strike destroyed an ISIL mortar position.
    -- Near Ramadi, two strikes struck two large ISIL tactical units.

    Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target.



    The Iraq War started under Bully Boy Bush continues under Barack Obama and would continue under Hillary Clinton.






    Blog Archive