Earlier this week, in "Linda McMahon -- grifter and accused of being involved in a pedo ring," I noted I was shocked to discover Chump's inept Secretary of Education was accused of being involved in a pedo ring and the case is still to be determined. Today, Sophie Clark (Independent) reports more problems for Linda's husband:
Vince McMahon is facing further allegations of assault by former World Wrestling Entertainment employee Janel Grant, as part of an ongoing lawsuit against the former WWE CEO.
A new graphic and disturbing 40-page affidavit filed by Grant accuses McMahon of rape, coercion, and physical and mental abuse. It also alleges that current WWE President Nick Khan was aware of her circumstances, and accuses other WWE employees of abuse and cover-up.
This affidavit is part of Grant’s lawsuit, which was launched in January 2024. McMahon is fighting the suit while reportedly attempting to return to WWE.
“I
felt used, leveraged, humiliated, shamed, dehumanized, intimidated, and
exploited for the business and the sexual gratification of these men,”
stated Grant in her affidavit obtained by The Independent.
Grant’s affidavit alleges that she met McMahon through a friend. Shortly afterward, he helped her get a job in the WWE legal department in 2019 after she suffered from a family tragedy. She alleges his predatory behavior began almost immediately.
She says that as soon as she got the job, “Vince made his next overtly sexual move and, despite my saying no and to stop, put his hand in my pants. I do not remember what happened next because I blacked out.”
She added, “in retrospect I see that Vince created my job so he could monitor me and engage in predatory behaviors more easily.”
Grant was hired to work in WWE's legal department in 2019, and said her encounters with McMahon -- who lived in the same condominium complex -- became sexual relatively quickly. By 2020, she said she felt trapped in her relationship because of the COVID-19 pandemic relegating her and McMahon to work from home in the same building.
"Vince had unlimited access to me to act on his sexual impulses on any day, at any time. I could not escape from him at work or home," she said.
Grant said she was forced into multiple threesomes with McMahon, his "friend" and on another occasion with Laurinaitis.
Grant also offered more details on her interactions with Lesnar, the WWE superstar whom she previously identified as someone McMahon would traffic to. Although the two never met in person, Grant said in the new filing that she was contacted by Lesnar in 2021, that he went by "Polish Joe" and that he asked for nude photos and sought to have her travel to meet him.
"I now understood that I would not only be expected to perform sexually for Brock, but I would also be expected to travel to other states to do so," she said in the affidavit.
The McMahons are not only accused of being part of a pedo ring, her husband is also accused of harassment. And she's a sitting member of Chump's Cabinet?
This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has fired the highest-ranking Army officer in the country in the middle of the U.S. war on Iran.
On Thursday, CBS News reported that Hegseth had asked Gen. Randy George, the Army’s chief of staff, to step down and retire. The Biden appointee’s term was set to end in 2027; Army chiefs of staff typically serve four-year terms. George joins more than a dozen high-ranking military officers who have been fired since Hegseth and his ultra-hawkish ideology took over at the Pentagon.
The tension with Mr. Hegseth was not rooted in substantive differences over the direction of the Army, military officials said. Rather it is the product of Mr. Hegseth’s long-running grievances with the Army, battles over personnel and his troubled relationship with Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll, the officials said.
Over the last year, General George and Mr. Driscoll had formed a tight partnership, officials said.
Mr. Hegseth has also clashed in recent months with General George and Mr. Driscoll over the defense secretary’s decision to block the promotion of four Army officers to be one-star generals.
Two of the officers targeted by Mr. Hegseth are Black and two are women on a promotion list that consisted of 29 other officers, most of whom are white men. Mr. Hegseth’s highly unusual decision to remove the officers prompted some senior military officials to question whether they were being singled out because of their race or gender, officials said.
Mr. Hegseth had been pressing Mr. Driscoll and General George for months to remove the officers from the promotion list. But Mr. Driscoll and General George refused, citing the officers’ long records of exemplary service.
Two weeks ago, General George asked Mr. Hegseth to meet with him to discuss the removal of the four officers from the one-star list, as well as the general’s view that Mr. Hegseth was interfering unnecessarily in Army personnel decisions overall, the officials said. Mr. Hegseth refused to meet with General George about the matter, they said.
[. . .]
In addition to removing General George, Mr. Hegseth also fired Gen. David M. Hodne, who was promoted in October to lead the Army’s Transformation and Training Command, a key four-star position focused on Army modernization and doctrine.
Mr. Hegseth also fired Maj. Gen. William Green Jr., the Army’s top chaplain, an official said.
In the midst of a war, Hegseth is firing generals? A war that has gone very poorly and is extremely unpopular?
The American people don't like the war and they don't like Chump.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
Committee Ranking Members argue that the scheme “will set the stage for more dysfunction in a federal student aid system that the Trump Administration has already made more expensive and confusing to navigate”
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ron Wyden (D-OR), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) pressed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent to rescind their plans to move the administration of federal student loans to the Treasury Department (Treasury), the latest move in the Trump administration’s attempts to dismantle the Department of Education (ED).
The lawmakers are the Ranking Members of the Senate Appropriations Committee; Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee; Senate Finance Committee; and Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies.
“This latest illegal scheme from the Trump Administration threatens to trap student loan borrowers, students, and families in chaos and bureaucracy, all while American taxpayers are left to foot the bill for Treasury to administer programs that ED can and should administer itself,” wrote the lawmakers.
Congress recently reaffirmed on a bicameral, bipartisan basis that ED has no authority to transfer its statutory responsibilities to other agencies, stating that doing so would “create inefficiencies, result in additional costs to the American taxpayer, and cause delays.”
Contrary to that directive, ED’s most recent interagency agreement (IAA) transfers its responsibilities of managing student loans and federal student aid to Treasury, without Congressional authorization. Previous IAAs transferred ED’s management of career and technical education programs, adult education grant programs, along with dozens of programs for early childhood, elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education out of ED.
“The Trump administration’s record of haphazard decision making and utter disregard for the actual issues facing students, families, and student loan borrowers suggests that this IAA will be implemented in a way that leaves borrowers with limited options and little to no guidance while increasing the number of borrowers in default and economic distress,” warned the lawmakers.
The senators argued that the first phase of the IAA is likely to worsen the student loan default crisis, because it tasks Treasury — an agency with no experience in student loan administration — with collecting on defaulted student loan debt and helping borrowers exit default. They cited the Treasury Department’s reductions in force as reason to doubt the success of the new arrangement, in addition to a pilot study where Treasury was made responsible for collections and loan rehabilitation for several thousand student loan borrowers but only successfully completed rehabilitations for eight.
Further, the senators argued that the second and third phases of the IAA — in which Treasury will be tasked with potentially managing the entire federal student loan portfolio and administering the FAFSA form — are illegal and likely to throw the financial aid system into further disarray.
“Treasury’s lack of expertise in the federal student aid system could be disastrous for the implementation of the latter phases of the IAA, as the federal student aid system is highly complex and administrative errors could endanger access to financial aid or statutory debt cancellation,” wrote the senators. “This ill-advised plan also ignores the laws of Congress.”
ED’s IAA with the Department of Labor for Career and Technical Education and Adult Education, programs which are a fraction of the size and less complex than student loan programs, have cost ED over $1 million in extra program costs and resulted in weeks-long delays in grant disbursements, harming students and schools.
“(I)t is reckless for ED to enter into another IAA with no information or clarity on the cost,” said the senators.
“The ED-Treasury IAA will set the stage for more dysfunction in a federal student aid system that the Trump Administration has already made more expensive and confusing to navigate…We call upon you to rescind these IAAs immediately,” concluded the lawmakers.
The senators asked Secretary McMahon and Secretary Bessent to provide details on the cost of transferring student loan administration to Treasury, basic information on the staff responsible for and the timing of the IAA, and how Treasury will be held accountable for poor performance in administering its new student loan responsibilities by April 15, 2026.
Senator Murray has aggressively pushed back against Secretary McMahon’s efforts to dismantle the Department, including through the illegal use of IAAs, and she fought to insert ironclad language in the fiscal year 2026 funding bill for the Department that would bar Secretary McMahon’s use of IAAs to dismantle the Department—but Republicans refused to include new, binding language. The final agreement did, however, make clear there is no legal authority for the Department of Education to slough off core responsibilities through these agreements.
The full text of the letter is available HERE.
###
