Thursday, July 18, 2024

Shady doesn't wanna -- leave the Senate, go to prison

maxi trump

 

That's Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Donald Trump On The Wings Of A Maxi" and it went up last night.



Shady Menendez earned his name long ago.  So this news from Alex Woodward and Gustaf Kilander (Independent) should not be a surprise:


Senator Bob Menendez has rejected a report that he’s set to resign from Congress after a jury convicted the longtime New Jersey lawmaker on federal corruption charges.

It was previously reported by NBC News the senator told allies that he plans to resign, but he refuted that version of events when speaking to CBS News.


“I can tell you that I have not resigned nor have I spoken to any so-called allies ... Seems to me that there is an effort to try to force me into a statement. Anyone who knows me knows that’s the worst way to achieve a goal with me,” he told CBS on Wednesday.


He just got convicted, found guilty on all 16 felony counts.  And he's refusing to step down.  Shady.  


I hope they lock him up for a long, long time.

 

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 

Thursday, July 18, 2024.  Joe Biden has COVID while the RNC convention turns out to be a super-spreader for lies, and much more.

Last night, Team Biden sent out a message from US President Joe Biden.  It opened, "I'm sick..." and then continued:


 …of Elon Musk trying to buy this election for himself and his billionaire buddies.

Did you see he pledged 45 million bucks a month to help reelect Donald Trump in November? I’m not kidding. 


But you are, Joe, but you are.


The reason most people opened that e-mail after the headline of "I'm sick . . ." is because Joe is, in fact, sick.  He has COVID.  Again.  This is his third time.   Ana Faguy and Tom Bateman (BBC NEWS)  notes:

President Joe Biden faces new questions over his candidacy in the November election - with his campaign events currently on pause due to a Covid-19 infection.

The top two Democrats in the US Congress, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, are both reported to have met him individually to express concerns over his bid for the White House.

Nancy Pelosi, the former House Speaker, has also privately told him that he cannot beat Donald Trump in November's election, according to CNN.

Mr Biden’s re-election attempt was already being buffeted by growing dissent among top Democrats after his disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump last month.

Announcing his Covid infection on Wednesday, Mr Biden's press secretary said the 81-year-old was facing mild symptoms.

He would isolate at his home in Delaware while carrying out "all of his duties fully", said Karine Jean-Pierre. She added that the president was vaccinated and boosted. He has tested positive for Covid twice before. 


He was already on limited campaigning -- roughly from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm.  And how he's got off the campaign trail?  This is nonsense.  We're expected to shut up and accept his lousy campaigning and his mental decline and now he's also got to take time off for COVID -- third time COVID?

He needs to step aside.  He's not up to four more years.  He needs to step aside and let a healthy and robust candidate step forward and save the election. In last night's ",Step aside, COVID Joe" Elaine noted the polls, noted the drag he was on other Democratic Party candidates in their down ticket races and noted his bizarre attack in a Zoom call last Saturday where he snapped at US House Rep Jason Crow, "Tell me something you've ever done with your Bronze Star like my son."  As Elaine pointed out, "Also, not a good look.  Being proud of your son?  Great.  But, Joe, you didn't serve in Vietnam.  It looks a little cowardly for you to bring up your son to Crow who served several tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. "  


A strong majority of Democrats want President Joe Biden to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race, new polling finds, as faith in his mental fitness drops and Democratic lawmakers are stepping up their efforts to replace him with a different candidate.

AP-NORC’s latest polling released Wednesday finds that 65 percent of Democrats say that Biden should step aside and allow the party to choose a different candidate. Only 35 percent say that he should stay in the race.

Opposition to Biden’s continued candidacy is especially strong among younger people — a key demographic for Democrats — with 75 percent of those aged 18 to 44 agreeing that he should withdraw, though a strong majority of those older than 45 also believe another candidate should be selected.

The findings come amid growing concern over Biden’s health, with only 3 in 10 Democrats saying they’re “extremely” or “very” confident that Biden can effectively serve as president, down by roughly 10 percentage points from a February AP-NORC poll.

These concerns were largely sparked after Biden’s disastrous debate performance at the end of June, though progressives have long been warning Biden that he is risking his chances of winning due to his funding of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Concerns about his health have compounded in recent weeks, however, with the president doubling down on his candidacy even as he continues to make embarrassing gaffes in every public appearance.


On THE MAJORITY REPORT, Sam and Emma note all the problems Joe Biden is creating for their party.





In further bad news for Joe, THE NATIONAL reports:

The US announced on Wednesday that it will end aid delivery to Gaza through its temporary pier and instead send relief for the Palestinian enclave to Ashdod port in Israel.

The pier was plagued by many issues including severe weather damage, ensuring security and increasing aid to Gazans, who are wrestling with worsening humanitarian aid crises.

But the US insists the temporary pier was "successful" despite the challenges.



$230 million wasted by Joe on this project.  Promised in his State of the Union Address and presented as we're going to rush to get this done project.  It didn't actually start construction until May.  Late opening and no real results to speak of although it was apparently used by the Israeli government in the staging of at least one attack on Palestinian civilians.

The pier may be the best exxample of the inertia of Joe's administration.



In Wisconsin, the GOP continues their convention.  It wraps tonight.  I don't encourage anyone to watch but we will find out tonight whether or not Donald's going to take the maxi pad off the side of his head or not. 
maxi trump


Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Donald Trump On The Wings Of A Maxi" went up late last night or early this morning depending upon your time zone. 



"I cannot believe you don't care about a political convention!" a few insist in e-mails.

First off, check the ratings, most people -- like me -- are not watching this garbage live.  I'm not going to sit through hours of hate speech and violent threats. and never-ending lies.  Most Americans aren't, again check the ratings.

In the past?   Ava and I've covered them before, we've attended them before to cover them.  I don't see the point in watching lies live on television.  I read the day after and even there I'm encountering too much repeating of  lies.  Amplifying them.


Isn't that all Joseph Morton does in "Ted Cruz bashes Biden immigration record during Republican National Convention speech" (DALLAS MORNING NEWS)?  That's journalism?

In a 34 paragraph 'essay' -- don't call it a report, it's not reporting -- he offers two paragraphs of 'critique' -- paragraph 8 and paragraph 15:



Critics of the GOP focus on those crimes cite research indicating undocumented immigrants have lower crime rates than native-born citizens and legal immigrants.

And:

Critics have said figures Cruz and other Republicans often cite are inflated or misleading because many migrants encountered at the border were quickly turned away under pandemic-era public health policies or sent back to their countries of origin.


34 paragraphs and that passes for a fact check?  Before he published that piece yesterday morning, I had already heard this segment of Wednesday's DEMOCRACY NOW!




AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, “War, Peace and the Presidency: Breaking with Convention.” I’m Amy Goodman. We’re broadcasting from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, from the Republican National Convention.

On Tuesday night, several of Donald Trump’s former rivals endorsed the Trump-Vance ticket. Speakers at the RNC included former Ambassador Nikki Haley, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Texas Senator Ted Cruz and Vivek Ramaswamy.

Much of the evening focused on the party’s hard-line border and immigration policies. The 2024 Republican platform backs Trump’s pledge to carry out, quote, “the largest deportation operation in American history,” unquote, and to stop what it calls a “migrant crime epidemic.” This is Texas Senator Ted Cruz speaking last night.

SEN. TED CRUZ: Never before has an election mattered so much. We are facing an invasion on our southern border — not figuratively, a literal invasion. Eleven-point-five million people have crossed our border illegally under Joe Biden. Every day Americans are dying, murdered, assaulted, raped by illegal immigrants that the Democrats have released. Teenage girls and boys wearing colored wristbands are being sold into a life of sex slavery. This is evil, and it’s wrong. And it is happening every damn day. Today, as a result of Joe Biden’s presidency, your family is less safe, your children are less safe, the country is less safe. But here’s the good news: We can fix it. And when Donald Trump is president, we will fix it.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz, speaking here in Milwaukee at the Republican National Convention last night. There’s no data linking immigrants to rising crime.

For more, we’re joined by Jean Guerrero, contributing opinion writer for The New York Times, author of the book Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda. Her latest piece is headlined “How Biden Can Win Over Young Latinos.” She’s a senior fellow at the UCLA Latina Futures 2050 Lab and a former opinion columnist at the Los Angeles Times. She’s joining us from Los Angeles.

Jean, welcome back to Democracy Now! Why don’t you summarize your response to what Ted Cruz was saying, in particular? And, overall, the theme of last night was the issue of immigration and safety, as they put it, immigration and crime, Jean.

JEAN GUERRERO: Exactly. Great to be here, Amy.

What we saw last night was the politics of hate. The Republican Party is not letting up on its deceptive anti-immigrant hatemongering. Again, this is a politics of hate, that is rooted in the deceptive demonization of one of the most vulnerable groups in the United States, which is immigrants.

And Texas Senator Ted Cruz’s speech was one of the most debased and deceptive of the week. He listed example after example of Americans being killed by immigrants, which, as you noted, Amy, immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes than people who are born in the United States. Data consistently shows this. But this is a strategy that has been used by Trump, and it’s straight out of the playbook of Trump’s senior adviser Stephen Miller, which is to take aberrant examples, unusual examples of crimes and to paint them as the norm. This is a strategy that was used by the Nazis to vilify Jewish people and other groups that they didn’t like. They published lists of crimes committed by these people to create the false notion that these are monsters, that they’re subhuman, that they’re a threat to society.

And this is what we saw last night, that even in the wake of Trump’s assassination attempt, the Republican Party is not letting up on its anti-immigrant hatemongering, on its very dangerous and deceptive rhetoric, which is not surprising, given that when Trump was shot, he was in the middle of anti-immigrant hatemongering. If he hadn’t turned to look at that chart showing border crossing statistics, he might be dead. So, as the Republican Party is painting Trump as the victim of demonization by the left, Trump and the Republican Party continue with its classic anti-immigrant hatemongering, which is endangering this group of people and Latinos across the United States who come from mixed-status families.

AMY GOODMAN: And we should say, as Senator Cruz spoke, as Nikki Haley spoke, as our next clip we’re going to play of a mom who lost her son to fentanyl spoke, President Trump was there sitting next to J.D. Vance, and President Trump had a bandage over his right ear after Saturday’s assassination attempt. I want to go to another speaker at the RNC last night, and that was Anne Fundner of Southern California, who said her son Weston’s fentanyl overdose death was because Biden opened, quote, “our borders.” This is a clip.

ANNE FUNDNER: We did everything right. I had those conversations with him, and fentanyl still found my son. And on February 27th, 2022, our lives were shattered, and our baby was gone. This was not an overdose; it was a poisoning. His whole future, everything we ever wanted for him, was ripped away in an instant. And Joe Biden does nothing. I hold Joe Biden, Kamala Harris — the border czar, what a joke — and Gavin Newsom, and every Democrat who supports open borders, responsible for the death of my son.

AMY GOODMAN: In fact, data shows fentanyl is largely smuggled by U.S. citizens across U.S. ports of entry. Jean Guerrero, this is a statistic that you talk about. The statistic is 90%?

JEAN GUERRERO: Exactly, about 90% of fentanyl is actually smuggled through ports of entry, not through the desert, and it’s smuggled by U.S. citizens, not by immigrants. So the Republican Party is misusing a legitimate tragedy to manipulate perceptions about what is happening at the border.

This woman’s son, Weston, should not have died. It is a tragedy that he died. However, this blame on, quote-unquote, “open borders” is misleading, to say the least, because the border, first of all, is not open. Biden has deployed more Border Patrol agents than any president in U.S. history. They have had record fentanyl seizures under his administration. And again, when fentanyl is smuggled across the border, it is smuggled through ports of entry, which are always open. And there’s — yeah, the Trump administration also kept the ports of entry open because you have legitimate commercial traffic that needs to be coming across the borders. And that is where the fentanyl is being smuggled, not through the desert.

AMY GOODMAN: And can you respond to Senator Cruz saying that immigrants commit murders, I think he said, “every damn day”?

JEAN GUERRERO: That’s extremely deceptive. Again, immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes than people who are born in the United States. They have a lot more to lose, particularly undocumented immigrants. The statistics consistently show that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes. And so, this idea that they’re committing crimes every day is just absolutely bonkers.

But it’s a strategy that is very classic Stephen Miller. My book was about Trump senior adviser Stephen Miller. And one of the things that they did under the Trump administration was they created an office called the VOICE. It was for the victims of immigration crimes. And it was constantly publishing lists of immigrants committing crimes, which, again, creates the false notion that they’re out there disproportionately committing crimes, when in fact that is not the case.

And if you wanted to demonize somebody based on a statistical fact, you might choose, for example, the fact that white men are disproportionately responsible for mass shootings. But, of course, you don’t see anybody advocating for the mass detention or deportation of white men, because that would be crazy. And again, this is based on a completely false notion that immigrants are more likely to commit crimes, which is — it’s just not the case.

AMY GOODMAN: Kari Lake, who’s running for Arizona’s Senate seat left vacant by Kyrsten Sinema, kicked off the RNC on Tuesday night, lashing out against the media and her Senate race opponent, Congressmember Ruben Gallego.

KARI LAKE: You have spent the last eight years lying about President Donald Trump and his — and his amazing patriotic supporters. Actually, guys, they lie about everything. They’ve lied about Joe Biden’s health, the economy, the laptop, the border. I could go on and on and on. But the really good news is that every day more and more people are turning off the fake news. And they’re — that’s right. And Americans are waking up to the truth about the disastrous Democrat policies pushed by Joe Biden and his favorite congressman, my opponent, Ruben Gallego.

These guys, they are full — they’re full of bad ideas. Just last week, Ruben Gallego voted to let the millions of people who poured into our country illegally cast a ballot in this upcoming election. Gallego and the Democrats have handed over control of my state Arizona’s border to the drug cartels. And because of them, criminals and deadly drugs are pouring in, and our children are dying. Our children are getting their hands on these drugs and dying.

AMY GOODMAN: Kari Lake falsely said that her opponent, the Congressmember Ruben Gallego, quote, “voted to let millions of people who poured into our country illegally cast a ballot in this upcoming election,” unquote. However, she did not mention that it’s already banned by federal law for noncitizens to vote. Lake is a former TV news anchor who lost Arizona’s governor’s race and has since become a face for Trump’s 2020 election denial movement. Jean Guerrero, her comments?

JEAN GUERRERO: Gallego is a moderate on immigration. And what the Republican Party does is, regardless of whether you are a moderate, which is the case with Biden — you know, he has, as I mentioned earlier, increased border security to unprecedented levels. But regardless of whether you take a moderate stance on immigration, they’re going to say that you have opened the borders, that you are in favor of people coming across the border without any sort of security measures, without any enforcement. And that’s just simply not the case.

But they are heavily leaning on this because they have nothing else to offer the American people. It’s a scapegoating politics, which is rooted in stoking fear and stoking hate and creating the impression that there’s a dystopic reality at the border, which simply is not the case. You know, Trump promised to shut down the border, and he was not able to build the wall that he said he was going to build, because it’s physically impossible to build a 2,000-mile structure along the terrain that exists at the border.

So, President Biden is doing the best that he can, and Democrats like Gallego are in favor of moderate immigration strategies that embrace certain levels of border security. And the Republican Party simply takes that completely out of context, ignores that, and claims that they’re in favor of open borders, which is just absolutely not the case.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to another clip. We’re on the floor of the convention at night. This is another Arizona delegate, named Stacey Goodman, who spoke with Democracy Now!’s Renée Feltz. Goodman wore a white patch of paper on her right ear, similar to the bandage Trump is wearing at the RNC on his right ear after the assassination attempt on Saturday.

STACEY GOODMAN: I’m here to serve my community, my country. What I have on my right ear is in solidarity with President Trump. He got shot on Saturday. Somebody attempted to take his life. It was an attempted assassination, all because of the rhetoric on the left. Even Joe Biden said it, and he even apologized for it. He said, “We need to put Donald Trump in the bull’s-eye.” So, crazy people take that as meaning, you know — you know, the hypocrisy is ridiculous, because the left says, “Oh, unity, unity, unity,” but there is no unity on the left. Look what CNN did today, said D.J. [sic] Vance is more toxic than Trump. Where’s the unity in that? No.

RENÉE FELTZ: And I just have to ask. It does seem like it’s being reported that this young man was able to use a gun purchased by his father and that the family, or at least the young man was a registered Republican. So, it seems —

STACEY GOODMAN: He wasn’t a registered Republican, OK? His Facebook page was wiped. He was not a registered Republican. That’s just the narrative of the left. He was not a Republican.

RENÉE FELTZ: What was he?

STACEY GOODMAN: I’m not 100% sure, but he was probably mentally ill and easily swayed by the left.

RENÉE FELTZ: OK. Can I ask you one other question —

STACEY GOODMAN: Sure.

RENÉE FELTZ: — about immigration? It seems like it’s a major topic tonight. Is it a big one for you?

STACEY GOODMAN: Well, yeah. I’m all for people coming into this country and supporting this country, speaking English, assimilating. What we have — and I’m from a border state — we have open borders. We have illegal immigrants coming in here, killing, raping and maiming our children. OK? That is not acceptable. The border wall —

RENÉE FELTZ: But you’re saying that’s not all of them?

STACEY GOODMAN: The border wall needs to be finished. Joe Biden, had he just left that alone, we would have had a complete border wall. The blood is on Joe Biden’s hands and his administration’s.

RENÉE FELTZ: Just real quick, there are some people who have drawn attention to reports that show that U.S.-born citizens are much more likely to commit crimes than immigrants.

STACEY GOODMAN: That’s a lie. That’s an out-and-out lie. I don’t know where you’re getting your information from, but it’s a lie.

RENÉE FELTZ: One, I got it from a study that was done by Northwestern, who used census data.

STACEY GOODMAN: No. No. No, not buying it.

RENÉE FELTZ: And one other — 

STACEY GOODMAN: I was a police officer for 21 years. I will tell you, illegal immigrants commit more crimes than anyone else, because, first of all, they’re coming into this country — they’re committing a crime by coming into this country, so they don’t care about our laws. They don’t abide by our laws.

AMY GOODMAN: In fact, it’s been widely reported that Thomas Matthew Crooks was in fact a registered Republican, who would have been eligible to cast his first presidential vote in November for the election. Public records also show Crooks’ father is a registered Republican, his mother a registered Democrat, and that, as a 17-year-old, Crooks made a $15 donation to a Democratic Party cause. Jean Guerrero, you’ve been shaking your head through this comment. Stacey Goodman is a retired police officer.

JEAN GUERRERO: Yeah, she mentioned blood on Biden’s hands. If you want to talk about somebody who has blood on their hands, the Republican Party has spent the last seven years normalizing the white supremacist “great replacement” theory, which has been used by white terrorists, by white extremists across the world and in this country to commit horrific acts of violence against Mexican Americans, against Latinos, against Black people, and it’s one of the most dangerous theories that exists today. And it has been normalized in U.S. politics. It’s the idea that immigrants are being brought to the United States to replace white people. It confuses demographic change and demographic growth with demographic subtraction and demographic violence. It’s extremely deceptive and manipulative, and the Republican Party has been doing this for seven years. And so, it’s, of course, no surprise that under the Trump administration we saw the worst, the most deadly attack against the Mexican American community that the United States has seen, in El Paso, when you saw the white supremacist shooter attack a Walmart because of this theory.

So, the notion that Trump is the victim, that he is being victimized, or that Americans are being victimized by the Democratic Party’s border policies, completely ignores the reality, which is that President Biden has deployed historic numbers of agents to the border. They’re seeing record seizures of fentanyl. He has kept in place a majority of Trump’s restrictive policies at the border. And again, the research consistently shows that immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes, and this includes undocumented immigrants. Undocumented immigrants are far less likely to commit crimes.

AMY GOODMAN: Jean Guerrero, before we go, I want to ask you about your latest piece in The New York Times, “How Biden Can Win Over Young Latinos.” You say that 20% of the Latino population that will be voting will be voting for the first time. What is the significance of this?

JEAN GUERRERO: So, the focus has been on the MAGA Latino. Every time you talk about the Latino vote in the national media, you hear about the MAGA Latino, the Latino who’s supporting Trump. And while this is a reality of a segment of the Latino voters, those who are going to determine the future of the Latino vote are young progressive voters, who are overrepresented, actually, in battleground states. So, if President Biden focuses on turning out this young Latino electorate, it can make all the difference.

And these are Latinos who are very, very progressive. They believe in a pathway to citizenship for long-term undocumented immigrants. They believe in abortion rights. They believe in stopping climate change. They believe in stopping gun violence. They’re more likely to belong to groups that have been harmed by Trump. They’re more likely to identify as LGBTQ. They’re more likely to have a family member or a close friend who is undocumented.

So, if President Biden wants to win over young Latinos, he needs to take the group of people that Trump has chosen to persecute systematically, and show that he has what it takes to defend them. He has already taken significant actions as far as executive action to provide deportation relief to the undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens. However, he needs to go farther than that. He needs to take much bolder action to show that he is in fact a fighter for oppressed communities.

Right now there is an impression among young voters, including Latino voters, that he is as bad with oppressed communities as Trump, because of the horrors in Gaza. And there is one way — there is just one way that President Biden can counter that narrative, and it is to take these people that Trump is victimizing, that the Republican Party is victimizing, and show that he has what it takes to defend them and take bold action to provide deportation relief to all undocumented people who have lived here a long time, who have U.S. citizen children here, who were essential workers during the pandemic, and make sure that they can be safe here, they can continue paying taxes, and they can continue to save this economy from a recession.

AMY GOODMAN: Jean Guerrero, we want to thank you for being with us, author of Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda. We’ll link to your piece in The New York Times, “How Biden Can Win Over Young Latinos.”




Get it?

One is reporting and one is stenography.

And those two 'fact checks' Morton did aren't even specific, nor did they require any research.  'Some say . . .'  Send Joey back to the steno pool.




“We are facing an invasion on our southern border,” Cruz said as he began. “Not figuratively. A literal invasion. 11.5 million people have crossed our border illegally under Joe Biden.”

That’s not true. A number of those counted as having been apprehended at the border were turned away. Millions more were deported and millions remain in detention.

“But,” Cruz continued, “the numbers don’t show us the true price that our country is paying.”

That cost? That “every day, Americans are dying — murdered, assaulted, raped by illegal immigrants that the Democrats have released.” The accuracy of that sweeping, unsupported statement notwithstanding, it has been demonstrated repeatedly that immigrants are less likely to commit crime than native-born Americans.




Cruz was building to something, though, exaggerating the number of immigrants in the country and the threat they pose so that he could make a staggering, dishonest claim about his political opponents.



We could go on and on but I think Philip Bump's already demonstrated that some do the work and some people fluff.  What's really sad though is that Morton is supposed to be the stronger of the two since Morton works at a Texas outlet and Cruz is a Texas senator.  A paper can change hands constantly and still be garbage.  I don't know who is served in Texas by a lousy report on a US senator from Texas; however, THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS never really served anyone.  THE DALLAS TIMES HERALD was the only decent paper that city ever had.  


But it's true of the bulk of what passes for media and it's sad.  A sorry state of journalism.  



Ahead of the International Court of Justice's expected advisory opinion on legal consequences for Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations reminded other diplomats at a U.N. Security Council meeting on Wednesday that the slaughter of more than 38,000 people in Gaza has been broadcast for nine months—while Israel has claimed it is acting in self-defense and is targeting Hamas.

"What is happening in Gaza is going down as the most documented genocide in history," Riyad Mansour said. "When will the world denounce the crimes and stop tolerating their reoccurrence?"

In addition to the daily news of aerial and ground attacks on schools, homes, and places of worship in Gaza, Mansour pointed to Israeli soldiers' filming of their own attacks in the enclave, leaving no doubt that innocent civilians are being targeted.

Members of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have "openly, brazenly, and repeatedly" shared its "crimes" on social media, said Mansour.

 Since the IDF began its bombardment of Gaza in October with political and material support from the United States and other Western countries, videos taken by Israeli soldiers themselves have shown the controlled detonation of Israa University, a soldier blowing up a mosque, and another IDF fighter giving a thumbs up while driving a bulldozer into a destroyed car, accompanied by the caption, "I stopped counting how many neighborhoods I've erased."

In a segment produced by Al Jazeera in March, Sarah Leah Whitson of Democracy for the Arab World Now said that "there have been a remarkable number of videos posted by Israeli soldiers on social media, depicting themselves pillaging property, mocking the death and destruction that they are causing, and most egregiously, torturing, humiliating, and mocking detained Palestinian prisoners."

Meanwhile, human rights experts and aid groups have amplified images of the results of Israel's use of what Mansour called "the ultimate weapon": a near-total blockade on humanitarian relief. Last month, the Al Mezan Center for Human Rights documented the deaths from starvation of five-month-old Fayez Attaya and 13-year-old Abdulqader Al-Serhi—two of more than two dozen children who have perished as U.N. experts have warned famine has taken hold in Gaza.

"Two million people who were subjected to a 17-year-old blockade are now confronted with a hermetic siege, dying of hunger and disease while food and medicine are available only meters away," said Mansour on Wednesday.

Palestinians including Bisan Owda, a journalist who won a Peabody Award for her coverage, have also documented their own forced displacement, the destruction of their homes, and the loss of loved ones.

Mansour on Wednesday asked the Security Council—which only voted in favor of a cease-fire in Gaza in June, after U.S. officials had vetoed several resolutions—why it has allowed Israel to violate international laws and norms.  



As noted earlier, the pier that was supposed to deliver food and aid such as medicine is no more after being a repeated failure.  While 'operational,'  it was often detached from the shoreline and floating off to no where like a Joe Biden interview answer.  Mina Aldroubi (THE NATIONAL) reports:

 

Doctors in Gaza are having to make extremely difficult choices, aid groups said on Thursday, as over 500 have been killed and hospitals have collapsed with an influx of patients.

The United Nations Palestinian Refugee agency receives 1,000 patients a day across their eight clinics in the Strip, spokeswoman Tamara Rifai told The National, with doctors being “heroes” and taking on much more than their capacity, she said.

“We are going to run out within a few weeks if we do not manage to get more supplies," Ms Al Rifai said, adding that UNRWA is facing two major issues.

"One is the very, very low access of humanitarian drugs, including those that carry medical supplies, but also our inability to truly go around the entire Gaza Strip," she said.

“We're still getting our access permits denied to the north.”



Gaza remains under assault. Day 286 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."   THE NATIONAL notes, "Gaza death toll reaches 38,794, with 89,364 wounded."  Yes, that is the same figure they offered yesterday morning.  No, the deaths did not stop on Wednesday.  ALJAZEERA notes this morning, "At least 54 Palestinians killed in 24 hours as Israel’s military intensifies strikes on central Gaza where hundreds of thousands of displaced people are 'drowning' in sewage."  Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:

  



April 11th, Sharon Zhang (TRUTHOUT) reported, "In addition to the over 34,000 Palestinians who have been counted as killed in Israel’s genocidal assault so far, there are 13,000 Palestinians in Gaza who are missing, a humanitarian aid group has estimated, either buried in rubble or mass graves or disappeared into Israeli prisons.  In a report released Thursday, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said that the estimate is based on initial reports and that the actual number of people missing is likely even higher."
 

As for the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."






The following sites updated:


Wednesday, July 17, 2024

Crooked and Shady Menendez

Shady Menendez remains in the news and remains at large.  Ry Rivard reports:

Twelve New York jurors found Sen. Bob Menendez guilty on 16 different corruption charges, but nine Supreme Court justices may have final say on his fate.


Menendez and attorneys for a pair of co-defendants found guilty of bribing the senator said within minutes of the Tuesday verdict that they planned to appeal. But they indicated throughout the two-month trial that an appeal was almost certain if the jury found the defendants guilty.

Larry Lustberg, an attorney for a New Jersey real estate developer found guilty of bribing the senator with cash and gold bars, said he’ll appeal “as long and as high” as needed.

The defense attorneys’ bet may be that the high court, which has undone several of the most high-profile political corruption cases in recent years, will do so again.

Menendez’s legal team includes Yaakov Roth, who represented former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell in his bribery case and argued on behalf of “Bridgegate” defendant Bridget Kelly and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo aide Joseph Percoco at the Supreme Court — which overturned all three convictions.


One of Menendez’s attorneys said Tuesday that appeals would focus on “grave” issues from the trial.



Here's the grave issue: Your client's a crook.  The Supreme Court doesn't need to here this and if it were a functioning Court today, it wouldn't.  You can apply and appeal all you want but the Supreme Court ignores most of those every year.  They only agree to hear a few cases.  This should not be one of them.  Nor should he be allowed to be running around while he appeals.  Go to prison already.  You've betrayed the public trust and you do not need to be out and about.  You need to be behind bars. 

I'm so tired of so-called 'victimless crimes.'  All that means is the criminal has a little money so we'll all pretend that there's no real victim here.  The victim here was democracy and an open government.  Shady killed those and Shady needs to go to prison -- go directly to prison.  Driving home today, I heard former US House Rep. Patrick Murphy on the radio.  I know he's a Democrat and I know him from the snapshots -- when he was in Congress, C.I. highlighted Murphy often when she attended a hearing he was at.  I also seem him there from time to time with regards to veterans issue.  But anyway, on the radio, he was stressing that it was the rule of law and no one's above it and that this conviction was a good thing.  I agree with Murphy 100% and am glad he said it.

 

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 

Wednesday, July 17,2024.  Palestinians prepare to compete in the Olympics, Donald Trump continues to have the menses even at his age,  calls continue for Joe Biden to step aside, and much more.

 

Starting in the US where we draw ever closer to the general election in November, REUTERS reports, "U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who is running for the Senate, warned donors in a private meeting on Saturday that his party was likely to suffer major losses if President Joe Biden remained at the top of the ticket, the New York Times reported on Tuesday, citing two unnamed sources."  It's a very strong possibility and one that should be addressed immediately.  A few e-mails asked why I said an announcement should be made on Friday?  RNC convention will be over and, without a big story to feed the press, the coverage of the completed convention will continue.  Joe Biden declaring that he has decided to step aside and not run for re-election, to instead assist the party in the selection of the new nominee and campaign for her or him would dominate the weekend.  That's the steal the narrative moment you'd want if you're a Democrat.  

Last night, NBC NEWS noted this.






Donald Trump has not received a poll boost in the first presidential election survey conducted since the failed assassination attempt on Saturday.
The poll, conducted by Morning Consult of 2,045 registered voters on Monday, reveals that Trump is leading Joe Biden by just one percentage point on 46 percent, compared to the president's 45 percent. The poll has a margin of error of +/- two percentage points.



That's not surprising at all.  Despite the media's 'shocked' coverage, this is the man who, as noted in Monday's snapshot, was calling himself "The Don" in the campaign's first big e-mailing since the shooting, featuring a photo of "The Don" looking like a mafia boss and cautioning to try to get the new t-shirt so you could, as the e-mail stated, "Show the world where your allegiances are before this offer is sleeping with the fishes, capisce?"



It didn't help, probably, that the GOP overplayed their hand immediately on Saturday with lunatics like JD Vance (now the vice presidential nominee!) began bloviating nonstop as Americans and watched and thought, "Wait, words?  Words are what you're blaming?  After all the threats from Donald's mouth, that's what you're blaming?"  And it also underscored that the GOP is neither willing nor able to address the shooting epidemic in this country.  First step should be?  Probably for the US government to cease assisting in the killing of Palestinians.  I love all the pearl clutching over violence when a shooting occurs as though our government's own actions abroad -- as well as domestically, Sonya Massey being only the latest example -- say over and over: Violence is an answer.


The US government has allowed the Israeli government to kill thousands of people over an action that is nine months old -- and an action that the people being killed for it had nothing to do with it.  And that figure is probably much higher than we know.


But let's all hand wring and pretend we're stupid while saying, "Why?  WHY!!!!!"  Why?  Because through its own actions -- including attacking Iraq for 9/11 when Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 -- the US government repeatedly demonstrates that they believe violence is the answer to conflict or disagreement.


The GOP is currently holding their national convention in Wisconsin.  Graig Graziosi (INDEPENDENT) reports on one half of the Bimbo Twins Marjorie Taylor Greene and her rant at the RNC which included:


“For far too long, the establishment in Washington has sold us out. They promised unity and delivered division. They promised peace and brought war. They promised normalcy and gave us Transgender Visibility Day on Easter Sunday," she said. “And let me state this clearly, there are only two genders. And we are made in God’s image. Amen.”



The deeply stupid are always with us.  Inter-sex has been around since the beginning of time -- children born with both genders.  I know it's difficult for an idiot to grasp that, but it is reality.

While we're dealing with eMpTy Greene and reality, Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Bimbo Twins Destroy Right Wing Christian Values" went up earlier this week.



 


We all grasp that, right?  Anti-feminist and anti-women Marjorie and Lauren Boebert went to Congress married and within two years both their marriages ended.  They had children and the two conservative women who constantly invoke God's name -- if not God's compassion -- broke up their own families.  Choice.  Choice that their buddy Speaker of the House Mike Johnson doesn't believe in.  He believes once you find your beard, hang on to her like you would your hag.  And that's why he has a covenant marriage.  And it's why he wants to make it harder to divorce.  And not just him, as Chloe Nazra Lee (MS.) points out:

 

Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio), claimed that leaving “unhappy or even violent” marriages “didn’t work out for the kids,” suggesting that people trapped in violent marriages should stay in them to preserve family stability. You know what’s worse for children than divorce? Domestic violence—highly destabilizing for children and disproportionately affecting women. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has also condemned no-fault divorceas well as feminism and birth control—as responsible for mass shootings. In reality, enactment of no-fault divorce laws has resulted in significant decreases in domestic violence, strongly associated with mass shooters, and a significant decrease in women murdered by intimate partners. Yet, Johnson chooses to blame women, rather than address male violence.

Underlying these conversations is a sinister presumption: that women have a societal obligation to forgo their right to self-determination. Thematically, these men frame a woman’s choice as destabilizing to society, normalizing male entitlement to women and declining to encourage self-improvement or accountability among men. Structurally, they exclude women from the conversation about women’s choices. 



Republicans have renewed their efforts to attack civil rights and American liberties, and now they are eyeing no-fault divorce. Conservatives have begun engaging in concerning rhetoric around no-fault divorce, arguing that it is unconstitutional or against the Christian conception of marriage. Should challenges to no-fault divorce become mainstream, efforts to combat violence against women will face extreme setbacks. 

In 1969, Republican California Governor Ronald Reagan approved the country’s first no-fault divorce law. In no-fault divorces, spouses could be granted a divorce for irreconcilable differences without having to prove misconduct by a spouse¹. Notably, prior to this law, women had to prove that their husbands had committed some wrong-doing – such as adultery, domestic violence, cruelty, or abandonment – or persuade them to agree to a divorce. Desperate to receive divorces, some individuals participated in “divorce tourism,”² the relocation to another state that had more lenient divorce laws, while others concocted stories to prove wrongdoing – but most women suffered in silence. Unable to prove their husbands had wronged them, they languished in loveless, and at times abusive, marriages. 

It is not an over-exaggeration to say that no-fault divorce saves women’s lives. According to CNN³, A 2004 paper by economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers found an 8 to 16% decrease in female suicides after states enacted no-fault divorce laws. They also noted a roughly 30% decrease in intimate partner violence among both women and men and a 10% drop in women murdered by their partners. Although divorce rates generally increased, no-fault divorce did not promote divorces but merely allowed all those who wished to dissolve a marriage to finally do so without an overly-prolonged and burdensome legal process. The rise in divorce rates reflected a pre-existing public desire, as opposed to an increased interest arising from the changing laws. Now, the majority of couples claim “irreconcilable differences” in their divorces. However, a reimposition of antiquated fault-based divorces will force individuals to not only prove fault but also “create[s] animosity where it doesn’t need to exist,” according to a divorce coach who spoke with Ms. Magazine⁴, thereby harming the children and families that proponents of fault-based divorce claim to advocate for. 

Some Republican lawmakers and politicians have begun criticizing no-fault divorce, arguing that it is too easy for people to obtain a divorce. According to the Guardian⁵, right-wing religious conservatives claim that contemporary divorce laws “deprive [men] of due process and hurt families.” The Texas Republican Party 2022 Platform, for example, expressed a desire to “rescind unilateral no-fault divorce laws and support covenant marriage,” directly threatening no-fault divorce¹. Ohio Republican Senate nominee J.D. Vance described how no-fault divorce makes it “easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear.”⁶ Beverly Willet, co-chair of the Coalition For Divorce Reform claimed, “unilateral no-fault divorce clearly violates the 14th Amendment. Too often in family court, defendants are deprived of life, liberty, and property without due process of law.”⁷ Contributors to the draconian Project 2025 have also expressed interest in ending no-fault divorce⁸, a concerning development as they lay out policy agendas for a potential Republican presidential victory in the 2024 General Elections. All of these perspectives represent dangerous conservative ideologies that pose a threat to individual freedom and the rights of women. 

Renewed threats to no-fault divorce are alarming, especially in relation to discussions of violence against women. Marium Durrani, vice president of policy at the National Domestic Violence Hotline shared, “any barrier to divorce is a really big challenge for survivors. What it really ends up doing is prolonging their forced entanglement with an abusive partner.”⁹ Legal changes that promote full-consent divorce would trap women in decaying and violent marriages if abusive husbands refused to grant their consent for a divorce. The elimination of no-fault divorce would threaten to transport us back to a day in which women were considered their husbands’ property and domestic abuse was considered a private matter as opposed to a crime. Researcher and university professor Justin Wolfers elaborated, that men’s rights activists “speak about no-fault divorce as a feeling that they’re ripped off because they don’t control their property. The moment you go a step further and admit that people are no longer property, this rhetoric becomes a lot less persuasive.”⁴ 

The overturn of Roe v. Wade and ensuing attacks on abortion, birth control, and IVF prove that anything is possible. Republicans have displayed renewed interest in “protecting the American family” and have expressed this through concrete action. As Dobbs taught us, nothing is guaranteed, and even well-accepted and established laws and norms can be attacked. Divorce is a social justice issue, an equality issue, and a violence prevention issue.


Majorie and BoeBoe got their divorces.  Now they're silent as their colleagues plan and scheme to destroy the right of other women.  They're happy to let their colleagues work to destroy women's rights and propose extreme measures upon women -- measures so extreme that even 'good MAGA' freaks like Majorie and BoeBoe couldn't live up to.  

Some e-mails are complaining that there's not enough RNC convention coverage.  

How about this: Marjorie, with those cottage cheese upper arms, you shouldn't go sleeveless on TV.  

I don't see the point in covering a bunch of liars.  I'm not watching it in real time.  I'm reading coverage of it from news outlets and we'll include that if it's necessary.  

I'm really concerned about this period right now and have control over what goes up here at least.  For example, Jon Stewart returned to THE DAILY SHOW last night and did a good segment.  We usually repost his segments here.  (Disclosed for years, I know Jon and like him.)  Last night's will not go up here.  It doesn't fit our purpose.

How so?

The country shrugged on Saturday.  And moved on.  The media doesn't want to.

If Jon had made his segment on Sunday, aired it then, there might have been a point.  Even on Monday.  But by Tuesday?  Life has moved on.  The people have spoken.  A crime was committed.  It was not a national tragedy.  

I'm not interested in anymore details or speculation about the shooter.  Jon didn't do that, I'm referring to other things on YOUTUBE.  I'm just not interested.  That didn't really effect Kyle and SECULAR TALK, for instance,  With him, we just grabbed videos on other topics.  

But some people have no other topic.  And I'm not going to build a shrine to a monster -- even if others unwilling are doing so -- nor am I encouraging the media to continue with this story that has run its course.  

There's no surprise coming off the stage of the RNC.  Well, there is one.  We'll probably have to wait until Thursday before we discover if Donald's going to wear that maxi pad on his ear all week long?

I get it.  He wants to be iconic and he wants sympathy.  If wearing a maxi pad on his ear does the trick, someone can be happy for him.  Not me.  Maybe he'll reduce to a tampon by Thursday when he delivers his acceptance speech?





AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. We’re “Breaking with Convention: War, Peace and the Presidency.” I’m Amy Goodman.

We turn now to Gaza. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit accusing President Biden of being complicit in genocide in Gaza. The judges agreed with a lower court that the courts cannot review foreign policy decisions made by the executive branch.

The Center for Constitutional Rights has sued President Biden, accusing him of failing to prevent genocide. The legal group sought an emergency order to block Biden, as well as Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, from providing further military funding, arms and diplomatic support to Israel, the lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of Palestinian plaintiffs.

We go now to Katherine Gallagher, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Can you talk about the significance of the court dismissing your case, Kate?

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: Good morning, Amy, and thank you very much for having us on this very busy morning and for bringing attention back to Gaza, where there is an ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. And so, it is against that backdrop that we are really deeply not only disappointed, but troubled by the unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals from the Ninth Circuit to dismiss our case.

Just to step back and explain what this case is, back in November, Defense for Children International-Palestine, Al-Haq, three Palestinians in Gaza living under the genocidal assault and five Palestinian Americans brought forward this case, framing U.S. conduct as complicity or aiding and abetting genocide and failing to prevent what was already in November a serious risk of genocide. So, they filed the case in federal court invoking clearly established law — the duty to prevent genocide and the prohibition against aiding and abetting genocide, which is codified in U.S. criminal law. It is in the Genocide Convention. And it has been recognized, including by the Biden administration, as binding customary international law. So, the plaintiffs turned to the courts and asked the courts to, please, put an injunction to stop the flow of two-ton bombs falling on Palestinian children, women, the entire population across the Gaza Strip, to stop the weapons being used in an aerial bombardment to maintain a total siege, denying food, fuel, energy, electricity, and decimating the health infrastructure, bombing hospitals and doctors. This is the case that was filed in November.

And it has been supported over the many months of litigation by a robust factual record, including findings by the International Court of Justice that there is plausible genocide in Gaza, supported by statements and reports from U.N. experts, affidavits by former State Department officials, expert opinions by the world’s leading genocide expert, William Schabas, and by historians of genocide and Holocaust studies here in the United States, that this is indeed a plausible unfolding genocide in Gaza.

And so, it is against that backdrop where there is a strong factual and legal case and unambiguous legal obligations on President Biden and Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Austin to not aid and abet genocide — it’s against that backdrop that the court yesterday abdicated its role and said that whenever foreign policy is invoked, the courts need to step back. They essentially said that foreign policy and conditions of war — they did not mention genocide, they did not say that this is an unfolding genocide in Gaza — but that conditions of war are ones where there really has to be deference to the executive branch, and that there isn’t a role for the courts to hold executive conduct against black-letter law and make declarations when executive conduct has exceeded what the president and his cabinet members are permitted to do. And so, they have said that this case needs to be dismissed, and essentially given the blank check to carry out any kind of conduct that the executive wants in times of genocide, in times of war, the blank check that the Supreme Court warned against and said did not exist back in the post-9/11 days in a series of cases.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to play for you — before we get to the end of this show, I want to play for you a clip of Scott Anderson, director of the U.N.'s refugee efforts in Gaza, talking about the aftermath of Israel's bombing on Saturday of al-Mawasi. That was designated as a safe zone in Khan Younis. The attacks killed at least 90 Palestinians and injured hundreds more. CNN reports at least one U.S.-made munition was used in the airstrike, identifying the tail fin of a joint direct attack munition — that’s a JDAM — a Boeing-manufactured GPS-guided kit. This is Scott Anderson.

SCOTT ANDERSON: On Saturday, I visited Nasser Hospital after a strike in the safe zone of Mawasi, and the hospital itself was in Khan Younis. I’ve been in Gaza for nine months, and I’ve witnessed some of the most horrific scenes I’ve seen in the nine months that I’ve been here. The health facility was overstretched. There were more than a hundred people injured. The air was filled with the smell of blood. And one health worker was mopping up pools of blood on the floor using only water, because there aren’t sufficient supplies of disinfectant material or other cleaning supplies to stop the spread of infection. There’s not enough beds, hygiene supplies, sheeting, mattresses or scrubs. And many patients were treated on the ground or on waiting room benches without disinfectant. And this puts even treatable injuries at risk of sepsis and much more significant complications. Now, ventilator systems were not working due to electrical problems.

And as I walked through the hospital and talked to families and children, we saw toddlers who were double amputees, children paralyzed and unable to receive treatment because they don’t have the equipment at the hospital in Khan Younis, and others who were separated from their parents. And we also saw mothers and fathers searching frantically within the hospital for their children, unsure if they were alive. One mother I talked to told me that she was told to move to Rafah because it would be safe there, and then she was told to move to al-Mawasi because it would be safe there. And unfortunately for her and her family, that was not true. And I think the words of this mother are a reminder that nowhere is safe in Gaza, and no one is safe in Gaza. That family had three children impacted by the blast. One child was completely uninjured, miraculously. Another child was paralyzed, and the other son was killed.

I mentioned that there’s nowhere safe in Gaza. And I think we saw that over the weekend both with what happened in Mawasi, but also the incident at the Beach camp, where 25 other people were killed. And what’s urgently needed is a complete ceasefire, for all parties to the conflict to protect the civilians wherever they are, but especially in U.N. schools and hospitals.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s Scott Anderson, director of the U.N.'s refugee efforts in Gaza, director of UNRWA affairs in Gaza. Katherine Gallagher, you're a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. Your case was just dismissed. Talk about what your efforts are now going to be, and how what he’s describing, that happened, you know, well after you brought your lawsuit, in al-Mawasi, an Israel-designated safe zone, that killed nearly a hundred Palestinians and injured 300 more, means.

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: Amy, I wish that the clip that we just heard was an unprecedented account, but, unfortunately, it is stories like that, accounts like that, that we’ve been hearing for nine months, of Palestinians being forced from one supposed safe area to another and being bombed, whether women, children, and in this case, there have been almost 15,000 children that have been killed and 20,000 that are disappeared, that we don’t know if they are buried under rubble, if they are detained in Israeli prisons. We don’t know where they are. So, over the course of these nine months, where that account, time and time again, has been heard, what we’ve also heard is that indication that U.S. weapons are being used. And U.S. weapons continue to be sent.

So, if we have not yet succeeded through the courts — and we will consider our next options, whether in domestic courts or in foreign courts or before international bodies, where we continue to press this case — we will also be bringing the case to those who are complicit. I think it’s time for weapons companies — you mentioned Boeing in that clip — to stop sending weapons. There are legal responsibilities and, frankly, moral responsibilities.

AMY GOODMAN: We have five seconds.

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: We call on the Biden administration to heed its at least moral responsibility and stop aiding and abetting genocide.

AMY GOODMAN: Katherine Gallagher, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

And that does it for our show. Democracy Now! is currently accepting applications for a director of development to lead our fundraising team. Learn more and apply at democracynow.org.

Democracy Now! is produced with Mike Burke, Renée Feltz, Deena Guzder, Sharif Abdel Kouddous, Messiah Rhodes, Nermeen Shaikh, María Taracena, Tami Woronoff, Charina Nadura, Sam Alcoff. Special thanks to Denis Moynihan. I’m Amy Goodman.




Most people probably don’t know this but Wikipedia has a page called “List of Israeli assassinations.” It begins in July 1956 and stretches over 68 years until today. The majority on the list are Palestinians; among them are famous Palestinian leaders PFLP’s Ghassan Kanafani, Fatah’s Khalil Ibrahim al-Wazir - also known as Abu Jihad, Hamas’s Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and Islamic Jihad’s Fathi Shaqaqi.

When looking at the long list, it is impossible not to notice that the number of assassinations and assassination attempts Israel has carried out over the years has increased exponentially: from 14 in the 1970s to well over 150 in the first decade of the new millennium and 24 since January 2020.

I was reminded of this list when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called a news conference on July 13 to celebrate Israel’s attempt to kill Hamas’s military commander Muhammad Deif in Gaza. Israeli fighter jets and drones had just hammered al-Mawasi camp, which now houses an estimated 80,000 displaced Palestinians living in densely populated tents.

Within just a few minutes of the fusillade, the pilots had massacred at least 90 Palestinians, including scores of women and children, while injuring an additional 300 people. All of this occurred in an area Israel had previously designated a “safe zone”. As gruesome images of dead bodies charred and shred to pieces filled social media, reports surfaced that Israel had used several US-made guided half-tonne bombs.

In his news conference at the Ministry of Defence headquarters in Tel Aviv just a few hours after this bloodbath, Netanyahu admitted that he was “not absolutely certain” that Deif had been killed but maintained that “just the attempt to assassinate Hamas commanders delivers a message to the world, a message that Hamas’s days are numbered.”

Yet even a quick perusal of the “List of Israeli assassinations” makes clear that Netanyahu was speaking with a forked tongue. He knows all too well that Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s political leaders Sheik Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi or military leaders Yahya Ayyash and Salah Shehade have done very little to weaken the movement and may well have increased its following.

If anything, years and years of Israeli assassinations demonstrate that they are primarily used by Israeli leaders to pander to and rally their constituencies. Netanyahu’s recent news conference is no exception.

But as macabre as the Wikipedia List is, the names on it only tell a partial story. That is because it fails to include the number of civilians killed during each and every successful and failed assassination attempt.

For example, the July 13 strike was the eighth known attempt on Deif’s life, and it is difficult to calculate the total number of civilians Israel has killed in its scramble to assassinate him. The Wikipedia List fails to capture how the increase in assassinations has led to an exponential increase in civilian deaths.

This becomes clear when we compare Israel’s current assassination policy with its policy during the second Palestinian Intifada. When Israel assassinated the head of Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades, Salah Shehade, in 2002, 15 people were killed, including Shehade, his wife, 15-year-old daughter, and eight other children. 


Turning to sports, THE PALESTINE CHRONICLE noted earlier this week:

 

PALESTINIAN FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION: 300 athletes were martyred during the aggression on the Gaza Strip, the last of whom was Shadi Abu Al-Araj, goalkeeper of the Khan Yunis Youth Team.

 

AFP notes:


Eight Palestinian athletes taking part in the Paris Olympics will be symbols of "resistance" during the Israel-Gaza war in Gaza, a Palestinian Minister said on Sunday as the official delegation left the occupied West Bank.

This will be the eighth time Palestinian athletes have taken part in the Olympics since 1996, but Olympic committee head Jibril Rajoub said the athletes had never felt so much attention.

The athletes are preparing for the start of the Paris Games on July 26 in a "very dark moment in our history", said Palestinian Authority Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Varsen Aghabekian Shahin.

"You are not just athletes, you are also ... symbols of Palestinian resistance," Ms Aghabekian added.

French organisers have stepped up security in Paris in response to the conflict.

"We want this participation to be a message from the Palestinians to the world that it is time for them to be free in their homeland," Mr Rajoub said.

"Through this participation, we want to present the suffering of the Palestinian people and the unprecedented killing taking place in Gaza."

 



Palestinian-American athlete Valerie Tarazi has arrived in Paris on a mission: To “speak up for the people who can’t” and raise hopes in Gaza as she prepares to represent them at the Olympics.

Making the Games “has been a dream of mine forever,” the swimmer, who will compete in the 200 meters individual medley, told NBC News in a video call, shortly after landing in the French capital last week.

Tarazi, who is planning to start a Ph.D. having just completed her master's degree in supply chain management at Alabama’s Auburn University, said she had envisioned herself at the Olympics ever since she was a child watching the Beijing Games in 2008.  

 But as well as fulfilling a personal ambition, Tarazi said, she hopes to use her presence in Paris to speak up for the people of Gaza, where more than 38,700 people have been killed in the Israeli military campaign, according to local health officials, since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, which saw around 1,200 people killed and around 240 people taken hostage, according to Israeli officials.

“We’re not here to compete for ourselves or represent ourselves,” said Tarazi, who was born and raised in Chicago. “This is more than that.”

The 24-year-old is one of eight Palestinian athletes set to compete in Paris, along with fellow swimmer Yazan al Bawwab, taekwondo fighter Omar Ismail and judoka Fares Badawi. Boxer Waseem Abu Sal, runners Layla Almasri and Mohammed Dwedar will also take part, while Jorge Antonio Salhe will compete in the skeet shooting. 







Gaza remains under assault. Day 285 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."   THE NATIONAL notes, "Gaza death toll reaches 38,794, with 89,364 wounded."  Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:

  



April 11th, Sharon Zhang (TRUTHOUT) reported, "In addition to the over 34,000 Palestinians who have been counted as killed in Israel’s genocidal assault so far, there are 13,000 Palestinians in Gaza who are missing, a humanitarian aid group has estimated, either buried in rubble or mass graves or disappeared into Israeli prisons.  In a report released Thursday, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said that the estimate is based on initial reports and that the actual number of people missing is likely even higher."
 

As for the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."

This morning, ALJAZEERA reports:

UNRWA is seen as a lifeline for Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip as it provides humanitarian support to millions of people.

But Israeli attacks and the blocking of crossings into the enclave have impeded aid distribution to 2.3 million people, most of whom are displaced, worsening the humanitarian crisis.

Antonio Guterres, the UN secretary-general said last week that the agency is also being targeted.

Here are some statistics since October 7 provided by UNRWA:

  • 189 UNRWA installations have been damaged.
  • As of July 14, Israeli forces had killed 197 UNRWA staff.
  • Only 10 of 26 UNRWA health centres in Gaza are currently operational.
  • There have been 458 incidents impacting UNRWA premises and the people inside them, including at least 74 incidents of military use or interference at UNRWA premises.



The following sites updated:






Iraq snapshot

Wednesday, July 17,2024.  Palestinians prepare to compete in the Olympics, Donald Trump continues to have the menses even at his age,  calls continue for Joe Biden to step aside, and much more.

 

Starting in the US where we draw ever closer to the general election in November, REUTERS reports, "U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who is running for the Senate, warned donors in a private meeting on Saturday that his party was likely to suffer major losses if President Joe Biden remained at the top of the ticket, the New York Times reported on Tuesday, citing two unnamed sources."  It's a very strong possibility and one that should be addressed immediately.  A few e-mails asked why I said an announcement should be made on Friday?  RNC convention will be over and, without a big story to feed the press, the coverage of the completed convention will continue.  Joe Biden declaring that he has decided to step aside and not run for re-election, to instead assist the party in the selection of the new nominee and campaign for her or him would dominate the weekend.  That's the steal the narrative moment you'd want if you're a Democrat.  

Last night, NBC NEWS noted this.






Donald Trump has not received a poll boost in the first presidential election survey conducted since the failed assassination attempt on Saturday.
The poll, conducted by Morning Consult of 2,045 registered voters on Monday, reveals that Trump is leading Joe Biden by just one percentage point on 46 percent, compared to the president's 45 percent. The poll has a margin of error of +/- two percentage points.



That's not surprising at all.  Despite the media's 'shocked' coverage, this is the man who, as noted in Monday's snapshot, was calling himself "The Don" in the campaign's first big e-mailing since the shooting, featuring a photo of "The Don" looking like a mafia boss and cautioning to try to get the new t-shirt so you could, as the e-mail stated, "Show the world where your allegiances are before this offer is sleeping with the fishes, capisce?"



It didn't help, probably, that the GOP overplayed their hand immediately on Saturday with lunatics like JD Vance (now the vice presidential nominee!) began bloviating nonstop as Americans and watched and thought, "Wait, words?  Words are what you're blaming?  After all the threats from Donald's mouth, that's what you're blaming?"  And it also underscored that the GOP is neither willing nor able to address the shooting epidemic in this country.  First step should be?  Probably for the US government to cease assisting in the killing of Palestinians.  I love all the pearl clutching over violence when a shooting occurs as though our government's own actions abroad -- as well as domestically, Sonya Massey being only the latest example -- say over and over: Violence is an answer.


The US government has allowed the Israeli government to kill thousands of people over an action that is nine months old -- and an action that the people being killed for it had nothing to do with it.  And that figure is probably much higher than we know.


But let's all hand wring and pretend we're stupid while saying, "Why?  WHY!!!!!"  Why?  Because through its own actions -- including attacking Iraq for 9/11 when Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 -- the US government repeatedly demonstrates that they believe violence is the answer to conflict or disagreement.


The GOP is currently holding their national convention in Wisconsin.  Graig Graziosi (INDEPENDENT) reports on one half of the Bimbo Twins Marjorie Taylor Greene and her rant at the RNC which included:


“For far too long, the establishment in Washington has sold us out. They promised unity and delivered division. They promised peace and brought war. They promised normalcy and gave us Transgender Visibility Day on Easter Sunday," she said. “And let me state this clearly, there are only two genders. And we are made in God’s image. Amen.”



The deeply stupid are always with us.  Inter-sex has been around since the beginning of time -- children born with both genders.  I know it's difficult for an idiot to grasp that, but it is reality.

While we're dealing with eMpTy Greene and reality, Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Bimbo Twins Destroy Right Wing Christian Values" went up earlier this week.



 


We all grasp that, right?  Anti-feminist and anti-women Marjorie and Lauren Boebert went to Congress married and within two years both their marriages ended.  They had children and the two conservative women who constantly invoke God's name -- if not God's compassion -- broke up their own families.  Choice.  Choice that their buddy Speaker of the House Mike Johnson doesn't believe in.  He believes once you find your beard, hang on to her like you would your hag.  And that's why he has a covenant marriage.  And it's why he wants to make it harder to divorce.  And not just him, as Chloe Nazra Lee (MS.) points out:

 

Trump’s vice presidential nominee, Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio), claimed that leaving “unhappy or even violent” marriages “didn’t work out for the kids,” suggesting that people trapped in violent marriages should stay in them to preserve family stability. You know what’s worse for children than divorce? Domestic violence—highly destabilizing for children and disproportionately affecting women. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has also condemned no-fault divorceas well as feminism and birth control—as responsible for mass shootings. In reality, enactment of no-fault divorce laws has resulted in significant decreases in domestic violence, strongly associated with mass shooters, and a significant decrease in women murdered by intimate partners. Yet, Johnson chooses to blame women, rather than address male violence.

Underlying these conversations is a sinister presumption: that women have a societal obligation to forgo their right to self-determination. Thematically, these men frame a woman’s choice as destabilizing to society, normalizing male entitlement to women and declining to encourage self-improvement or accountability among men. Structurally, they exclude women from the conversation about women’s choices. 



Republicans have renewed their efforts to attack civil rights and American liberties, and now they are eyeing no-fault divorce. Conservatives have begun engaging in concerning rhetoric around no-fault divorce, arguing that it is unconstitutional or against the Christian conception of marriage. Should challenges to no-fault divorce become mainstream, efforts to combat violence against women will face extreme setbacks. 

In 1969, Republican California Governor Ronald Reagan approved the country’s first no-fault divorce law. In no-fault divorces, spouses could be granted a divorce for irreconcilable differences without having to prove misconduct by a spouse¹. Notably, prior to this law, women had to prove that their husbands had committed some wrong-doing – such as adultery, domestic violence, cruelty, or abandonment – or persuade them to agree to a divorce. Desperate to receive divorces, some individuals participated in “divorce tourism,”² the relocation to another state that had more lenient divorce laws, while others concocted stories to prove wrongdoing – but most women suffered in silence. Unable to prove their husbands had wronged them, they languished in loveless, and at times abusive, marriages. 

It is not an over-exaggeration to say that no-fault divorce saves women’s lives. According to CNN³, A 2004 paper by economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers found an 8 to 16% decrease in female suicides after states enacted no-fault divorce laws. They also noted a roughly 30% decrease in intimate partner violence among both women and men and a 10% drop in women murdered by their partners. Although divorce rates generally increased, no-fault divorce did not promote divorces but merely allowed all those who wished to dissolve a marriage to finally do so without an overly-prolonged and burdensome legal process. The rise in divorce rates reflected a pre-existing public desire, as opposed to an increased interest arising from the changing laws. Now, the majority of couples claim “irreconcilable differences” in their divorces. However, a reimposition of antiquated fault-based divorces will force individuals to not only prove fault but also “create[s] animosity where it doesn’t need to exist,” according to a divorce coach who spoke with Ms. Magazine⁴, thereby harming the children and families that proponents of fault-based divorce claim to advocate for. 

Some Republican lawmakers and politicians have begun criticizing no-fault divorce, arguing that it is too easy for people to obtain a divorce. According to the Guardian⁵, right-wing religious conservatives claim that contemporary divorce laws “deprive [men] of due process and hurt families.” The Texas Republican Party 2022 Platform, for example, expressed a desire to “rescind unilateral no-fault divorce laws and support covenant marriage,” directly threatening no-fault divorce¹. Ohio Republican Senate nominee J.D. Vance described how no-fault divorce makes it “easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear.”⁶ Beverly Willet, co-chair of the Coalition For Divorce Reform claimed, “unilateral no-fault divorce clearly violates the 14th Amendment. Too often in family court, defendants are deprived of life, liberty, and property without due process of law.”⁷ Contributors to the draconian Project 2025 have also expressed interest in ending no-fault divorce⁸, a concerning development as they lay out policy agendas for a potential Republican presidential victory in the 2024 General Elections. All of these perspectives represent dangerous conservative ideologies that pose a threat to individual freedom and the rights of women. 

Renewed threats to no-fault divorce are alarming, especially in relation to discussions of violence against women. Marium Durrani, vice president of policy at the National Domestic Violence Hotline shared, “any barrier to divorce is a really big challenge for survivors. What it really ends up doing is prolonging their forced entanglement with an abusive partner.”⁹ Legal changes that promote full-consent divorce would trap women in decaying and violent marriages if abusive husbands refused to grant their consent for a divorce. The elimination of no-fault divorce would threaten to transport us back to a day in which women were considered their husbands’ property and domestic abuse was considered a private matter as opposed to a crime. Researcher and university professor Justin Wolfers elaborated, that men’s rights activists “speak about no-fault divorce as a feeling that they’re ripped off because they don’t control their property. The moment you go a step further and admit that people are no longer property, this rhetoric becomes a lot less persuasive.”⁴ 

The overturn of Roe v. Wade and ensuing attacks on abortion, birth control, and IVF prove that anything is possible. Republicans have displayed renewed interest in “protecting the American family” and have expressed this through concrete action. As Dobbs taught us, nothing is guaranteed, and even well-accepted and established laws and norms can be attacked. Divorce is a social justice issue, an equality issue, and a violence prevention issue.


Majorie and BoeBoe got their divorces.  Now they're silent as their colleagues plan and scheme to destroy the right of other women.  They're happy to let their colleagues work to destroy women's rights and propose extreme measures upon women -- measures so extreme that even 'good MAGA' freaks like Majorie and BoeBoe couldn't live up to.  

Some e-mails are complaining that there's not enough RNC convention coverage.  

How about this: Marjorie, with those cottage cheese upper arms, you shouldn't go sleeveless on TV.  

I don't see the point in covering a bunch of liars.  I'm not watching it in real time.  I'm reading coverage of it from news outlets and we'll include that if it's necessary.  

I'm really concerned about this period right now and have control over what goes up here at least.  For example, Jon Stewart returned to THE DAILY SHOW last night and did a good segment.  We usually repost his segments here.  (Disclosed for years, I know Jon and like him.)  Last night's will not go up here.  It doesn't fit our purpose.

How so?

The country shrugged on Saturday.  And moved on.  The media doesn't want to.

If Jon had made his segment on Sunday, aired it then, there might have been a point.  Even on Monday.  But by Tuesday?  Life has moved on.  The people have spoken.  A crime was committed.  It was not a national tragedy.  

I'm not interested in anymore details or speculation about the shooter.  Jon didn't do that, I'm referring to other things on YOUTUBE.  I'm just not interested.  That didn't really effect Kyle and SECULAR TALK, for instance,  With him, we just grabbed videos on other topics.  

But some people have no other topic.  And I'm not going to build a shrine to a monster -- even if others unwilling are doing so -- nor am I encouraging the media to continue with this story that has run its course.  

There's no surprise coming off the stage of the RNC.  Well, there is one.  We'll probably have to wait until Thursday before we discover if Donald's going to wear that maxi pad on his ear all week long?

I get it.  He wants to be iconic and he wants sympathy.  If wearing a maxi pad on his ear does the trick, someone can be happy for him.  Not me.  Maybe he'll reduce to a tampon by Thursday when he delivers his acceptance speech?





AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. We’re “Breaking with Convention: War, Peace and the Presidency.” I’m Amy Goodman.

We turn now to Gaza. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit accusing President Biden of being complicit in genocide in Gaza. The judges agreed with a lower court that the courts cannot review foreign policy decisions made by the executive branch.

The Center for Constitutional Rights has sued President Biden, accusing him of failing to prevent genocide. The legal group sought an emergency order to block Biden, as well as Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, from providing further military funding, arms and diplomatic support to Israel, the lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of Palestinian plaintiffs.

We go now to Katherine Gallagher, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Can you talk about the significance of the court dismissing your case, Kate?

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: Good morning, Amy, and thank you very much for having us on this very busy morning and for bringing attention back to Gaza, where there is an ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people. And so, it is against that backdrop that we are really deeply not only disappointed, but troubled by the unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals from the Ninth Circuit to dismiss our case.

Just to step back and explain what this case is, back in November, Defense for Children International-Palestine, Al-Haq, three Palestinians in Gaza living under the genocidal assault and five Palestinian Americans brought forward this case, framing U.S. conduct as complicity or aiding and abetting genocide and failing to prevent what was already in November a serious risk of genocide. So, they filed the case in federal court invoking clearly established law — the duty to prevent genocide and the prohibition against aiding and abetting genocide, which is codified in U.S. criminal law. It is in the Genocide Convention. And it has been recognized, including by the Biden administration, as binding customary international law. So, the plaintiffs turned to the courts and asked the courts to, please, put an injunction to stop the flow of two-ton bombs falling on Palestinian children, women, the entire population across the Gaza Strip, to stop the weapons being used in an aerial bombardment to maintain a total siege, denying food, fuel, energy, electricity, and decimating the health infrastructure, bombing hospitals and doctors. This is the case that was filed in November.

And it has been supported over the many months of litigation by a robust factual record, including findings by the International Court of Justice that there is plausible genocide in Gaza, supported by statements and reports from U.N. experts, affidavits by former State Department officials, expert opinions by the world’s leading genocide expert, William Schabas, and by historians of genocide and Holocaust studies here in the United States, that this is indeed a plausible unfolding genocide in Gaza.

And so, it is against that backdrop where there is a strong factual and legal case and unambiguous legal obligations on President Biden and Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Austin to not aid and abet genocide — it’s against that backdrop that the court yesterday abdicated its role and said that whenever foreign policy is invoked, the courts need to step back. They essentially said that foreign policy and conditions of war — they did not mention genocide, they did not say that this is an unfolding genocide in Gaza — but that conditions of war are ones where there really has to be deference to the executive branch, and that there isn’t a role for the courts to hold executive conduct against black-letter law and make declarations when executive conduct has exceeded what the president and his cabinet members are permitted to do. And so, they have said that this case needs to be dismissed, and essentially given the blank check to carry out any kind of conduct that the executive wants in times of genocide, in times of war, the blank check that the Supreme Court warned against and said did not exist back in the post-9/11 days in a series of cases.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to play for you — before we get to the end of this show, I want to play for you a clip of Scott Anderson, director of the U.N.'s refugee efforts in Gaza, talking about the aftermath of Israel's bombing on Saturday of al-Mawasi. That was designated as a safe zone in Khan Younis. The attacks killed at least 90 Palestinians and injured hundreds more. CNN reports at least one U.S.-made munition was used in the airstrike, identifying the tail fin of a joint direct attack munition — that’s a JDAM — a Boeing-manufactured GPS-guided kit. This is Scott Anderson.

SCOTT ANDERSON: On Saturday, I visited Nasser Hospital after a strike in the safe zone of Mawasi, and the hospital itself was in Khan Younis. I’ve been in Gaza for nine months, and I’ve witnessed some of the most horrific scenes I’ve seen in the nine months that I’ve been here. The health facility was overstretched. There were more than a hundred people injured. The air was filled with the smell of blood. And one health worker was mopping up pools of blood on the floor using only water, because there aren’t sufficient supplies of disinfectant material or other cleaning supplies to stop the spread of infection. There’s not enough beds, hygiene supplies, sheeting, mattresses or scrubs. And many patients were treated on the ground or on waiting room benches without disinfectant. And this puts even treatable injuries at risk of sepsis and much more significant complications. Now, ventilator systems were not working due to electrical problems.

And as I walked through the hospital and talked to families and children, we saw toddlers who were double amputees, children paralyzed and unable to receive treatment because they don’t have the equipment at the hospital in Khan Younis, and others who were separated from their parents. And we also saw mothers and fathers searching frantically within the hospital for their children, unsure if they were alive. One mother I talked to told me that she was told to move to Rafah because it would be safe there, and then she was told to move to al-Mawasi because it would be safe there. And unfortunately for her and her family, that was not true. And I think the words of this mother are a reminder that nowhere is safe in Gaza, and no one is safe in Gaza. That family had three children impacted by the blast. One child was completely uninjured, miraculously. Another child was paralyzed, and the other son was killed.

I mentioned that there’s nowhere safe in Gaza. And I think we saw that over the weekend both with what happened in Mawasi, but also the incident at the Beach camp, where 25 other people were killed. And what’s urgently needed is a complete ceasefire, for all parties to the conflict to protect the civilians wherever they are, but especially in U.N. schools and hospitals.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s Scott Anderson, director of the U.N.'s refugee efforts in Gaza, director of UNRWA affairs in Gaza. Katherine Gallagher, you're a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. Your case was just dismissed. Talk about what your efforts are now going to be, and how what he’s describing, that happened, you know, well after you brought your lawsuit, in al-Mawasi, an Israel-designated safe zone, that killed nearly a hundred Palestinians and injured 300 more, means.

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: Amy, I wish that the clip that we just heard was an unprecedented account, but, unfortunately, it is stories like that, accounts like that, that we’ve been hearing for nine months, of Palestinians being forced from one supposed safe area to another and being bombed, whether women, children, and in this case, there have been almost 15,000 children that have been killed and 20,000 that are disappeared, that we don’t know if they are buried under rubble, if they are detained in Israeli prisons. We don’t know where they are. So, over the course of these nine months, where that account, time and time again, has been heard, what we’ve also heard is that indication that U.S. weapons are being used. And U.S. weapons continue to be sent.

So, if we have not yet succeeded through the courts — and we will consider our next options, whether in domestic courts or in foreign courts or before international bodies, where we continue to press this case — we will also be bringing the case to those who are complicit. I think it’s time for weapons companies — you mentioned Boeing in that clip — to stop sending weapons. There are legal responsibilities and, frankly, moral responsibilities.

AMY GOODMAN: We have five seconds.

KATHERINE GALLAGHER: We call on the Biden administration to heed its at least moral responsibility and stop aiding and abetting genocide.

AMY GOODMAN: Katherine Gallagher, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

And that does it for our show. Democracy Now! is currently accepting applications for a director of development to lead our fundraising team. Learn more and apply at democracynow.org.

Democracy Now! is produced with Mike Burke, Renée Feltz, Deena Guzder, Sharif Abdel Kouddous, Messiah Rhodes, Nermeen Shaikh, María Taracena, Tami Woronoff, Charina Nadura, Sam Alcoff. Special thanks to Denis Moynihan. I’m Amy Goodman.




Most people probably don’t know this but Wikipedia has a page called “List of Israeli assassinations.” It begins in July 1956 and stretches over 68 years until today. The majority on the list are Palestinians; among them are famous Palestinian leaders PFLP’s Ghassan Kanafani, Fatah’s Khalil Ibrahim al-Wazir - also known as Abu Jihad, Hamas’s Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and Islamic Jihad’s Fathi Shaqaqi.

When looking at the long list, it is impossible not to notice that the number of assassinations and assassination attempts Israel has carried out over the years has increased exponentially: from 14 in the 1970s to well over 150 in the first decade of the new millennium and 24 since January 2020.

I was reminded of this list when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called a news conference on July 13 to celebrate Israel’s attempt to kill Hamas’s military commander Muhammad Deif in Gaza. Israeli fighter jets and drones had just hammered al-Mawasi camp, which now houses an estimated 80,000 displaced Palestinians living in densely populated tents.

Within just a few minutes of the fusillade, the pilots had massacred at least 90 Palestinians, including scores of women and children, while injuring an additional 300 people. All of this occurred in an area Israel had previously designated a “safe zone”. As gruesome images of dead bodies charred and shred to pieces filled social media, reports surfaced that Israel had used several US-made guided half-tonne bombs.

In his news conference at the Ministry of Defence headquarters in Tel Aviv just a few hours after this bloodbath, Netanyahu admitted that he was “not absolutely certain” that Deif had been killed but maintained that “just the attempt to assassinate Hamas commanders delivers a message to the world, a message that Hamas’s days are numbered.”

Yet even a quick perusal of the “List of Israeli assassinations” makes clear that Netanyahu was speaking with a forked tongue. He knows all too well that Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s political leaders Sheik Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi or military leaders Yahya Ayyash and Salah Shehade have done very little to weaken the movement and may well have increased its following.

If anything, years and years of Israeli assassinations demonstrate that they are primarily used by Israeli leaders to pander to and rally their constituencies. Netanyahu’s recent news conference is no exception.

But as macabre as the Wikipedia List is, the names on it only tell a partial story. That is because it fails to include the number of civilians killed during each and every successful and failed assassination attempt.

For example, the July 13 strike was the eighth known attempt on Deif’s life, and it is difficult to calculate the total number of civilians Israel has killed in its scramble to assassinate him. The Wikipedia List fails to capture how the increase in assassinations has led to an exponential increase in civilian deaths.

This becomes clear when we compare Israel’s current assassination policy with its policy during the second Palestinian Intifada. When Israel assassinated the head of Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades, Salah Shehade, in 2002, 15 people were killed, including Shehade, his wife, 15-year-old daughter, and eight other children. 


Turning to sports, THE PALESTINE CHRONICLE noted earlier this week:

 

PALESTINIAN FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION: 300 athletes were martyred during the aggression on the Gaza Strip, the last of whom was Shadi Abu Al-Araj, goalkeeper of the Khan Yunis Youth Team.

 

AFP notes:


Eight Palestinian athletes taking part in the Paris Olympics will be symbols of "resistance" during the Israel-Gaza war in Gaza, a Palestinian Minister said on Sunday as the official delegation left the occupied West Bank.

This will be the eighth time Palestinian athletes have taken part in the Olympics since 1996, but Olympic committee head Jibril Rajoub said the athletes had never felt so much attention.

The athletes are preparing for the start of the Paris Games on July 26 in a "very dark moment in our history", said Palestinian Authority Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Varsen Aghabekian Shahin.

"You are not just athletes, you are also ... symbols of Palestinian resistance," Ms Aghabekian added.

French organisers have stepped up security in Paris in response to the conflict.

"We want this participation to be a message from the Palestinians to the world that it is time for them to be free in their homeland," Mr Rajoub said.

"Through this participation, we want to present the suffering of the Palestinian people and the unprecedented killing taking place in Gaza."

 



Palestinian-American athlete Valerie Tarazi has arrived in Paris on a mission: To “speak up for the people who can’t” and raise hopes in Gaza as she prepares to represent them at the Olympics.

Making the Games “has been a dream of mine forever,” the swimmer, who will compete in the 200 meters individual medley, told NBC News in a video call, shortly after landing in the French capital last week.

Tarazi, who is planning to start a Ph.D. having just completed her master's degree in supply chain management at Alabama’s Auburn University, said she had envisioned herself at the Olympics ever since she was a child watching the Beijing Games in 2008.  

 But as well as fulfilling a personal ambition, Tarazi said, she hopes to use her presence in Paris to speak up for the people of Gaza, where more than 38,700 people have been killed in the Israeli military campaign, according to local health officials, since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, which saw around 1,200 people killed and around 240 people taken hostage, according to Israeli officials.

“We’re not here to compete for ourselves or represent ourselves,” said Tarazi, who was born and raised in Chicago. “This is more than that.”

The 24-year-old is one of eight Palestinian athletes set to compete in Paris, along with fellow swimmer Yazan al Bawwab, taekwondo fighter Omar Ismail and judoka Fares Badawi. Boxer Waseem Abu Sal, runners Layla Almasri and Mohammed Dwedar will also take part, while Jorge Antonio Salhe will compete in the skeet shooting. 







Gaza remains under assault. Day 285 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."   THE NATIONAL notes, "Gaza death toll reaches 38,794, with 89,364 wounded."  Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:

  



April 11th, Sharon Zhang (TRUTHOUT) reported, "In addition to the over 34,000 Palestinians who have been counted as killed in Israel’s genocidal assault so far, there are 13,000 Palestinians in Gaza who are missing, a humanitarian aid group has estimated, either buried in rubble or mass graves or disappeared into Israeli prisons.  In a report released Thursday, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said that the estimate is based on initial reports and that the actual number of people missing is likely even higher."
 

As for the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."

This morning, ALJAZEERA reports:

UNRWA is seen as a lifeline for Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip as it provides humanitarian support to millions of people.

But Israeli attacks and the blocking of crossings into the enclave have impeded aid distribution to 2.3 million people, most of whom are displaced, worsening the humanitarian crisis.

Antonio Guterres, the UN secretary-general said last week that the agency is also being targeted.

Here are some statistics since October 7 provided by UNRWA:

  • 189 UNRWA installations have been damaged.
  • As of July 14, Israeli forces had killed 197 UNRWA staff.
  • Only 10 of 26 UNRWA health centres in Gaza are currently operational.
  • There have been 458 incidents impacting UNRWA premises and the people inside them, including at least 74 incidents of military use or interference at UNRWA premises.



The following sites updated: