Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Washed up Giuliani

Washed up Rudy Giuliani refuses to acknowledge how awful his actions were and are.  But he does have time to complain about how he's drawn:

A courtroom sketch artist said Rudy Giuliani complained to her that a drawing she did of him made him look like a dog.

The former Trump lawyer’s reputation is going to the dogs after he was held in contempt Monday for failing to turn over assets to election workers he falsely accused of ballot manipulation. He was ordered to pay them $148 million in the defamation case. A judge this week ruled Giuliani had repeatedly violated a court mandate to fork over personal assets to the two Georgia women who were poll workers during the 2020 election.



He won't make his court ordered payments but, don't worry, he will have a hissy fit over the way a courtroom sketch artist draws him.  Meanwhile Margaret Hartmann (Intelligencer) writes:

Is Donald Trump about to make all of Rudy Giuliani’s legal troubles go away? That’s the impression you might get from the former presidential lawyer, who has been living life like he just has to make it to Trump’s second inauguration on January 20, 2025.

,

In October, Giuliani was ordered to turn over almost everything he owns — from his Upper East Side apartment to his 1980 Mercedes — in order to pay $148 million in damages for defaming Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. But since then, Giuliani has engaged in wild courtroom behavior and missed multiple deadlines to surrender his assets. Giuliani even asked to delay the trial over whether he must turn over his Florida home and his World Series rings so he can attend Trump’s inauguration festivities (the judge refused, saying the court doesn’t revolve around Giuliani’s “social calendar”). On January 6, Manhattan federal judge Lewis Liman found Giuliani in contempt for failing to turn over assets. Liman said he will rule on “appropriate sanctions” at a later date.


So what’s really going with Giuliani? Here’s what we know.

No. The defamation case brought by Freeman and Moss is a civil suit. The president can grant pardons only for federal criminal offenses.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Tuesday, January 7, 2025.  Senator Patty Murray notes the cap on prescription drugs, Donald Chump whines and whines, one of his lackeys lies for him (how is that different from any other day), BLUESKY and much more.


Let's start off with BLUESKY.  Ryan Cooper (TAP) reports:

One bright spot in the bleak year of 2024 was the rise of Bluesky. As someone who relied greatly on Twitter for news and my career—OK, I may have been somewhat addicted—before Elon Musk bought it and turned it into a snake pit of neo-Nazi filth, it was nice to see a Twitter-like replacement rise to relative prominence.

I joined in April 2023 as about the 47,000th user. Today, Bluesky has about 26 million users, and seems to be growing healthily. It actually has some notable improvements on Twitter, like the “starter pack” function where users can put together a group of accounts that one can follow at once (here’s the starter pack for Prospect writers, incidentally), or the “nuclear block” where if one participant in a conversation blocks the other, the entire conversation is zapped. This greatly cuts down on Twitter’s culture of aggressive pile-ons and abuse.

Unlike any other big platform, Bluesky does not censor posts with outgoing links. Indeed, it does not have any proprietary “for you” algorithm, instead defaulting to a traditional reverse-chronological feed, and allowing users to pick from algorithms that can be developed by others. This has major implications for publishers: Despite its modest size, The Guardian reports that Bluesky traffic has already outstripped that from Twitter, and here at the Prospect Bluesky traffic now regularly matches Twitter and is many times that of Facebook.

This ability to share outside the platform is proving so popular that Facebook’s Twitter clone, Threads, has belatedly altered its algorithm to include more posts from accounts you follow in an attempt to compete. And this disruption is being done on a shoestring budget—Bluesky has just 20 employees and about $23 million in funding, as compared to Meta’s 70,000+ workers and $156 billion in annual revenue.

It’s strong evidence that there is a large unmet demand for internet systems outside of the control of Big Tech monopolists. I don’t know if there can be a similar option for every walled garden on the internet—it’s hard to dislodge a giant—but there’s no question that there’s a lot of pent-up demand.


You can find out a lot on BLUESKY.







David Sirota's always a dirty fool.  Whether attacking the mother of an Iraq War veterans for speaking out against the Iraq War (and against the senator David worked for) or threatening us here because we pointed out what David left out when he attacked Tina in the column -- that the senator she was confronting was David's mentor and former boss.  Sort of a basic disclosure required in journalism but David thinks he makes up his own rules.

He has a filthy mouth and a lazy brain and that's why, when he was wrongly nominated for an Academy Award (for co-writing a piece of crap), I attended every event ahead of voting to make sure he didn't get the award -- I attended and took along printed copies of the nasty, threatening, bullying e-mail he sent me.  

It really exposed the true side of him to people who, like most of the world, would otherwise not even know his name.

POST-LEFT WATCH is on BLUESKY.  We've noted them for a couple of months now.  They're someone to watch and follow.  They call out the crazy.  






Isn't it great when a White man -- especially a liar like Christian -- wants to tell us about the targeting of a Black man and to explain it wasn't like what we thought it was.

He's such a damn liar and such a damn disgrace to his father.  He's also a closeted Socialist but, remember, we're never supposed to talk about that.

So there he was on Jimmy Dore rewriting history like only a Democrat hating Socialist can.  

It's hard for me to think of his nonsense without thinking of THE NEW YORK TIMES which launched a huge attack against Dr King and did so long before The Poor People's Campaign of 1968.  THE NEW YORK TIMES not only attacked him repeatedly -- and is corporate media, therefore a corporation -- but continued to attack and to denigrate him long after he was dead.

And they carried the attacks over onto Coretta. When she died, please remember, NYT had 'playwright' (she was not that good and she certainly wasn't worthy of more attention than Coretta Scott King) on the front page, ran three or so columns on her passing, did an editorial on her, blah blah blah, it never ended.  

"Why are you attacking me?"

That's what the paper's sole Black columnist at the time asked me.

Well, golly gee, you're Black and you have space on the op-ed pages and you're ignoring the fact that the paper is refusing to run columns -- because there were submissions by big name Black academics -- about Coretta's passing.  You're on the op-ed pages and you're writing garbage columns when you could be highlighting a pioneering Black woman who fought for a better America for all and continued her husband's legacy after he was assassianted.

The guilt trip got Coretta into a column by Bob.  Got her into it.  It wasn't about her.  But he worked in for two or three paragraphs.

And of course, Christian brings up the truth and the lies of NYT.

Put him on a minor media program with a small audience and he's telling the audience about how Dexter Filkins and John F Burns (NYT 'reporters') really were in the Green Zone.  Dexter especially did whatever the US military told him.  That included, Christian said on air, cancelling interviews when the US military conveyed that they'd prefer he not speak to this or that person.  

Now if he was going on something mainstream, he'd say exactly the opposite.  And of course when he was on an in-between program, he'd justify Dexy with comments like, 'The Dexter Filkins on the pages of THE NEW YORK TIMES is not the Dexter Filkins in Baghdad' -- meaning that it was the paper's problem and not Dexter bad journalism.

For those who don't know, our first weekend online back in 2004 called out Dexter for lies in print.  He won awards for those lies.  Is my face red?  No.  Because he covered up War Crimes with that article.  He covered them up.  They're known now but everyone looks the other way.  In 40 years, people will be calling for the dead reporter to be stripped of the prizes for his lying.

In forty years when it no longer matters.

But don't expect Christian to tell you any of that.  

On Iraq, this may be our last Iraq snapshot and the title may change to snapshot tomorrow.  I need to check.  Don't have time this second because we have other things still to cover.

BLUESKY is where it's happening.  

TWITTER is for elderly hate mongers -- like Katrina vanden Heuvel of THE NATION who led the attacks on Kamala.  But TWITTER's not the only cesspool.  Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) explains:

Facebook's parent company will make changes to its fact-checking to more closely resemble the site formerly known as Twitter.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday morning that content moderation and other restrictions on speech would be lifted across Facebook, Instagram and other platforms as Donald Trump returns to the White House, reported Fox News.

"We’re going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms," Zuckerberg said in a video posted Tuesday morning. "More specifically, we’re going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with Community Notes similar to X, starting in the U.S."

The company's third-party fact-checking program was put into place following Trump's first election win to "manage content" and misinformation on its platforms, which executives conceded was the result of "political pressure," but they now say that system has "gone too far."


In other news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump is still being a big titty baby because he's the continual disappointment that his father loathed and he's the man that could never satisfy Ivana.  He's just an immature jerk who never grew up and never stopped to grasp that there were other people on the earth and that they had feelings and the right to expect to be recognized.  Chump doesn't want to appear in person or via the internet on January 10th when he is to be sentenced.  His howler monkey Steven Cheung (who at 42 looks 97) declared, "The American People elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate that demands an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and all of the remaining Witch Hunts."  Chump lied on official documents.  There's no excuse for that and he can't pardon himself because it's not federal.  Chump is a sleazy, two-bit crook and that's what the record is going to reflect this week and forever more.

As for a mandate?


No, Steven, the American people didn't give him a mandate.

As Elaine noted Friday, there is no mandate.  1.8% isn't a mandate.  That's all Chump won by.  Ronald Reagan in 1984?  He got a mandate.  LBJ in 1964?  He got a mandate.

Convicted Felon?  He squeaked by with 1.8% more votes.  That's not a mandate.  See Elaine's "Can they stop lying about the 2024 election?"

Steven's clearly confused.  Must be overwork, right?  Can't be personal since he has no personal life.




 
 
 So it's work that consumes him.  And let us be the first to reveal his heretofore never discussed acting career.  For several years, Steven has appeared on the series AMERICAN DAD.



Don't know about you, but I think the jewels really make his eyes pop.


Speaking of idiots, Evan Williams (TAG24 NEWS) reports on one, "Republican Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman had to be shamed into agreeing to lower US flags to half-mast in honor of the late ex-president Jimmy Carter."  And now note this from the article:


Blakeman's original decision was seen as a response to rants made by Trump on Truth Social last week.

In response to the US flag potentially being left at half-mast during his inauguration, Trump said that Democrats "don't love our country" and are "giddy."

"In any event, because of the death of President Jimmy Carter, the Flag may, for the first time ever during an Inauguration of a future President, be at half-mast," Trump said.



Democrats don't love our country?  


He was never fit to be president.  He's a mad sociopath who is not fit to represent the American people and who only knows how to sew division.

Which makes him the ultimate LOVE CONNECTION for Elon Musk, right?


Yesterday was many things including the fourth year anniversary of the treasonous attack on our country.  Rachel Maddow addressed that last night on MSNBC.




Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

70,000+ seniors in Washington state, 4.5 million seniors nationwide will save hundreds or thousands of dollars each year thanks to the new annual cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for folks on Medicare Part D

***PHOTOS AND B-ROLL OF THURSDAY’S PRESS CONFERENCE AVAILABLE HERE***

In case you missed it: on January 1, a new provision that Democrats in Congress got signed into law went into effect, capping out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for seniors with a Medicare prescription drug plan at $2,000 a year. On Thursday, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, joined U.S. Representative Kim Schrier, M.D. (D-WA-08) at Northaven Senior Living in Seattle to highlight the new costs savings for millions of seniors.

The new cap is thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act Democrats passed through Congress in 2022—that every single Republican voted against—and it means millions of seniors will pay significantly less for their prescription drugs this year, lowering costs for families and giving them more breathing room.

“Starting January 1st, anyone with a Medicare prescription drug plan—also known as Medicare Part D—now has their out-of-pocket drug costs capped at two thousand dollars each year. That’s because of a law Democrats passed—the Inflation Reduction Act—that did all sorts of things to lower health care costs and make it cheaper and easier for folks to get the medications they need,” said Senator Murray. “As everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs—like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication. These are impossible choices that no one should ever have to make. But they’re the reality for so many people, and so many seniors especially. And make no mistake, when prescription drugs are too expensive for people to afford—that’s dangerous. Because even the best, most effective medication can’t do someone any good if they can’t afford to get it.”

Medicare Part D—a voluntary program that helps pay for prescription drugs for people with Medicare—provides prescription drug coverage for nearly 56 million Americans. More than 4.5 million older Americans enrolled in Part D are estimated to benefit from the new out-of-pocket spending cap that took effect January 1, 2025. Approximately 1.4 million Part D enrollees who reach the new out-of-pocket cap between 2025 and 2029 will see annual savings of $1,000 or more, and just over 420,000 will see savings of more than $3,000. In Washington state, at least 70,000 seniors are expected to see these new savings—nearly $1,900 in 2025—and that number will steadily increase over time.

The $2,000 annual cap is just one of the many actions Democrats took to lower prescription drug costs in the Inflation Reduction Act. Most notably, the law capped the cost of insulin for patients on Medicare at $35/month—which went into effect January 1, 2023—and it empowered Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for the first time ever.

  • In August, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced negotiated drug prices for ten commonly-used drugs in the first cycle of negotiations. The new, lower negotiated prices will go into effect on January 1, 2026, and will lower the prices people pay for some of the most common and expensive prescription drugs that treat heart disease, cancer, diabetes, blood clots, and more.
  • Allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug costs is expected to save American taxpayers $6 billion, with people enrolled in Medicare expected to save $1.5 billion in out-of-pocket costs in 2026 alone. 15 to 20 more drugs will be added to the negotiating table every year moving forward – all thanks to Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act.

See coverage of the landmark new prescription drug cap below:

Fox 13: Medicare prescription drug costs capped at $2,000 annually

Seniors on Medicare Part D will never pay more than $2,000 out-of-pocket for prescription drugs annually, thanks to a provision in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act which takes effect this year. The new benefit for seniors on Medicare Part D will cap out-of-pocket prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year. Once they reach this dollar amount, they will automatically receive “catastrophic coverage,” which means all out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs will be covered through the rest of the year. […]

In Washington state alone, 70,000 enrollees will save nearly $1,900 in 2025, with the number of beneficiaries growing over time.

“[It’s] a change that will save millions of people, hundreds or thousands of dollars on their prescription medications, every year from now on,” said U.S. Senator Patty Murray, who is a senior member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. “There is more to this story than just numbers—because as everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs. Like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication.” […]

“This cap means I can afford my medications without having to cut back on essentials like food or utilities,” said Katherine O’Hara, a local senior who is on Medicare.

Stephan Gerhardt, who lives with dystonia and degenerative disc disease, also praised the change.

“One of my anti-inflammatory medications isn’t covered by my insurance, but luckily, it only costs $45 a bottle and lasts six months,” Gerhardt said. “I’m fortunate compared to others.”

Gerhardt, who has been on Medicare for over a decade due to his disabilities, said the new law will help many seniors in his community avoid tough choices between essential needs.

“People I know often have to decide: ‘Do I eat, pay rent, or take my meds?’” said Gerhardt. “Almost everybody will choose to pay rent because they can’t survive being homeless; and then it’s, ‘How do I figure out food?’”

“This is life-changing for folks who can’t afford their medications,” said Gerhardt. “It reduces the strain on individuals and the healthcare system. If people can afford their medications, they’re less likely to end up in emergency rooms, which costs everyone more in the long run.”

Despite the bipartisan benefits, every Republican in Congress voted against the Inflation Reduction Act, a point highlighted by Murray. She warned of potential future efforts to repeal the law.

“This is about making life more affordable and ensuring no one has to risk their health because they can’t afford medication,” Murray said. “The President-Elect has talked about cutting everything, so he’s got everything in front of him, and we’re going to make sure this is not one he goes after.”

KING 5: Prescription drug costs now capped at $2,000 a year for some Washington seniors on Medicare

Sen. Patty Murray held a press conference Thursday in light of a cap on prescription drug costs for some on Medicare going into effect.

Out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications will be capped at $2,000 a year for seniors on Medicare Part D. Part D is a voluntary program that pays for prescription drug medication that covers nearly 56 million Americans.

The change was included in the Inflation Reduction Act that was passed in Congress in August of 2022. […]

“As everyone knows, high drug prices cause other painful costs, like stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills they needed to skip in order to take a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing medication,” Murray said. “Those are impossible choices that no one should ever have to make, but they’re the reality for many people and many seniors.”

Other provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act also take aim at drug costs for people with Medicare. The cost of insulin is capped at $35 a month and recommended vaccines like the flu, shingles, COVID-19 and RSV are free to everyone with Medicare Part D, according to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

###




The following sites updated:

Monday, January 6, 2025

Who you gonna believe

 Might there finally be some real justice in the country?  Gina Martinez (The Mirror) reports: "Judge finds Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court for failing to turn over assets to Georgia election workers."  That single sentence provides me with so much joy.  Rudy G just can't stop lying.  NBC News notes:



Giuliani said Friday that the DiMaggio jersey was “missing,” and denied an assertion made by his friend Monsignor Alan Placa that he had seen it framed in Giuliani’s property in Palm Peach, Florida, within the past two years.

On Monday, Giuliani said he's still searching for the jersey. "I don't know where it is, and it is hard to recreate who took it, and I am personally conducting my own investigation about this," he said.

Giuliani on Friday also denied withholding other Yankees memorabilia, saying he wasn’t “hiding” a signed image of Reggie Jackson, another Hall of Famer, that the election workers’ attorney said was listed as an asset in a bankruptcy document.



Okay, let's put our heads together on this one.  Monsignor, a man of the cloth, says one thing and Rudy G says another.  Hmm.  Which one would most likely be lying?


Go read Stan's "10 actors who should be retired and go off into obscurity" if you haven't already.


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Monday, January 6, 2025.   We're not tolerating political closets and let's outline exactly how much damage those closeted, non-Democrats did to the 2024 election while pretending that they were Democrats.


Friday, we were talking about the way forward (you can also refer to Wednesday's "2024: The Year of Betrayal From Inside The Left") and how we use this platform this year.  We're going to expand on that but two videos that went up here yesterday we are going to note at the top. 


First, THE MAJORITY REPORT.



Where are we going to take the show?  Sam asks that and it's something anyone with a platform should be asking.  Here?  We're not plaforming liars.  Last night, in "A crazy mistakes herself for Paul Revere," we noted crazy Jessica Denson.  We noted her before when she was with another outlet -- they have parted ways as she constantly insists, and we noted her a week or so after the election and noted that I was not interested in election lies.  She was going to get the results overturned because she knew this or she knew that.  And I noted that I would love for the results to be different but that they weren't.  And I noted that different results would mean we lived in a far less racist country than we do.


Last night, I get on, at a party, to do an entry and the public e-mail account is swamped with over 70 e-mails insisting that Jessica's latest video has to be covered.  It was garbage and I outlined why.  We are done with her.  

That's not the first person time we've had to wash out hands of people who are self-defeating.  Another group like that was noted by Rebecca in "the oklahoma trash behind 'i've had it' podcast" on Friday. 


We're also not noting you if you're in a political closet.  Meaning?  If I know you're not a Democrat but you're lying online that you are, I'm not interested in you.  DEMOCRACY NOW! brought on one Socialist after another to slam Kamala during the general election and they presented as Democrat.  That's how they lie. 


There's nothing wrong being a Socialist.  But a Socialist doesn't like Democrats.  That's why you see so much praise for Bernie Sanders.  The decades of racism, for example, slid right by.  It takes a Black YOUTUBER -- such as Roland Martin -- to tell the truth about Bernie that not White YOUTUBER wants to.  The left outlets attacked Kamala.  But they found time -- COMMON DREAMS, THE NATION, DEMOCRACY NOW!, THE PROGRESSIVE, etc  -- to praise Tim Walz?  Why?  They never told you and they want us to not know what happened or to not talk about it.  Now.  But in August Democratic Socialists of America bragged to the press -- and at their Twitter feed -- that they got Tim Walz on the ticket!!!! He was their guy!!!!  (Sabby Sabs might get noted again because, if you look, she called them out in a response on that official Tweet.) 


He was a lousy candidate.  The debate between vice presidential nominees is always about drawing blood.  Tim did not just fail to draw blood, he was an embarrassment.  Sweating on camera, looking like a stooge, not knowing what word he was about to say next as he struggle to speak.  An embarrassment.


Now ask yourself why these same outlets didn't tell you that?  Because he was their guy.  They, DSA insisted, got him on the ticket.


And they shielded him from any press critiques.  Rebecca was right, the governor o Kentucky was the way to go.  Not some looney tune who made Elmer Fudd look like a genius.  And that's before we get into all the lies -- or, if you prefer, "whoppers" -- he kept telling during the campaign.  We'll go into this more, I'm sure as the year goes along.


And we'll probably touch again on the SEP.  I've noted them, we've noted their publication, WSWS.  They are Socialists.  I have no problem with Socialists.  I do have a problem with Socialists who want to pretend that they're Democrats.  Say what you are.  The reason that they won't is because they know that'll cut their audience down and also make their arguments/lies be taken less seriously.


Some people get this, some people don't.  Kamala lost because of voter suppression.  Outlets on the left elected to attack her daily for three months solid.  They repeated lies about her -- Amy Goodman made a point to air the attack on Kamala's race from Donald Trump repeatedly and only one time did she bring on a guest to refute it.  They knew what they were doing and you need to know what they did and what they'll do again.  


Because of their actions, the electoral college with give the presidency to Chump later today.


We can't afford them.


And if you're feeling sorry for the fake asses -- include Jill Stein in that --we can go over the debate that the fake ass Uncommitted 'movement' carried out.  We can go over how they had Jill and Cornel there for a debate.  And we can go over how they refused to allow the SEP's presidential candidate to be on that stage.  How they lied to the SEP and claimed there would be another event but there wasn't.  The closet cases just didn't want an out Socialist on the stage.


We may also go into how certain Palestinian-Americas did the front work for Uncommitted while the true organizers like Norman Solomon hid in the background.


Does it matter?

Second, I said two videos, Hal Sparks.



Cenk and Ana.  


Ana says she didn't even vote for president.


Hmm.


Well the thing here is the grift.  And the thing here is that the grift is not new.  


I had a good friend decades ago who I haven't spoken to since because he was a Socialist who moved over to the right wing.  He was hurt and didn't do it for money -- move over to the right -- but he stayed there because of the money.  And I've seen that over and over.


Ana and Cenk are Socialists.  That's why Bernie was all over Cenk's campaign until one too many disgusting details emerged about Cenk.  That's why "Justice Democrats" came about -- Kyle and Cenk's Socialist election campaigns.  See Mike's "Yea for Sarah McBride, remember when Socialist Kyle Kulinski was for Jill Stein, and Idiot of the Week."


They lied to you.


And then, in 2024, they lied some more.


But they lied all along because they weren't Democrats, they were Socialists.


Ana got a JACOBIN podcast which people want to forget but it happened and it is why JACOBIN doesn't want to call her out on her right wing drift because she knows a little too much about Socialists in closets.  

They let Ana attack Katie Halper (also a Socialist) on their own podcast.  They didn't drop her then.  Even though she attacked Katie in a podcast where Ana's guest was Katie's co-host.


And that's another reason to dislike Katie.  She was attacked and she didn't say a word.  Acted like it didn't happen, acted like Nacho Noodlers or whatever the idiot's name was, hadn't joined Ana in attacking her.


She's pathetic.


But the point here is, right now everyone's noting how badly Cenk and Ana are betraying the Democratic Party and how they are stabbing it.


But people are still pretending that those two were Democrats.  They were not.  They're angry Socialists that are pimping the right wing.  The Max Blumenthal 'left.'


They are not helping the Democratic Party.


We'll note criticism in 2025 of the Democrats.  I'm sure I'll have plenty myself, but we'll note WSWS and others as well.  They can be of the left and we'll note them.  What we won't note is political closet cases because while we're trying to have an honest conversation, they're trying to trick and lie -- that's why they hide in their political closets.


If those who invested so much into Cenk and Ana over the years had know that the two were not Democrats, that they were Socialists, Cenk and Ana wouldn't have gotten away with as much.


Which brings us to the fake assery of BREAKING POINTS.  Apparently, even they realize that they went too far too early.  Which is why they're now burying a video they posted over the weekend.  You can't find it at their YOUTUBE site.  But it existed and Socialist -- not Democrat -- Briahna Joy Gray was the guest and she Tweeted about it:


Will the Democrats learn anything from their 2024 defeat?


@briebriejoy

 says don’t count on it.


“They will do this quick mea culpa and then it’s going to be back to business as usual”


WATCH: http://youtu.be/cMeCKzOAmKM


Imagine that, before Chump's even declared the victor in the election, BREAKING POINTS is already telling you that Dems will sell out.


Why is that?


Because they're not Democrats.


People wrongly thing because of creepy guy being a Republican, that the show is about a Republican and a Democrat having conversations.  It's a bigger fake assery than CROSSFIRE on CNN ever was.


We stopped noting them because Saagar was scapegoating gay men (glass houses?) over Monkeypox and then Krystal did her order that all must support Marianne Williamson -- you know, Krystal and Kyle's wedding guest that neither wanted you to know that fact?


I'm tired of liars.  Bri is not a Democrats. She's a Socialist.  So she was brought on to attack the Dems and by not explaining who she really is, it comes off much differently to the viewers.  Titsy another Socialist.  I'm glad she finally learned to wear a bra.  I know Rania's streaming numbers dropped when she did but no one needed her delivering 'news' in tight shirts, no bra while she jumped around.  Yes, she really was that pathetic.  And who is she with now?


Oh, that's right: BREAKING POINTS.


Rania is not a Democrat.  And let's go to one of her Tweets at random. 

This is what Trump surrogates told Arabs in Dearborn, while Harris refused to even meet with them and kept insulting them. 


It’s likely untrue, but his campaign repeatedly told Arab Americans they would stop the wars. 


So if you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the Democratic Party for appealing to racists and republicans instead of their actual base and those hurting from a Democrat sponsored genocide.

Quote

Rania Khalek

@RaniaKhalek

·

Nov 1, 2024

At a Trump event in Dearborn, Michigan former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell told me Trump will not appount Mike Pompeo or John Bolton or Jared Kushner to any role and said Amos Hochstein & Brett McGurk would get the boot.

10:56 AM · Nov 6, 2024

·

48.3K

 Views


Rania lies about who she is politically and lies about everything.  Kamala Harris did meet with Palestinian-Americans -- including Rashida Tlaib's sister.  But there's Rania lying because a Socialist will tear apart a Democrat with lies.  And many people know that which is why so many Socialists on the left lie about who and what they really are.


But look at that Tweet within a Tweet.  Rania Tweeted it.  As truth.  She Tweeted Trump's lie as truth.  That he would be better for Palestine.


Starting get why she had to use her (average size) breasts for attention for most of her career?


They're liars and we can't afford them.  So they're not going to be noted.  BREAKING POINTS is a Socialist platform that hides who they really are.  They have right-wing Republican hosts who attack the Democratic Party and then they bring on the 'left' to attack the Democratic Party and never once let you know that these people are not Democrats.


It's a grift and it's a con.  


And you're seeing the end results right now with Cenk and Ana.  This is how it ends.  We don't need to repeat this in 2028 or, for that matter, 2026.  It's time to send a message that we will not let them stay in the closet and misrepresent who they actually are as they try to destroy the Democratic Party.


No.  


Not going to happen.

 

And by eliminating the liars, we might be able to have an honest conversation.  


Elaine served up some honesty on Friday:


Can they stop lying about the 2024 election?

That idiot James Carville is yammering away with more lies.  I just wonder when can we get honest about this past election?  C.I.'s "2024: The Year of Betrayal From Inside The Left" delivered a ton of honesty.  At one point, before she edited it down (to a little over 11,000 words), she talked about the percentage and how  people were being ahistorical about it to argue for their nonsense -- 'Dems should turn their back on trans rights!' and other nonsense.  


So let's talk about that.

Let's start by noting the AP count for 2024's presidential election popular vote and we're looking at the percentage:

1.5%.  That was the percentage that Chump won by.  

Let's drop back to 2004:

Popular vote 62,040,610 59,028,444
Percentage 50.7% 48.3% 


50.7% to 48.3%


Do you remember that?  Bully Boy Bush won.  John Kerry lost to him by 2.4%


Let's to back another 20 years.


Popular vote 54,455,472 37,577,352
Percentage 58.8% 40.6% 

Ronald Reagan won.  He got 58.8% of the vote to Mondale's 40.6%. Reagan won by 18.2%


Popular vote 43,129,040 27,175,754
Percentage 61.1% 38.5% 


LBJ won with 61% of the vote.  That's 22.6% that he beat Barry Goldwater by.


Are you getting the point yet?  We're focusing on percentages because they don't change.  The number of those voting. 


Chump won.  That's the story at the end of the day and I'm not trying to pretend it's not.

But the hand wringing that's taking place and the nonsense of Seth Moulton, James Carville and others is not about the results.  If we're talking about results, the totals don't call for massive changes.  


Chump is not going to make our lives better.  Four years from now, the country will want a new direction.  That includes those who voted for Trump.


Kamala got 1.5% less votes.  The most likely reason for that is because of the non-stop attacks that THE NATION, COMMON DREAMS, THE PROGRESSIVE, DEMOCRACY NOW! and others carried out on Kamala from August through the end of October.  It's past time for that to be addressed. 


Kamala performed amazingly well considering that elements of the left media -- non-Democrats -- worked to dampen enthusiasm for her campaign every single day.  That's reality.  And that can never happen again.  


The following sites updated: