Friday, February 28, 2025

Politics, Prime Target and The Last Showgirl

I think you all know I love Trina and I love her website.  Last night's "Tuna Melt Sandwiches in the Kitchen" made me very sad.  Trina started her site to cover food and to do so because our economy was so bad and people were struggling with food prices.  Bully Boy Bush occupied the White House then.  All these years later, she's still having to do it.  And one of her readers, Geri, suggested the recipe because her husband has lost his job and they're down to one paycheck (her husband was a federal government worker).  I always love the recipes that Trian and her readers share.  But I'm just shaking my head that we're now not just back there, we're now worse than we were back then.


It's so sad. 


We could have progressed.  Joe Biden got us back onto track.  Kamala could have carried us further.  


I'm a Green.  My parents are Greens.  Cedric, my husband, is a Democrat.  My parents and I voted for Kamala Harris.  We realized her qualifications and we realized how important this moment was. 


I don't have a lot of sympathy for any Green that voted for Jill Stein.  We all knew Jill was a fake ass -- Greens all knew.

She runs for office and then runs off.  She did it again.  From Ava and C.I.'s ""Media: Thrillers and Spoilers"

SPOILER: PRIME TARGET is strong show that avoids the problems of THE NIGHT AGENT by making the character of the male lead gay or bisexual.  THE NIGHT AGENT returned for a less than inspiring season two.  The biggest problem?  Though a significant amount of time has passed since season one, the two leads -- who we rooted for as a couple -- have to reconnect.  Leo Woodall plays Edward Brooks, a grad student, who studies numbers and is developing a possible cypher that would act as a decoder for all computer workings.  Taylah (Quintessa Swidnell) is a US spy.  She is one of the agents monitoring the UK based college Edward attends.  SPOILER: As Ed and Taylah will both learn, don't trust your mentor.

Trust really is the key issue for PRIME TARGET.


Reminds us of Jill Stein, the con artist embraced by the Green Party again in 2024.

Six.  

And six.

What are those numbers?

The first is the number of videos Green Party 2020 presidential candidate Howie Hawkins has done since the 2024 election.

Six is also the number of videos Howie did in the equivalent period following the 2020 election.

Spoiler:  Zero.

That's the number of videos Jill Stein has created since the election.  It's also the number of videos she has ever created.

She was the Green Party's candidate in the 2012 presidential election.  And again in 2016.  Then last year as well.  She never does anything to build the party. 


She's done nothing again.  

It was very important that, as a country, we protect ourselves by voting for Kamala.  


I don't have sympathy for those on the left who worked to defeat her.   Defeating her meant defeating us, defeating our democracy.  I don't think I'm a Green anymore.  I don't have respect for the party anymore.  It was bad enough that they ran a 74 year old at a time when people are calling for younger leaders but that they ran someone for the third time?  And then they just watched as she attacked Kamala and stayed silent on Donald Chump.  

I have no sympathy.


I have no sympathy for those influenced by Rashida Tlaib.  You betrayed the country and you betrayed the people and, as all of us said in real time, you were betraying Palestinians because Chump was not going to protect Palestinians.


No sympathy for you at all.


Okay, two media notes.  First, Prime Target.  I included the paragraph about it from Ava and C.I.'s review because this is a really great show.  It's on APPLE+ and it really is full of twists and turns.  And I purchased The Last Showgirl -- I mention that because it made my  "2024 in film (Ann and Stan)" and Stan's "2024 in film (Ann & Stan)" best films of 2024:



 8) THE LAST SHOWGIRL


Gia Coppola's drama has the spirit that American indies had before big studio's started snapping them up and sapping them up.  A first rate cast -- including Pamela Anderson, Dave Butista, Jamie Lee Curtis and Jason Schwartzman -- shine and register as the plot moves in story teller fashion -- as opposed to the Sy Field cookie cutter fashion that destroyed enthusiasm for film.  Not yet available on streaming.  Sorry but we have pirated copies.  We'll buy streaming copies of the film -- purchase not rent -- when it comes out.  But we heard good things and when it started showing up at the Black barbershops, we got our pirated copies because, if it was as good as we kept hearing, we wanted it on our list.  It wasn't as good as we heard, it was better.  


I did pre-order the film because I do not believe in piracy.  It's now for sale on streaming platforms.  

 This is C.I.'s "The snapshot:"


Friday, February 28, 2025.  Donald Chump's erratic and confused nature does not instill confidence, polling reflects this as Americans reject The Chump-Musk Destroy America Campaign. 

How are things for the Convicted Felon Donald Chump?  Sarah K. Burris (RAW STORY) reports:   


Longtime Republican Party pollster Sarah Longwell is conducting focus groups with voters of President Donald Trump — and she's beginning to see some "buyer remorse."

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace introduced the segment, playing the comments from a participant who voted for Trump.

"There's a lot of babies being tossed out with the bath water, to use an old-fashioned phrase, in this first few weeks and, of course, as usual, and I'm disappointed about this with President Trump because he served before, we're just forfeiting respect internationally daily," said one Trump voter.
"If we had a drinking game where everyone took a drink when word 'reverse course' or 'walking this back,' we'd be drunk in 20 minutes. It's chaos up there," he added.
"I think what we're starting to see is the very beginning of buyer's remorse setting in," said Longwell. "And the voters that I was talking to — both before the election — and after the election that are kind of these, we say, low-information. But we just mean people who aren't tapped into politics all the time. They voted for Donald Trump for one very specific reason. They thought things were too expensive. And they still think things are too expensive."

What is coming up now, she said, is that they don't like Trump's priorities.

"They're like, what is he focusing on? I didn't vote for this dismantling of the government!" said Longwell.

She noted that there are people online who are excited about DOGE, but the people she spoke to are citing friends or family members who are dealing with the government purge. This isn't just a "message" from Democrats.

"It's that people are experiencing negative personal consequences as a result," Longwell explained, noting Musk's work is simply that "vast."
 

“I think what we’re starting to see is the very beginning of buyer’s remorse setting in,” Longwell told MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace on Deadline: White House. “And the voters that I was talking to both before the election and after … They voted for Donald Trump for one very specific reason—they thought things were too expensive, and they still think things are too expensive.”

The segment also played a few recordings sent over by frustrated Trump voters who detailed why they’ve been disappointed with the president’s moves so far.

It's not one issue, it's pretty much every issue that Chump's failing on.  The economy?  Paul Krugman (SUBSTACK) provides this overview:

Early this month Donald Trump announced that he was about to impose 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Then he put them on pause for 30 days. So are they on again next week? Yesterday he insisted that they are. But will they really happen? Nobody knows.

Trump is also threatening a trade war with the European Union, which he says “was formed to screw the United States.” (It was actually created with America’s blessing, because we saw it as a force for peace and democracy.) Will he follow through on his threat? Nobody knows.

The legislation currently providing the federal government with the money it needs to stay open will expire on March 14, and it’s by no means clear that Republicans have the votes to continue that funding. So will the U.S. government shut down? Nobody knows (although betting markets say that there’s a better than even chance that it will.)

The real possibility of a general shutdown aside, will DOGE’s efforts to fire large numbers of federal workers — half the staff of the Social Security Administration! — cripple essential government services? Nobody knows.


The rising prices, the erratic behavior from the nation's supposed leader, the government layoffs, confidence in the economy is fading.   Shawn Donnan and Claire Ballentine (BLOOMBERG NEWS) explain:

President Donald Trump’s plan to impose new tariffs on imports to force manufacturers to relocate production to the US is getting a skeptical reaction from one important audience: American consumers.

Almost 60% of US adults expect Trump’s tariffs will lead to higher prices, according to a Harris Poll conducted for Bloomberg News. Some 44% say the levies are likely to be bad for the US economy — compared to 31% who say they’d be a boost.


On today's The Daily Blast with Greg Sargent, Greg addresses American sentiment regarding the economy:


Sargent: Let’s start with this Bloomberg poll. Not only do 59 percent say Trump’s tariffs will bring higher prices, 61 percent say food prices have increased in the last month. Only 38 percent think the economy is working for them. All this is echoed by a whole bunch of other polls and by worsening consumer sentiment metrics. It’s worth pointing out, Andrew, that many economists agree with these majorities. They, too, say Trump’s tariffs will lead to rising prices. Your reaction to all of it?

Bates: Yeah, I think that he betrays the fundamental promise that he made to the country. I remember in the Republican National Convention speech, he told people on day one—that’s a direct quote—prices will fall across the board. He also said that inflation would end immediately—immediately is also a direct quote. He was very explicit about this. And of course that was a false promise. Tariffs are a tax, and they are a tax that is disproportionately paid by people who are not wealthy, people that spend a greater percent of their income on daily necessities, food, clothing.

And I think that what’s especially telling about this is the revenue that they make from these tariff taxes—the revenue they’re taking in from middle-class folks who they said they were going to fight for—they’re turning around and they’re using it to make room in the budget for tax giveaways to billionaires and big corporations. It’s like a Bernie Madoff scheme. They are trying to take money out of the bank accounts of hardworking people after they got their votes promising lower cost, lower prices. Instead, they’re actively raising prices that they said they were going to reduce, and taxing people for it, and they’re pocketing that money.

Sargent: It’s a funny thing, Andrew. Trump is explicit on this point because he keeps saying the tariffs are going to bring in gangbusters revenue. Well, what do they need the revenue for?

Bates: That’s right. Because they’re trying to add trillions to the deficit with tax giveaways for the wealthy. And you mentioned the DOGE cuts too. That also relates to this because while everybody is against waste—myself, every Democrat I’ve ever known—a lot of what they’re cutting is bone and not fat. For example, they fired people who have been in charge of fighting bird flu while egg prices are skyrocketing. They want to use the money that went to those salaries for tax cuts for the rich. And it’s also true of the Medicaid cuts and the Affordable Care Act cuts they want to make. That is also to accommodate tax welfare for the richest people in the country, for Elon Musk and for Donald Trump themselves. It’s just a total reverse of what they promised voters. 


On the economy, remember that today's National Economic Blackout.  Anne Marie Lee (CBS NEWS)  noted yesterday:

Over the past few weeks, information has been spreading on social media about a nationwide economic protest called the "Feb 28 Economic Blackout."

The call to action — or rather inaction — is asking that American consumers refrain from making any purchases at major retailers on Friday, February 28. The protest comes as people continue to endure rising prices on everything from food and gas to housing and utilities, epitomized by the soaring cost of eggs which in January averaged $4.95 a dozen.

"I'm just not going to spend any money tomorrow," said Pat Gavin-Gordon, 83, who lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Gavin-Gordon learned of the boycott from an email circulated among a small group of friends of hers which she describes as "socially responsible women who try to do things for the community and help people."

A lifelong social activist, Gavin-Gordon said she marched along highway I-25 in Denver with civil rights leader Cesar Chavez in the 70s. She sees Friday's protest as a way to voice her disapproval of many things she said she sees going on today, from the cancellation of DEI by corporations to the Department of Government Efficiency's firing of thousands of federal workers.

"All these young people were being laid off for bad performance, which is not true at all," said Gavin-Gordon. 

Also supporting the Economic Blackout is Isabel Cotarelo from Kingston, New York. "I'm all for 2/28 Economic Blackout to demonstrate that the majority of people don't agree with the way things are being taking over the richest man in the world, how the oligarchs are supporting this government and only care about enriching themselves," the 69-year-old artist told CBS MoneyWatch.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk — the world's richest person, with a net worth of $398 billion — has been tasked by President Trump to oversee DOGE, in slashing government spending and cutting the federal workforce.

"One day of Economic Blackout may not impact the corporations gravely, but they will see that there is action and that action, hopefully, will inspire more people to resist this horrendous path my dear country is going through," Cotarelo said.



On BLUESKY people are noting today's economic blackout. 






Last night, Rachel Maddow covered the layoffs and the public support for the government workers as well as so many erratic and crazed things about Donald Chump's second failed presidency.





There is no stability.

Last weekend, Alien Musk -- in his role of presidential consort -- was demanding that federal employees e-mail him on Monday justifying their jobs.  And some agencies told their staff to ignore the e-mail, don't respond.  Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard were among the ones telling employees at the agencies they headed not to respond to the e-mail.  Then Alien Musk announced that they had to reply or risk being fired.  Then Donald Chump said it was "somewhat voluntary."


Is anyone in charge?  Anyone rational and possibly on their meds?  Chump and his administration can't be consistent from day to day.  They have no idea what they're doing.  That's why Musk keeps firing people only to realize their jobs are required and needed.  The incompetence on display just signals how unprepared and unqualified Chump and his administration truly are. 



How's life going for Alien Musk?  Jennifer Bowers Bahney (RAW STORY) reports:

Attitudes have changed, however, in statehouses across the country with lawmakers who are vehemently opposed to Musk's growing influence over the Trump administration.



“Given these mounting concerns and the potential material impact on pension fund portfolios, I would appreciate a response detailing your firm’s assessment of Tesla’s current valuation and the steps you are taking to protect AFT members who are your clients and beneficiaries,” Weingarten said at the end of the letter.  

The letter was sent to the CEOs of six asset managers, with the Tesla board and Elon Musk copied onto the message.

In the letter, Weingarten goes directly after Musk, saying he is a big reason people are losing trust in Tesla.  

“According to the American EV Jobs Alliance, EV swing consumers—those open to EVs once costs drop—view Musk negatively, making customer expansion even harder. Just last week, Stifel analyst Stephen Gengaro declared that Tesla’s net favorability is at an all-time low at 3 percent, down from 9 percent in January 2024,” Weingarten wrote. 


In the fall of 1984, when I was a senior in high school in Washington, DC, the protests at the South African Embassy began. Civil rights leaders met with the ambassador of South Africa on Thanksgiving Eve. Timed for maximum press coverage, that meeting became a sit-in, and that sit-in launched a movement. Soon, there were protests at consulates across the country. College students held rallies, built “shantytowns,” and pushed their schools to divest.

Area high school kids like me got in on protesting the embassy too. And we had a soundtrack. “Free Nelson Mandela” had been released by the Specials in March. The leader of that British ska band, Jerry Dammers, later admitted he didn’t know much about Mandela before he went to an anti-apartheid concert in the UK, where a long-simmering boycott movement was rolling into a boil. The DC music scene was pretty wild then—a bouillabaisse of go-go, R&B, punk, New Wave; there was breakdancing in the hallways during lunch hour—and for some of us, ska was sort of a unified field theory. Musically but also culturally. (If you have a racist friend / now is the time, now is the time for your friendship to end.)

But it wasn’t just kids who cosplayed in checked socks or porkpie hats. In 1985, a month after I started college, Artists Against Apartheid recorded Steven Van Zandt’s “(I Ain’t Going to Play) Sun City”—essentially the music world launching its own boycott on South Africa. The song was not (like, at all) great, but the wild cross-genre supergroup—DJ Kool Herc, Lou Reed, Bonnie Raitt, Gil Scott-Heron, Pat Benatar, Bono, and Miles Davis to name but a very, very few—guaranteed continual rotation on a relatively new cultural phenomenon: MTV.

We were getting a collective education: Because South Africa was so dependent on Black labor and exports, if industrialized nations withheld trade and investments, we could backstop Black South Africans who’d been directly resisting the Afrikaner regime for decades. So, suddenly, amazingly, we did. By 1986, Congress had imposed sanctions on South Africa and banned direct flights to it. Coca-Cola became the first major company to pull out of South Africa. Sports teams joined the musicians in refusing to play there. Divestment battles raged on campuses and boardrooms for the rest of the ’80s. And they worked. South Africa’s economy ground to a near halt. Mandela was freed in 1990, and negotiations to wind down apartheid began. By 1994, free elections were held and Mandela became president.

I found myself reconstructing this history recently, as the protests and boycotts against Tesla began. Do you need a reminder as to why? Okay: Tesla CEO Elon Musk—the world’s richest man, and Trump’s biggest campaign donor; an unelected, ketamine-happy, video game cheating, transphobic, subsidyguzzling, deadbeat dad—is leading a bunch of scythe-wielding mini-me shitposters through innards of the federal government, harvesting and compromising the most essential data of every taxpayer, government contractor, and NGO in America. Oh, and he’s also supporting fascists, using apparent Nazi salutes, and blasting antisemitic and racist theories to his millions of followers.

Anyway, the dude is bad news. And he’s threatening to use his hundreds of billions—again, money he would not have without US subsidies—to take out any politician, foreign or domestic, who opposes his and Trump’s agenda, which is a mix of toxic masculinity, grift, and a seeming desire to return to a gauzy form of racial apartheid.

Words like “apartheid” and “Nazi” shouldn’t be tossed around lightly. Musk has denied he’s a Nazi, and that his salute was a Nazi salute. But clear-eyed commentators aren’t buying it, and white nationalists like Nick Fuentes are downright jubilant: “That was a straight up, like, Sieg Heil, like loving Hitler energy.” And then there’s Musk’s history. His maternal grandparents were, according to Musk’s own father, members of the Canadian neo-Nazi party who decamped to South Africa because they were fans of racial oppression. Musk has been pretty mum about what it was like to grow up in South Africa and the influence that had on him. (Today he holds US, Canadian, and South African citizenship.) But the fact is that many white South Africans who left at that time did so because their position of privilege was coming to an end.

In any case, once in the States, Musk joined forces with fellow South Africans Peter Thiel, David Sacks, and Roelof Botha—grandson of former South African leader Pik Botha; now the head of venture capital giant Sequoia Capital—to form PayPal. And they revealed themselves to be racial reactionaries. Thiel (who, according to his biographer, once called critiques of apartheid “overblown”) and Sacks wrote “The Case Against Affirmative Action” for Stanford Magazine in 1996. They’ve led concerted, organized attacks on DEI. Musk, who was under federal investigation for racial discrimination in his Tesla factories—that is, until Trump took over—is supporting extremist movements across the world, using Holocaust Remembrance Day to tell Germans they should no longer feel “guilt” over it, and echoing South Africans who claim they’re victims of “white genocide.”

So yes, some people are too quick to label people they don’t like as Nazis. But also, people who don’t want to be called Nazis should avoid giving Nazi salutes.


Apartheid is a huge issue here.  You can see it in the attacks on people of color from the administration and you can see it in the attacks on modern day South Africa -- modern day South Africa where apartheid -- much to Musk's regret -- has ended.  And good for Clara for making the connections.  Some writers can churn out an entire book and never manage to grasp the obvious -- see Ava and my "Media: OWNED finds Eoin Higgins owned by bad journalism" for an example of how Higgins did just that. 


This country never knew Musk.  They knew a p.r. created dream.  He wanted to sell Teslas and conservatives aren't big on electronic cars so he pandered to the left and he got rewarded with easy press and easy press.  Most didn't even know, ten years ago as he was being pimped on THE SIMPSONS and elsewhere, that he was from another country and they certainly didn't grasp his support for racism.  An e-mail accused me of 'othering' him.


You don't need to accuse me of that.


I'll gladly cop to it.


It's about time those of us of color learned how to turn othering back on White racists.  


Yeah, America doesn't like him.  He is the other.  He's got a creepy voice, he looks ridiculous, his accent is laughable and he's corrupt as hell.  He's unelected but he's determining who gets to keep a job and who doesn't and who's entitled to government services and who isn't and whether we -- Americans, real ones not abusers with triple citizenship -- owe our veterans.


I'm not one of those 'support the . . .'  people.  I've never been that.  I'm not a jingoist.


But when we ask people to be prepared to die for this country -- or some lame brained scheme of some idiot who got into the Oval Office -- we keep the promises we made to them.  That's why we've focused on VA issues here and covered VA hearings.  


Not being an American -- he's not one, he had two citizenships before he bought his US citizenship -- he doesn't care about Americans who served in the US military.  So he and Chump (who avoided military service with lies and with money) have no problem firing veterans who work at the VA.  And they have no problems firing VA workers -- veterans and non-veterans -- who take care of basic needs including assistance hotline workers.  They don't see the very real debt our country owes because of promises we made to people we were willing to send off to foreign lands.


Foreign.  That's Musk.  That's Chump.  They're foreign to the basis of American life.  Chump didn't care to learn about it and Musk was raised elsewhere. 



One of the unacknowledged advantages of the horrendous era we’ve entered is that it is revealing the putrid connections between great wealth and great power for all to see.

Oligarchs are fully exposed and they are defiant. It’s like hitting the “reveal codes” key on older computers that let you see everything.

Mark Zuckerberg, the second-richest person, has followed suit, allowing Facebook to emit lies, hate and bigotry in support of Trump’s lies, hate and bigotry.

All three of these men were in the first row at Trump’s inauguration. They, and other billionaires, have now exposed themselves for what they are.

They are the oligarchy. They continue to siphon off the wealth of the nation. They are supporting a tyrant who is promising them tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks that will make them even richer.



As sentiment continues to move against Chump and his attacks on We The People, Republicans in Congress are going to have to step up.  The are living in a social media bubble if they still can't grasp just how angry voters are across the country over Chump and his foreign boyfriend attacking our country, our way of life and our history.  

Chump ran from Project 2025.  He lied throughout the campaign.  And he did that because Project 2025 is offensive to the majority of Americans.  Now he's implementing it and voters who voted for him are saying this isn't what we voted for.

He had to lie about it to get back into the White House. 

Of course, the American people were going to turn on him.  

Each day, he looks more of a liar, more of an incompetent and more of a crazed fool in the midst of cognitive decline.  The polling doesn't usually allow you to increase your popularity when you're where he is now.

Smart GOPs in Congress would realize that voters -- especially swing voters -- reward those incumbents who appear to stand up for the American people to presidents.  Still they cower and hide, unable to buy a clue.  Writing at LGBTQ NATION, Dr. Warren J. Blumenfeld  explains:


“Enabler” is the term given to those who fail to act in stopping those who perpetuate abuse.  “Passive bystander” or “bad Samaritan” is the name for people who are conscious of bad actions developing around them but fail to intervene.

I often wonder how Trump’s enablers can sleep at night and get back up in the morning, still willing to degrade and prostrate themselves by supporting those who attack our democratic institutions and seriously dismantle our country’s standing in the world.

Each time anyone enables an abusive action, they keep perpetrators and themselves further from the truth and from help, and they diminish themselves and their integrity more than just a bit.

Why does Trump eagerly respond as if he were Putin’s puppet? Does Trump simply respect Putin’s dictatorial powers? Or is Putin carrying some sort of incriminating evidence over Trump?

No matter what, Trump could not be any more aligned with Putin and his agenda to return Russia to its former empire and weaken the Western alliance than if he were a secret Russian agent.

Rabbi Joachim Prinz, a Berlin-based rabbi who fled Nazi Germany in 1937 concluded: “The most important thing that I learned under those tragic circumstances was that bigotry and hatred are not the most urgent problem. The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful and the most tragic problem is silence.”

For what is true in AIDS education and activism holds true for all forms of politics: “Silence = Death.”

So, where are the Republicans with any backbone?



Let's wind down with this:

The Black Commentator Issue #1030 is now Online
 
February 27, 2025



Read issue 1030

Our email address is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

Our voicemail number is 856.823.1739


The Black Commentator | P.O. Box 2635A weekly publication dedicated to economic justice, social justice and peace.,
Tarpon Springs, FL 34688-2635




The following sites updated:







Thursday, February 27, 2025

Chump's a sucka for the Tate boyz

 Another reason we don't need to allow dual citizenship:





Every thing about this is wrong but that's Donald Chump for you, isn't it?


Donald Chump doesn't care about anyone other than himself.  He can only rake in dough and cheapen the Oval Office with his nonsense. And isn't it telling that they're already here in the US, the Tate brothers, while he's deporting people -- even some citizens and claiming birthright citizenship doesn't exist -- but letting rapists into the country because they're part of his cult of MAGA.  He's such trash.  We've had crooks as presidents before -- Richard Nixon comes to mind -- but never anyone this trashy.  

Here's Tabitha addressing the topic. 




This is C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


 Thursday, February 27, 2025.  Tabitha reminds "We did not have to be here It did not have to be this way,"  MAGA creeps in Congress don't want truth to come out in hearings, Alien Musk continues to lie, and much more.


Lets start with TABITHASPEAKS.


There were two choices in the fall of 2024: Kamala Harris or Convicted Felon Donald Chump.  There was no excuse then and there's no excuse now.  DSA launched their plan to attack Kamala and depress turnout and they got away with it because they control so much of the media.  If you're new to the topic, you can refer to these two pieces: "2024: The Year of Betrayal From Inside The Left." and "Media: How Amy Goodman harmed immigrants and helped elect Chump."


In 2028, if they try to start this same rat f**kery, we need to shut it down immediately.  Dropping back to 2023, Alex Seitz-Wald (NBC NEWS) reported:


At the DSA’s national convention in Chicago earlier this month, questions about whether the group should form an independent political party and how vigorously it should discipline members in elective office were front-and-center, with strong opinions on both sides.

But a resolution for a full “clean break” with the Democratic Party fell short and a Rhode Island DSA member who ran for the national political committee on an anti-Democratic Party platform did not succeed.

Renée Paradis, a member of the party's National Political Committee said opinion inside the DSA ranges widely, including those who want the group to be more active inside the Democratic Party.

But the consensus coming out of the convention, she said, remains that DSA should keep running candidates in Democratic primaries while building its own outside campaign infrastructure.

They have to pose as Democrats to win.  Socialism isn't going to carry them  into office in most districts.  So they have to lie.  And they lie about who they are in their books they write about each other -- their bad books that are nothing but a circle jerk --  and they have this whole deception that they pull.  If you're a Democrat and they start doing this in 2028, you need to be vocal and you need to call them out.  You need to point out that they aren't Democrats.  


One of the funniest things in watching 'brave' voices call out Ana of THE YOUNG TURKS is watching the people shy from noting that she was DSA.  


That's typical DSA.  I have friends in DSA but I am not DSA because that crap has always happened -- even with their predecessor.  They're more radical than thou and they want to tear down the system and then they get frustrated and they do their move to the right. 


As a DSA member, Ana got to host JACOBIN's podcast.  Why are we saying, 'She went from left over to MAGA"?  She went from Socialist over to MAGA.


They both want to tear down the system.  It's not that big of a leap and far too many DSAers have made that leap over the years.  


Kyle Kulinski is DSA.  He and Cenk came up with Justice "Democrats" because they knew Justice Socialists wouldn't work.  


Kyle seems like a caring person.  He can sometimes make a highly astute call.  


But we don't highlight him anymore.  


If you're a Socialist trying to pass yourself off as a Democrat, after 2024, we can't afford you.


Silly and Billy -- as Cenk calls THE VANGUARD's Zac and Gavin -- look more and more hypocritical with each day.  And more stupid.


What's the latest from the world of domestic Socialism?  Ask Zac and Cody!  Don't ask Zac and Gavin because they're incapable of honesty.  

Doubt it?


"Bernie's back!"


From where?  


He's yacking again.  He's good with words from time to time, he just can't deliver.  The kids don't grasp that.  They don't realize that he was called out for his fake assery for years and years but his excuse was "I can't do this or that because I'm in the House and have to run every two years for re-election."  And a number of us bought that excuse -- I donated to his first Senate run.  He never did anything.  In the Senate now for decades and he has nothing to show for it.


But Zac and Gavin are on board!  They are going to vote for him in 2028 for president!!!!!


Do they realize that this is why they look like freaks to the rest of us?


In 2028, Bernie will be 87 years old.  


It's a four year term.  


87 years old.  Older than Joe Biden was when he was president, older than Donald Chump will be when he finishes his four year term.


87 years old.


They are whining constantly like two little bitches about this age or that age.  Gerry Connolly  shouldn't have been picked to chair that committee, it should have been AOC.  I argued that here.


I remember THE VANGUARD making an argument on that as well: Gerry was too old.

Gerry is 74 years old.  They said he was too old.  But now they're wasting our time on Bernie needs to run in 2028 for president --- when he will be 87?


I can disagree with you and still have some respect for your opinion -- unless you're a hypocrite.


That's why we called out Jimmy Dore to begin with.  And this is also true of Zac and Gavin.


They feel that a primary was stolen.  2016.  Now they are too stupid and too ignorant to go into the 2008 primary and the world only began for them in 2016 as they nursed on Bernie's tits.  But Bernie was done wrong and blah blah blah.  Yet these same people were trashing the Green Party for not making Jesse Ventura their 2016 presidential nominee.


They insisted the DNC rigged 2016 (and they have a point) but then they want to argue that the Greens should have rigged the primary.  Because that's what they're advocating for.  Jesse wouldn't run for the nomination, other people were declared candidates for the nomination.  But they're supposed to ignore that and give him the nomination?


Their hypocrisy is only surpassed by their sheer stupidity.


Last week or the week before, they were attacking Jon Stewart and I didn't pay attention, don't really care.  I like Jon as a person, I've known him for years.  I did not like what THE DAILY SHOW did in the lead up to the election -- which included "that's so gay" as a 'joke' and I thought we had all surpassed that nonsense by the '00s.  They also did a number of 'jokes' that weren't funny and were just Jon both siding it.  Because Jon wants to be seen as fair by both sides.


Guess what, Jon? MAGA isn't fair.  They lie and they lie again.  And if you're not being threatened by them, you're not telling the truth.


I like Jon, I've known him for years.  But as the election approached and he pulled his usual nonsense, we backed away.  I have no intention of ever highlighting THE DAILY SHOW here again.  It does more harm than good.


A week or two ago, the YOUTUBERs were attacking Jon. Fine, I don't really care.  Except . . .


When real issues could have been addressed we got the Zac and Codys doing their YOUTUBE segments about how we needed to run Jon Stewart for president.


I'm tired of the stupidity.  I'm so tired of the stupidity.  


I think Senator Patty Murry is one of our best US senators.  I've thought that for some time.  I had a heated argument with an editor as MS.MAGAZINE when they were intentionally overlooking her while covering other Dem 'sheroes.'  Patty's a workhorse who will work on an issue and work on an issue and even if she hits a wall she'll continue working. 


If she runs in 2029 (that would be her next election), I'm not going to be trying to turn out the vote.  She's 74 right now.  And I love Patty.  I think she's done amazing work and think her work as Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee was outstanding.  


But I'm not Zac and Cody.  "BERNIE! BERNIE!  RUN BERNIE!"  


Just grow the hell up.  There's no way in the world that an 87 year old Bernie Sanders can walk -- he can't run -- for president.


While they're jerking off to their fantasies and wasting everyone's time, Senator Roger Wicker won't let Senator Elizabeth Warren finish a statement in a hearing.   That 'mean'  Elizabeth Warren wanted a corporation to explain how they ran a hospital into the ground.  Wicker, of course, was present to protect the corporation and to punish the people.  And then you had US House Rep James Comer refusing to let US House Rep Max Frost speak.  What's going on?


MAGA is sinking as is their leader. 

 EJ Montini (ARIZONA REPUBLIC) reports:


Where is co-president Elon Musk and his snotnosed band of pubescent hackers when Donald Trump needs them?

You’d have thought that with all the whiz-bang computer skills Musk claims his nerd bros possess, they’d have been able to weasel their way into the data collection systems of some big-time pollsters and jack up the numbers for the co-commander in chief.

 But I guess not.

Because it ain’t good news.

According to the most recent Gallup poll, Trump is the least popular president in more than 70 years.

Or, as the company put it on its website: “Trump’s job approval rating is 15 points below the historical average for all other elected presidents in mid-February since 1953.”


Here's some reality that Silly & Billy can't make time for.  This is the high water mark.  The first 100 days are the high water mark in terms of popularity for presidents.  And once the rot sets in, public opinion only hardens against them.  

MAGAs can't handle the truth so they shut it down.  Comer was insisting that calling Chump "the grifter in chief" was disrespectful to Chump.  I think Chump's use of porn actress and prostitutes and roll dogging around with the late Jeffrey Epstein and the accusations of assault from all the women pretty much exempt Chump from respect -- as does the 34 felony convictions he received.






Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) notes of the video segment above:


"I honestly have never in my life seen anything so outrageous as that," she began. "Now, I know there's a lot of things that are outrageous that impact American's lives every day so don't yell at me online. But this is really, really bad. "

"What they're saying is, if you criticize the president of the United States as an elected member of Congress, we will silence you," she continued. "I mean, that's a really good way to lose the midterms."

Addressing the video clip, she added, "I hope that that goes viral, because the truth is, the only thing we know about what Musk and Trump are doing in all these federal agencies is what he puts on his privately owned social media. He owns it privately, I mean, it is something that he bought for billions of dollars, and now he is lifting it up."


Senator Elizabeth Warren's office issued the following regarding yesterday's hearing:

Trump Nominee Seeks A Top Pentagon Leadership Role

Video of Exchange (YouTube)

Washington, D.C. – At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned Mr. Stephen A. Feinberg, President of Cerberus Capital Management and nominee for Deputy Secretary of Defense, about his troubled private equity history and his qualifications for the job of second-in-command at the Pentagon. 

Senator Warren called out Mr. Feinberg’s involvement in Steward Health Care, a now-bankrupt hospital system, which once owned 31 hospitals nationwide. In Massachusetts specifically, Mr. Feinberg enriched himself and his investors at the expense of the hospitals, sucking out over $700 million while leaving the hospitals understaffed, underresourced, and severely indebted. In part due to his corporate extraction, the system went bankrupt and, two Massachusetts hospitals shut down for good, leaving Massachusetts communities without access to the care they need. 

Mr. Feinberg claimed Steward hospitals were doing “well” at the time Cerberus sold the company. However, “[m]any Steward hospitals were financially struggling as Cerberus began to make its exit in 2020,” according to the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. More importantly, before he left, Mr. Feinberg sold the hospitals’ real estate, cashing out the profits but leaving the hospitals with massive liabilities in the form of years of increasing lease payments for the land they used - a key factor in the hospitals’ 2024 bankruptcy.

Mr. Feinberg claimed he “turned [Steward] around, fixed them, grew them, [and] had a tremendous amount of success.” However, he slashed a full medical center, a primary and specialty care unit, a surgery department, an urgent care department, and a VA Clinic at a Quincy Medical Center, leaving nothing but an emergency room. Additionally, just two years after Cerberus took over Steward, nurses in Massachusetts filed more than 1,000 “unsafe staffing” complaints, a significant increase from previous years.

Transcript: Hearing to Consider the Nomination of Mr. Stephen A. Feinberg to be Deputy Secretary of Defense
U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee 
February 25, 2025 

Senator Elizabeth Warren: So, Mr. Feinberg, you’ve been nominated to be Deputy Secretary of Defense, in charge of DOD’s $850 billion budget. Your main qualification is that you have built one of the world’s largest private equity companies. You’ve spent your entire career honing the private equity tools used to hollow out businesses, from department stores to veterinary practices. And, presumably, those are the skills that you would bring to the Department of Defense. So, I just want to look at how that’s worked.

Let’s start with how you treat people. In Massachusetts, in 2010, your private equity firm bought six non-profit hospitals, turned them into for-profit hospitals called Steward. Ten years later you cashed out, having made a profit a little shy of a billion dollars, and leaving behind a hospital system that was staggered under a load of debt and, four years later, collapsed into bankruptcy.

Now, Mr. Feinberg, when we met in my office, you told me that your private equity outfit made an average 23% annual return each year that you owned our hospitals. If Steward nurses had gotten the same 23% salary increases that your investors effectively got every year, do you know how much they would be paid at the time you sold off your hospitals?  

Mr. Stephen A. Feinberg, nominee for Deputy Secretary of Defense: Well, I do know that in 2010, the hospitals were going under, and we were asked – 

Senator Warren: I’m sorry, Mr. Feinberg, we’re going to have very limited time here and I actually want to spend it on your qualifications to do this job. And it’s about how you treat people. The average nurse in the Steward hospitals at the time you bought them made $85,120. 

At a 23% annual raise, how much money would they be making right now? 

Mr. Feinberg: I’m not going to do the math, but what I could tell you – 

Senator Warren: Okay, I’ll do the math for you. $829,828. Now, of course, the nurses didn’t do that well. During that same period of time, Carney Hospital, one of the hospitals you bought in Massachusetts, raised nurse salaries about 1.5% a year - and that was the best increase across the Steward hospitals that you were running. 

Mr. Feinberg: That’s incorrect. 

Senator Warren: In other words, you seem to think that when it is time to reorganize a business, that equity should get about fifteen times as much return on their investment as the people who actually do the work.

So, let’s take a look at the second issue, and that is maintaining critical functions – 

Mr. Feinberg: Senator, would you like me to respond to Steward? Because a lot of inaccurate statements. 

Senator Warren: We need to make cuts at the Department of Defense, but we also need to maintain our national security.  

Chair Wicker: Mr. Feinberg, she’s entitled to make a speech. 

Mr. Feinberg: I apologize. 

Chair Wicker: She’s entitled to go on and on. 

Senator Warren: So let’s go back to Steward Hospitals. Did you cut fat or cut vital functions?  

Now, Mr. Feinberg, the town of Quincy used to have a full medical center, with primary and specialty care, a surgery department, an urgent care department, and a VA Clinic. That was its basic function. After your private equity company finished with it, what was left?

Mr. Feinberg: Well, when we exited the investment in 2020, the company was doing well –

Senator Warren: I’m asking what was left of the Quincy hospital. When you took it over – 

Chair Wicker: Now, Senator, he’s trying to answer a question. You finally stopped for a breath. 

Senator Warren: Well, that’s what I’m asking – 

Chair Wicker: Do you intend to let him at least have maybe 20, 30 seconds to answer a question? 

Senator Warren: Well, can I have my time back? 

Chair Wicker: Yes, I said you’re entitled to make a speech, but you stopped for – you stopped with a question mark and he started to try to answer the question. 

Senator Warren: All right, what’s the answer to the question? What was left of the Quincy hospital? That was my question. 

Mr. Feinberg: Lots happened after we exited. And there has been mismanagement. We did save – 

Senator Warren: My clarifying question: what was left when you exited? 

Mr. Feinberg: I’m not certain about that – 

Senator Warren: It was an emergency room, and nothing more.  

Mr. Feinberg: But, but, we took those hospitals from collapse in 2010 – we were going to shut it down as the tenth largest employer in Massachusetts, turned them around, fixed them, grew them, had a tremendous amount of success, worked closely with the governor, and the problems with Steward happened after we exited the investment. 

Senator Warren: I am asking about questions as you exited and during the period of time you ran it. Now, of course, a hospital is supposed to provide good quality care—and that takes qualified nurses and other staffers. Mr. Feinberg, for the hospitals that didn’t close down, during the time you ran it, do you know how many “unsafe staffing” complaints were filed?

Mr. Feinberg: I do know the vast majority of problems happened after we left. And by the way, our nurses were among the highest paid in the country.

Senator Warren: Is that a no, that you don't know how much? How many “unsafe staffing” complaints were filed? 

Mr. Feinberg: I don’t know. 

Senator Warren: Well, let me tell you. There were over a thousand filed, that is five times the normal rate in Massachusetts. 

Mr. Feinberg: What year was that? 

Senator Warren: These are the years that you were in control. For the two hospitals – 

Chair Wicker: Senator Warren, perhaps you would like to take another round?

Senator Warren: No, I’d like to just finish. I just have a quote. 

Chair Wicker: Your time is expired, Senator. Your time is expired. 

Senator Warren: I spent a great deal of that time listening to the Chairman telling me how I have to conduct my questions. 

Chair Wicker: The senator's time is expired. 

Senator Warren: Could I just close? 

Chair Wicker: Senator Sullivan. 

Senator Warren: Could I just close, Mr. Chairman? I’d just like to say why I care about this issue. 

Chair Wicker: The senator's time has expired. She can have another round.

###




So what's really going?  MAGA members of Congress are finding it difficult to go home. People are too upset with the lousy job MAGA is doing.  So what they're trying to do in the halls of Congress now is to shut down all truth.  So James Comer, for example, just screams and hisses and thinks back to those teenage years and that cow that really touched him -- in a way no human female ever could.  Mooooo, Comer, moooooo.



Despite doubling the number of listed contracts, the updated itemized savings now total $9.6 billion, a sharp drop from the original $16.6 billion in savings DOGE itemized last week. At the same time, DOGE is now claiming total savings of $65 billion — far higher than the amount itemized, and an increase from its earlier claim of $55 billion, much of which has previously been called into question. 

$65 billion is approximately 0.9% of the entire 2024 federal budget of $6.75 trillion. 

DOGE's website claims this higher figure includes savings from contract and lease terminations, renegotiations, grant cancellations, layoffs and other miscellaneous reductions, but DOGE has not supplied documentation for the vast majority of the savings it claims.

In addition, $144.6 million is attributed to real estate savings, but DOGE has provided no supporting details beyond the dollar figure, agency and city, making independent verification difficult.

You get it, right?  DOGE is the most visible of Chump's programs.  And it's a complete and utter failure.  MAGA members of Congress don't want to talk about that. 



Elon Musk, billionaire presidential vizier and de facto head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has long feuded with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), an agency that has fined his aerospace company SpaceX while conducting unwelcome oversight. Now, amid an alarming spate of air travel accidents - including a deadly mid-air collision of a passenger jet and a U.S. Army helicopter over Washington, D.C. last month, which President Donald Trump and allies callously tried to blame on cultural diversity - the tech oligarch has said DOGE will lead reforms at the FAA.

That might reassure some people impressed by videos of SpaceX's rockets, but on Tuesday afternoon, Musk, who did qualify for a private pilot certificate in 2002, seemed baffled by some of the basics of air travel. In a post on X - the misinformation-heavy social media site Musk shaped from the remains of Twitter, after buying the platform for $44 billion in 2022 - supply chain company CEO Ryan Petersen shared a screenshot of the projected flight path of a United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Houston, which hewed close to the southern U.S. border with Mexico. "Why is this plane not flying in a straight line?" Petersen wondered. Musk replied, "It should be."

While both men appeared to suggest there was something irregular or suspicious about the flight plan, this was not the case. Planes may take certain less direct routes due to weather, air traffic, or any number of factors. Indeed, Musk's own private jet has flown on curved trajectories, as captured in screenshots of flight records shared on X by Jack Sweeney, a software engineer who has worked for American Airlines and the aviation consultant UberJets, and famously aroused Musk's ire by tracking the movements of his private jet with ElonJet, a network of social accounts. (Sweeney has also monitored the flight activity of Taylor Swift, Russian oligarchs, and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and his company Ground Control aims to provide "unrestricted air traffic data" to all.) Sweeney posted the flight path that Trump's plane took from Southern Florida to Texas in November ahead of a SpaceX launch, which for a while hugged the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico instead of tracing a straight line over the body of water.

"There are countless reasons why a flight might not follow a straight path - weather, [Extended-range Twin-engine Operations Performance Standards] regulations, or optimizing fuel efficiency by following favorable winds," Sweeney stated on X. 

Sweeney tells Rolling Stone that Petersen and Musk appeared to be "jumping to conclusions" to "push a point that our system is outdated, which, there's definitely things that can be updated." But, he adds, it's a complex system currently in place, and "there are reasons things were designed the way they were," including with established routes in the sky that function as aerial highways. "It takes time for things to get updated properly," he adds, which it seems that Musk's DOGE has not taken into account as it seeks to slash away at vital federal agencies, including the FAA.

It's because Alien Musk doesn't know anything.  He's never worked in these agencies, he's unfamiliar with them since he grew up in South Africa.  He knows nothing.  








Musk's ignorance is harming the American people.  Carl Gibson reports:



"In the time that i was at VA, what I saw was a bunch of dedicated employees trying to do their best to maintain VA.gov and keep it online and secure. But they were overworked. There just weren't enough people to do all the work," Kamens said. "And now with me being gone and other people being gone because DOGE has fired them or fired them by proxy through VA, there's even fewer people to do the work. And it's inevitable when you don't have enough people to maintain the cybersecurity of VA.gov or any other website, it's going to deteriorate and eventually there's going to be an incident."




For decades, the anti-abortion movement has aggressively promoted women into visible leadership roles. It's for cynical reasons, namely, to bat off entirely accurate accusations that the movement is misogynist. Never mind that there have always been women who are eager to police the bodies and behavior of other women. Enough people are credulous or at least disingenuous enough to think that "I'm a woman, which means I can't hate other women" is an actual argument. For ambitious women who wanted to climb the ranks of Republican politics, anti-feminism has long been the steadiest of ladders. The propaganda value of their gender outweighed their party's larger hostility to women in leadership. 

But now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned and Donald Trump is back in the White House, many on the right feel they no longer need to hide the naked sexism fueling their movement or put up with the annoyance of women in even token leadership positions. As Kiera Butler at Mother Jones reports, the anti-abortion movement is embroiled in an escalating civil war right now over these issues. Male leaders of the Christian right have been swarming Kristan Hawkins, the 39-year-old head of a "student" anti-abortion group, demanding her ejection from the movement. It started after she objected to Republican legislators introducing bills to charge women who get abortions with murder, an extreme move she fears will backfire on the movement. But mostly it was about growing male anger on the Christian right that women are allowed leadership positions at all. 

"Removed [sic] this woman from public service," declared influential Christian nationalist pastor Joel Webbon, part of the "TheoBros" movement that includes the leadership of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's church. Soon other TheoBros jumped in, declaring "We need Christian men leading the fight against abortion," arguing that women's suffrage was a mistake, and accusing Hawkins of emasculating her husband by being "busy jet-setting."
Forty-five percent of female voters backed Trump in 2024, despite his overt misogyny. Most, no doubt, believed that complicity would protect them and that the attacks would be centered on other women. But while the GOP certainly wants to strip liberal and feminist women of their rights, male MAGA leaders are showing increasing interest in bringing Republican women to heel, both culturally and through the force of law. After all, they are more likely to live and work with Republican women. If they want to feel the full flowering of male domination, it's Republican women they need to see submitting. 

Webbon and the TheoBros have been clamoring more loudly in recent months about their wish to strip women, especially their own wives, of the right to vote. "You won't let women vote? Well, our society doesn't let five-year-olds vote," Webbon explained in a May podcast. He added that "a woman is like a child" and that "God has appointed men to protect them." As Sarah Stankorb at the New Republic documented, there has been growing support in Christian nationalist circles "for the repeal of the 19th Amendment and support a 'household vote' system in which men vote on behalf of their families." Hegseth's former sister-in-law reports she heard him echo similar sentiments. 


The following sites updated: