Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Rich Procida is an asshole

Doubt it?  Read his garbage at LA Progressive and grasp that there's nothing progressive about Rich Procida. 

He writes garbage like this:

As we can see, Tara Reade may not be the propagandist here. The propagandists are the Right-wing media outlets who have the ability to bring this matter to the public’s attention at this crucial time. Tara Reade may simply be a pawn in a high-stakes game. 


I'm so sick of men like Rich.  They should just shut the f**k up.  Tara knows she was assaulted and she's not anyone's pawn. 

Rich may be Joe Biden's pawn, he may be Joe's bitch.

I'm so sick of these 'progressive' men.  Really, they need to shut up.

I don't need to hear from them -- no woman who's been assaulted ever needs to hear from them.




This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Tuesday, May 5, 2020.  The Iraq War continues with the death of another US service member, the attacks on Tara Reade continue.


At THE NATION this morning, Kate Manne weighs in on the allegations against Joe Biden:

One evening in the mid-nineties, Lynda LaCasse was smoking a cigarette on the front stoop of her apartment in Morro Bay, Calif., when she was joined by her neighbor and friend Tara Reade. It was an emotional conversation, encompassing custody battles and violence. According to LaCasse, Reade disclosed an incident that occurred when Reade worked for then-Senator Joe Biden in 1993: After she brought him his gym bag, he backed her up against a wall, kissed her neck and hair, put his hand under her clothes, and penetrated her digitally. “I remember the skirt. I remember the fingers. I remember she was devastated.” Reade had wept at the memory; LaCasse urged her to file a police report.

On April 27, Business Insider published this account, corroborating Reade’s prior testimony. LaCasse made it plausible, moreover, that she has no axe to grind: She is a longtime Democrat, with a history of anti-Trump posts on social media, together with recent praise for Biden as well as Bernie Sanders. She even said she still plans to vote for Biden. She also believes her friend Tara Reade should be heard; she believes her, period. “I have to support her just because that’s what happened,” said LaCasse, who added that she came forward without Reade having asked her to: “We need to stand up and tell the truth.”
Such evidence supplements several other accounts that corroborate elements of Reade’s story—from her brother, two anonymous friends, a former colleague, and footage from Reade’s late mother, who called into Larry King Live a few months after the alleged incident in 1993 to seek advice on behalf of her daughter.
Given this strong evidence, why are many people still refusing to believe Tara Reade? Among the primary reasons: an unwillingness to believe that Biden is “the type” and sheer political inconvenience. 
We know, alas, that Biden is the type. He has sniffed and kissed the hair of the politician Lucy Flores. Six other women have testified to his touching and kissing them in ways that made them uncomfortable. We also have relevant footage. This is a man with a demonstrated history of handsiness—and a man who so does not understand boundaries that he made jokes last year about having permission to hug and touch people onstage after being confronted about his problem. 


The attacks against Tara Reade have intensified.  Human trash like Ken Olin whip up rage (wonder how that's going to effect THIS IS US in the ratings) via Twitter, they smear Tara and think they can get away with it.  It's no surprise that she walked away from the planned interview with Chris Wallace after the threats against her intensified.  People like Ken Olin better be taking responsibility for yelling "Fire!" right now.  They know what they're doing, they're trying to destroy her.

They think if they destroy her, it will be on to November with Joe.  If they can keep her off the airwaves of CNN, FOX NEWS, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and NBC, no one will hear her and Joe is protected.  The hate they are aiming at Tara is a testament to just how strong her story actually is and just how very scared they are.

Since she came forward, the real leaders among the press have been student journalists writing in university publications.  Long before THE NEW YORK TIMES and others discovered the story on Easter Sunday, college papers were already discussing and debating the story.  Today, Max Teszler (THE DARTMOUTH) offers:

Nobody should ever have to endure the violence that Reade alleges, and nobody wants the presidential nominee of their party to have committed assault. But the truth must sometimes be inconvenient, difficult and painful.
While these details do not guarantee Reade’s allegations are true, I do believe the growing number of corroborations have proven Reade’s claims to be more likely true than not. I hoped my fellow Democrats would similarly evaluate the evidence and acknowledge that there is a non-trivial chance Biden committed assault.
Instead, many liberals on social media have employed truly despicable tactics to not only discredit Reade’s story, but to slander her personally. These range from questions of why she did not come forward earlier to  suggestions of her being in cahoots with Russia and Vladimir Putin stemming from a number of pro-Putin blog posts made by Reade. Reade’s political alignment aside, the argument of Russian conspiracy seems far-fetched and would require a wide net of U.S. citizens to be working on Russia’s behalf, including Reade’s brother, former neighbors and former colleague. 

Reade’s doubters have also accused her of changing her story and have suggested that the timing of her accusations -- just as the presidential race has narrowed to Biden versus Donald Trump -- is suspicious. But the ways Reade has “changed” her account are entirely consistent with a person slowly becoming ready to tell her full story. In 2019 -- along with eight other women -- Reade accused Biden of uncomfortable touching that didn’t rise to the level of assault. This has led to speculation that her more serious allegations are made-up, concocted to derail Biden at the last minute. But critically, at the time that she made her initial allegations -- in April 2019 -- she acknowledged, “I did not even tell the whole story.”


The Ken Olins don't grasp what's taking place.  They are too out of touch.  They have no idea of how others see this story, of the hypocrisy that is offending so many.  They don't realize just how much damage that does to Joe Biden and will continue to do to Joe.

Wagatwe Wanjuki Tweets:


Many men use the rape scandal du jour to show how they'd handle their own victims coming forward. I notice the men who are particularly vicious and vindictive when they speak about Tara, you know she's a placeholder for the victims they want to remain silent.



Equally true, at some point Joe Biden has to pick his running mate.  Once he does, he loses many of his fighters.  It's amazing how Kamala Harris hasn't been asked to call out her supporters.  Yes, it's a small group, we saw that with the primaries.  But they are devoted.  They ignore Kamala's actual record and they insist she must be Vice President.  So they attack Tara daily.  If Joe doesn't pick Kamala, he loses her social media orgy.

It's funny to watch all the women vying for the post lie and pretend Joe has no history that would ever raise an eyebrow.  Didn't he physically assault a girlfriend in the 90s?  Wasn't she in charge of one of the biggest organizations for women?  These are not new rumors.  We've noted this story going back to 2006.

If Joe doesn't drop out and isn't dumped, can you imagine the lifetime of damage to whichever idiot is stupid enough to join his ticket and declare herself anti-woman in the process.

If Elizabeth Warren thought her false claim to be Native American turned out to be a nightmare, imagine what it would be like being joined at the hip for all of history with Joe Biden.

US House Rep Ayanna Pressley writes at MEDIUM:


I’m here for an uncomfortable conversation. Not because it’s convenient. Not because it’s strategic. Because it’s necessary. I am a survivor. I am an elected official. I am not new to watching survivors bare their souls, and I am not new to being offered false choices in politics.
For generations, survivors and advocates have fought to shine a light on harassment and abuse. We have shown up, we have marched, we have told our stories. For those involved in the struggle for survivors’ justice, most of the work doesn’t take place in public, it is late night phone calls when trauma wraps us in a chokehold, it is tearful conversations whispered in confidence. It is the slow and steady work of helping each other heal and rebuild.
But when the experience does play out in public — as it has with Joe Biden and Tara Reade — we are called to examine an urgent and visceral question: what does an authentic path towards healing and justice look like for survivors in America?
I speak from personal experience when I say the path often isn’t linear; for many, taking even the first step takes years. What I know to be true in this moment is that we do not have a public model of how to get this right.
When deep personal trauma is viewed through the skewed kaleidoscope of public opinion — pundits, commentators, twitter bots — it is difficult to articulate what getting to the other side looks like. How can healing occur when wounds are reopened daily, and how can justice be served when our legal system is broken and our culture deeply flawed?
Our assumptions and our starting points for these conversations have to change, and the allegations against Joe Biden are no exception. Listening to the stories of those who step forward is the baseline. We say “believe survivors” because, for nearly all of history, the experiences of survivors have been dismissed and derided by a society steeped in misogyny and hatred. We advocate that we begin with assumptions of credibility and move to due process and reconciliation.
We are in the throes of an election of the greatest consequence — one that will determine if core rights and tenets of democracy survive in this nation. The stakes cannot be overstated. But I have no patience for any person who tells me that is a reason to lower my voice. I reject the false choice that my party and our nominee can’t address the allegations at hand and defeat the occupant of the White House.





Lucy Flores was the first woman to publicly call out Joe Biden for his inappropriate behavior.  She spoke with SLATE's Mary Harris:


Mary Harris: In the weeks since Tara Reid came out with her new allegations against Joe Biden. Lucy Flores has gotten back in touch with her looking to offer support. Lucy knows better than anyone how vulnerable and accuser can feel. I’m wondering what your conversations with Tara Reid have been like.

Lucy Flores: I’ve only spoken to her once since she came out with her full story. And it the entire conversation was more about moral support. And, you know, giving her whatever feedback I could in terms of the way in which people are going to come for her, the various things that she needed to do to protect herself. I think it was more a lot more practical advice and also just moral support and letting her know that that I was thinking about her and that I obviously empathize with everything she’s going through.

Mary Harris: What’s your number one piece of practical advice?

Lucy Flores: My number one piece of practical advice to her was that she just really needed to take it day by day and to focus on herself and her truth and her. Why her? Why, yes. Why did you decide to speak out? Tell me more about that. Well, that’s for me. That’s what kept me grounded when I was experiencing so much harassment after I spoke about my interactions was that I had to always focus on why did I decide to do this? And we talked about those reasons.

Mary Harris: I mean, I’m curious, why did you decide to tell your story? I’m not sure that I know that. Like what what what your decision process was.

Lucy Flores: The primary reason was because I began to see photos emerge of him interacting that way with other women. And there were stories that were written and there was even a vignette that was done by Jon Stewart and, you know, making fun of creepy.
Jon Stewart: Uncle Joe Biden left his hands on Stephanie Carter’s shoulders for an estimated 20 expected.
Jon Stewart: You seem tense. Is it the stress of me groping you for 28 straight seconds?

Lucy Flores: And so I had to just constantly be reminded that he was acting this way, that he was making women feel uncomfortable and everyone was just laughing about it. It was not being treated seriously. And I knew from personal experience what that felt like. And it was wrong.


Mary Harris: For Lucy, telling her own story was a way of shifting the way the rest of us saw what happened to her, not as an incident that was laughably awkward, but as an incident where she was actually harmed. And that gives her empathy for Tara Reid, who seems to be seeing what happened in her own life through new eyes.  

Turning to Iraq where another US service member has died.  Howard Altman (MILITARY TIMES) reports:

A service member with Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve died in a non-combat related incident in Erbil, Iraq, May 4.
 The cause of death remains under investigation, but COVID-19 is not suspected, officials said in a media release.

It is CJTF-OIR policy to defer casualty identification to the relevant national authorities after the next of kin have been notified.
The service member is the seventh to die this year supporting Operation Inherent Resolve, the fight against ISIS and the second to die in a non-combat incident in Erbil.


Shelly Kittleson (AL-MONITOR) observes:

The first of several Islamic State (IS) attacks in Iraq started just before suhoor on May 2, the pre-dawn meal during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan prior to fasting, and lasted several hours, Salahuddin council member Subhan Jiyad told Al-Monitor via WhatsApp later in the day.
Most of those killed were Sunni locals from the Albu Issa tribe, according to another source who sent a list of the names of those “martyred.”
This first of several attacks in the area over a 24-hour period happened in Mukashifa, a town northwest of Samarra along the main road linking Baghdad and Tikrit. Samarra is a Sunni-majority city in central Iraq known for its Al-Askari Shrine, or Golden Dome Mosque, a place of pilgrimage for Shiite Muslims. The town is also the birthplace of former IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
“Six members of the local Popular Mobilization Units [PMU] were killed in the attack on a checkpoint,” council member Jiyad added. “Then, when reinforcements were sent in, three more were killed by an improvised explosive device [IED] set by IS.”
Another pre-dawn attack happened in Tal al-Dhahab in the Yathrib district southeast of Samarra.
The two attacks killed a total of 11 PMU fighters, Al-Monitor was told by a fighter previously deployed to the area with Saraya al-Salam that maintains an extensive network of contacts in the area.
The Yathrib district is in Salahuddin but borders on Diyala province, which has seen an uptick in attacks in recent months and which stretches from north and east of the capital to the Iranian border.
Capt. Isser Ali Rabea al-Azzawi, a border forces officer, had been assassinated in his home in Yathrib on April 30, also reportedly by IS.




The following sites updated:

Monday, May 4, 2020

A whore named Gretchen Whitmer

Did you catch Governor Whore on CNN Sunday? 



Ava, C.I. and I wrote about the whore in "A whore named Whitmar (Ann, Ava and C.I.)" at Third Estate Sunday Review.

It's not just that the bitch attacked Tara Reade, it's also this garbage she snarled at Jake Tapper, "I really resent the fact that everytime a case comes up, all of us survivors have to weigh in.  It is reopening old wounds."

Excuse the f**k out of me?  Bitch said what?

I was raped.  I am beginning to ponder Governor Whore's assault and how real it was? It it was real -- I'm not saying it wasn't -- then someone needs to immediately get her into therapy because she's clearly in denial. 

I am more than happy to stand up for any survivor.  If she isn't?

Either she wasn't assaulted or she hasn't dealt with it.

If you've been raped, and I've written about my rape here multiple times. you do want to stick up for other survivors -- especially is you see them being attacked.

She's not a very good person, Governor Whore.  It's all about the whore with the whore.

I believe Tara Reade.  And she deserves to tell her story.

Governor Whore wants to silence Tara.

Why? 

Because Governor Whore wants to be vice president.  Good luck with that, Governor Whore.   

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Monday, May 4, 2020.  The efforts to silence Tara Reade continue.


Friday, Joe Biden appeared on MSNBC's MORNING JOE in an attempt to convince "the American people" (Mika's term) that he did not assault Tara Reade in 1993.  Jimmy Dore offers his take below.




Among other things, Jimmy takes MSNBC on for making it about what is or isn't in the National Archives.


Journalist Nicole Einbinder Tweeted the following Friday morning during the interview:

Joe Biden said that Tara Reade's complaint could only be at the National Archives, at what was then called the Office of Fair Employment Practices. But, a National Archives spokesperson told me that they do not hold records from that office.



Instead, a Senate Historical Office staffer said the Fair Employment Practices records are governed by a Senate resolution mandating that "records containing personal privacy, information closed by statute, and records of executive nomination are closed for 50 years."

That staffer said that rules for filing a complaint to the Office of Fair Employment Practices were complicated and that it was possible that a staffer attempting to do so without proper guidance may not have taken the necessary steps to get an investigation started.

According to congressional testimony from 1995, 479 people contacted the office between 1992 and 1995 seeking assistance. Of those, only 102 entered the office's five-step "dispute resolution" process, which included a formal complaint and hearing.

If Reade's complaint was filed to the Office of Fair Employment Practices, the record will remain closed until 2043 — more than two decades from now.

It's also important to note that Reade isn't just looking for the complaint. She has other reasons for wanting the University of Delaware to unseal the records:

Full story here:



Tara endured a series of public attacks over the weekend -- she also reports that she and her child received multiple threats.   AP attacked her with a bad headline that was untrue.

EXCLUSIVE: Tara Reade slammed The Associated Press on Saturday for its framing of a story regarding her Senate personnel complaint she filed against her former boss Joe Biden, calling for the news outlet to "retract" its headline.


Even MJ Lee of CNN called them out, as we noted Saturday:



CNN's MJ Lee Tweeted:

The AP's Tara Reade story headline appears to now been changed from “AP Exclusive: Harassment, assault absent in Biden complaint” to “Reade: ‘I didn’t use sexual harassment’ in Biden complaint”

And she Tweeted:

That clumsy initial headline appears to be the reason that we appear to have now entered the news cycle of: Tara Reade now says she didn't file a complaint about sexual harassment or assault.



The misleading headline distracted people from two things in the report.  1) AP knew about the assault in 2019 and elected not to report on it.  And you wonder why she wanted help from Times Up to come forward?  2) AP found two more people who corroborate Tara's story:



Tara Reade asked the Associated Press to change their misleading headline: "I asked AP to retract headline," she said on Sat. That night the AP changed it. foxnews.com/media/tara-rea The headline was crafted to bury news of the AP finding 2 more people corroborating Reade's claims!


Reading is hard for so many.  A headline was all they needed.  That's especially true of the horrid and faux 'woke' Debra Messing.  The woman who never called out the Iraq War attempted to smear Tara by promoting an article by two con men who have been banned from Twitter.  Debra's an air head with no real foundation in anything.  She's a menace.  So is the disgusting Kurt Eichenwald.  He attacked her over the weekend -- hoping the whole time that we forgot he was a pedophile.  Note this Tweet:

reminder: Kurt Eichenwald funded the creation of child pornography by FedExing an underaged prostitute cash to make videos, he would then comment/critique them after they were made. in a court of law he told a judge he "didn't remember" doing this, and somehow it was dropped

Kurt is and always will be trash.  We addressed his nonsense Saturday night in "How lucky, as women, we are to finally have a man explain to us what rape's really like."  Kurt announced, in a series of Tweets, that he was raped in the 80s and used that to attack Tara Reade (who he wants to "rot in hell").  If you did not respond to your rape as Kurt The Man responded to his, you were not assaulted.  That's his argument.  It's as crazy as anyone listening to a pedophile to begin with.

We'll note this Tweet:


Forget politics. Why should her emotional response be the same as your emotional response? Who are you to tell a victim when and how they should remember, grieve, process, act? Do you want to be judged on how you handled your trauma? Why should she?


Also attacking Tara over the weekend?  Professional liar David Axelrod ('spinmeister' if he prefers).  Ava and I took on his nonsense of the claim that Barack Obama had Joe thoroughly vetted.  Thoroughly vetted?  The way they thoroughly vetted Van Jones who didn't last a year in the administration because it turned out that he was of a press demonized group: The 9-11 Truthers?  Where was the vetting there?  Everyone in the Bay Area knew about Van's involvement in the 9-11 Truth Movement.  How did Barack's 'skilled' vetters miss that?  They missed a lot with a lot of people.  David needs to sit his tired ass down.


Also at THIRD, Ann, Ava and I noted Jake Tapper asked Governor Gretch The Wretch Whitmar about why she believed Christine Blasey Ford but not Tara Reade?  As Jake note, Tara has far more corroboration than Blasey Ford did.  Gretch The Wretch chose to lie.  But she wanted you to know she had read about this issue.  [Ann's site is ANN'S MEGA DUB.]

Maybe that's the actual key.  They're trying to stop the story.  Tara's never been allowed to tell her story on any of the corporate channels -- MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN or even FOX NEWS.  That's what Gretch The Wretch fears.  So she -- and other whores -- are going to try to shut the story down right now, before the American people are really informed of it.



What happens if something like George Galloway's presentation above ends up on the US corporate media?  That's why Gretch The Wretch and others are attacking Tara.  They should be ashamed of themselves.  Tara is the one without any power.  They are sliming a woman claiming to be assaulted to defend a man who has made over $15 million since leaving the White House in January of 2017.  They are sliming a victim to defend a man connected to power his entire life.  They are trying to shut her down before she can tell her story in order to protect Joe Biden.

That's why they're also -- these whores -- calling for the FBI to investigate members of the press covering the story.  It's why they attacked Chris Hayes and are calling for him to be fired.  They want to scare the press into silence -- that's the goal of Lindy Li and these other creeps.

Sunday, at THE NEW YORK TIMES, Elizabeth Bruenig weighs in on Tara Reade and Joe Biden:

I have my own impressions regarding Ms. Reade’s allegations, but no one — save Ms. Reade and Mr. Biden — knows with certainty whether her claims are true. What I can assert with firm conviction is that Democrats ought to start considering a backup plan for 2020.
Ms. Reade’s account is not nearly as incredible as some have argued. In the course of my reporting, I have worked closely with many survivors of sexual assault. It isn’t unusual, in my experience, for survivors to exhibit behavior that seems unstable or erratic to others. They may initially disclose to investigators or journalists only a fragment of what happened, and then reveal more over time — some even falsely recant, either because they sense the police don’t believe them, or because they fear the consequences of pressing their claims. And victims often maintain relationships with their attackers or harbor mixed feelings about them.

“It’s not at all uncommon for someone to still have positive feelings about aspects of the person who assaulted them, or to admire or respect them,” Scott Berkowitz, the founder and president of the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) told me. “With people who work for politicians, there’s usually a strong measure of loyalty or respect in that relationship. So it’s not indicative that someone wasn’t telling the truth.”
[. . .]
 But it is also possible that this won’t just go away, and that it will demoralize voters and place Mr. Biden at a disadvantage against Mr. Trump in the general election, despite the fact that Mr. Trump has a damning list of accusers alleging sexual offenses. For a candidate mainly favored for his presumed electability and the perception of empathy and decency, that’s a serious liability. To preserve the strides made on behalf of victims of sexual assault in the era of #MeToo, and to maximize their chances in November, Democrats need to begin formulating an alternative strategy for 2020 — one that does not include Mr. Biden.


It's time to dump Joe Biden.  Ryan Cooper (THE WEEK) offered:

However, Biden still has not been officially nominated. The Democratic National Convention is not until August 17, and before then he could be pressured into dropping out. If Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, a critical mass of the rest of other Democratic elected officials, and all the various Democratic-aligned activists groups all said in unison that Biden was unfit to be president, and should drop out for the good of the party, he probably would withdraw. The primary rules regarding candidates who drop out are somewhat vague, saying that delegates cannot be "mandated" to vote for someone else, and "shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them." But this would seem to allow Biden to instruct his delegates to support another candidate, and in 11 states there are specific rules for doing so. Realistically, no unclear legal technicalities are going to prevent someone else from getting the nomination if Biden refuses to take it.
Bernie Sanders would certainly be ruled out, despite the fact that he would have the second-most number of delegates. The entire point of the panicked scramble to endorse a clearly lousy candidate before Super Tuesday was to keep Sanders from winning. But it still could be somebody else — perhaps Washington Governor Jay Inslee, or California Governor Gavin Newsom, both of whom have handled the coronavirus pandemic relatively well (unlike New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, whose incompetent bungling created the worst outbreak in the world). Inslee or Newsom would not be my first choice, but at least they have no rape allegations against them and are in full possession of their faculties.

Or simpler still, as Alex Pareene suggests, Democrats could simply re-start the primary and see who wins. There would surely be some controversy, but most Democratic voters would wind up happier in the end.


ISIS never went away in Iraq.  Apparently burned out on the wall-to-wall coronavirus coverage, AP has suddenly rediscovered ISIS.  They offer, "The man wearing an explosive vest emerged from a car and calmly marched toward the gates of the intelligence building in Iraq’s northern city of Kirkuk. When he ignored their shouts to halt, guards opened fire, and he blew himself up, wounding three security personnel in the first week of Ramadan. Days later, a three-pronged coordinated attack killed 10 Iraqi militia fighters in the northern province of Salahaddin -- the deadliest and most complex operation in many months."   IANS explains, "Despite repeated military operations against the IS remnants, IS militants are still hiding in deserts, rugged areas as well as in Himreen mountain range which extends in the provinces of Diyala, Salahudin and Kirkuk. They are capable of carrying out frequent guerilla attacks against security forces and civilians."


 The violence happens daily.  Halgurd Sherwani (KURDISTAN 24) reports, that 3 police officers and 1 civilian were killed by the Islamic State at the Zaganiya police station in al-Abara while two more police officers and five civilians were left injured.  Sherwani notes, "The bloody incident comes as part of a recent increase in activity by fighters loyal to the group, over two years after its territorial defeat in Iraq in late 2017 by federal security forces, Kurdish Peshmerga, and Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) militias, with air support by the US-led coalition."  ALMASDAR reminds, "Six Iraqi fighters were killed late Thursday night after ISIS terrorists targeted a point belonging to the 35th Brigade of the Popular Mobilization Units in the Salaheddine Governorate."   Lawk Ghafuri (RUDAW) charts this pattern:


ISIS militants also carried out multiple attacks against Iraqi security forces early Saturday in Saladin province, killing ten  members of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), also known as Hashd  al-Shaabi. It was ISIS’s biggest attack in Iraq since its territorial  defeat.

Iraqi Defense Minister Najah al-Shammari vowed last week to “ramp up” anti-ISIS efforts.

Despite Iraq’s coronavirus lockdown measures and the US-led coalition’s withdrawal from several bases across Iraq, the ISF has stepped up its operations against ISIS remnants active in the country’s remote deserts and mountains.

Between January 1 and April 15, the ISF carried out 1,060 operations  and killed 135 ISIS targets, defense ministry spokesperson Yehia  Rasool said on April 21.






New content at THIRD: