Monday, January 4, 2021

Justin Beth

I find this video very interesting.


 

With the squad having demonstrated themselves to be the Fraud Squad and their refusal to fight for Medicare For All, I find the video to be important and needed.


The host Zack Leary is speaking to Justin Beth.  Who is Justin Beth?  Here:


Justin Beth, Co-Chair
Maine

Justin is honored to serve the interests of the delegates to the Green Party of the United States National Committee (GPUS NC) and believes that the Green Party is transforming American politics, to finally and truly represent millions of Americans that have been left behind by the single party rule of the Plutocratic Party.

His involvement in electoral politics has increased exponentially since the 2016 presidential cycle. During the 2016 election season, he had earned a spot as a National Delegate for the Bernie Sanders campaign, as a result of countless hours of volunteering in Maine and New Hampshire. However, like so many others, Justin found himself getting Berned by the Democratic Party’s rigged primary system. Learning from his mistakes, he started volunteering with the Jill Stein campaign on the last day of the DNC Convention, by proudly walking out of the Fargo Center with a Jill Stein sign held high over his head. The insights gained from this experience has shaped his understanding of why the only party that stands a chance of leading a political revolution is the Green Party and why progressives seeking political change must start considering the Green Party to be Plan A, not Plan B. Additionally, these experiences have provided him insight on the Democratic Party’s internal operations, which can benefit the Green Party’s strategy of how we can overcome the Democratic Party going forward.

Following the 2016 General Election, Justin continued his electoral activism on several Green Party campaigns in 2017: making phone calls for Cheri Honkala in her race for Pennsylvania State Rep in District 197; managing phone and text banking for David Kulma’s campaign for US Congress in South Carolina’s District 5 special election; and more phonebanking for Seth Kaper Dale in his run for Governor of New Jersey. It was at this time that Justin began to connect with other Greens around the country that were focused on supporting out-of-state races (which began his work as a liaison to the Coordinated Campaign Committee).

Justin continued his growth in the Maine Green Independent Party (MGIP) in 2018, being elected that March as Chairperson of the Portland Green Independent Committee and later being awarded the New Maine Green of the Year at the 2018 MGIP Convention (and was officially elected to be a MGIP Steering Committee and a GPUS NC Alternate Delegate). In addition, Justin’s passion in electoral activism led to collecting ballot line signatures for Maine candidates, assisting with voter list database management for MGIP, and being a part of the team that helped Ranked Choice Voting succeed in Maine. In addition to his volunteering his time, Justin has also made financial investments in the Green Party by enrolling as a sustaining member for GPUS and MGIP. Some of you may remember Justin from the 2018 Annual National Meeting, where he made a pitch for others to become sustaining members.

Born in San Diego, CA in1974, Justin moved to Brunswick, ME at the age of 6. In 2000, he graduated from University of Maine at Orono with a degree in Engineering Physics and currently works his day job as a Health Physicist. About 90% of his free time is dedicated to the Green Party and the remaining 10% of his time is split between making music (playing saxophone with an activist marching band) and playing frisbee golf. Justin currently lives in Portland, ME and is a dedicated dad to a 20 year old tuxedo cat named Chubby, who can often be heard roaring in the background of many a Steering Committee conference call.

 

 

He's someone who needs to be part of the conversation.

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 Monday, January 4, 2021.  We desperately need some common sense in this new year.


Let's start the year with some common sense.


First?  Donald Trump.  The election is over.  It was over when the electoral college voted.  


Was the election stolen?  I see nothing to indicate that it was but let's say that it was stolen.  It's too late now.  The electoral college voted.  Donald had every chance to make his case and it's over.  


In 2000, Al Gore won the votes but didn't get the presidency.  But at a certain point, it didn't matter anymore.  And Al understood that and grasped that the only thing that could happen if he continued to persist was for him to be labeled a sore loser.  


Is that what Donald wants to look like?  Like Hillary Clinton for the last four years?  Ranting with unfounded conspiracies of how Russia stole the election from her?  Coming on a like a crazy woman?


It's over.  Donald Trump has lost and any close to him would do well to explain that to him.


If you're late to the story, we're talking about the call SKY NEWS reports on below.


SKY NEWS?  We're not going with any US outlet -- they're not known for their fairness.


SKY NEWS, if anything, would be in favor of Donald.  I can understand people being dismissive of THE WASHINGTON POST, THE NEW YORK TIMES, MSNBC, CNN and others who shredded their credibility over the last four years.  But that's not them.  That's SKY NEWS out of Australia.  It is right-wing leaning outlet, it is not a US outlet.  So I would hope even Trump supporters could absorb what is reported in the video above.


Now it is over for Donald Trump.  He can accept that or not.  Whether he accepts or not, Joe Biden will become president January 20th.  Donald should be spending the time remaining figuring out who he wants to pardon, what papers he wants to order released, that sort of thing -- the things you do as you close shop.  


He should consider pardoning Julian Assange.  WIKILEAKS' publisher is in the news this morning.



At SHADOW PROOF, Kevin Gosztola offers the following analysis of the breaking news.




For those late to the party, Julian is being persecuted for exposing War Crimes of the US government.  Monday April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released  military video of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were killed in the assault including two Reuters journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. Monday June 7, 2010, the US military announced that they had arrested Chelsea  Manning and she stood accused of being the leaker of the video. Leila Fadel (Washington Post) reported in August 2010 that Manning had been charged -- "two charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The first encompasses four counts of violating Army regulations by transferring classified information to his personal computer between November and May and adding unauthorized software to a classified computer system. The second comprises eight counts of violating federal laws governing the handling of classified information." In March, 2011, David S. Cloud (Los Angeles Times) reported that the military has added 22 additional counts to the charges including one that could be seen as "aiding the enemy" which could result in the death penalty if convicted. The Article 32 hearing took place in December. There was an Article 32 hearing and then a court-martial.  February 28, 2013, Chelsea admitted she leaked to WikiLeaks.  And why.



Chelsea Manning:   In attempting to conduct counter-terrorism or CT and counter-insurgency COIN operations we became obsessed with capturing and killing human targets on lists and not being suspicious of and avoiding cooperation with our Host Nation partners, and ignoring the second and third order effects of accomplishing short-term goals and missions. I believe that if the general public, especially the American public, had access to the information contained within the CIDNE-I and CIDNE-A tables this could spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy in general as [missed word] as it related to Iraq and Afghanistan.
I also believed the detailed analysis of the data over a long period of time by different sectors of society might cause society to reevaluate the need or even the desire to even to engage in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations that ignore the complex dynamics of the people living in the effected environment everyday.



   

Monday April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released US military video of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were killed in the assault including two Reuters journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh.  In addition, October 22, 2010, WikiLeaks released 391,832 US military documents on the Iraq War. The documents -- US military field reports -- reveal torture and abuse and the ignoring of both. They reveal ongoing policies passed from the Bush administration onto the Obama one. They reveal that both administrations ignored and ignore international laws and conventions on torture. They reveal a much higher civilian death toll than was ever admitted to. Calls are coming in from officials in many countries for an investigation -- including from the UK, Norway and Israel -- and from the United Nations High Commissoner for Human Rights and the United Nations' Special Rapporteur on Torture. 


For publishing these revelations -- and others -- Julian Assange has been persecuted.  


Today, the judge has ruled that he may not be extradited to the US.  Hopefully, this will be followed by Julian being released.  Common sense dictates that.


Common sense.  It was in short supply in 2020 -- and the US media ensured it was in short supply for the last four years.  Donald's going to be removed from office!!! There are indictments against Donald Jr.!!!  One claim after another fizzled out and the bulk of them should never have been 'reported' or amplified by the non-reporting talk shows of MSNBC.  That's all they are: Talk show hosts.  It would be great if the new year could bring even a semi-functioning media in the US.  All standards were shredded over the last four years and they were not impartial in the least.  It was appalling.  And Donald Trump has every right to complain about the US media.  They were not fair, they did not follow the same rules on him that they did for others.  


Are they going to turn it around now?  Probably not.  They've gone down a road that would require a major u-turn at this point.  Whatever credibility they had left is gone.  Yes, rabid partisans on both sides will cheer what passes for 'journalism' when their foes are the victims of journalistic malpractice.  But the vast middle of America isn't feeling it.  And, let's remember, the US media has ignored the hit they took for lying about Iraq but despite ignoring it (or maybe because of ignoring it) they suffered a body blow that they still have not come back from.


Common sense?


2021 will be very difficult in the US for anyone who wants to see the US government actually serve the needs of the American people.  No, $150 a month (what the only stimulus check -- issued back in April -- provided for American citizens) is not taking care of the needs of the American people.


It's going to be difficult to try to move a non-responsive government.


And it's going to be difficult because there are so many who love an abusive relationship.


That's what We The People have with the US Congress.  


Jimmy Dore called for progressives in the House to state that they would withhold their votes for Nancy Pelosi in the Speaker of the House race unless she agreed to bring Medicare For All to a floor vote in the House by the end of January.


This was a solid move.  A drama queen who loved Hillary now loves Kamala Harris and tries to pretend he's a K-Hiver.  Whatever.  But he's among the many attacking Jimmy and saying that this is how the left turns on its own.


Drama Queen, you're not in Congress.  Members of Congress are not your own.  They are your public servants -- something that they forget becaue we don't remind them of it.


They are there to serve us, not corporations, not foreign interests, not the zodiac, not the rolling tides.  They are there to serve us.


People like Drama Queen ensure that this will be a difficult battle because they refuse to hold members of Congress accountable.


AOC is not your friend.  What is she?  She's an idiot.  She sometimes makes good statements but she's inexperienced and she's failed to take any real stands.  She talks but she doesn't act.  She's rather vapid -- a glossy individual -- remember I offered that critique when she got into Congress -- and former Senator Claire McCaskill echoed those points on CNN.  


You give up all your power when you work and work to turn someone into your hero.  


As Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman says in BATMAN RETURNS, "You make it so easy, don't you? Always waiting for some Batman to save you."




You create false gods and you do so for a number of reasons including that you're lazy.  False gods let you pretend that everything's alright -- when it's not.  It's the point of John Mulaney's whole bit about the horse loose in the hospital.


It was not alright that a bunch of nonsense treaties and agreements with no teeth to them passed for eight years during Barack Obama's two terms as addressing climate change.


That is not alright.


And it cannot happen under even one term of Joe Biden's -- this is a crisis and it needs to be addressed.  That's not going to happen by being the pep squad for Congress.


They need to fear you.  They need to fear that they could be voted out of office.  


Jimmy Dore's plan was a good one.


It was supposed to educate us.  It was supposed to demonstrate, via a floor vote, who we could count on in the fight for Medicare For All and who we couldn't count on.


It did educate us.  It showed us that the so-called progressives are empty vessels who will not be agents of change unless tremendous pressure is brought to bear on them.  


Drama Queen is a joke, a US citizen who won't stand up for his rights because he's too busy giving standing ovations to politicians who haven't delivered anything.  


Jimmy Dore did a wonderful thing and hopefully this is the first of many battles.  At his Twitter thread, he's noting Ana Kasparian.  If he does a commentary on it at his YOUTUBE channel, we'll post it but I'm not sharing a video of her -- I'm not giving her views.  (A video of THE JIMMY DORE SHOW would include the clip but the views would go to Jimmy.)


At THIRD, we did "JACOBIN needs to fire Ana Kasparian."  I don't call for people to be fired, it's a difficult economy.  My default position, for example, is not fire the awful Bill Maher but bring on a show with people who aren't anti-Muslim and aren't anti-women.   We need more voices, not less.


But Ana already has a voice -- on THE YOUNG TURKS.


We have said for some time that she is hurting JACOBIN's brand.  She is not what the publication is or at least what it pretends to be.


From Ruth's "Ruth's Streaming Report:"



I cannot listen to JACOBIN.  I know there is a mid-week program and C.I. highlights it, and she defended it this week at HILDA'S MIX.  I get her point.  But as long as JACOBIN is going to dilute their own brand by allowing the hideous Ana Kasparian to host their weekend program, I am not going to stream them.  Ms. Kasparian is hateful and she is rude.  More to the point, she is part of THE YOUNG TURKS.  I thought JACOBIN was about Democratic Socialism.  I am confused how the DSA can endorse Madeleine Albright because that is what Ms. Kasparian has done.


Ana Kasparian is a Madeline Albright Democrat.
Image



Ms. Albright is a War Criminal.  If this is what JACOBIN wants to represent, I hope they understand that many of us on the left will not be visiting their website.  Ms. Kasparian already works for THE YOUNG TURKS.  She has an outlet.  It is time to let someone else -- especially someone not giddy over copping a feel of War Hawk Albright -- host the weekend program.



Mad Maddie Albright?  She cozies up to that?  Is that what JACOBIN wants to stand for?  


And now she's really made it important that JACOBIN retire her.  She used Saturday's JACOBIN program to attack Katie Halper and Briahna Joy Gray.  


She can do that on THE YOUNG TURKS.  They do anything on that cesspool -- and have, sexism, homophobia, racism, you name it.


But is this what JACOBIN wants to stand for?


And while attacking them, she whines that others -- not her, never here (despite her Twitter nonsense attacks that she's carried out for weeks now) -- are dividing the left.


Ana, look in the mirror.  


The Iraq War continues.  But JACOBIN won't make time for that -- they're not alone on that -- however Ana's allowed to use the magazine's program for personal vendettas?


That's not what JACOBIN is supposed to be about.  She needs to go.



You didn't have a 'protest' in Baghdad yesterday.  A protest is something against the government.  And when we've seen real protests in Baghdad, we've seen real violence.  This was a rally to support militias and to support the government of Iran.  That's why they weren't attacked by government forces, that's why two Members of Parliament took place.  This was not a protest.


Steven Nabil Tweets:


Safaa Al-Sarai, a young Iraqi poet, writer and activist was shot in the head during the 2019 protest. Since then he became a symbol for the protests, his love of Iraq from his writings and actions taken alongside his struggles as an orphan working hard labor jobs to pay
Image


And:


For his schooling made him a role model for many. Today Iranian backed militia supporters defaced a painting of Safaa in Tahrir Square and wrote on it “ Sulamiani”. Further angering millions of Iraqis who see Safaa as a reflection of themselves.
Image
Image
Image
Image


I'm sorry, where is the coverage in western media of that?  Or of the murder of Safaa al-Sarai?  Never.  Can't be bothered.  But they can call Sunday's rally in Baghdad a protest. From the slums of Sadr City they pilled into downtown Baghdad and ALJAZEERA proclaimed them "mourners."  


Zagrosi Tweets:


Honest question Why is there no organized commemoration by the current Iraqi govt for: - The 100.000s of Iraqis killed in 1991 uprising? - The 100.000s of Iraqis killed in Iran-Iraq war? - The 100.000s Shia, Kurd, Sunni killed by former govts? Why for Iranian citizen Soleimani?


NBC NEWS stated "thousands of Iraqis gathered in Baghdad's central square on Sunday to mark the anniversary of the U.S. killing of a top Iranian general."  Really?  Because the UK-based REUTERS got it right: "Tens of thousands of supporters of Iranian-backed Iraqi paramilitary groups" -- yep, that's what they were.  Germany's DEUTSCHE WELLE got it right too: "Thousands of Iraqi followers of Iran-backed paramilitary groups"


This wasn't a protest.  If you've forgotten, the same square, weeks ago, was torched and actual protesters attacked -- torched by and attacked by government forces.  So don't pretend that thug Muqtada and his slum dwellers are representative of Iraq.  They're not even representative of the Shia in Iraq.  


If you're still not getting it, Amnesty's Donatella Rovera Tweeted it plainly:


Over a million participated - that is most of #Iraq’s 40 millions didn’t - in 1st anniversary commemoration in #Baghdad’s Tahrir Square, where #Soleimani’s & #Muhandis’s militias murdered, wounded & abducted 100s & 100s of peaceful demonstrators
From


Year-in-review pieces went up last week:


C.I.'s "2020: The Year Long Walk Of Shame,"  Ruth's "Ruth's Streaming Report," Kat's "2020 in music" and Martha & Shirley's "2020 in Books (Martha & Shirley)" went up here earlier.  Ann's "2020 in films" and Stan's "2020 in films" (joint-post) went up at their sites and will be reposted her later as will Rebecca's "sexiest men of 2020."


New content at THIRD:




 


Friday, January 1, 2021

2020 in films

Ann and Stan:  2020 was not a good year for film.  Theaters closed due to the pandemic and those that are open have trouble filling seats.  Product was in short supply.  WONDER WOMAN 1984, for example, was postponed repeatedly.  Then it came out.  And?  As Ava and C.I. noted "TV: WONDER WOMAN 1984 is an awful film."  So much was awful in 2020 films, so much that we really look forward to seeing the Academy Award nominations because they're either going to pull rabbits out of a hat or their nominees are going to be outright laughable.


We weren't sure we'd even be able to come up with ten films to recommend.  Then we got together and came up with 17 which we whittled down to 10.  Here they are . . . 


1)  ALEX WHEATLE


AMAZON PRIME members can stream ALEX WHEATLE for free.  It's one of five films Steve McQueen directed for AMAZON in 2020 and it's the only one of the five that we liked.  And we didn't just like it, we loved it.  We thought it was the best film of the year.


2) INVISIBLE MAN



Released right at the pandemic was starting, this film managed to be a box office hit.  It was also the first film to come out for streaming while it was at the movies.  A tight script and strong direction really make the film work. Strong praise for Elisabeth Moss and Aldis Hodge, of course, but also for Oliver Jackson-Cohen who is threatening and charming.  Available to purchase for rental or to own.

 



3) THE STAND-IN 



Drew Barrymore plays an actress with a few problems in this comedy.  She also plays the actress' stand-in.  Normally, that just means that the stand-in stands in on the set when they're getting the lighting and the angles right.  But, as the actress' life goes off the rails, the stand-in stands in on everything.  A very funny film.  Available to purchase for rental or to own.


4) REBECCA 



Another film where Armie Hammer holds your interest.  He needs better films but, at least in REBECCA, he gets a co-star who matches him in skill, Lily James, and with whom he has real chemistry.  The chemistry alone makes up for the weaker spots in the movie.  Streaming on NETFLIX.


5) THE CHRISTMAS CHRONICLES II.



It's not often we get a Christmas classic.  This Kurt Russell film is a classic.  The previous one was good but this one ups the wattage in every way -- including beefing up Goldie Hawn's role. Streaming on NETFLIX.



6) AVA



AVA is a thriller and it's got a strong script and some outstanding action scenes.  Mainly though, it's got one strong performance after another which starts with Jessica Chastain as the title character and includes John Malkovich as the dark heart of the film.  Colin Farrell is ferocious and Common, Joan Chen and Geena Davis really deliver. Streaming on NETFLIX.




7) THE LIFE AHEAD



People are saying Sophia Loren will win her second Academy Award for this film.  We can't think of any actress who gave a stronger performance in 2020.  Sophia is the film.  And she is magic.  So much so that, even if you hate reading subtitles, you'll be glad you streamed this film.  Streaming on NETFLIX.


8) THE VANISHED



One of the few films we paid for in 2020.  We each paid to stream it on AMAZON while it was in theaters.  The trailer made it look interesting and it was even better than the trailer with twists and turns and realizing that we thought we knew the characters but . . . Peter Facinelli is good in the film in a supporting role.  But he's even better as a director and he ensures this film has tension and is tight.  Thomas Jane, Anne Heche and Jason Patric give applause worthy performances. Available for rental or to own.



9) LAZY SUSAN



This offbeat comedy stars Sean Hayes.  It's weird and we like that.  It's not the cookie cutter screenplay that Syd Field readers would have churned out.  It's weird and it's charming and Sean's great, and Allison Janey is great and so is Margo Martindale and, in a very small role, Matthew Broderick. Streaming for free (for PRIME members) on AMAZON PRIME.


 10) SUPERINTELLIGENCE.



Ben Falcone and Melissa McCarthy teamed up again for SUPERINTELLIGENCE -- they're producing, she's starring and he's directing.  This is a film with heart and with humor and much better than a lot of people wanted to give it credit for.  Word on it was so bad, we avoided it.  Then we read Ava and C.I.'s "TV: The end of the road?" and gave it a chance.  Sometimes reviewers aren't reviewing what's onscreen and we think SUPERINTELLIGENCE is much better than it was given credit for.  It's a solid comedy and Ben and Melissa seem back on track (there were parts of LIFE OF THE PARTY that made us wonder if they should keep working together).  Streaming on HBO MAX.


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Thursday, December 31, 2020. The last snapshot for 2020.


On the last real news day in the US prior to January 3rd, the media slowly wakes up to a potential attack in Iraq.  ANI reports, "Amid concerns of possible Iranian retaliation, the U.S. on Wednesday flew a pair of B-52H over the Persian Gulf, according to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)."

Last news day?  Friday is the first day of 2021 and that's a 'slow' news day in the US with many people on vacation.  Saturday and Sunday are weekend days and Sunday is the 3rd.  Will there be violence?  I hope not but the US government is worried and it's a damn shame that what passes for a media in the US couldn't have spent time explaining that.


Here's the statement from CENTCOM:


Release # 20201230-02

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

U.S. Air Force B-52H "Stratofortress" aircrews from the Minot Air Force Base, N.D.-headquartered 5th Bomb Wing made a deliberate appearance in the Middle East today to underscore the U.S. military's commitment to regional security and demonstrate a unique ability to rapidly deploy overwhelming combat power on short notice.

The two-ship deployment also delivers a clear deterrent message to anyone who intends to do harm to Americans or American interests.

"The United States continues to deploy combat-ready capabilities into the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility to deter any potential adversary, and make clear that we are ready and able to respond to any aggression directed at Americans or our interests," said Gen. Frank McKenzie, Commander, U.S. Central Command. "We do not seek conflict, but no one should underestimate our ability to defend our forces or to act decisively in response to any attack."

The United States continues to work closely with allies and partner to advance regional security and stability.

This mission is the third bomber deployment into CENTCOM's area of operation in the last 45 days.


They also released the following video.



Robert F. Burns (AP) notes, "One senior U.S. military officer said the flight by two Air Force B-52 bombers was in response to signals that Iran may be planning attacks against U.S. allied targets in neighboring Iraq or elsewhere in the region in coming days, even as President-elect Joe Biden prepares to take office."  If you're late to the party, AFP explains, "One year after US forces assassinated Iran's most storied commander, tensions are boiling between Iraq's Washington-backed premier and pro-Tehran forces that accuse him of complicity in the Baghdad drone strike."  Dan Lamothe (WASHINGTON POST via BOSTON GLOBE) words it this way, "The US military is bracing for a possible attack on American personnel and interests in Iraq, US defense officials said, days before the first anniversary of an American drone strike that killed an Iranian general in Baghdad."

The murder of Gen Qasem Solemani revealed just how hollow the US peace movement is as various voices disappointed lamenting the death of the terrorist.  Joan Baez, when she still had ethics, upset a lot of people by defending the Boat People and calling out the Vietnamese government but that was the right thing to do.  Jane Fonda's reaction was a knee-jerk reaction -- to call them refugees names and rush to minimize the actions of the Vietnamese government and attempt to justify what took place.  There was no justification.  


At the start of the year, the reviled Donald Trump ordered the murder of terrorist Soelmani and you could have called out murder, you could have called out many things.  But the knee jerk reaction was to rush to defend the terrorist, to call him a poet, and a person of peace and a hundred other bits of garbage that only Americans who never paid attention to Iraq could have uttered.  He was a terrorist.  The Sunnis were terrorized by him, Iraq's LGBQT community was terrorized by him, his actions go back to the original targeting of Iraq's intellectual community (doctors, professors, etc) following the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq.  Not surprising because this is the man who, in Iran, advocated for taking out (for killing) the leaders of the 1999 student uprising in Iran.  He was a man with blood on his hands.


That doesn't mean you couldn't be dismayed by his murder.  It does mean you didn't act like he farted rainbows and burped unicorns -- but that's what so many on the left in the US did.  It's because we're so damn stupid.   


Qasem Soelmani was a man of violence so it's not a surprise he met a violent end.  He was a brutal thug and there's no need to pretend otherwise -- unless your goal is to flaunt your stupidity.  


Americans then tried to portray a Baghdad funeral procession as the Iraq position.  It wasn't even the Shi'ite position, let alone the position of all of Iraq.  Again, your stupidity was showing.  Iraq and Iran are neighbors, they are also frequently at odds.  And the majority of Iraqis are very clear that they don't want to become an Iranian proxy (or a US proxy).  They weren't thrilled that an Iranian general was in the country directing militias.


This was ignored.


It was very disappointing to watch as various people -- including Margaret Kimberley -- turn this man into a noble person and realize that they could comment on events in Iraq it's just that they had chosen, for months and months, to ignore the protests that started in October of 2019 and that were continuing (and still continue).  Their Tweets and other b.s. went to everything that's wrong in the United States.


You had a mass movement of Iraqi youth taking to the streets but you couldn't tell that story.  You needed a celebrity and you needed to play with 'the rugged individual' because that's your limited mind functions.  A large group of Iraqi students taking to the streets was too much for you to cover.  But an individual killed and suddenly you were all experts and all concerned and all wanting to use your power -- such as it was.  The failures of the US media are ingrained in the failure of the US to develop beyond restrictive narratives that they trot out century after century in their attempts at conversations.  One has to believe even cave dwellers were better at communication.


MIDDLE EAST EYE notes, "The United States announced on Wednesday that it sent Iraq's army 30 armoured vehicles to secure Baghdad's Green Zone, ahead of the anniversary of the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis."


Again, I hope there is no attack.  But this is a news story.  CNN offers, "Yet others in the Pentagon contend that the threat is being exaggerated, with the first senior defense official -- who is directly involved in discussions -- telling CNN that there is 'not a single piece of corroborating intel' suggesting an attack by Iran may be imminent."  I hope the unnamed official is correct.  I hope s/he's not playing word games -- I don't think anyone believes Iran's going to do anything themselves.  I think the fear is they'll use Iranian linked militias in Iraq to carry out an attack.  The wording offered to CNN makes it appear someone may be playing word games.


A new development on that year ago murder, MEMO reports, "Iranian Prosecutor Ali Al-Qasi Mehr has accused the British company G4S of providing the US armed forces in Iraq with the arrival details of the aircraft in which General Qasem Soleimani was travelling prior to his assassination by an American drone. G4S is responsible for aviation security at Baghdad International Airport, where the attack which killed Soleimani took place."


On the militias, Murat Sofuoglu (TRT) offers:


With the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, Washington unexpectedly helped Iran play its political game better, removing one of Tehran’s fiercest enemies, Saddam Hussein, the former Sunni leader of the Shia-majority country. 

Since that time, Iran has dominated the Iraqi political life. The recent escalations between Iraq’s top Shia cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al Sistani and Iran’s Shia spiritual leader Ali Khamenei, however, show that something has changed in terms of Tehran’s influence in Baghdad.

The main problem between the two leaderships is related to the composition of Iraq’s top militia group, Hashdi Shabi, which means Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF). Iraqi factions loyal to either Tehran or Baghdad have grave differences over how Hashdi Shabi should be led.  

“The emergence of divisions has been long expected. As much as Iran’s influence in Iraq has increased, these divisions become more clear and visible,” Bilgay Duman, the coordinator of Iraq Studies Department at Turkey’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies (ORSAM).

Since last year, a protest movement with a clear anti-Iran message has also dominated the streets of Baghdad, demanding the Iraqi leadership to limit Tehran’s oversize influence in the country. 

“Iraq’s Shiites feel that they can not move independently, being under the total control of Iran. As a result, they began reacting to Iran. The emergence of Hashdi Shabi, which has long appeared to follow Iran’s lead along with other Shia militia groups, has irritated them a lot,” Duman tells TRT World. 


A few hours ago, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq Tweeted:


Happening Now: SRSG Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert delivers remarks at the "Social, Religious and National Diversity in #Iraq and its Importance in Building Citizenship and Peaceful Co-existence" workshop in #Baghdad
Image
Image
Image



As we've noted before, she has a problem with 'messaging' in Iraq.  For example:


Ammar al-Hakim guards yesterday attacked the demonstrators, and today the United Nations joined with him in this meeting !!



What do Iraqis think of the protests that have been taking place in their country?  A new study sought to discover the feelings on the protests.  Here's the summary:


In a recent study initiated by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and conducted by an international research company 1,000 Iraqis aged 18 years and older were interviewed in person in September and October 2020. For the majority, the protests are an outcry against corruption in a crisis-ridden country; the desire that those responsible for the socio-economic crunch will be held accountable is overwhelming. The most recent protests were very popular among those surveyed: 60 percent support the movement, which is undoubtedly more than just a youth revolt. 
Since October last year, thousands of people have regularly taken to the streets against their government and engaged in often bloody street battles. The results so far are appalling: more than 600 people have been killed in the protests and around 7,000 injured. Nevertheless, the majority of the Iraqis are optimistic about the future - especially the younger generation between 31 and 45. It can be assumed that the demonstrators will not give up in 2021 either. 



PDF format warning, full report is here.  From the report:



In the poll 66% of Iraqis expressed optimism about the future.  The 31-45 age group are the most optimistic about the future (71%).  Contrary to the other regions, the majority of Kurds in the KRI are pessimistic about the future (37%).

In general, 60% of Iraqis support "the events", i.e. the protests, that are happening since October 1st, 2019.  More men (63%) tend to support "the events" than women (57%).  Iraqis from Central and Al-Furat Al-Awsat regions (both 67%) support "the events" more than the other regions, especially Iraqis from Kurdistan (53%) and the Northern regions (55%).

We asked the participants for the name they would ascribe to "the events": Most Iraqis call the current events a demonstration (44%) or a revolution (31%).  Fewer call it an uprising (17%) or a movement (7%).

For the Iraqis, "the events" are a clear result of the accumulated conditions it preceded.  89% strongly or somewhat agree to that (Top 2 Boxes = T2B).  For the vast majority "the events" erupted as a call against corruption (93% T2B).  While the majority thinks that it all started with clear demands and it was later exploited and modified (67% T2B).  Iraqis mostly disagree that the protests are not being manipulated by either local parties (56% L2B = Lower two Boxes) or by external parties (58% L2B).  

[. . .]

Most Iraqis agree that it is true that "the events" have some deficits, but describe them as necessary (89% T2B).  They support "the events", but do not support blocking roads.


Updating a story covered earlier this week, YOUR MIDDLE EAST reports, "Iran will resume normal gas flow to Iraq on Wednesday after reaching an agreement with the country on Tuesday over unpaid bills, Iraqi electricity ministry spokesman Ahmed Moussa told state television."  Staying with economic news, Dilan Sirwan (RUDAW) reports:

A member of Iraqi parliament’s finance committee has told state media that the country’s budget deficit for 2021 stands at 71 trillion dinars (approximately $49 billion), according to a bill set to be read by parliament next month.

Muhammad Saheb Al-Daraji told state media on Wednesday that the budget, approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers on December 21, stands at 164 trillion dinars (approx. $113 billion), and the price of oil is set at $42 per barrel, according to the bill.

“The deficit in the budget reaches 71 trillion dinars,” Al-Daraji added, saying Iraq will also be steeped in 16 trillion dinars, or $11 billion, worth of debt from previous loans.

Deputy parliament speaker Basheer Haddad said that the parliament will conduct their first reading of the bill at the “beginning of January,” state media reported on Tuesday.

Iraq has plunged deeper into an economic crisis amid low oil prices, the main source of revenue for Baghdad. Economic woes were a key factor pushing people to the streets in widespread protests that began in October 2019, with youth calling for better services and an end to mass unemployment, but the economy has continued to weaken amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In October, the World Food Programme warned that 10 percent of Iraqis are going hungry. 


The Iraqi government has devalued the dinar.  Hatem Hussein (ALMADA) reports that economist state this move will increase the percent of Iraqis living in poverty to 60% of the population.  


The following sites updated: