Wednesday, December 14, 2022

The horrors and abuses women in prison are facing

Picking up on yesterday's topic about the abuse of female inmates, ABC News reports:


Former inmate and survivor Briane Moore testified before the subcommittee on Tuesday, recounting how she was raped by an officer while she was imprisoned at a federal facility in West Virginia. She said the officer, a captain at the prison, would take her to private areas of the facility to abuse her out of sight of surveillance cameras.

"I knew he had the power to prevent me from being transferred to a prison closer to my family closer to my daughter," Moore said. "He was a captain with total control over me. I had no choice but to obey."

She said that she feared getting placed in solitary confinement if she tried to report the officer and was aware of other women who were punished for reporting abuse.


And for more on the topic, this is a press release from Senator Jon Ossoff's office:


Chairman Ossoff: “Our findings are deeply disturbing and demonstrate, in my view, that the BOP is failing systemically to prevent, detect, and address sexual abuse of prisoners by its own employees”

Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Jon Ossoff unveiled the results of his 8-month bipartisan investigation into sexual abuse of women in Federal prisons.

Chairman Ossoff’s 8-month bipartisan investigation uncovered that Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) employees sexually abused female prisoners in at least two-thirds of federal prisons that have held women over the past decade, and that the BOP has failed to prevent, detect, and stop recurring sexual abuse, including by senior prison officials

“Let me be absolutely clear: this situation is intolerable. Sexual abuse of inmates is a gross abuse of human and Constitutional rights and cannot be tolerated by the United States Congress,” Chairman Ossoff said. “It is cruel and unusual punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and basic standards of human decency.”

Click here to watch Chairman Ossoff’s opening statement.This is an external link

This is an external link

Please find a transcript of Chairman Ossoff’s opening statement below.

Chairman Ossoff: “The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will come to order. 

“Today’s hearing will examine the findings of our eight-month bipartisan investigation into the sexual abuse of women in federal prisons.

“Before we proceed, viewers are advised that this hearing will discuss sexual violence and other deeply disturbing issues that we are duty-bound to bring to light.

“Anyone seeking mental health assistance can call the nationwide hotline at 988 to connect with a trained counselor.

“Eight months ago, as chair of PSI, I launched an investigation into the sexual abuse of women held in federal prisons.

“With Ranking Member Johnson’s support, our bipartisan staff reviewed extensive non-public Bureau of Prisons and whistleblower documents and conducted more than two-dozen interviews with senior BOP leaders, whistleblowers, and survivors of prison sexual abuse.

“Our findings are deeply disturbing and demonstrate, in my view, that the BOP is failing systemically to prevent, detect, and address sexual abuse of prisoners by its own employees.

“The Subcommittee has found that Bureau of Prisons’ employees sexually abused female prisoners in at least two-thirds of Federal prisons that have held women over the past decade.

“We found that BOP has failed to prevent, detect, and stop recurring sexual abuse, including by senior prison officials.

“At FCI Dublin in California, for example, both the Warden and the Chaplain sexually abused female prisoners.

“We found that BOP has failed to successfully implement the Prison Rape Elimination Act, or PREA.

“For example: two prisons where multiple BOP employees were abusing multiple women over an extended period, FCI Dublin and FCC Coleman, nevertheless passed or were found to have exceeded the PREA audit criteria, which are mandated by Congress and intended to detect the risk of sexual abuse in BOP facilities.

“In the case of FCI Dublin, the PREA compliance officer — the official specifically tasked with ensuring compliance with the Federal law whose purpose is the elimination of prison rape — was himself sexually abusing prisoners.

“In the case of FCC Coleman in Florida, all female prisoners had been transferred out of the facility two days before the PREA audit, making it impossible for the auditor to interview female prisoners despite the legal requirement that they interview inmates as part of the audit.

“Amidst more than 5,000 allegations of sexual abuse by BOP employees, we found at least 134 against female detainees were substantiated by BOP internal investigations or by criminal prosecutions.

“And given the fear of retaliation by survivors of sexual abuse, the apparent apathy by senior BOP officials at the facility, regional office, and headquarters levels, and severe shortcomings in the investigative practices implemented by BOP’s Office of Internal Affairs and the Department of Justice Inspector General, I suspect the extent of abuse is significantly wider.

“Indeed, we found there is currently a backlog of 8,000 internal affairs cases at the Bureau of Prisons, including at least hundreds of sexual abuse allegations against BOP employees that remain unresolved.

“DOJ’s Inspector General has found that BOP fails, at times, to properly credit allegations of sexual abuse brought by inmates.

“And multiple BOP employees who would later admit in sworn statements to sexually abusing prisoners have escaped criminal prosecution, due in part to weaknesses in the process by which BOP and the DOJ Inspector General work together to investigate such allegations. In fact, several officers who admitted under oath to sexually abusing prisoners were able nevertheless to retire with benefits.

“Let me be absolutely clear: this situation is intolerable. Sexual abuse of inmates is a gross abuse of human and Constitutional rights and cannot be tolerated by the United States Congress.

“It is cruel and unusual punishment that violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and basic standards of human decency.

“In July of this year, the former Director of BOP testified before this very Subcommittee and insisted that BOP was able to keep female prisoners safe from sexual abuse by BOP employees.  

“We now know that that statement was unequivocally false.

“The purpose of today’s hearing is to understand what’s gone so badly wrong — to establish and examine the facts upon which we must build reform. Progress begins with the truth. It requires a full and unflinching examination of grievous failure.

“On our first panel, we will hear from three survivors of sexual abuse at the hands of BOP employees that occurred while they were incarcerated in federal prisons: Carolyn Richardson, Briane Moore, and Linda De La Rosa. All of their abusers have since been convicted.

“The first-hand accounts of survivors are essential, and I am deeply grateful to them for coming forward to testify before the Senate. Their bravery will make it easier for others to tell their stories.

“Next, we will hear from Professor Brenda V. Smith of American University, a national expert on sexual abuse in custodial settings. We will ask her to put the survivors’ testimony in a broader context.

“Finally, we will question two government witnesses: the Inspector General for the Department of Justice, Michael Horowitz, whose office both oversees BOP and investigates criminal misconduct by BOP employees, and the new BOP Director Colette Peters, who began her tenure just six months ago, in July.

“The hearing today is part of a two-year bipartisan effort by this Subcommittee under my leadership to investigate conditions of incarceration and detention in the United States. From corruption at the U.S. Penitentiary Atlanta in Georgia, to the Department of Justice’s failure to count almost 1,000 deaths in custody across the country, to abusive and unnecessary gynecological procedures performed on women in Department of Homeland Security custody.

“Ranking Member Johnson, I thank you sincerely for your assistance in these efforts and your staff.

“Before I yield to the Ranking Member for his opening statement, it is important to acknowledge that law enforcement professionals working in our prisons have among the hardest jobs in our country, and I believe the vast majority of BOP employees share our goals of ending sexual abuse once and for all in Federal prisons.

“I also want to state for the record the Subcommittee investigated sexual abuse of women in federal prison because of some of their unique considerations: women are more likely than male prisoners to have suffered from trauma and sexual abuse prior to incarceration, and particularly susceptible to subsequent abuse in a custodial setting. However, the Subcommittee fully acknowledges that sexual abuse is not limited to female prisoners.

“Finally, the Subcommittee’s findings, which form the basis for today’s hearing, are laid out in a Bipartisan staff report, and I ask unanimous consent that this report be entered into the record.

“Ranking Member Johnson.”


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot;'


Wednesday, December 14, 2022.  In the Kurdistan some women are setting themselves on fire, in the US Joe Biden takes part in history (even if the White House staff bungles it) and much more.





Yesterday, US President Joe Biden signed The Respect for Marriage Act into law.  The White House issued the following statement:

On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, the President signed into law:

H.R. 8404, the “Respect for Marriage Act,” which establishes statutory authority for same-sex and interracial marriages and repeals provisions of law that once prevented any State or territory from being required to give effect to a same-sex marriage from another State or territory.

Thank you to Speaker Pelosi, Representatives Nadler, Cicilline, and Davids, Leader Schumer, Senators Baldwin, Collins, Portman, Sinema, Tillis, Feinstein, and Booker, and many others for their leadership.


Leave it to the White House to mess that up.  This was a time to quote Joe.

A few outlets do, for a minute or two, they say Joe declared, "For most of our nation’s history, we denied interracial couples and same sex couples from these protections. We failed to treat them with equal dignity and respect. And now, law requires that interracial marriage and same sex marriage must be recognized as legal in every state in the nation."  That's really not an accurate quote but NPR and others are running with it.  What he said should have been in the statement that the White House released.

Was the communications team too busy chatting with a celebrity (one who, Marcia noted, wanted to thank people for the passage of the act but couldn't think of one gay person to thank)?  This is embarrassing, the White House needs to get its act together.  Yes, it's very good that the spokesperson had a talking to by legal and, yes, she stuck to her lane yesterday (even noting the Hatch Act all by herself).  But this was a historic moment and Joe's remarks needed to be noted.  The White House staff failed him. 

This was going to be the snapshot where we could just note some good work done by Joe.  Instead, we have to note that the tiny statement above, in bold, issued by the White House (a) isn't enough and (b) is so poorly written that when it appears to be a quote (after the colon in bold), it's not really a quote.  They bungled everything.

Joe has his problems and issues and we note them frequently here.  But this was Joe's moment to shine -- and he did -- and he's let down by the people working at the White House.  How very sad.




Let's note some of what Joe said:


Hello, hello, hello.  Today's a good day.  A day America takes a final step towards equality, towards liberty and justice -- not just for some but for everyone. Everyone.  Toward creating a nation where decency, dignity and love are recognized, honored and protected.  Today, I sign The Respect for Marriage Act into law.  Deciding whether to marry, who to marry is one of the most profound decisions a person can make.  And as I've said before -- and some of you might remember on a certain TV show ten years ago [NBC's MEET THE PRESS] -- I got in trouble -- marriage, I mean this with all my heart, marriage is a simple proposition -- who do you love and will you be loyal to that person you love.  It's not more complicated than that.  And the law recognizes that everyone should have the right to answer those questions for themselves without the government interference.  It also secures the federal rights, protections, that come with marriage -- like when you're loved one gets sick and you're legally recognized as the next of kin.  For most of our nation's history, we denied interracial couples and same sex couples from these protections. We failed -- we failed to treat them with an equal dignity and respect. And now, the law requires interracial marriage and same sex marriage must be recognized as legal in every state in the nation.  I want to thank all of you for being here today, for being part of this important movement.  

 



MONTANARO: Our latest NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll, which is going to be released Thursday, shows 68% are in favor of same-sex marriage. You know, it was still a bit of a surprise. I have to say, though, that the bill got through because it wasn't clear they could get the 60 votes to overcome a filibuster because Republicans really have been much slower to embrace same-sex marriage. But a dozen Republican senators voted for it, 39 Republicans in the House did, too. And it's really reflective of how the country, even Republicans, are changing, even though GOP support, you know, has been much less in our surveys, less than a majority.

SHAPIRO: All right. We've been describing this as now a law that protects same-sex and interracial marriage. Beyond that top line, explain exactly what it does and does not do.

MONTANARO: Yeah. Not everyone's celebrating this as the be all, end all - and it's not. You know, this was largely passed because of the threat that the conservative supermajority at the Supreme Court after the Dobbs ruling that took away the right to an abortion, you know, could overturn other rights, including same-sex marriage. You know, while this bill gives federal benefits to same-sex couples, make sure those marriages are recognized across state lines, it doesn't guarantee that states won't deny marriage licenses to gay couples again if the court overturns it. You know, and I have to say, one of the most overlooked things in this bill, you know, isn't just about same-sex marriage, but also interracial marriages. Easy to overlook because 94% in the latest polling say they approve, but majorities didn't approve until the late 1990s, which isn't that long ago for some of us.





Now let's move over to Iraq where AFP reports 3 Iraqi soldiers have been killed by a roadside bomb 20 miles outside of Baghdad. MEHR NEWS AGENCY reports:

On Tuesday evening, a heavy gunfire was reported in the US military base at the US Embassy in Baghdad, known as "Unit 3".

The shooting was reported as eyewitnesses had earlier announced the flight of as US military helicopter over Baghdad's Green Zone.

The shooting, the details of which are still unknown, happened in the area of the US military base located in the US Embassy inside the security and protected Green Zone of Baghdad, and some Iraqi sources, such as Sabereen News Telegram channel embarked on broadcasting its video clips.


Staying on the topic of violence, we'll note this from BBC NEWS.


Women in Iraq are facing rising levels of domestic abuse. Cases of gender-based violence have seen a surge of 125% between 2020 and 2021, according to the United Nations.

In the Kurdistan region, women who feel trapped in abusive households often see suicide by self-immolation as their only way out.

The Kurdistan Regional Government has tried to combat violence against women, but many remain at risk.

The BBC has been granted rare access to one of the main hospitals for burns in Iraqi Kurdistan, where many women die of self-inflicted burns.


Meanwhile, the persecution of the LGBTQ community in Iraq continues.  THE SIASET DAILY notes:


The Iraqi Parliament recently drafted a law to ban publications regarding queer issues. This has alarmed the members of the LGBTQ+ community in the country.

The law would punish anyone who would for any reason “publish or promote” homosexuality in state’s media, institutions, schools, universities, social media platforms, books, cinemas, theatres, publications, and in public.

On December 3, 25 MPs, mostly from Shia group Coordination Framework, which opposes influential cleric Muqtada Al-Sadr, who is also Shia, signed a bill proposing the criminalisation of all publishing on LGBTQ+ topics in Iraq.

Individual citizens could be fined one million Iraqi dinars ($685), while government agencies and companies could be fined millions more. 


In the US today, US House Rep Carolyn Maloney will chair a hearing about the rise of violence aimed at the LGBTQ+ community in the US:



     Dec 12, 2022
Press Release
New Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson, Pulse Nightclub Shooting Survivor Brandon Wolf Also Slated to Testify  

Washington D.C. (December 12, 2022)—On Wednesday, December 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. ET, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, the Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, will hold a hearing to examine how the surge of anti-LGBTQI+ policies advanced by Republican lawmakers and the proliferation of extreme anti-LGBTQI+ rhetoric are fueling a rise in violence against LGBTQI+ people in the United States.  The Committee will hear firsthand testimony from individuals impacted by this violence, including survivors of last month’s mass shooting at the Colorado Springs LGBTQI+ nightclub Club Q that took the lives of five people.

 

“From Colorado Springs to my own district in New York City, communities across the country are facing a terrifying rise of anti-LGBTQI+ violence and extremism,” said Chairwoman Maloney.   “I am deeply grateful that survivors of these attacks are coming before my Committee to share their stories with the American people.  Make no mistake, the rise in anti-LGBTQI+ extremism and the despicable policies that Republicans at every level of government are advancing to attack the health and safety of LGBTQI+ people are harming the LGBTQI+ community and contributing to tragedies like what we saw at Club Q.  Next week, Republicans on my Committee and across the country will be forced to face the real-life impact of their dangerous agenda.  I hope LGBTQI+ individuals across the country will see that Democrats in Congress are fighting for them and will continue to push for policies that protect and expand their ability to live authentically and safely.”

 

On November 19, 2022, a shooter armed with an AR-15 style rifle opened fire on patrons and staff of the LGBTQI+ nightclub Club Q in Colorado Springs, Colorado, killing five people and injuring more than a dozen others.

 

The Club Q shooting comes as extremist, right-wing lawmakers at every level of government have advanced harmful policies that undermine the ability of LGBTQI+ people to live authentically.  In 2021 alone, state legislators introduced more than 340 pieces of anti-LGBTQI+ legislation, including many that target LGBTQI+ people in classroom settings and health care. 

 

Following the passage of Florida’s anti-LGBTQI+ “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law in March, vitriolic social media content alleging that members of the LGBTQI+ community were “groomers” skyrocketed by more than 400%.  Since 2015, hate crimes have increased by 40%, with the last two years being the deadliest on record for transgender and gender non-conforming people.

 

WHAT:  

 

Full Committee hearing entitled “The Rise of Anti-LGBTQI+ Extremism and Violence in the United States.” 

 

WHEN:

Wednesday, December 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. ET

 

WHO:    

 

Panel I


Michael Anderson

Survivor of Club Q Shooting

 

James Slaugh

Survivor of Club Q Shooting

 

Matthew Haynes
Founding Owner of Club Q

 

PANEL II

 

Kelley Robinson

President

Human Rights Campaign

 

Brandon Wolf

Survivor of Pulse Nightclub Shooting

 

Olivia Hunt

Policy Director

National Center for Transgender Equality

 

Jessie Pocock

CEO & Executive Director

Inside Out Youth Services

 

Ilan Meyer

Distinguished Senior Scholar for Public Policy

The Williams Institute

 

Additional Witnesses to be Announced.

 

WATCH:

A livestream will be available on YouTube and the Committee on Oversight and Reform website.  

 

MEDIA:

  

Seating in the hearing room is limited and as a result, credentialed media must RSVP to the Oversight Committee Democrats Press Office at oversightpress@mail.house.gov no later than 5 p.m. ET on December 13, 2022. 

 

###



We'll wind down with this  from Will Lehman's campaign:



The following sites updated:



Tuesday, December 13, 2022

Abuse and assault in prison



A shocking report has been released on the sexual abuse of women in federal prisons. 

The findings were just released by a U.S. Senate committee. 

It found cases of abuse in two thirds of U.S. federal prisons. 

Investigators looked closely at two facilities in New York City -- MCC in Lower Manhattan and MDC in Brooklyn. 

The report found that in both facilities, multiple employees abused women. In many cases, the women were abused multiple times over a period of months or years. 

The committee also found the Bureau of Prisons has failed to implement a law meant to prevent prison sexual abuse. 



That is disgusting.  Heads need to roll.  There is no excuse for this.  

This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Tuesday, December 13, 2022.  Not in the mood for those trying to bridge build with homophobes and racists.


On a good day, I'm not in the mood for your crap ass bulls**t.  On a good day.



Shut up, Krystal and Saagar, honestly just shut the f**k up.


It's not that you're trying to allude to what I had the guts to state last week.  I get it your chicken s**t.  But I don't care about that.  I'd rather you allude then ignore.  The only issue that the Twitter dumps have offered of value is that the FBI which had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop since December 2019, went to social media companies and lied in the fall of 2020 that there was talk of disinformation from Russia, maybe in the form of a hard drive and blah blah blah.


It would be great Saagar if you were strong enough to make the case I did and not just allude to it.


It is what will piss America off and what will force answers.


But you and your candy ass can't do that.


And, Krystal, honestly, stop your nonsense.


I just can't.


No one gives a damn that Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and they don't care why.


Elon Musk is controlloing the narrative and a bunch of 'reporters' are letting him.


He doesn't know what the hell he's doing.  Nor do they.


Donald Trump should not have been banned from Twitter.  NYT should not have apologized for running a column by a US senator.  We took those stands here.  I didn't back off.  I do believe in free speech.


I also know those were unpopular stands and they're not going to rally anyone at this point but a bunch of kooks -- a small bunch that's already rioted in DC, to be honest.


You and the losers doing the dumping seem to think that you can cobble here and cobble there and you'll have an outraged coalition.


No, you won't.

And, Saagar, if you really think that the next dump needs to be about Fauci, you're much more stupid than I've ever thought you were.


I think Fauci's a liar.  And I've said it here before.  And that's how I know this is a losing story currently.  People bought into, they made arguments about those, they chose to persecute people for it.  You're not going to sway them in 2022.  It's going to take a long time.  Not because they can't be honest about Fauci but because they can't be honest about their own actions.  They need time and distance so they can rewrite what they themselves did to their neighbors, to their family members and to their friends.


Russia-gate was a lie, a huge lie.


We were decrying it the moment it started -- and doing so on campuses.  


It was January of 2017 when my mouth dropped open over Russia-gate.  I had been hearing that nonsense from college students being misled by the media.  I was not prepared for someone my own age, someone that we all think is so smart and has tons of fan boys, to tell me to my face that it was true.  With college students, I can talk through the issue and debate it.


With a 'voice of the left,' I shouldn't have to.  And after 30 minutes of debunking his nonsense, I was done and I was done with him.

We didn't talk again until the 2019 Democratic Party debates.  

He was now publicly decrying Russia-gate and acting like he always had because that is the narrative that fits his reputation -- 'brave truth teller.'  He came up to me and I brushed him off.  I wasn't in the mood. Then, in a roomful of people, he whispered that he had been wrong and that he was sorry.


Whispered.


I don't think anyone was listening to our conversation.  But his ego was such that he feared they might.  And now that Russia-gate was exposed as crap, he didn't want to be caught holding the bag.


I don't know what they teach communications majors -- if anything.  But it's not just about getting information.  It's also about egos.


And the Twitter dumps were always going to be a hard sell.  The middle and the left are not on your side and haven't been since the dumping began.  You're putting together nothing but a wall that's keeping out the people you need to effect change.

Did you not read Jeffrey St. Clair's opinions at COUNTERPUNCH?


The left is not running with the dumps.  You are losing the left.  Legacy media has turned the story -- and its 'reporters' -- into a joke.  Your only way to shape public opinion is to go after the FBI because its actions are appalling and your amplification of what they did could move public opinion.


This garbage of 'poor Donald.'  It's not going to play.  You turn off more people with that garbage.  Krystal saying, "Pretend it's someone you hate . . ."  A) It's not going to work.  And (B) this isn't a personal story.  This is not about personalities.  This is about government abuse.  This is about the FBI trying to influence an election and trying to control what the American people have access to from the media.  Both of those things are illegal for the FBI to do.


If you think you can grow up and address the FBI, by all means do.  But cut the crap and stop trying to spit polish those dumps.  No one gives a damn about Donald Trump being off Twitter.  And as Jeffrey rightly pointed out at COUNTERPUNCH,  the left was 'shadow banned' and worse.  WSWS could also write about that because it happened to them as well.


Krystal, get it through your head that you aren't coming off impartial.  You're coming off a hand maiden to the right-wing.  That's Saagar's job on BREAKING POINTS.  He doesn't need your help.  You need to be shining the light on how COUNTERPUNCH and WSWS and BLACK AGENDA REPORT and so many others were harmed on social media and you need to be asking where are the Tweets on that?


It's a niche story at present for the right wing.  It caters to them, it seeks them out and there have been what, four -- five -- six -- dumps already.  


Everyone's yawning and going home on this story.  


Because you know the 'reporter' who took the first dump, you keep pimping each one.  But no one gives a s**t beyond Donald's most radical fans -- an increasingly small base.


And the left likes it that way -- I like Donald being over and done.  So when you stop focusing on the FBI and start talking about what was done to Donald, boo-hoo, you're losing people.


Now I don't think the 'reporters' taking the dumps are smart at all.  But they are hampered by some unknown agreement that they have with Musk.  BREAKING POINTS isn't.  It should be decrying what the FBI did every day and making that the focus.  That's the only way you're going to reach the number of people you need to reach to make this matter.


Stop trying to promote the latest dump from your friend and start zooming in and repeatedly hitting what the FBI did.  We don't need to hear Donald Trump.  The world has heard enough about him, thank you very much.


I may soon walk from this story because I see how it's playing and we don't need Krystal and Saagar feeding that crowd.  One of the idiots we rightly ripped apart for her stupidity and homophobia at THIRD is a big fan of Glenn Greenwalds and all over these dumps . . . when she's not trashing Brittney Griner for being African-American and gay.


You're not going to build a coalition with the left.  We're not going to be paired with racists and homophobes.  And that's not 'identity politics.'  That's self-respect and a belief in equality.


Get out of your damn bubble where you talk to those 'reporters' and plan what you're going to say.  You need to take a real look at who these dumps currently appeal to.  It's not anyone I'd care to associate with.  One minute they're Tweeting "Great job, Bari" or whomever, the next they're Tweeting that "homosexuality is Satanic behavior."  


No, I will not coalition build with those people and shame on you if you're rejecting the left, if you're not trying to appeal to the left, but you're catering your coverage to appeal to the homophobes and racists.


ALJAZEERA notes:


Amid a spate of recent attacks targeting LGBTQ communities in the United States, advocates say the government must do more to protect vulnerable citizens.

Late last month, a man opened fire at a gay and lesbian nightclub in Colorado, killing five people and injuring at least 17 others. The suspect has been charged with hate crimes, murder and assault.

Right-wing demonstrators have also increasingly targeted drag shows during a year in which President Joe Biden has warned of rising violence against LGBTQ communities.

Days after the Colorado shooting, the Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin highlighting the risk of terrorism against LGBTQ citizens and other marginalised groups, noting that “lone offenders and small groups motivated by a range of ideological beliefs and/or personal grievances continue to pose a persistent and lethal threat”.

But while this acknowledgement is a step in the right direction, rights groups say, it is not enough.

“We are living in a time where there is this rising threat of violence from extreme far-right groups across the spectrum of marginalised communities. It’s frightening, but it’s not surprising, unfortunately,” Laurel Powell, a spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington-based LGBTQ+ advocacy group, told Al Jazeera.


Charles R. Davis (INSIDER):

Across the country, right-wing extremists with guns have been showing up at libraries and churches to intimidate parents and children attending drag queen story hours. Groups such as the Proud Boys conflate the reading of books by members of the LGBTQ community with the predatory "grooming" of kids. 

Hospitals that provide gender-affirming care have received death threats after being targeted by social media influencers like Chaya Raichik, the former real estate agent who runs the "Libs of TikTok" account on Twitter, and featured in prime-time diatribes by Fox News's Tucker Carlson.

Other soft targets for the hard right have included gay pride parades. Over the summer, 31 members of the neo-Nazi Patriot Front were arrested in Idaho after a concerned citizen reported seeing them loading up a U-Haul with what looked to be a "little army" of men in riot gear.

By the end of November, far-right activists took part in at least 55 public actions targeting members of the LGBT+ community — up from 16 the year before, an increase of some 340% — with a corresponding rise in violent attacks on people perceived to be gay or transgender, according to a report released this week by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, or ACLED.


Brooke Migdon (THE HILL) reports:

A House committee this week in a first of its kind hearing will hear testimony from LGBTQ people and policy experts to examine how a surge in anti-LGBTQ policies and rhetoric has fueled increasing violence against the community.

“Make no mistake, the rise in anti-LGBTQI+ extremism and the despicable policies that Republicans at every level of government are advancing to attack the health and safety of LGBTQI+ people are harming the LGBTQI+ community and contributing to tragedies like what we saw at Club Q,” House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said Monday in a statement announcing Wednesday’s hearing.

The panel will hear firsthand testimony from individuals impacted by anti-LGBTQ attacks, including survivors of last month’s Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs that claimed the lives of five people and a survivor of the 2016 Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando – the deadliest attack on LGBTQ people in U.S. history.


If BREAKING POINTS wants to stand with homophobes, it'll be a lonely group.  But, hey, what is silence but standing with homophobes, right?  Unless Saagar's felt the need to attack gay men, BREAKING POINTS has ignored LGBTQ issues.  That's reality.  Saager and Krystal may think they come off caring, but to a lot of people, the reality has been that they're bigots.  They'll cover any topic in the world -- especially about the 'poor' right-wingers -- as long as they don't have to talk about 'the gays.'  


We'll close with this from ARAB WEEKLY:

Sanctions-hit Iran is consolidating its hold over neighbouring Iraq, an economic lifeline where pro-Tehran parties dominate politics, all to the chagrin of the United States, experts say.

For years, Iraq has been caught in a delicate balancing act between its two main allies Tehran and Washington.

After a 2003 US-led invasion toppled Iraqi long-time ruler Saddam Hussein, Iran's influence has grown through political proxies.

Pro-Iran parties now dominate Iraq's parliament and in October they named a new prime minister following a year-long tussle with their Shia rivals, the followers of populist cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

Iraq has become an "economic lifeline" for Iran, said Ihsan al-Shammari, a political scientist at the University of Baghdad.

This is "even more so with sharpening Western economic sanctions and nuclear negotiations that do not seem to be leading to a favourable deal for Iran", Shammari said.

"Iran's role will be even more important than during previous (Iraqi) governments"

During a visit to Tehran late last month, Prime Minister Mohammed Shiaa al-Sudani and Iranian officials urged greater bilateral cooperation in all fields.

He thanked Iran which provides gas and electricity,around one-third of Iraq's needs, adding this would continue until Iraq was self-sufficient.


New content at THIRD:




The following sites updated:





Monday, December 12, 2022

Golden Globe nominations

Stan told me he was writing about the Golden Globe nominees.  I will too.

I'll write about the people I don't want to see nominated.

Tom Cruise.  He's entered Wilford Brimley days.  Get gone, you old geezer.  And take Brad Pitt with you.  Did someone run over Brad's face?  Looking at him now, it's hard to believe anyone ever considered him handsome.  He got old?  Richard Gere did as well.  Richard Gere still looks good for his age.  Brad does not.  

I'm also tired of Kate Winslet who, fortunately, is not up for an award this year.  She's been overly praised.  

Cate Blanchett is also hugely praised but the difference is she can actually act.  Kate Winslet's really lucky not to have been cast by merit -- otherwise, she would be making Dawn: Portrait of a Teenage Runaway.

Along with Cate, Frances McDormand and Angela Bassett are two others that I never tire of and who earn their praise.

I can't say the same of Viola Davis.  She doesn't deserve a nomination (but she got one).  She also didn't have a hit film.  Hopefully, this is the end of Viola as a leading lady in film.  She really has no range at all.

Adam Driver is another overly praised performer.  He's not that good.  I thought he was good in the film with Channing Tatum and Daniel Craig and then it turned out that is the same performance he gives in every film.  I'm so tired of him.  By the way, Angela Bassett earned a Best Supporting Actress Golden Globe nomination for Black Panther: Wakanda Forever and I would argue that was more than earned.

The only other performance in a superhero film that I'd argue for a nomination?  Batman V Superman -- Holly Hunter as a senator in that film.  She was amazing as is Angela in Wakanda Forever.


I wish everyone had that kind of talent.

Few do.

Look at the awful Michelle Williams.  Vastly limited, a small and tiny range.  And now the looks have failed.  In fact, since 2016, she's looked hagged out.  She's a bad actress and now she's an ugly one.  But that happens to a lot of blond women.  Because they're blond, their limited talents are inflated and then when the looks go, they've got nothing.  Helen Hunt comes to mind and she fooled people enough to grab an Oscar for Best Actress.  It should have gone to Julie Christie for AFTERGLOW.  No one pretends anymore that Helen is a great actress and she wasn't one in the 90s when she won.


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Monday, December 12, 2022.  Joe Biden continues to persecute Julian Assange, another Twitter dump, a fresh call for all US forces out of Iraq, and much more.


PROJECT CENSORED has released it's annual look at the press, STATE OF THE FREE PRESS 2023.  At RANDOM LENTH NEWS, Paul Rosenberg notes the 10 most censored stories and we'll zoom in on number eight:

8) CIA Discussed Plans to Kidnap or Kill Julian Assange

The CIA seriously considered plans to kidnap or assassinate WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in late 2017, according to a September 2021 Yahoo News investigation, based on interviews with more than 30 former U.S. officials, eight of whom detailed U.S. plans to abduct Assange and three of whom described the development of plans to kill him. If it had been up to CIA Director Mike Pompeo, they almost certainly would have been acted on, after WikiLeaks announced it had obtained a massive tranche of files  —  dubbed “Vault 7”  —  from the CIA’s ultra-secret hacking division, and posted some of them online.

In his first public remarks as Donald Trump’s CIA director, “Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks” Yahoo News noted, “Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency.” He even called it “a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia,” a designation intended to grant the CIA wide latitude in what actions it took, while shielding it from congressional oversight.

“Potential scenarios proposed by the CIA and Trump administration officials included crashing into a Russian vehicle carrying Assange in order to grab him, shooting the tires of an airplane carrying Assange in order to prevent its takeoff, and engaging in a gun battle through the streets of London,” Project Censored summarized. “Senior CIA officials went so far as to request ‘sketches’ or ‘options’ detailing methods to kill Assange.”

“WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” a former Trump administration national security official told Yahoo News. “After Vault 7, Pompeo and [Deputy CIA Director Gina] Haspel wanted vengeance on Assange.” It went so far that “Pompeo and others at the agency proposed abducting Assange from the embassy and surreptitiously bringing him back to the United States via a third country  —  a process known as rendition,” they reported. (Assassination entered the picture later on.) Since it would take place in Britain, there had to be agreement from them. “But the British said, ‘No way, you’re not doing that on our territory, that ain’t happening,’” a former senior counterintelligence official told Yahoo News.

There was also push-back from National Security Council, or NSC lawyers and the Department of Justice, which wanted to put Assange on trial. But the CIA continued to push for capturing or killing Assange. Trump’s “NSC lawyers were bulwarks against the CIA’s potentially illegal proposals, according to former officials,” Yahoo News reported, but the CIA’s own lawyers may have been kept in the dark. “When Pompeo took over, he cut the lawyers out of a lot of things,” a former senior intelligence community attorney told them. “Pompeo’s ready access to the Oval Office, where he would meet with Trump alone, exacerbated the lawyers’ fears. [The NSC’s top lawyer John] Eisenberg fretted that the CIA director was leaving those meetings with authorities or approvals signed by the president that Eisenberg knew nothing about, according to former officials.”

“US plans to kidnap or assassinate Julian Assange have received little to no establishment news coverage in the United States, other than scant summaries by Business Insider and The Verge, and tangential coverage by Reuters, each based on the original Yahoo News report,” Project Censored notes. “Among US independent news outlets, Democracy Now! featured an interview with Michael Isikoff, one of the Yahoo News reporters who broke the story, and Jennifer Robinson, a human rights attorney who has been advising Julian Assange and WikiLeaks since 2010. Rolling Stone and The Hill also published articles based on the original Yahoo News report.”


Julian Assange remains persecuted by US President Joe Biden.  Last week, Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) reported:

Press freedom and rights organizations on Thursday expressed "grave concern" about the Biden administration's "relentless pursuit" of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, an Australian who is jailed in London while he fights against extradition to the United States.

"It is more than a year since our coalition sent a joint letter calling for the charges against Assange to be dropped," 21 groups wrote to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland. "Today, we repeat those concerns, and urge you to heed our request. We believe that the prosecution of Assange in the U.S. would set a harmful legal precedent and deliver a damaging blow to press freedom by opening the way for journalists to be tried under the Espionage Act if they receive classified material from whistleblowers."


For those who've forgotten, Julian's 'crime' was revealing the realities of Iraq -- Chelsea Manning was a whistle-blower who leaked the information to Julian.  WIKILEAKS then published the Iraq War Logs.  And many outlets used the publication to publish reports of their own.  For example, THE GUARDIAN published many articles based on The Iraq War Logs.  Jonathan Steele, David Leigh and Nick Davies offered, on October 22, 2012:



A grim picture of the US and Britain's legacy in Iraq has been revealed in a massive leak of American military documents that detail torture, summary executions and war crimes.
Almost 400,000 secret US army field reports have been passed to the Guardian and a number of other international media organisations via the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.

The electronic archive is believed to emanate from the same dissident US army intelligence analyst who earlier this year is alleged to have leaked a smaller tranche of 90,000 logs chronicling bloody encounters and civilian killings in the Afghan war.
The new logs detail how:
US authorities failed to investigate hundreds of reports of abuse, torture, rape and even murder by Iraqi police and soldiers whose conduct appears to be systematic and normally unpunished.

A US helicopter gunship involved in a notorious Baghdad incident had previously killed Iraqi insurgents after they tried to surrender.
More than 15,000 civilians died in previously unknown incidents. US and UK officials have insisted that no official record of civilian casualties exists but the logs record 66,081 non-combatant deaths out of a total of 109,000 fatalities.

The numerous reports of detainee abuse, often supported by medical evidence, describe prisoners shackled, blindfolded and hung by wrists or ankles, and subjected to whipping, punching, kicking or electric shocks. Six reports end with a detainee's apparent deat



The Biden administration has been saying all the right things lately about respecting a free and vigorous press, after four years of relentless media-bashing and legal assaults under Donald Trump.

The attorney general, Merrick Garland, has even put in place expanded protections for journalists this fall, saying that “a free and independent press is vital to the functioning of our democracy”.

But the biggest test of Biden’s commitment remains imprisoned in a jail cell in London, where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been held since 2019 while facing prosecution in the United States under the Espionage Act, a century-old statute that has never been used before for publishing classified information.

Whether the US justice department continues to pursue the Trump-era charges against the notorious leaker, whose group put out secret information on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay, American diplomacy and internal Democratic politics before the 2016 election, will go a long way toward determining whether the current administration intends to make good on its pledges to protect the press.

Now Biden is facing a re-energized push, both inside the United States and overseas, to drop Assange’s protracted prosecution.





Turning to the topic of Twitter -- where Tweets are supposed to pass for reporting -- Jeffrey St. Clair (COUNTERPUNCH) weighed in Friday:


+ I’d like to see someone leak the Bari Weiss Files on Matt Taibbi’s new partner’s ceaseless campaign to get Joseph Massad fired from Columbia University.

+ According to Business Insider, Musk has provided the anti-Palestinian zealot Bari Weiss access to Twitter’s employee systems, added to its Slack, and given a company laptop, a level of access to Twitter systems  typically reserved only for staff…

+ CounterPunch wasn’t just “shadow banned” on Twitter, we went into total eclipse. For more than a year our followers remained static or declined. We couldn’t even attract bots, Russian or porn. Its editor’s Twitter account (mine) was permanently locked. But there’s never been a single inquiry about this or any other suppressed Leftwing, animal rights, radical green, Occupy Wall Street or pro-Palestinian Twitter account. Why? Because it doesn’t fit the narrative Musk, Taibbi and Weiss want to project. This isn’t about free speech–how could it possibly be when an apex blacklister is in charge of determining what is & isn’t a blacklist?

+ Bari may not know much, but she knows blacklists…

+ Amid the hundreds of rightwing (and neo-Nazi) accounts being
restored, I don’t know of any accounts associated with the Left or pro-Palestinian accounts, like Stanley Cohen’s, having been resurrected or are likely to be with Weiss calling the shots. Yet, the account of Andrew Anglin, editor of the neo-Nazi Daily Stormer, is back up and running.

+ Looking forward to two-plus years of Congressional hearings over Hunter Biden dick picks, with expert commentary from men’s shower monitor Jim Jordan and Lauren Boebert (spouse of a convicted flasher).  Brace yourself, CSPAN!

+ MAGA accusing Sebastian Gorka of being part of a Deep State cover up  is the best thing to come out of Laptopgate. Well done, Matt Taibbi!

+ Taibbi, who once blamed the excesses of his own satirical writings in The eXile on his heroin usage, rummaging around in the pilfered files of a drug addict and claiming a major exposé, doesn’t demonstrate much addict-to-addict solidarity…

+ The eXile was one of the best magazines to emerge in the 90s. The problem wasn’t the satirical pieces–worthy of Paul Krassner–but Taibbi’s cowardly renouncement of them–and blaming his partner Mark Ames, all to curry favor with people he once rightly despised and ridiculed.

+ Instead of Hunter Thompson, Taibbi’s morphed into David Horowitz…

+ Taibbi likes to think of himself as a “muckraker,” but I can’t think of a single “muckraker” agreeing to secret conditions set by the richest tech mogul in the world to run a story based solely on documents given to him by the same tech lord to be run on that very tech lord’s site. It sure ain’t the way IF Stone did it.

+ Over to you, Dr. Jung…

+ When the principle condition of the conditions constraining your reporting is that you don’t name the conditions, you’ve got a problem. You don’t know what the full story is if you’re only printing what your clearly biased source has given you. This is exactly what Judith Miller did with Curveball. Except it’s worse because in this case your source owns the means of publication and requires it to be published there.

+ Mark Ames: “All Musk’s fanboys on this wretched site want nothing more than to cancel their s**tlib-enemies’ accounts, you constantly see them snitching and tagging their Hero, just as libs did to them. No principle here, just a buncha snitches riding the oligarchy’s dopamine rollercoaster…”


The first reporter to take a Twitter dump still hasn't managed to write a report but, last Friday, he took another Twitter dump.  This time on how Donald Trump was banned from Twitter.

An editor at TIME pointed out to me why the reporter keeps taking dumps on Twitter and avoiding writing an actual report -- the minute he writes a report he either gets honest or stops being seen as a journalist.  To write an actual report requires explaining exactly what terms you agreed to.  Failure to do so would make it clear you were no longer practicing journalism.  (Yes, Virginia, there is a line between journalism and public relations.)  

Iraq?


We like to point out here that Bully Boy Bush was in the White House when Brookings identified the disputed areas as one of the hotspots for future violence.  And that nothing was ever done even though Article 140 of Iraq's Constitution mandated that the disputed areas be resolved by the end of 2007.  For those who don't get it, RUDAW reports:



Dozens of resettled Arabs on Wednesday attacked Kurdish farmers in Daquq district of Kirkuk province after ploughing on their land. Two farmers were injured. Kurdistan Region Prime Minister Masrour Barzani called on the Iraqi government to put an end such attacks. 

Disputes over land ownership between Arabs, resettled to areas disputed between Erbil and Baghdad by the Baathist regime, and Kurdish farmers have existed for years, often causing violence. 

Abdulqadir Mohammed, a Kurdish farmer in Daquq, told Rudaw’s Hardi Mohammed on Wednesday that dozens of resettled Arabs had been ploughing on his land for three days with the alleged support of the Iraqi army. He said that when they tried to stop them, the resettled Arabs attacked with stones and guns. 

Mohammed said he has all necessary documents to prove the ownership of the land. 


DEUTSCHE WELLE interviews Salam Omer about covering the disputed areas:

#mediadev spoke to Salam Omer, editor-in-chief of KirkukNow, a news outlet based in Kirkuk in Northern Iraq. Launched in 2011, it is the only specialised media platform for citizens in Iraq's disputed territories.

#mediadev: Mr. Omer, your media outlet works in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious context. Who is your audience?

Salam Omer: We cover the disputed territories of Northern Iraq, located north of a line dividing the whole country from Syria to Iran. Our primary audience is the population of these areas: Kurds, Arabs, Turkmen, Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Christians, Yezidis etc.

In addition to news in these areas, what do you focus on in your reporting?

Our priorities are topics across the country related to freedom of expression, press freedom and groups like women, internally displaced people (IDPs), or the LGBT community. We reach around two million people across all platforms.

What are the main challenges in your work?  

I have to look at three things on a daily basis: Are we secure? Do we have enough money? Do we have access to information? And all that depends on the ruling party, the ruling militia. That's the biggest challenge for us. Other media organizations, the mainstream media, belong to a political party. They have access to information, access to public oil money and they are safe. We don't have anything. We believe in the rule of law, that's the starting point for us.

You must face a lot of criticism for your work. How do you deal with it?

It is a challenge. At the beginning, we were attacked by almost all sides. For example, we published an article on the Kurds, and the next day, people suggested that we were financed by Arabs and Turkmens. The week after, someone else got upset. We built relationships with everyone to always have a channel of dialogue. We needed a lot of time to prove that an independent, impartial media platform can function. That needs work. And dedication.  


In other news, MEHR NEWS AGENCY reports on a fresh call for US forces to leave Iraq:

Following the withdrawal of American forces, there would be no trace of ISIL in Iraq, Qasim al-Kariti, commander of the PMU's 41st Brigade said.

Criticizing the sabotage and obstruction of the Americans in the fight against terrorism in Iraq, Al-kariti noted that the American forces influence the process of security operations in this country.

Therefore, they should be expelled from the country, he stressed.

If the American forces leave the country, in a few days, there will be no trace of ISIL terrorists, he said, adding that the war against ISIL strengthened the determination of Iraqi youth.


The following sites updated: