As I've noted before, we do any meatless meals in my house. I believe it's helpful for our health and a new article by Marie Claire Dorking indicates that as well:
Bacon sarnie fans take note. Eating just a couple of bacon butties or sausage rolls a week “could trigger heart attack or stroke”, new research has suggested.
We know we need to cut down on our weekly fill of processed meat, but there’s now even more evidence to suggest we should be stepping away from the sausage sarnies.
The US study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, analysed 29,682 people from six different studies, over an average of about 19 years and found a small but significant association between eating two servings of meat, including poultry, per week and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
Participants who ate two servings of red meat, processed meat, or poultry a week had a 3-7% higher risk of cardiovascular disease.
But consuming two servings of red meat or processed meat – not poultry or fish – per week was linked to a 3% higher risk of all causes of death.
There was a 4% higher risk of cardiovascular disease for people who ate two servings per week of poultry.
But researchers say the evidence is not sufficient to make a clear recommendation about poultry intake.
I love Diet For A Small Planet. I learned about it at The Common Ills. It's a book published by Frances Moore Lappe and it's a revolutionary book. When I first read it, I made a point to do one meatless meal a week. I've gradually increased that. I do three dinners with a meat and that's it. No lunches. No breakfasts. Some day, I may be able to do away with dinner. But it's a journey and the book has helped me so much. I recommend it. We are a small planet and Frances addresses what we need to do on our small planet in order to feed us all. She addresses the various costs of cattle, for example.
The original book came out in 1971. She has updated it. I believe it was most recently updated in 1991. Here's how the publisher describes the book:
The book that started a revolution in the way Americans eat
The extraordinary book that taught America the social and personal significance of a new way of eating is still a complete guide for eating well in the twenty-first century.
Sharing her personal evolution and how this groundbreaking book changed her own life, world-renowned food expert Frances Moore Lappé offers an all-new, even more fascinating philosophy on changing yourself—and the world—by changing the way you eat.
The Diet for a Small Planet features:
• simple rules for a healthy diet • streamlined, easy-to-use format
• food combinations that make delicious, protein-rich meals without meat
• indispensable kitchen hints—a comprehensive reference guide for planning and preparing meals and snacks
• hundreds of wonderful recipes
Back in 2016, NPR filed a report on Diet For A Small Planet which included the following:
When Frances Moore Lappe wrote the best-selling Diet For A Small Planet back in 1971, she helped start a conversation about the social and environmental impacts of the foods we choose.
And, back then, what she had to say was revolutionary. Her idea that a plant-centered diet could be better for the planet — and our health — than a meat-centered diet was considered radical. "It was heresy," Lappe told me during a recent interview.
So, what inspired her thinking? Well, let's go back in time a moment. When Americans turned on the evening news in the 1970s, they couldn't escape images of famine.
At the time, some experts were predicting a doomsday scenario. The argument was this: As the population grew, food shortages would worsen.
Back in 1982, Lappe described her thinking during an interview on NPR's All Things Considered. "When I first start looking at these issues, I was very much influenced by the ecology movement ... and metaphors that were telling us that we'd actually reached the Earth's limits to feed people," she said.
But Lappe argued it didn't need to be this way. She pointed out that there were more than enough calories being produced to feed the world. It's just that much of the grain being grown wasn't used to feed people.
"One of the reasons for world hunger was the American demand for meat, which meant that much of the world's grain was going to feed cattle rather than people." This was how NPR's All Things Considered host Noah Adams described Lappe's argument in the 1982 piece.
And as Lappe went on to tell Adams: "So my message was, look, in fact we have this tremendous abundance" of food grown. But "it's the economic and political structures [that] determine whether or not that production is actually meeting the needs of human beings."
Now, remember, back in the 1970s, meat was at the center of Americans' plates. A steak dinner was a symbol of security and prosperity. Nobody was snacking on edamame, and kale was not yet celebrated.
So, when Lappe began promoting a diet rich in vegetables, beans and grains, people were dismayed. "It was shocking," Lappe says, "especially coming from a girl who grew up in cow town, Fort Worth, Texas."
Diet For A Small Planet is filled with vegetarian recipes. Leafing through, I spot one for a spinach lasagna, soy burgers, vegetable enchiladas — nothing that seems too unfamiliar, and definitely not radical, today.
But back then, "people told me their parents said they would die of malnutrition if they followed the advice I was giving in the book," Lappe recalls with a laugh.
It's a journey.
This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Tuesday, February 4, 2020. Iowa results have still not been released, a
desperate Joe Biden hopes to fundraise heavily before the results come
out, protests continue in Iraq, the issue of the US leaving Iraq is
discussed in public forums in the US, and much more.
Starting in the US where War Hawk Joe Biden had his "Tyrone" moment last night in Iowa.
Time for Joe to get his s**t and go.
Starting in the US where War Hawk Joe Biden had his "Tyrone" moment last night in Iowa.
So matter of fact, I think ya better call Tyrone (call him)
And tell him come on, help you get your s**t (come on, come on, come on)
You need to call Tyrone (call him)
And tell him I said come on
-- "Tyrone," written by Erykah Badu and Norman "Keys'' Hurt, first appears on her album LIVEAnd tell him come on, help you get your s**t (come on, come on, come on)
You need to call Tyrone (call him)
And tell him I said come on
Time for Joe to get his s**t and go.
I represent the second largest county in Iowa.
Joe Biden was not viable in my precinct. By the second alignment, he had one supporter and received zero delegates.
There’s a lot going on rn, but Biden’s poor performance in MUST-WIN areas should be concerning to Dems. #iacaucus
INTERNAL DATA FROM BERNIE SANDERS
Bernie Sanders 30%
Pete Buttigieg 25%
Elizabeth Warren 21%
Joe Biden 12%
Amy Klobuchar 11%
I'm going to bed, I have class in a few hours 
#NotMeUs #TomPerezResign
#IowaCaucuses
#NotMeUs #TomPerezResign
#IowaCaucuses
We don't know the 'official results.' Why? One reason is Joe Biden learned from Iraq's thug Nouri al-Maliki.
Barack Obama put Joe in charge of Iraq. It was 2010 and elections were held in March. Nouri and the press knew he would win . . . but he didn't. So he immediately threw a fit insisting the results were wrong and whining. Eventually two or three more votes were tossed his way but he still lost.
Joe's doing something similar with his screeching that the Iowa results cannot be released yet.
Whether we're going by THE NEW YORK TIMES' tracking of the caucus or what the heads of various caucuses are saying, Bernie Sanders won.
Joe did very poorly.
Very poorly.\
Why throw a fit?
To delay that reality. The campaign's got orders to spend this morning digging out as much corporate dollars as they can. They're supposed to be sunny and upbeat when the reality is Joe's campaign is cratering financially and if donors realize that and realize how poorly he did in Iowa, it's over for Joe. There's no money to go forward. If donors grasp that Mayor Pete is a better shot than Joe, they will abandon Joe and pour their money into Pete's campaign.
Joe is on the ropes and he knows it. The campaign knows it. Few got any sleep last night. There was a heated strategy session following Joe's live remarks streamed on the net.
A sane person would grasp that it's over and admit it. There aren't any sane people -- including Joe -- in charge at Team Biden.
Say what you will about 2008 Joe, at least he was smart enough to drop out the morning after the Iowa caucus. By the way, NYT and the Sanders campaign both have Joe coming in fifth.
Fifth.
That's where he came in back in 2008. Fifth. Iowa doesn't like him. Fifth, he's not electable. At some point, the results get released and (unless some of the serious issues Max Blumenthal and others are raising bear out) and we see he came in fifth again.
Joe's not likable. Why is that?
Why.
Is.
That?
Maybe because he's disgusting.
Maybe because he's a perv.
The hot mess in Iowa had two specific purposes:
#1) Hide the lack of support for Joe Biden
#2) Ensure Bernie Sanders did not gain momentum...
That's it.
At the end of this predictable rainbow is this:
Chris Matthews called it last night on MSNBC, "I don't know if he [Joe] is going to make it." He wouldn't be around right now if the results had been released.
Bernie won.
Joe's going to lose New Hampshire as well.
Loser Joe. That reality will now impact the polling. People who bought into the media lie that Joe was the most electable will be confronted with the reality that Joe's not all that electable. We saw this in 2008 as well. As 2007 wound down, Hillary Clinton led in the national polls. But then Barack won Iowa and she didn't seem so electable and her support dropped.
Joe should be packing it in right now. Most of his staffers know they can't revive the corpse. Why Joe refuses to admit it is anyone's guess.
Pete and Mike Bloomberg -- because they stand the most to benefit if Joe withdraws -- should be calling for him to drop out. They should be arguing that this election is too important for vanity campaigns and that the voters have spoken so Joe should leave the race.
From snowy Denver, my message is simple: tonite is the beginning. We’re gonna make #PresidentSanders a reality, whether the establishment likes that or not. Stay focused. Redouble your efforts. Let’s do this.
Let’s get #PresidentSanders trending for all the volunteers and staff who worked their hearts out in Iowa — and who launched this amazing grassroots campaign that’s gonna transform this country.
Let's get "loser Joe" trending so that the campaign has no luck this morning trying to scrape up money from various corporate donors.
Joe's not the only one who needs to get their act together. The Democratic Party in Iowa needs to get it together as well. There are no ballots to count. The whole point of the caucus system is that they are open and transparent and, yes, immediate. This is outrageous that they cannot release their results hours after the caucus has ended.
There's no excuse for it.
If they haven't released their results in the next few hours, Iowa needs to be pulled from the front of the 2024 campaign and stuck in a spot sometime after Super Tuesday. If they can't get their act together, that's what needs to happen. Did no one do a dry run on the new software and equipment? Was there no preparation at all?
Sounds like someone's gotten too comfortable with getting the first event every election year. Their actions (inaction) are sewing distrust in the vote. They need to release the totals immediately.
In Iraq, the protests continue.
New painting themed around the ongoing protests in Iraq by Assyrian artist Nenous Thabit, titled "Will of the People."
The Iraqi people are protesting against corruption, they want a responsive government.
Radical cult leader Moqtada al-Sadr has responded to these demands by sending his goons to attack the protesters. See yesterday's "Moqtada's goons attacking Iraqis in the street" and "Editorial: Moqtada is a thug." Moqtada al-Sadr and his cult of thugs are ignoring what Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani called for in last Friday's prayers. Even some of his most deluded followers must grasp that.
Anti-government demonstrators face off against followers of influential cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in protest squares across Iraq, a day after one demonstrator was killed in a clash between the two sides.
Iraqi students in #Baghdad are chanting anti Corruption and anti Al-Sader chants this morning #IraqProtests
تابعوا اخر التطورات من كربلاء عبر حساب المصور حازم حمودي
“ Our homeland here is your youth, we came out without the need for a tweet” in direct reference to Muqtada Al Sader’a loyalist who answer to his tweets and calls to protest on twitter: #IraqProtests #Iraq
Iraqi protests swell despite clash with Sadrist supporters almon.co/3bcl via @AlMonitor #IraqProtests #Save_the_Iraqi_people #iraq #IraqiRevolution
At THE WASHINGTON POST, THE NATION's Katrina vanden Heuvel argues:
Trump’s
broken promise on Iraq will hurt him in the 2020 election, and, given
his narrow margin of victory in key battleground states, it could be the
reason for his defeat. But the Democrats should not rest on this
prospect alone. They should actively make it happen by convincing the
public (or more precisely, those Americans who voted for Trump in 2016
because of his position on endless wars) that they can deliver when
Trump could not.
At THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE, Charles Ashurst offers:
Many many years ago, before some of you were born, the justification of
the U.S. occupation of Iraq was along the lines of, “We’re there to
assist some people achieve self-determination. Oh my, yes. We just love
peoples’ right to self-determination, and that is why we must occupy
this country to assist them achieve self-determination.”
Does anyone see the irony of the U.S. occupying Iraq against their will
for the purpose of assisting them toward self-determination?
Apparently, we understand their need for self-determination far better
than they do.
Why aren’t we the American public insisting on an explanation for why
we are still occupying Iraq? What earthly good are we getting from it?
What earthly good are Iraqis getting from it? What’s our objective? When
will it be done? In more practical terms, how long will China keep
lending us the money to occupy the Middle East?
New content at THIRD:
- Truest statement of the week
- Truest statement of the week II
- A note to our readers
- Editorial: Moqtada is a thug
- TV: America's need for 9-1-1
- Carole King's lost album
- 10 Carole King deep cuts you might not know of
- Jim's World
- Video of the week
- Glenn just cracked her face
- Political Tweet of the week
- This edition's playlist
- Highlights
The following sites updated:
No comments:
Post a Comment