Originally, I had posted a news video that I thought was an interesting topic. Then I started streaming it and I don't support that video. It sounded like propaganda. So I've replaced it with a video about American Dad's Roger and the various female personas he's created over the years.
Thursday, May 25, 2023. Tina Turner is the focus for the snapshot today.
The
Queen of Rock and Roll has died. This after a multi-decade career
which saw Tina Turner awarded with 12 Grammys -- the only woman to win a
Grammy in all three popular music genres -- rock, soul and pop.
As
a member of a revue, she found fans in 1960 with her vocals on "A Fool
In Love." She would next touch recording genius when she went into the
studio with Phil Spector for "River Deep, Mountain High." Phil wanted
nothing to do with the revue, he just wanted Tina in the studio by
herself to record the vocal. Just as Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong had
nothing to do with "Someday We'll Be Together" (Diana Ross is the only
Supreme that sings on that number one song), Tina was the only artist
from the revue performing on that song.
Jeff
Barry and Ellie Greenwich wrote the song with some tinkering around by
Phil. It was the culmination of Phil's entire work. And it flopped in
the US. It only went to 88 on the US pop charts but it went to number
three in England and the song is now considered a historically and
artistically significant recording, one that was inducted into the
Grammy Hall of Fame and one that regularly makes the lists of all time
great recordings.
It greatly expanded the
appreciation of and audience for Tina Turner. She recorded the song in
1966. For context, Cher was also a solo artist and part of a duo at
this time. In 1967, Sonny & Cher would have their last significant
hit of the decade with "The Beat Goes On" (number six on the US pop
chart) and Cher would have her last significant solo hit of the decade
with "You Better Sit Down Kids" (number nine on the US pop chart). Both
women, who would become great friends, saw the careers sag and both
would look at the older men in charge of the duo and say they needed to
modernize and go younger. Sonny didn't believe that was the answer.
Tina had more luck because the revue was forever doing club dates and
needed to have songs that got the room pumping so current hits by others
could be worked in. As a result of Tina's interest in and love of the
music around her, she would do vocals on covers such as "Let It Be,"
"Honky Tonk Woman," "I Want To Take You Higher," "Get Back," "Everyday
People," "With A Little Help From My Friends," "Up On The Roof" and
many more. She always made the songs her own.
Many
would only realize how great her interpretive skills were when she took
"Proud Mary" back into the top ten in 1971. I just probably do a note
right here that I knew Tina and she was a great friend. In this obit,
we're not naming people who were mean to her. That's not just her first
husband, that's also people who thought it was cute, as late the 80s,
to refer to Tina with the n-word. So if you see "Proud Mary" and think
of some 60s White group, don't e-mail me telling me I should have
included their racist ass in this entry. It's not an oversight on my
part, this is about honoring Tina and I'm not honoring anyone who hurt
her.
Tina took the tired 60s song and made it unique. Resulted in a Grammy win.
She
also was a song writer. One of the songs she wrote was the song about
her hometown "Nutbush City Limits." It would become a top forty hit in
the early seventies and she would re-record it and perform it repeatedly
throughout her career.
She
was an amazing live performer and one of the few women who could
regularly fill auditoriums. Janis Joplin recognized Tina's onstage
brilliance as did audiences. Of the female musical artists who came to
fame in the sixties and survived (Janis would pass away shortly after
that decade ended; Joni Mitchell would garner her audience in the
1970s), Tina was part of a rare group of women who set records with
ticket sales for their performances -- it was Tina, it was Cher and it
was Diana Ross.
Aretha Franklin! No, it was
just those three. Aretha didn't tour that often and she had a
reputation by the end of the 70s as cancelling too often that led to
poor ticket sales -- you don't want to buy a ticket, make plans to
attend only to show up and find out that the artist has decided they're
not doing the concert. Cher, Diana Ross and Tina were the three that
sold tickets.
She made a name for herself and she did it with hard work. No one was going to take her name from her.
I,
TINA, her 1986 book with Kurt Loder, was made into the film WHAT'S LOVE
GOT TO DO WITH IT starring Angela Bassett who was nominated for an
Academy Award for her performance in the film.
Part
of the story of Tina Turner is her courage and her love for life and
people. She was terrorized throughout the sixties and most of the
seventies by a man who claimed to love her but didn't. He was a liar
and he was a thief who stole songwriting credits throughout his career.
His beating up Tina was well known by the time he thankfully died.
But, for those too young to remember, when he did die in 2007, there
were people trying to praise him and trying to minimize what he did.
Those people included Danny Schechter who thought doing one interview
with Tina gave him 'insight' into her abuser and that Tina needed to
forgive him and . . .
Now reading some of the boys last week, it appeared that the film What's Love Got To Do With It
confused them. Or possibly it was Angela Bassett's fighting figure that
confused them? Her deltoids are world class and could qualify her for a
bodybuilding competition, no question. While she gave an amazing
performance, it was too strong to capture Tina (offstage) in the days
before she left [terrorist]. The body type was wrong as well which is why it's
so very jarring when Tina takes over the performance during the last
minutes of the film's final scene. It's equally true that [terrorist] was
softened by the actor performing him who also had the benefit of being
attractive.
Somehow, the film's timeline?, some people
seem to have the idea that he beat her up real bad in a limo in Dallas
in 1976 and Tina up and left. Wrong. He beat her repeatedly. He beat her
through the sixties, he beat [her] through the seventies until she left. And
when she left, this 'kind' man threatened to kill her and did a little
more than threaten.
That wasn't about 'love.' What's love got to do with it? Not a damn thing.
Tina
was a meal ticket and long before [terrorist] moved into his 'open'
relationship ('open' for him only, of course), Tina was well aware of
his many girlfriends, mistresses and one-night-stands. When she would
try to leave, he would beat her. When she did leave, he would pull her
off a bus and beat her. When the song didn't sail up the charts, he'd
beat her. When he was having a bad day, he'd beat her. When he thought
she was getting too much credit (she was the act), he'd beat her. He'd
beat her for any reason whenever he damn well felt like it. It was a
non-stop abusive relationship.
And, sad to say, many of
the rock press knew about it when they were together and many of them
sided with [terrorist]. That was the attitude in the rock press. It was
especially the attitude at Rolling Stone and, for those who
doubt it, you can comb the archives and find that attitude displayed
everywhere -- even in an article on Sonny & Cher's then-new TV show,
where it was 'shared': "Many of my friends favor the belief that after
work Sonny beats the sh*t out of her with a tire iron." (For those too
lazy to do their own research, the pig 'sharing' that bit of 'amusement'
was Chris Hodenfield.)
That was the Rolling Stone
attitude. It didn't disappear. In 1981, editor Brant Mewborn was
screaming loudly for the magazine to feature Tina (who just done two
multiple night engagements of SRO business at the Ritz and been brought
on Saturday Night Live by Rod Stewart to sing a duet of "Hot
Legs") and the reaction was one of indifference, one of 'she walked out
on [terrorist].' The abuse was well known by then. Didn't matter. That was the
'feel' and 'mood' at Rolling Stone: Tina walked out on the man who beat her, she didn't matter.
Rolling Stone
was long aware of what actually went on in The [terrorist] and Tina Turner
Revue. Some of the truth leaked out in Ben Fong-Torres' hard hitting
piece in the magazine's October 14, 1971 issue. Rolling Stone
was made even more aware after the publication of the article when the
police nabbed a man who had been hired by Ike to break the legs of Ben
Fong-Torres and publisher Jann Wenner. The article noted his
'flirtations' with other women and his heavy coke use.
Tina
was the one who got them to update their sound when their music was
dying in the sixties. So the idea that "even Tina has to" feel anything
is beyond belief.
She was enslaved. She wasn't allowed to
live her life. She wasn't allowed to practice her religion. She wasn't
allowed to be just an artist in the revue. She would try to bargain her
way out of the relationship with that and [terrorist] would just beat her.
He
beat her because he was damn lucky she presented herself in his life.
He beat her because he couldn't beat men and he couldn't make the male
singers stay. He beat her because she was his ticket to big money and
big fame. Even with all her talents provided him with, he still beat her
and that was because he really couldn't take the fact that no one
really considered it "[terrorist] and Tina," it was just Tina. Which is why the
Who wanted Tina for their film (Tommy) and not [terrorist]. Which is
why Phil Spector wanted Tina (and not [terrorist] for "River Deep Mountain
High." By the end of the act, he couldn't even keep it together in the
studio.
He beat her over and over for their entire
relationship. He beat her with his fists, he beat her with wire hangers,
he beat her with whatever was handy. An electrical cord could and would
do. He threatened her with death (repeatedly) if she left him.
[. . .]
No, Elijah, [terrorist] did not "discover" Tina. And comparing the serial
physical abuse Tina endured for over sixteen years to a sex act
("groupies and playthings") reveals a lot of stupid. The choice of the
word "treatment" as opposed to "abuse" ("his treatment of her") is also
sadly revealing. (Wald does use abuse elsewhere. But we don't think
abuse is "treatment." Even "mistreatment" would be an improvement over
"treatment.") As for Wald's claim in the article that a White musician's
death wouldn't result in the same kind of obituary attention to his
violence, give us an example? We can provide one who would get the same
treatment: Phil Spector.
And that would have been true if
he'd died long before Lana Clarkson was murdered. He was another
control freak and he was abusive to Ronnie Spector. Not on an [terrorist] scale
but few people in the world will reach that kind of scale while in the
spotlight.
Jim asked us to write about this and showed an
e-mail explaining why this topic needed to be addressed. A reader of
two years had been on the AOL message boards and saw [terrorist]'s abuse
minimized by guys with man-crushes on [terrorist] who repeatedly down-played the
physical abuse of Tina Turner, the beatings, the crimes. The reader
said it brought back for her the denial she was met with when she
brought charges against her then husband for abuse.
Boys,
it's sad when your heroes have feet of clay, we understand. It must be
even sadder when your hero turns out to be an abusive crook. But that is
the reality of [terrorist]. And he didn't 'just beat Tina once,' he did
so repeatedly. And the message that the reader copied and pasted into
her e-mail, where a man was saying that all that happened, all that
caused Tina to leave, was [terrorist] was in a bad mood and just slapped her, is
a nice little fantasy for those who need their daily dose of denial.
But it's not reality.
[. . .]
Nor
are we willing to allow that [terrorist] got a bum deal because his
abuses,
his crimes, were noted in his obits. He was an abuser who regularly beat
Tina, made her live in fear (to the point that she once tried to take
her own life just to be free of him -- a detail that got left out by the
[terrorist] Defenders) and really only controlled her because she was a
woman.
He thought it was his 'right' and when men defend him, they,
intentionally or not, further that message. The reader who wrote saw her
then-husband convicted of violent abuse (some of which he admitted to
in court but tried to justify it with the 'pressure' he was under) and
yet, even with that, nearly a decade later, she still encounters people
who feel the 'need' to sing his praises to her and say they hope someday
she can put her 'issues' behind her. Her 'issues.' Had she been
assaulted by a stranger would the same 'caring' people stop to wonder
when she and the criminal could be in the same room together? No.
Here's
the thing, if [terrorist] had beat a woman he wasn't involved with even once
the way he regularly beat Tina, his ass would have been hauled off to
jail and it's doubtful that people would be writing "Poor [terrorist]" pieces
today. But because it was his wife (or 'wife'), we're supposed to allow
for something. What, we're not sure. But there's a lot of minimizing
going on about the fact that he 'only' beat his wife. (And for the
record, he also beat many of his mistresses. Ann Thomas is only one of
the many women who've gone on record explaining how [terrorist] also beat them.)
As if it's somehow 'different' if the woman you physically attack is
your wife. Almost as if they're saying, she probably asked for it.
Tina
survived. Nothing could take the abuse or the memories away. She was
terrorized and she suffered throughout her life as a result. It's
nothing to be minimized or excused. Or glamorized by two idiots in
music who felt their own boring lives needed dressing up.
Tina couldn't change what she'd endured but she could -- and did -- make the rest of her years matter.
In
1984, she returned to the charts with her PRIVATE DANCER album (ten
million copies sold around the world) which included the hits "Better Be
Good To Me," "Let's Stay Together," "Show Some Respect" and the number
one hit "What's Love Got To Do With It." She'd start touring for the
album as Lionel Richie's opening act but quickly go out on her own and
rock the whole world. She'd have one achievement after another. Many
more hits, many more record topping concert tours.
The music legend — who died at age 83
on Wednesday after a "long illness," her rep confirmed — opened up
about her romance with Bach, now 67, in her 2021 HBO documentary Tina.
"He was [16 years] younger [than me]. He was 30 years old at the time
and had the prettiest face. I mean, you cannot [describe] it. It was
like insane. [I thought], 'Where did he come from?' He was really so
good-looking. My heart [was beating fast] and it means that a soul has
met, and my hands were shaking," Turner recalled in the film.
"We met at Cologne [Bonn] Airport — actually it was Düsseldorf Airport [in Germany], and her manager Roger [Davies] asked me to pick up Tina," added Bach, a former music executive, in the documentary," Bach said in the documentary.
As
the Iraq War dragged on and on -- and continues to -- it became a song
we'd note here many times. "You can't stop the pain of your children
crying out in your head/ We always said that the living would envy the
dead."
Tina's passing is the news. Someone else thought he'd be the news but it's Tina Turner that the world is thinking of. In "Tina"
last night, we noted those commenting on her passing -- that included
Diana Ross, Jennifer Hudson, Ringo Starr, Keith Urban, Dionne Warwick,
Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. It's a passing
that touches the world, a loss that many of us feel.
No comments:
Post a Comment