Thursday, May 22, 2014

Awful job, Barack, awful job

The lies never stop with Barack.  CNN reports:


On Monday, White House spokesman Jay Carney acknowledged the White House learned of the situation at the Phoenix VA from CNN reports in April.
Asked Tuesday about the 2010 memo by Schoenhard, Carney refused to answer and instead referred reporters to the VA because it was an internal agency document.

And, of course, Barack himself was told of the problem following the November 2008 elections when his transition team was gearing up for the start of his first term.

I'm not trying to use the VA scandal as a "political football," but I do want to say that this type of lying is exactly why I reject the two-party system and am a Green.


Barack (and Michelle) have used veterans as "political football."

And now when veterans are in need, where's Barack?

Oh, that's right praising his incompetent VA Secretary Eric Shinseki.

The VA scandal is not going away and what's become very clear is that Barack is incapable of addressing it seriously.

Again, I'm a Green.  I don't get caught in the two-party partisan b.s.  I just call out what needs to be called out.

Barack's doing an awful job of handling the latest VA crisis.


This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


May 21, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri wants everyone to accept the voting results, more calls for VA Secretary Eric Shinseki to resign, Barack gives an insulting speech on the VA scandal, in the VA speech he defended Eric Shinseki by name but couldn't note any of the veterans who've suffered such as Barry Coates, equally bad Barack gave a speech praising a sports team today and the prepared remarks were just forty words less than his speech on veterans making perfectly clear how little the White House cares about veterans, all that and much more.


The last time I saw Barack?

You like roses and kisses and pretty men to tell you
All those pretty lies, pretty lies
When you gonna realize they're only pretty lies
Only pretty lies, just pretty lies
-- "The Last Time I Saw Richard," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on her Blue album.


Pretty lies no longer work as well for US President Barack Obama.  And today he spoke about the latest Veterans Affairs scandal.

“The question is this: if the administration has known about these issues for at least four years, why is it just now taking action?"

That is the question to ask, we'll get to it in a moment.

In the United States, the VA stands accused of cooking the books.  Numerous VA medical centers maintained two sets of appointment lists.  The first one, the official one kept in the computer system, demonstrated veterans received medical attention within 14 days of needing it.  That list is the fairy tale.  The reality was the off books list which demonstrated veterans were actually waiting weeks and months.

The fairy tale list was used to give the impression that VA was doing their job and serving veterans in a timely manner.  It was also used to reward officials for strong performances -- resulting in raises for them and bonuses.  Again, this list was a lie.


Most recently, Patricia DiCarlo and Scott Bronstein (CNN) reported, "An audit team sent to the Malcom Randall VA Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida, discovered a list of patients needing follow-up appointments that was kept on paper instead of in the VA's electronic computer system."  It is just the most recent addition to a growing list.  Scott Bronstein and Tom Cohen's (CNN) report, "Meanwhile, the number of Veterans Affairs facilities under investigation has expanded to 26, the agency's Office of Inspector General confirmed Tuesday. Last week, the inspector general told a Senate committee that 10 facilities were being investigated."

As the scandal has grown, people have awaited word from Barack.  Monday, the White House said Barack had just learned of the scandal and then it was revealed Barack learned of the scandal right before he was sworn in as president in January 2009.

Stephanie Gaskill (Defense One) reminds,  "In 2008, Sen. Barack Obama vowed to fix the Department of Veterans Affairs if elected president. But over the past 5 years, problem after problem has emerged: a massive case backlog, delayed GI Bill payments, a stalled electronic records system, and now allegations that federal employees have been lying about wait times at VA hospitals."  David Zucchino, Cindy Carcamo and Alan Zarembo (Los Angeles Times) offer the following examples:

 • In Washington state, Navy veteran Walter “Burgie” Burkhartsmeier, 73, had to wait two months to get an MRI exam at a VA facility in Seattle for shooting pains down his left arm. Eighteen months passed before someone read the MRI results — which showed bony projections on his spinal cord that put him at risk of paralysis if he were struck in the back.
• In Texas, Carolyn Richardson, 70, said a VA doctor last year ordered “immediate” chemotherapy for her husband, Army veteran Anson “Dale” Richardson, 66, but a two-month delay robbed him of the chance to fight the throat cancer that killed him Nov. 4.
• In Phoenix, Thomas Breen, 71, a Navy veteran with a history of bladder cancer, waited two months last fall for a follow-up appointment at the VA facility there after discovering blood in his urine. His family finally took him to a private hospital that diagnosed him with terminal bladder cancer. He died Nov. 30.
• In Nevada, Sandi Niccum, 78, a blind Navy veteran, was forced to wait five hours for emergency room treatment at a VA facility in North Las Vegas last year. Niccum, who was weeping and pounding the floor with her cane because of intense pain in her abdomen, died less than a month later after a large mass was found. A VA investigation did not link the care delay to her death, but it faulted the facility for the long wait and for failing to monitor Niccum.

• And in Durham, N.C., two employees were put on administrative leave last week after an internal review uncovered irregularities in appointments, a local VA spokeswoman said.


Today, Barack finally spoke himself about the scandal.

What did he say?

Among other things, "He has put his heart and soul into this thing. At this stage, Rick is committed to solving the problem and working with us to do it."

What?

Yes, Barack finally spoke about the scandal and his primary concern was "Rick" -- Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki.

"Rick," Barack wants the world to know, "has put his heart and soul into this thing."

So forget you, Barry Coates, the VA's failures kept you from getting timely medical treatment meaning your cancer wasn't caught in time and progressed to stage-four.  Your problems are nothing, apparently, when compared to "Rick" Shinseki's "heart and soul."  (Barry Coates shared his story with the House Veterans Affairs Committee on April 9th -- nothing in Barack's speech indicated he was aware of how the VA failed Coates or other veterans in the same situation.)

You can read his remarks in full here -- all 1370 words.

All 1370 words.

I emphasize that for a reason.

Barack made a joke of veterans today.

He thought 1370 words were adequate for this issue?

On the same day he gave a speech "Honoring the Super Bowl Chapmion Seattle Seahawks"?

Really?  Because I think he came off looking like a fool -- and an uncaring and thoughtless fool at that.

1370 words in his VA scandal speech.

We're supposed to take that seriously when he gives a speech on a football team the same day and that speech is 1330 words -- only 40 less than his speech on a VA scandal that threatens the health and well being of veterans?

He should be ashamed of himself.

Veterans health and lives in jeopardy was only worth 40 more prepared remarks than Barack's gushing (and whoring) over a sports team.  He and his speech writers should be ashamed of themselves.

Not surprisingly, Barack's speech did not go over well.


Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America issued the following statement:

President's Lack of Action Disappoints New Veterans

CONTACT: Gretchen Andersen (212) 982-9699 or press@iava.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
President's Lack of Action Disappoints New Veterans
IAVA CEO and Founder Paul Rieckhoff says public trust with Veterans Affairs is broken, urges Congress to pass VA Accountability Act

Washington DC (May 21, 2014) – Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) today released the following statement from Founder and CEO Paul Rieckhoff in response to President Obama's remarks on the growing VA controversy:
"The President's remarks today were a tremendous disappointment to America's newest generation of veterans. He did nothing to quell the growing nationwide VA controversy. His long-overdue remarks gave outraged IAVA members no reason to believe anything will change at the VA anytime soon. The public trust with the VA and Secretary Shinseki is broken. As a Washington Post survey recently revealed, nearly six in ten post-9/11 veterans say the VA is not doing a good job meeting the needs of veterans. 
"This controversy is much bigger than Phoenix. And our veterans shouldn't have to wait a month for an investigation into one city as disturbing allegations have emerged in at least nine others. The controversy has now spanned to Fort Collins, Austin, San Antonio, Cheyenne, St Louis, Chicago, Gainesville, Durham, and Albuquerque.
"These issues are not new. Problems surrounding unacceptable wait times, delays and cooked books have been emerging for years. IAVA has been sounding the alarm for over a decade. After numerous GAO reports and dozens of public hearings, if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention. 
"These issues were also predictable and preventable. But as we all learn in the military, failing to plan is planning to fail. 
"Speeches and excuses will not solve this problem. Only decisive leadership, bold change and strong accountability will repair decades of failure. 
"While the President continues to dither, Congress has an opportunity to take bipartisan action today by passing the VA Accountability Act. IAVA calls on all members of both parties to swiftly pass this legislation that is essential to empowering the leadership of the VA." 
Last week, IAVA and the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) announced they are joining together to protect VA staff who come forward with information about agency wrongdoing.
As part of the effort, the organizations have launched a secure website, www.VAOversight.org, where VA employees can get in touch with POGO and IAVA.  The effort combines IAVA’s deep knowledge of the VA system with POGO’s experience working with whistleblowers to expose federal wrongdoing.
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (www.IAVA.org) is the nation's first and largest nonpartisan, nonprofit organization representing veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan and has more than 270,000 Member Veterans and civilian supporters nationwide. Celebrating its 10th year anniversary, IAVA recently received the highest rating - four-stars - from Charity Navigator, America's largest charity evaluator.
# # #


Gregg Zoroya (USA Today) speaks with a number of people including IAVA's Paul Rieckhoff:

"I think everybody had high hopes for Secretary Shinseki," says Paul Rieckhoff, founder and executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of American and today one of Shinseki's most vocal critics. "He's gotten more of a benefit of the doubt than any political figure I've ever seen in my life."
Rieckhoff says the reputation that preceded Shinseki into office has ultimately been a liability to the veterans he serves because it has, for many years, taken the edge off holding the secretary to a high standard.
"It's bad for accountability," he says. "And it's bad for the VA because it looks like there's a culture of failure."

Also expressing disappointment?  The Washington Free Beacon quotes Senator Mike Rogers stating, "As a veteran myself, I am horribly disappointed in what I saw today on behalf of the president. He’s very good at the glitz and glamour and the very sternly worded memos, but this is about governance." Senator John McCain's office issued the following:


Washington, D.C. ­– U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) released the following statement on President Obama’s remarks on the VA scandal today:
“While I am glad that after many weeks of refusing to acknowledge this widening scandal, President Obama finally saw fit to speak about it today, but his remarks are wholly insufficient in addressing the fundamental, systemic problems plaguing our veterans’ health care system. According to the latest reports, 26 VA facilities nationwide are now being investigated, and this Administration’s ineffectual response has created a crisis of confidence in our veterans’ community. We need answers, leadership and accountability, none of which we’ve seen from the Obama Administration to date. Further, Congress must act to address the systemic problems at the VA by giving its leaders greater ability to hire and fire those charged with providing care, and by giving veterans far greater flexibility in how they get quality care in a timely manner.”

###


US House Rep John Barrow's office issued the following today:


 May 21, 2014
Press Release

WASHINGTON – U.S. Congressman John Barrow (GA-12) called on the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Eric Shinseki, to resign his post in the wake of problems at VA clinics across the country. Today, news was reported that 26 clinics across the country, including clinics in Georgia, are under investigation for failing to provide adequate care for veterans. In 2013, issues were raised at the Charlie Norwood VA in Augusta regarding delays in care that led to at least three veteran deaths.
Congressman Barrow said:
“Secretary Shinseki is a decorated veteran who has served this country honorably, and I’ve personally met him on numerous occasions and found him to be devoted to caring for this nation’s heroes.  Unfortunately, this Administration has fallen short in providing the kind of care that our veterans have earned.  While I don’t think a change in leadership will immediately solve the serious problems that plague the VA, I do think it’s time to give someone else an opportunity to lead the agency and begin the rebuilding process to ensure these issues never happen again. Our nation’s veterans deserve the best we can give them, and too much time has passed since this issue was brought to light without anyone being held accountable.  Secretary Shinseki deserves the utmost respect for his service, but it's time for someone new to get to the bottom of what's happened on his watch.”
Congressman Barrow and House Veterans Affairs Chairman Jeff Miller (R-FL) conducted an oversight visit of the Augusta VA following the claims. 


Gordon Lubold (Foreign Policy) notes Barrow's call and that of US House Rep David Scott is also calling for Shinseki to resign.  McCain is a Republican, Barrow and Scott are Democrats.

May 5th, The American Legion called for the resignation of Shinseki.  Today, they issued the following:


Responding to President Obama’s press conference earlier today, American Legion National Commander Daniel M. Dellinger released the following statement:
“The American Legion applauds President Obama for committing himself to hold leadership at the Department of Veterans Affairs more accountable for their actions. If this system-wide failure is to be corrected, it is paramount for our commander-in-chief to be personally involved. The president needs to ensure that every veteran who relies on the VA can do so secure in the knowledge that he or she will receive the best and most timely care humanly possible.
“The question is this: if the administration has known about these issues for at least four years, why is it just now taking action?
“Moreover, the president’s decision to keep Secretary Shinseki at his post is an unfortunate one. The VA has been aware for some time that inappropriate scheduling procedures are widespread among its medical facilities. Yet Secretary Shinseki has taken no initiative in correcting the problem. Veterans continue to die waiting for their health care, senior VA executives continue to get their bonuses, and only after all of this is the secretary now pledging to fix what’s wrong.
“So now America’s veterans are told, in effect, wait a while longer and things will get better. Meanwhile, care is delayed or denied and veterans and their families suffer. Words are nice, and even somewhat comforting, but when will the VA’s house be cleansed of those who are soiling it and dishonoring the system?”



Prior to Barack's speech today, many were weighing in.  Florida's News4Jax's Bruce Hamilton (The Morning Show -- link is video and text) spoke with the state's Governor Rick Scott who states, "Now we know there are secret wait lists at our Gainesville facility. Our VA facilities need transparency and accountability. It starts at the top."  Therefore, he says, "Eric Shinseki should resign."    The editorial board for the Delaware News Journal weighed in on the scandal and noted:

For example, a scandal has been bubbling up for days involving VA hospitals around the country, possible deaths of veterans waiting for service, and the claim that government officials falsified records to protect their rear ends. Yet the White House announced President Obama is really, truly angry about it because he saw a report on CNN.
What?
Then the White House claims it has taken decisive action because it fired the person in charge of the VA health program. It turns out the government had announced the official's planned retirement weeks ago.
President Obama promised during his 2008 campaign that he would fix problems with the Veterans Administration. So much for promises. 


Still on veterans, Senator Patty Murray is the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee and serves on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.  Her office issued the following today:


FOR PLANNING PURPOSES                                 CONTACT: Murray Press Office
Wednesday, May 21st, 2014                                                           (202) 224-2834
 
VETERANS: TOMORROW: Murray to Continue Call for Immediate VA Action
 
Murray: “What we need from VA now is decisive action and I think this Committee should be clear to the VA what we expect. The lack of transparency and the lack of accountability are inexcusable and cannot be allowed to continue.”
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. — TOMORROW, Thursday, May 22, 2014, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) will attend the Senate Appropriations Committee’s first Full Committee Markup of the year. During consideration of the Military Construction and Veterans’ Affairs bill, Murray plans to continue her push for immediate action at the VA, and express support for provisions in the Appropriations bill that would address wait times and increase accountability.
 
WHO:             U.S. Senator Patty Murray
 
WHAT:          Remarks on the VA at the Senate Appropriations Committee Markup.
 
WHEN:          TOMORROW, May 22, 2014 at
                        10:30 AM EST/7:30AM PST
                                                                                                              
WHERE:       SD-106, Dirksen Senate Office Building
 
 
###
 
 
---
Meghan Roh
Press Secretary | New Media Director
Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
Mobile: (202) 365-1235
Office: (202) 224-2834




Let's stay with the Senate.


Senator Robert Menendez:  Finally, I would like to hear the views of each of our witnesses on the prospect of repealing the Iraq AUMG, which I believe must be repealed.  It's my understanding that, from a legal and operational perspective, there are no barriers to repeal and no deficiencies of needed authorities to assist the government of Iraq in counter-terrorism activities.


Senator Menendez was speaking at this morning's   Senate Foreign Relations Committee  hearing this morning entitled "Authorization For Use Of Military Force After Iraq and Afghanistan."  Senator Robert Menendez is the Committee Chair, Senator Bob Corker is the Ranking Member.  The Committee heard today from two panels.  The first was made up of DoD's Stephen Preston and the State Dept's Mary McLeod.  The second panel was made up of Yale Law School Professor Harold Koh and former US Attorney General Michael Mukasey.



Chair Robert Menendez:  The US ended its combat operations in Iraq in 2010 and, in fact, withdrew all of its military forces that same year.  Since then, Congress has, on a number of occasions, examined the possibility of repealing the 2002 AMUF authorizing our Iraq operations but the administration has repeatedly opposed those efforts. Starting with you, Ms. Mcleod, can you explain to the Committee, one, whether the administration continues to oppose repeal of the Iraq AMUF and, if so, why?  And I'd like to hear your answer to this, Mr. Preston, as well.


Mary McLeod:  Certainly, Chairman Menendez, and once again, thank you for inviting me to testify here today.  As you said, the United States has ended combat operations in Iraq and we've withdrawn our military forces and I can confirm that we're not relying on the 2002 Iraq AMUF for any military operations -- nor do we intend to do so.  And I am here to tell you today that the administration now supports repeal of the 2002 Iraq AMUF.


Stephen Preston: Mr. Chairman, I agree.  That is certainly my understanding as well. 


Chair Robert Menendez:  Alright, that brings to full circle my view that we shouldn't have been in Iraq in the first place, that's why I voted against it and would be happy to repeal it now.


Ranking Member Bob Corker asked about the 9-11 AMUF and whether it was needed and noted his displeasure that McLeod needed to flip through pages, find a passage and read it out loud and that when he asked her about this a second time, before she would attempt to respond to his question, she was consulting Preston.




Turning to Iraq where Nouri's War Crimes continue.  As he continues to bomb the residential areas of Falluja, National Iraqi News Agency reports 1 adult civilian was killed and 1 child was killed with five more people left injured. Targeting civilians is a War Crime.  Nouri's practicing collective punishment which is a legally defined War Crime.   Jo Wilding (Exaro) notes:

A friend whose family lived in the city told me: "Fallujah is being bombed every day.  Even during the 72-hour ceasefire in February, Fallujah was bombed by the Iraqi forces."
He denies the claims of Iraq's government that a jihadist group is in control of Falluja, which is 42 miles from Baghdad in Anbar province.  The group grew out of al-Qaeda's affiliate in the country.
Another friend in the city -- in the so-called Sunni Triangle -- said that there was no "humanitarian corridor". So there is no way out for civilians.  He asked that aid organisations be told how bad conditions are for them.

In attacking the Iraqi civilians, Nouri is using weapons the US government supplies him with.  And Nouri is again insisting that he needs lethal drones.  World Tribune reports, "Iraq is pressing the United States for a combat unmanned aerial vehicle which it considers more urgent than its request for AH-64 Apache attack helicopters. Officials said the government of Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki has expressed the need for a U.S.-origin combat UAV."

Last fall, Nouri began insisting he needed drones.  Lethal drones.  He came to DC at the end of October making that case.  He asked Barack for drones when Barack received him at the White House November 1st.  The White House said "no."  They even told Congress there would be no drones.  Congress was balking at supplying Nouri with weapons since he was already attacking the Iraqi people.  But the White House insisted drones (predator drones) would not come into the picture.  It will be interesting to see whether that promise now sticks.

Thug Nouri continued his pattern of intimidation.  Little Saddam gave his weekly speech today.  Alsumaria notes Nouri declared any TV channel report that questioned the actions of the Iraqi military was committing treason.

I'm sorry, the White House condemned those remarks when?  Oh, that's right, they didn't.  Nor did the State Dept.

Thug Nouri wasn't done.  Duraid Salman and Ammar al-Tariq (Alsumaria) reports Nouri declared that the announced results of the election must not be questioned.  A) These are preliminary results that have been announced.  B) When the official results of the 2010 voting was announced, Nouri didn't accept them, he stamped his feet and demanded -- and got -- a recount.  C) Even after the recount, Nouri refused to accept the results, refused to step down and brought the government to a halt for over eight months (the political stalemate) until the US brokered The Erbil Agreement -- a legal contract that gave Nouri a second term.


Nouri al-Maliki is a little man, a small man, a tiny man.  But he is a big hypocrite.


Anniston Star publisher Brandt Ayers (at Montgomery Advertiser) offers a look at Thug Nouri:

He threatened to "turn the world upside down" if he is summoned by parliament to account for his actions, unleashing his secretive files on members. Maliki has even resurrected a Saddam-era law against criticizing the head of state.
A consequence of thin-skinned imperial power is a loss of caution. When a Sunni parliamentarian inflamed protestors in Anbar province, security forces surrounded his compound.
Gunfire broke out and troops killed six Sunnis, taking away the Sunni official, even though he had immunity. Soon afterward, troops cleared a Sunni compound in Ramadi and the whole province erupted in turmoil.
Maliki responded by ringing Fallujah and Ramadi with artillery and began shelling. Maybe sensing he had gone too far, he ordered the army away. Into the resulting void streamed trucks flying the black flags of Islamic extremists.


Liz Sly (Washington Post) Tweets:


  • In Iraq, a 4-year term actually is more like 3 years, because they spend about a year arguing about who gets what job (pt)


  • Preliminary results of the April 30th parliamentary elections were announced Monday.  Kitabat notes a sense since then that the elections will not bring about any change and will not solve the problems facing Iraq.  All Iraq News reports the Iraqi National Coalition issued a statement today which included this sentence, "The INC sides called the Independent High Electoral Commission to deal seriously with the complaints against election results."









    Let's note the violence in Iraq today, National Iraqi News Agency reports a Ramadi home invasion left the son of Judge Sabri al-Dulaimi dead,  2 Kirkuk bombings left eleven people injured, 1 civilian was shot dead near Sharif cemetery, a battle "on the road links between Baquba and Muqdadiyah" left one police captain injured, one mayor was shot at near Muqdadiyah and he was left injured, Joint Operations Command announced they killed 10 suspects in Anbar, 1 police officer was shot dead in Falluja, a Jurf al-Sakhar bombing left two Iraqi soldiers injured, an Albu Ajil battle left 2 police members and 5 rebels dead, a Tarmiyah roadside bombing claimed the life of 1 Iraqi soldier and left three more injured,  and 1 Iraqi soldier was shot dead in Riyadh.  Alsumaria adds a Qadisiyah roadside bombing left 1 woman dead and two more people injured.  All Iraq News reports a bus carrying soldiers in Tuz Khurmatu was attacked leaving 8 Iraqi soldiers dead and four more injured, secuirty forces say they shot dead 1 sniper in Ramadi, 2 women were shot dead in Baghdad, and Baghdad Operations Command says they killed 8 suspects.  Through yesterday, Iraq Body Count counts 610 violent deaths in Iraq so far this month.



































    the washington post
    liz sly
    kitabat

    Tuesday, May 20, 2014

    Only Clarence Page is a more ridiculous columnist

    Eugene Robinson is a full time joke.  He's a whore for the Democratic Party and especially for Barack Obama.  He's Barack's little girlfriend wanting to kiss Barack and hold his hand.  That a grown man, a near elderly man, would behave like a schoolgirl is rather sad.  He writes:

    The VA situation, however, looks more serious day by day. If VA hospitals really are falsifying records to disguise lengthy waiting times — and if veterans are dying as a consequence — then President Obama needs to bring in new management to fix the problems, and fast.
    White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, speaking Sunday on "Face the Nation," described Obama as "madder than hell" about the VA scandal. By now, we should all be used to the fact that Obama is never what you would call demonstrative with his anger, at least publicly. No frothing, no foaming, no gnashing of teeth. I take McDonough at his word that the president is royally steamed.
    We should also be used to the fact that Obama is extremely loyal to the members of his team. Despite the disastrous launch of the Health-Care.gov website, the president declined to dismiss Kathleen Sebelius as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, allowing her to leave on her own terms.

    But, Gene, Barack knew about the problem.

    And, more importantly, "madder than hell"?

    Barack doesn't care about anything but himself.

    As for being loyal to members of his team?  No, he's lazy and refuses to hold people accountable.

    That's not the same thing as loyal.

    When you are screwing up, you need to go.

    These are important positions, not carhops at Sonic.

    You do the job, or you go.

    And Gene's got a job to do as well -- be a functioning member of the press.

    That means less tongue up Barack's ass and more holding him accountable.


    This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


    Tuesday, May 20, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, a professor tries to blame Congress for a scandal (she flaps her know-nothing gums), but the scandal was known to Barack's transition team all those years ago, the VA scandal of the fake appointment lists involves Barack's current nominee for the post of VA Deputy Under Secretary of Health, Barack puts the US under a state of "national emergency" over Iraq, allegations of election fraud continue to swirl in Iraq, and much more.


    Some people should grasp that they don't know everything.  Linda Bilmes has her areas of expertise and her areas of stupidity.  She tells Jordain Carney and Stacy Kaper (National Journal), "Congress has been totally exasperated by the VA’s inability to get on top of the problem for a long time.  But they haven’t been willing to really contemplate anything other than throwing more money at the problem."

    Her stupidity is dangerous to the nation.

    Her statement 'feels' right so she blathers on like an idiot.  But she's completely uninformed and ignorant.  If you didn't do the work, sit your tired ass down because nobody needs to hear it.

    I've been at the hearings, I've reported on the hearings.  Linda's efforts to blame Congress are shameless.  I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican, members of Congress have not just tossed money at the problem.  They have asked VA repeatedly, "What do you need?"  They have asked that in terms of money, in terms of bills.  Stephanie Herseth Sandlin was one of the best about this.  Her remarks in Subcommittees she chaired went like this, "We are here to help our veterans and we need to work together on this.  So what tools do you need that you don't have?"

    Carney and Kaper say that it takes 2 years for a VA claims adjuster to be trained.  Really?

    I'd love to know where they got that figure.  VA officials have usually told Congress that it takes 8 months to a year.  It's interesting how so-called facts can be made up -- look at the crap Linda's spewing for example.  We note Linda on the costs of the Iraq War.  We will be far less likely to note Linda in the future because she is either lying in the statement we quoted or she is perfectly willing to speak without any research at all.  In either case, she is no longer trustworthy and her ridiculous remarks question the legitimacy of all of her work -- past, present and future.

    Linda didn't make the VA claims remark ("It takes approximately two years to fully train a claims worker") but here's why Carney and Kaper look like idiots -- how about people start doing the damn work required? -- the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees did not start offering money for more claims workers two years ago.  Bernie Sanders is the Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee and I can remember then-Chair Patty Murray raising this issue and then-Chair Daniel Akaka raising this issue.

    And, by the way, when Committee members raised this issue they were told by Dr. Robert Petzel and Allison Hickey and others with VA that they didn't want extra workers (because it would take 8 months or a year to fully train them) which is why overtime was utilized instead.

    Do Carney and Kaper know about that?  Apparently not.

    Apparently, you can 'report' any damn thing in the world if you're willing to make it up.

    Bob Filner.  I know Bob and I like Bob.  As San Diego Mayor, he disgraced himself with unbecoming actions that were also criminal.  My heart breaks for Bob and I hope he can learn from what happened, I do believe in redemption.

    But what happened there has nothing to do with his tenure as Chair of the House Veterans Affairs Committee.  He called out Petzel and Hickey.  The only one who shows that kind of determination today is Senator Richard Burr (Ranking Member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee).

    Maybe if reporters had actually attended the hearings -- novel concept, isn't it? -- and reported on them, we wouldn't have to scream so loud here.

    I'm fine with holding anyone accountable -- even Oval Office occupants.

    And I think, with the exception of Bob Filner and Richard Burr, all Committee members are too kind to VA officials -- who are liars, they've lied repeatedly and should be held in contempt of Congress for their lies.

    I praise Daniel Akaka for the tone he set as Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, but I also called out Daniel.  And I know Daniel and like Daniel.  But we're the ones who said he needed to step down and we're the ones who said Patty Murray needed to be made the Chair.  I love Daniel but he was making too many mistakes and was far too pleasant in the face of repeated lies from the VA.  I cried after I dictated the snapshot calling for him to step down as Chair but I cried after. I didn't silence the criticism (which I still consider accurate).

    So no one should ever think I'm going to pull punches.  If I feel a hard call has to be made, I will make it.

    That doesn't mean I'm right and I can be wrong and often am.  But it does mean I don't run around trying to excuse the Veterans Affairs Committees.

    Linda flaunts gross ignorance when she states, "Congress has been totally exasperated by the VA’s inability to get on top of the problem for a long time.  But they haven’t been willing to really contemplate anything other than throwing more money at the problem."

    Patty Murray has repeatedly asked VA officials what tools do they need?  Richard Burr has especially asked them that question with regards to how to hold failing employees accountable.

    Linda needs to get her lazy ass to a VSO hearing.  That's when the Committees hear from various Veterans Service Organizations about proposed bills and laws and what the VSOs think of these measures.

    In hearing, VA officials will frequently insist that this or that bill will hamper them.  Does Linda know about that?

    No, she doesn't know a  thing.

    But what a pleasing lie to tell, "It's everyone's fault!"


    The Veterans Affairs Committee need to do a better job of oversight but, in terms of attempting to address problems, they have proposed various legislative changes and, generally speaking, the VA opposes them on every measure.

    Whatever Bob Filner is, he was a strong advocate for veterans.  So was/are Steve Buyer, Jeff Miller, Patty Murray, Daniel Akaka, Richard Burr, Mark Begich, etc.  And it is insulting to be ignorant of what's taken place yet respond to the latest VA scandal with some insipid remark that builds on collective guilt (but lacks the guts to go there).

    It's amazing Linda can blame Congress but not say a word about the president.

    That would be Barack Obama, the president who has nominated Jeffrey Murawsky for the post of Under Secretary of Health despite the fact that Murawksy is currently responsible for overseeing one of the VA medical centers involved in the current scandal where whistle-blowers have come forward to expose two sets of appointment lists.  The first is a fairy tale where veterans request an appointment and receive one within 14 days.  The fairy tale list is the official list, the one in the computers.  There's also an off books list where its documented that veterans are waiting weeks and months for medical care.  Murawsky was either involved in that or unaware of it -- neither option builds confidence in his nomination.

    It's the Phoenix VA medical center where the lists are said to have led to the deaths of 40 veterans so, yes, it's better that Murawsky was over Chicago instead of Phoenix but not 'better enough' to justify nominating him for a promotion.  Oh, wait, he was also supposed to supervise Phoenix.

    Senator John Cornyn called today for Barack to withdraw the nomination noting:

    Instead of nominating a reformer from outside the VA system who can bring fresh leadership as the next Under Secretary for Health -- a key position responsible for overseeing the VHA -- you have appointed Dr. Jeffrey A. Murawsky, a career administrator whose own tenure at the VA raises serious concerns.  [F]rom February 2010 through February 2012, Dr. Murawsky directly supervised Sharon Helman, the current director of the Phoenix VA Health Care System who has been placed on administrative leave due to similar allegations of secret wait lists and resulting veteran deaths there.

    40 veterans may be dead because of this and Barack's nominating Murawsky?

    This is not about 'rush to judgment.'  Rush to judgment might include calling for Murawaky to be fired before the Inspector General's investigation was completed.  But anyone who's supervision has allowed the impression -- just the impression -- that 40 veterans died as a result of their own incompetence is someone who does not need to be advanced in the system.

    I don't say this often (this may, in fact, be the first time) but Senator John Coryn is right, the nomination needs to be withdrawn.

    This is why people get outraged and wonder, "Where is the accountability?"

    Murawsky is an official charged with oversight and he failed at his job.  Not only is he not fired or even demoted, he's being nominated for a promotion.

    Barack tried his usual lie of "I only learned of this from the TV!" Mike Hashimoto (Dallas Morning News) ribs that claim here.  David Martosko (Daily Mail) reports:

    White House Press Secretary Jay Carney wound up with egg on his face Monday as he told reporters that President Barack Obama first learned from a TV news report that his Veterans Administration was denying medical care to vets with secret off-the-books-waiting lists.
    But new evidence emerged this morning that his transition team was notified five years ago about how VA medical centers' official wait-list times bore little resemblance to reality and risked denying military heroes critical health care.
    The Washington Times reported Monday that waiting times at veterans' medical facilities were known to be wildly inaccurate at the end of the George W. Bush administration. By the time Obama's transition team got a post-election briefing from the VA at the end of 2008, scheduling failures were already reaching a critical point.
     Of that transition report, Martosko and Francesca Chambers (Daily Mail) report:

    'This is not only a data integrity issue in which [Veterans Health Administration] reports unreliable performance data,' the transition report read; 'it affects quality of care by delaying – and potentially denying -- deserving veterans timely care.'
    It also recommended a series of tests that would compare doctor appointments in veterans' official medical records with appointment times recorded in the VA's computer system.

     They knew and did nothing.
    Which is like Shinseki's first VA scandal.  In the fall of 2009, veterans attending colleges and universities on the Post-9/11 GI Bill waited and waited for checks.  The VA's first response was to flat out lie.  They blamed the academic institutions.  There was also some blaming of veterans.
    But October 14, 2009, when Shinseki appeared before a House Veterans Subcommittee, he admitted the truth.  When he was made Secretary of the VA, he was told the roll out would not work, that the system in place could not handle the checks for all veterans.  He ordered an outside review and the review found the same thing.  This was in the early months of 2009.  He didn't inform Congress, he didn't inform veterans.
    And, repeating, when the problem emerged and the media started reporting on vets who couldn't pay their tuition and couldn't pay their rent because their checks did not arrive, the VA's initial response was to lie and say it was the fault of academic institutions.
    How many lies and failures and scandals is Shinseki going to get away with?

    Let's drop back to Thursday's snapshot to note how VA Secretary Eric Shinseki responded to questions -- and remember, this wasn't a pop quiz.  He knew he would be appearing before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee that day.  He knew the topic would be these lists for medical appointments.  Yet he failed at even basic responses to Ranking Member Richard Burr's questions:



    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Mr. Secretary, were you aware that on October 25, 2013, the Office of Special Counsel requested that the VA conduct an investigation into the allegations of inappropriate scheduling at the Fort Collins Community Outpatient clinic?  And that since then, the media has reported about Mr. Freeman's e-mail of June 19, 2013 that explains how to game the system to avoid being on the bad boy list.  Were you aware of those?

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  Uh, Senator, I became aware of that-that, uh, that screen shot -- I believe that's what it was -- screen shot of an employee who was suggesting that there are ways to game.  I put that employee on administrative leave, uh, 

    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  When was that?

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  That was last Friday.


    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Mr. Secretary, it's my understanding that on June 21, 2013, VA received a report from the Office of Medical Inspector  regarding chronic understaffing issues at the Jacksonville VA Medical Center and that report described multiple patient scheduling problems including scheduling two patients for the same appointment slot and scheduling patients for a clinic that does not have any assigned  providers -- often referred to as ghost clinics.  And that on September 17, 2013, the Office of Special Counsel submitted a letter to the President of the United States on which the VA was courtesy copied the findings of that June 21st Office of Medical Inspector on the Fort Jackson Medical Center including the practice of double-booking patients and the use of ghost clinics.  Do you remember reading that report and receiving that copied letter to the president?

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  Uh, I can't say that I remember it today here.

    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Okay.  There was a December 23, 2013 report by the Office of -- by the Office of Medical Inspector  regarding the Cheyenne Medical Center in Fort Collins Clinic that found that several medical support assistants reported that, and I quote, "Medical Center's business office training included teaching them to make the desired date the actual appointment and, if the Clinic needed to cancel appointments, they were instructed to change the desired date to within 14 days of the new appointment."  Did you read that report? 

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  That, uh, report has come to my-my attention here recently.

    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Okay, on February 25, 2014, your Chief of Staff, Mr. [Jose D.] Riojas, submitted a response to the Office of Special Counsel which included the December 23 , 2013 Office of the Medical Inspector report on Fort Collins.  And in that letter, Mr. Riojas states, and I quote, "However as OMI" Office of Medical Inspector "was not provided any specific veterans cases effected by these practices, it cannot substantiate that the failure to properly train staff resulted in danger to public health or safety."  Were you aware of what your Chief of Staff wrote?

    Secretary Eric Shinseki: I was.

    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Okay.  Mr. Secretary, were you aware that the GAO report entitled "VA Health Care: Reliability of Reported Out Patient Medical Appointment Wait Times Scheduling Oversight Need Improvement" which was publicly released in January 2013 and then on December 11, 2012, to that same report, your former Chief of Staff, John Gingrich, sent a letter to the GAO which stated, and I quote, "VA generally agrees with the GAO's conclusions and concurs with GAO's recommendations to the Dept"?  Do you remember that letter?   That report and your Chief of Staff's response?

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  In-in general, I do remember that report.

    Ranking Member Richard Burr:  Mr. Secretary, you knew that there were specific issues relating to scheduling and wait times as early as June 21, 2013 at Jackson, December 23, 2013 at Fort Collins, as well as numerous IG reports related to excessive wait times in January '012 in Temple, Texas, September '012 in Spokane, Washington, October 2012 in Cleveland, Ohio, September 2013 in Columbia, South Carolina.  December '012, a GAO report questions the validity and the reliability of the reported wait time performance measures.  Which brings us to today in Phoenix.  On May 1, you publicly stated that you had removed Ms. Hellman as the medical director.  And you  stated then that that was to ensure the integrity of the IG's current ongoing investigation.  On May 5th, Dr. Petzel conducted a conference call with all medical directors, all VISN directors and the chiefs of staff -- a rather large group -- to discuss the ongoing face-to-face audits of all VA centers and large community outpatient clinics.  I have been told by sources that were on that call that during that call, Dr. Petzel made the statement that the removal of Ms. Hellman was, I quote, "political and that she's done nothing wrong."  If you're asking us to wait until the investigation is over, doesn't the same apply to people who work for you?  And, Mr. Secretary, from all I've described to you and the current investigation, why should this Committee or any veteran believe that change is going to happen as a result of what we're going though? 

    Secretary Eric Shinseki:  I-I was not aware of, uh, the phone call you referred to and I will look into it.  Uhm, I would just tell you that, uh, my removal of the director, uh, placing her on administrative leave was at the request of the IG.  He is the lead in this, uh-uh, comprehensive review.  Uhm, I don't get out ahead of him.  Uh, he requested it.  And I, uh, put Director Hellman and two other individuals on administrative leave.


    The hearing was covered  in Thursday's snapshot and Friday's, Ruth covered it in "Senator Richard Blumenthal says call in the F.B.I.," Kat covered it in "Shinseki needs to be fired," Ava covered it in "Shineski (Ava)" and Wally covered it in "More talk, no action (Wally)."  And Dona moderated a roundtable on it "Congress and Veterans."  Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank notes Shinseki's performance at that hearing:

    Worse was Shinseki’s response when he finally appeared before a congressional committee to answer questions about the scandal. He refused to acknowledge any systemic problem, and declined to commit to do much of anything, insisting on waiting for the results of yet another investigation.
    “If any allegations are true,” Shinseki told the Senate veterans affairs committee, “they’re completely unacceptable to me.”
    “If any are substantiated by the inspector general,” he said, “we will act.”
    If?

    Is there not already evidence of VA appointment schedulers cooking the books?

    Milbank also notes Senator Richard Blumenthal's request for calling in the FBI (also see Ruth's report linked to above on this) and how Shinseki could only respond "if" -- he would call for it if the Inspector General requested it.  Eric London (WSWS) also notes Shinseki's "if"s:

    The Obama administration has responded by denying the existence of wrongdoing and scrambling to minimize the scandal. Shinseki told the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on May 15 in conditional terms that “ if these allegations are true” and “ if they are substantiated,” then “they are completely unacceptable” and “timely action will be taken.”
    Shinseki and Obama both issued choreographed statements in recent days stating that they were “mad as hell” (Shinseki) and “madder than hell” (Obama).



    Turning to Iraq, yesterday a major announcement was made:

    Notice -- Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq


    NOTICE 
    - - - - - - -
    CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH
    RESPECT TO THE STABILIZATION OF IRAQ
    On May 22, 2003, by Executive Order 13303, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the continued reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq.
    The obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303, as modified in scope and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007, must continue in effect beyond May 22, 2014. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the stabilization of Iraq declared in Executive Order 13303.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

    BARACK OBAMA 



    What?  You thought we were talking about polling results?

    No.

    I'm talking about Barack and his never ending lying.

    We all know now that Iraq had no WMDs (a few of us hazard a guess to that effect before the illegal war started) so why does the US have to declare -- to renew annually -- a state of national emergency as a result of Iraq?

    Explain: "the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the continued reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq."

    Somebody want to explain that one?

    No?

    Didn't think so.


    April 30th, Iraq held parliamentary elections.  And, yes, yesterday, preliminary results were announced.

    Today?

    All Iraq News reports, "The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham congratulated Iraqis on the annoucement of the elections results. In a press conference held in Tehran on Tuesday, She also congratulated the Iraqi nation and government on the successful holding of parliamentary elections."  Well at least someone is happy.

    Abdulrahman al-Rashed (Al Arabiya) offers, "Maliki, whose bloc won most of the votes, needs the support of more than 60 other members of parliament to become premier again. If Maliki makes it to the premiership, his term would be the second longest after Saddam Hussein. Maliki is expected to resume running the country on his own and adopting the policy of dominance. This will thus eliminate the state institutional system the Americans pledged to establish."


    The US invaded Iraq, broke the law, killed millions, lost some of their own and all to create a new Saddam Hussein?

    Nouri's third term only becomes a done deal if the US government demands it (as they demanded his first term and his second).  The results -- preliminary -- aren't impressive.  Nouri's where he was in 2010 more or less.  And his 2010 results weren't considered impressive that year.

    Kurdistan Alliance MP Najiba Najib is unimpressed.  NINA quotes her stating that Nouri's vote totals aren't surprising when one considers, among other things, "the distribution of residential lands which brought him more votes."  Najib is incorrect, the term is "bought," not "brought."  And other political blocs complained in real time that Nouri was buying votes.

    And, of course, now he'll really be trying to buy them.  Gazi Hassan (Rudaw) offers a cautionary note:

    We have to remember that the Kurds' hands have been tied for a long time because of Bagdad's anti-Kurd policy. That's why the Kurds should make a crucial decision: they should not involve in any coalition or cabinet without official documents signed by the Prime Minister granting the Kurds what is their legitimate rights. 


    What is Hassan smoking?

    It must have been good for him to demand that they hold out for "official documents signed by the Prime Minister granting the Kurds what is their legitimate rights."

    One of their legitimate demands is to resolve the issue of Kirkuk.  Kirkuk is oil rich and it's disputed as to who has rightful claim to it -- the central government out of Baghdad or the KRG.

    There's an official document that's in writing and that Nouri took an oath to uphold -- twice took that oath.  The document is the Iraqi Constitution.

    Article 140 of the Constitution explains how to resolve the issue of Kirkuk, a census will be taken and a referendum held.  Despite taking an oath to the Constitution in 2006, Nouri never implemented Article 140.  The Constitution mandated that the prime minister implement no later than the end of 2007.

    Nouri ignored it.

    In 2010, to get a second term as prime minister for Nouri, the US government brokered a contract -- a written one -- which all the leaders of the political blocs signed off on -- that would include Nouri.  In exchange for the other blocs agreeing to give Nouri a second term, the contract stipulated things Nouri would give.  Those things included that he would (finally) implement Article 140.

    He never did.  He used The Erbil Agreement to get a second term and then refused to honor the contract -- the written contract.  So I'm confused as to why Gazi Hassan thinks the 'answer' is to get a promise from Nouri in writing.


    Rudaw quotes Nineveh Governor Atheel al-Nujaifi stating, "I am not against the State of Law, but against the continuation of Maliki in power.  His continuation in power is a big threat to Iraq."  All Iraq News quotes him posting to Facebook, "If the Shiite agreed to grant a third term for the Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki means a clear message for the Sunni and Kurds of their will to end peaceful coexistence in Iraq."  In which case, al-Nujaifi says, it may be required that they form regions where they are able to fight back against the "domination of politicized security forces and judiciary."

    Meanwhile, World News Bulletin reports:

    Former Iraqi premier Ayad Allawi's political bloc on Tuesday demanded that parliamentary polls – results of which were officially announced yesterday – be repeated, claiming that the vote was rigged.
    "There were many cases of vote-rigging and other violations," Entessar Allawi, a spokesperson for the former PM's Wataniya bloc, told Anadolu Agency.


    Al Mada reports Prince Kanani, with the Sadr bloc, states that he finds the results "shocking" and that the 'Independent' High Electoral Commission refused to investigate complaints -- including that Nouri's votes in Baghdad exceed by 20% the population eligible to vote in Baghdad.

    They should complain.  Nouri did it in 2010, demanded a recount and was tossed a few seats to shut him up. So Allawi and others should be demanding a recount as well.  All Iraq News reports the Jamal al-Batiekh, leader of The White Bloc (a grouping that split from Iraqiya early on) states that "forgery that took place in the elections in Diwaniya and Wasit" resulted in loss of votes for the White Bloc.

    It's not as though democratic elections took place anyway.  Not when Nouri used the military to close the polling stations in areas hostile to him.  They turned away voters all morning and only allowed voters in because the press got wind of it and began reporting on it.

    The Iraqi press, of course.  The western media is far too timid to report much of anything that angers thug Nouri.


    Certainly, they don't want to report on his War Crimes as he continues to bomb residential neighborhoods of Falluja.  Today, those bombings claimed the lives of 4 civilians and left another five injured.


    In other violence, National Iraqi News Agency reports Joint Operations Command states they killed 38 suspects in Amiriyat al-Falluja, an Alexandria car bombing left two people injured, an al-Baghdadi car bombing left four federal police members injured, a Baiji suicide bomber took his own life and the lives o 3 Iraqi soldiers (five more were injured), a Baquba sticky bombing left a father and son injured, 1 man was shot dead in front of his Mosul home, later a second person was shot dead in MosulSamara Operations Command announced they killed 5 suspects, a Tikrit attack left three police members injured, and a Zankurh bombing killed 4 people,  2 Al-Aitha Village bombings left 5 Sahwa dead, 8 Iraqi soldiers were shot dead (and four more injured) "on the road Kirkuk-Baghdad," Baghdad Operations Command announced they killed 8 suspects, a Ramadi battle left 5 Sahwa killed and one injured, a Zankurh bombing left 4 people dead, and the corpse of 1 man was found dumped "in Diayala River north of Baquba" (gunshot wounds).


    There is some political news out of Iraq that is decisive.  All Iraq News and National Iraqi News Agency report that the Kurdistan Regional Government has selected Nijervan Barzani to be the Prime Minister of the KRG and Qubad Talabani to be the Vice President.  The KRG held provincial elections last fall.  Barzani is the current prime minister so this is a second term for him.  He is the son of KRG President Massoud Barzani (who will be replaced shortly -- a vote limited the KRG presidency to two terms and since it was passed half-way into Barzani's term, it was decided he would be given two years extra).  Qubad Talabani is the son of Iraq's President Jalal Talabani.

    The Talabani and Barzani families have long dominated Kurdish politics with the Talabanis part of PUK political party and the Barzanis part of the KDP political party.  (Iraq's First Lady Hero Ibrahim spans both parties due to blood relations as well as marriage.)

    The results may be most surprising in light of Goran besting the PUK in those elections.

















    Monday, May 19, 2014

    Ken Auletta's all wet




    Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Shinseki's Limited Hang Out"

    Can Jill Abramson just go away already?

    She was fired for cause.

    She did a lousy job.

    Why can't she just go away?

    It's really telling how resistant the press is to African-Americans.  Dean Baquet isn't even getting a moment to bask in his achievement because we have to wallow in idiot Jill.

    As Jonathan Chait details in New York magazine, Jill was fired for cause.

    Ken Auletta of The New Yorker got the story wrong, tried to novelize it and generally misled the American public with his nonsense of 'sexism.'

    No, Jill was a lousy person.

    She lied to her boss and got caught.  This was not even the first time (though Chait seems unaware of that).  She's publicly embarrassed the paper repeatedly, she was unable to increase traffic to the website and her journalism 'principle' was to make a report 'buzzworthy.'

    The Times was struggling under her nonsense.

    This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


    Monday, May 19, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri's plans for a majority government fall by the wayside due to the inability of his State of Law to win enough seats in Parliament, allegations of fraud arise as the IHEC issues its (confusing) count, Nouri's War Crimes continue, talk of a confederation and not a nation may be growing, Iran wants Nouri to hand over the Ashraf community, and much more.



    The April 30th election results are known. or are they?


    Reuters reports, "Preliminary results on Monday showed Maliki won at least 94 seats, far more than his two main Shi'ite rivals, the movement of Muqtada Sadr, which picked up 28 seats, and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), which won 29 seats."  Press TV reports, "Results released by Iraq's Independent High Electoral Commission on Monday showed that the premier’s State of Law alliance garnered 92 out of 328 parliamentary seats. Maliki’s bloc won 30 seats in the capital Baghdad alone and won the first spot in 10 out of 18 provinces overall, while his main rivals are said to have gained between 19 and 29 seats in total." Sinan Salaheddin and Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports 92 as well and point out, "He will still need to approach other parties to piece together a broader majority coalition to get the first crack at forming a government as violence rages and instability grows."  Duraid Adnan and Tim Arango (New York Times) point out that these are "initial results -- still subject to challenges from various political parties" while stating Nouri won 93 seats.

    They also note Saleh al-Mutlaq call for the United Nations and other international bodies to launch an investigation into election irregularities.  National Iraqi News Agency reports:

    Spokesman for the Citizen Coalition, Baligh Abu Kalal confirmed on Monday that the coalition has recordings of fraud acts and breaking the locks of ballot boxes and what preceded that as the distribution of lands and the use of public money.


    92 or 93 or 94 seats, it's not a winner.  Nor are Nouri's votes -- he ran for Parliament the same as everyone else -- particularly impressive.

    The rush to praise him for basically standing still (State of Law got 89 seats in the 2010 elections) is rather surprising since the goal ahead of the elections for other Shi'ite parties was to break up into smaller groupings because it was felt that the 2010 elections benefited smaller political blocs.  He managed to prevent much of Anbar from voting.  Disqualifying cities such as Falluja from voting is preventing Anbar from voting.  This was not free and fair elections.  At one point, the US government was publicly insisting that if elections did not take place everywhere then the election would not be free and fair.  But that assertion disappeared as parts of Anbar were prevented from voting.  In many ways, Nouri's thuggish manner was on display in 2013 when he sought to punish Anbar Province and Nineveh Province by refusing to allow them to vote in March 2013 provincial elections.

    The White House has privately claimed that it was only their efforts and those of the State Dept which allowed Anbar and Nineveh to finally vote in June 2013.

    Apparently, the concern was never over the Iraqi people -- the US government's concern.  It was only over being embarrassed publicly by their proxy and puppet Nouri al-Maliki.  That's why the farce of letting sections of Anbar -- a highly populated and Sunni dominated province -- vote went over so well with hypocrites such as US President Barack Obama.


    UNAMI issued the following today (yes, today -- they wrongly put "19 April" on it):

    SRSG Welcomes the Announcement of the Preliminary Results of the Parliamentary Elections, Calls for Complaints to be Resolved through Legal Channels         

    Baghdad, 19 April – The Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG), Mr. Nickolay Mladenov, welcomed the announcement by the Independent High Electoral Commission of the preliminary results of the Council of Representatives elections held on 30 April 2014.


    “As the people of Iraq have now spoken, I call upon all elected representatives to work together for the future of Iraq”, he said.
    He reiterated his appreciation of the work done by the Independent High Electoral Commission and recalled that all potential complaints and disputes should be addressed through the established legal mechanisms in a fair and transparent manner and without undue political pressure. 
    Mr. Mladenov reaffirmed the United Nations’ readiness to continue working closely with the newly elected Members of Parliament in pursuing the necessary reforms aimed at further enhancing the democratic process and addressing the country’s priorities.



    Ban Ki-moon is the United Nations Secretary-General.  His office issued the following:


    The Secretary-General welcomes the announcement of the preliminary results of the Council of Representatives election in Iraq of 30 April 2014. He looks forward to the certification of the final results after all procedures have been completed, including the adjudication of possible appeals. The Secretary-General urges all political parties to engage constructively and in a timely manner in the process of government formation.
    The Secretary-General is concerned about the security situation in Anbar province and urges the government of Iraq to ensure that military operations against terrorism are conducted in accordance with Iraq’s international and constitutional human rights obligations.

    The Secretary-General condemns the deliberate flooding of the Abu Ghraib area and urges all sides to refrain from actions that result in displacement of populations or cause environmental disasters. He reiterates his appeal regarding the need to address the humanitarian needs of the hundreds of thousands of people affected by the ongoing fighting in Anbar Province.


    Press liars are hailing Nouri as a winner.  This wasn't a win.  He stated his plan for an I-rule-alone government and not a power-sharing one.  By that goal, he lost.  He didn't get the votes necessary for that.  He doesn't even have enough MPs currently to be named prime minister-designate.

    He barely improved on his 2010 standing -- despite all the fraud, the refusal to let some areas vote, the refusal on April 30th to open the polls in areas where he was expected to perform poorly -- instead his military sent people away.  And the polls there remained closed for half a day, only opening after noon.

    He rigged the elections and he still came up short.  And that's not even factoring in that the results could change.  Or that one outlet says he got 92 seats in Parliament, another says 93 and another says 94 -- great job, 'Independent' High Electoral Commission in announcing the votes.

    The custom now is to form a group -- the Constitution was tossed aside long ago -- so now the move will be to try to form groupings and blocs.  The one with the most seats in Parliament is supposed to have a member named prime minister-designate and then that person has 30 days to form a Cabinet.  That means nominating people and getting Parliament to vote for them.

    Press liars love to lie for Nouri.  So when he fails to form a Cabinet, they lie and say the Constitution says nothing about a full Cabinet.  That's because it's obvious to any fool -- even those with press passes.  You move from prime minister-designate to prime minister solely by forming a Cabinet.  This is the sole test.  If you can do that, you're up to the leadership aspect.

    If you can't do that, the President of Iraq names another person prime minister-designate.

    A partial Cabinet is not meeting the requirement.

    But that's the Constitution and the reality is that the United States picks Iraq's prime minister.

    That's not written into the Iraqi Constitution.

    But it's what they did in 2006 when the Bully Boy Bush administration refused to allow the Parliament to name Ibrahim al-Jafaari prime minister.  BBB insisted on Nouri al-Maliki.

    In 2010, there was no way to give Nouri a second term.  Not constitutionally.

    So Barack Obama's administration came up with a legal contract, The Erbil Agreement, to give Nouri a second term.

    Barack spit on democracy and pissed on the Iraqi people with that one.

    Despite voting in March 2010, the determination of who would be prime minister would come via a backroom contract -- brokered by the US -- that would give Nouri a second term.

    It condemned Iraq.  Not just because it put Nouri in charge but also because Barack broke his word.  After his envoys insisted the contract had the full support and weight of the US government behind it (and Barack made that  promise to Ayad Allawi over the phone -- personally made it), the White House looked the other way as Nouri refused to honor his promises in the contract.

    The contract didn't just say, "Nouri gets a second term as prime minister."

    To get that, Nouri had to make promises to the various political blocs.  And he used the contract to get a second term and then refused to honor it, has his attorney declare it was illegal and the US government, Barack Obama, stabbed the Kurds in the back, stabbed Iraqiya in the back, stabbed the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq in the back, stabbed Iraqi Christians in the back . . .

    You only believe Barack keeps his word if you're a partisan whore.

    And it's disgusting to see those people lie about all the great things Barack's done in Iraq.

    He's destroyed the country.

    Not by pulling out.  (All US forces never left.)  But by backing a known thug who was known to run secret prison and torture chambers.  That's who Barack hopped into bed with in 2010.  Shame on him.

    All of Iraq's current political crises stem from The Erbil Agreement and Nouri's refusal to honor the legal promises he made in that contract.

    So maybe it's a good thing Jen Psaki didn't even mention Iraq in today's US State Dept press briefing.

    But it's also difficult to talk about because the process has never been what it outlined in the Iraqi Constitution.

    And few want to get honest about that.

    A lot of hypocritical Americans want to point their fingers at the Iranian government and its influence on the proceedings but they're hypocrites and useless because they refuse to hold the US government accountable -- something which, by the way, is the expectation of citizenship in a democracy: Holding your own government accountable.

    But there is little accountability for what this administration has done to Iraq.

    Senator Robert Menendez was right to refuse to arm Nouri last year.  But the White House pressured and pressured and Menendez caved.

    And now Nouri uses those weapons to terrorize the Iraqi people.

    And why the hell would that be a surprise?

    His first term was most noted for his running secret prisons and torture chambers.

    Why would anyone be surprised that, given weapons, he would use them to attack the same Sunni population he was falsely imprisoning and torturing?

    It's not a surprise at all.

    The latest victims of Nouri's War Crimes?

    National Iraqi News Agency reports 4 civilians were killed and five more injured from Nouri's bombing of Falluja's residential neighborhoods.

    Those tolls aren't stagnant.  Every day they inch up a little more.  And while 10 or less of both the White House was willing to live with, this has now dragged on for over five months -- Nouri's assault on Anbar -- and the numbers have climbed with it which is why US Vice President Joe Biden raised the issue with Nouri on Friday.

    Raising the issue doesn't wipe away the US government's complicity and participation in Nouri's ongoing War Crimes.  They are a partner in those War Crimes.  They continue to arm Nouri.  The US government is in violation of international law, of numerous treaties the US government has signed on to and in violation of the Leahy Amednment which prohibits pretty much all the actions the US government is currently engaged in with Nouri's government.  Prohibited actions include, but are not limited to, the training (in Jordan) that the US military is currently providing to Iraqi forces, the brigade of Special Ops who are providing intel and training to Iraqi forces (providing this from inside Iraq), the weapons the US government is sending Nouri and the drone information the CIA is providing Nouri with.

    With Nouri killing civilians, those 'cooperations' and much more are outlawed by the Leahy Amendment.  By international law and the treaties the US government has signed off on, those 'cooperations' are aiding and abetting Nouri in War Crimes -- meaning the US government is legally a co-conspirator in the act of War Crimes within Iraq today.

    Majeed Nizamaddin Gly (Rudaw) notes the ongoing assault on Anbar and offers:


    Iraq has two choices: Keep fighting the Sunni insurgents in Anbar and hope it will not further edge the country toward a full-scale civil war; or respond to the Sunni grievances by allowing Sunnis self-rule and greater autonomy in the majority-Sunni province. Anbar is Iraq’s largest province, and a base for the largest insurgency movement since the withdrawal of US forces in 2011. 
     Iraqi government forces are already losing control over the Sunni areas, and the Shiite-led government forces are not likely to regain command anytime soon. So why not make it official and recognize the Sunni populated provinces as autonomous regions? 

    That's not the only advocating today for  autonomy in Iraq's provinces.  The Kurdistan Regional Government is a semi-autonomous region made up of three provinces (according to Baghdad's central government but the KRG split one province up into two).  Daily Sabah reports:

    A top Iraqi Kurdish lawmaker has urged the newly elected parliament to change the constitution to pave the way for the creation of an Iraq confederation.
    "The House of Representatives needs to amend the constitution to allow a confederation because it is the ideal solution for Iraq's problems," Deputy Parliament Speaker Aref Tayfour said in a statement on Sunday.
    "This [demand] is the right of the Kurdish people who have suffered for decades under successive totalitarian regimes," he added.


    The move is one then-Senator Joe Biden advocated for up until early 2008.

    Prior to the release of the voting results, Rudaw noted:

    Iraq’s political groups appear headed for a showdown over whether Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki should stay for a third term, following the April 30 polls that his Shiite-led State of Law bloc says it swept.
    In order to stay in his post, Maliki needs the support of the country’s powerful Sunnis and Kurds, as well as fellow Shiites that his party has alienated with its policies. But none appears ready to offer such support.
    The Sunni al-Watania bloc said on Sunday it would not allow Maliki to stay in for a third term, the powerful Shiite Sadrist bloc said it was also opposed and the autonomous Kurds, who tried to engineer an unsuccessful “no confidence” bid against Maliki during his second term, have no love lost for the premier.
    Iyad Allawi, head of the al-Watania bloc, said that a large part of the problems in Iraq could be resolved by replacing Maliki. Allawi said that Maliki staying in power was a “red line” for his bloc, which is not ready to allow it.


    Notice how few outlets will note the above in their rush to declare a third term for Nouri a 'done deal.'  It may very well be a done deal but, if it is that, it's due to the fact that the US government is yet again insisting on Nouri for prime minister.  Abdul Rahhan al-Rashed (Arab News) offers this evaluation of Nouri's leadership, "Of course, the multitude of political powers, no matter how small they are, reflect the sorry state of Iraqi politics. The administration of Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki is to be blamed for the current situation. Although he stayed in power for eight years, he failed to help Iraqis reach reconciliation, particularly after the US pulled its troops out of Iraq. Instead of joining the Iraqis in broader and larger forces, it exercised the policy of exclusion and marginalization."  Duraid Adnan and Tim Arango (New York Times) offer a lengthy look at the results and note:


    It was the United States government that gave crucial support to Mr. Maliki when he became prime minister in 2006, and again, though with greater reluctance, in 2010. Now, though, many argue that Mr. Maliki has divided the country, pursuing policies like the mass arrest of Sunnis in the name of fighting terrorism, that have heightened the country’s sectarian divisions and brought the country to the brink of another civil war.


    The violence never ends in Nouri's Iraq.  National Iraqi News Agency reports a Baghdad sticky bombing left 1 police member dead, a Ghazalliya bombing left five people injured, an Alsajlah bombing killed 4 people, an Ibn al-Atheer roadside bombing left three police members injured, an al-Rashidiya home invasion left 1 Lieutenant pilot officer dead, 2 Mosul roadside bombings left two Iraqi soldiers injured, and 5 corpses were discovered in Baghdad,



    In other US government failures,  AFP reports, "Iran's judiciary chief Ayatollah Sadeq Larijani has called on his Iraqi counterpart to extradite exiled Iranian opposition members so that they could stand a "fair trial" in Tehran, media reported Sunday."  The exiled opposition refers to the Ashraf community.


    As of September, Camp Ashraf in Iraq is empty.  All remaining members of the community have been moved to Camp Hurriya (also known as Camp Liberty).  Camp Ashraf housed a group of Iranian dissidents who were  welcomed to Iraq by Saddam Hussein in 1986 and he gave them Camp Ashraf and six other parcels that they could utilize. In 2003, the US invaded Iraq.The US government had the US military lead negotiations with the residents of Camp Ashraf. The US government wanted the residents to disarm and the US promised protections to the point that US actions turned the residents of Camp Ashraf into protected person under the Geneva Conventions. This is key and demands the US defend the Ashraf community in Iraq from attacks.  The Bully Boy Bush administration grasped that -- they were ignorant of every other law on the books but they grasped that one.  As 2008 drew to a close, the Bush administration was given assurances from the Iraqi government that they would protect the residents. Yet Nouri al-Maliki ordered the camp repeatedly attacked after Barack Obama was sworn in as US President. July 28, 2009 Nouri launched an attack (while then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was on the ground in Iraq). In a report released this summer entitled "Iraqi government must respect and protect rights of Camp Ashraf residents," Amnesty International described this assault, "Barely a month later, on 28-29 July 2009, Iraqi security forces stormed into the camp; at least nine residents were killed and many more were injured. Thirty-six residents who were detained were allegedly tortured and beaten. They were eventually released on 7 October 2009; by then they were in poor health after going on hunger strike." April 8, 2011, Nouri again ordered an assault on Camp Ashraf (then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was again on the ground in Iraq when the assault took place). Amnesty International described the assault this way, "Earlier this year, on 8 April, Iraqi troops took up positions within the camp using excessive, including lethal, force against residents who tried to resist them. Troops used live ammunition and by the end of the operation some 36 residents, including eight women, were dead and more than 300 others had been wounded. Following international and other protests, the Iraqi government announced that it had appointed a committee to investigate the attack and the killings; however, as on other occasions when the government has announced investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations by its forces, the authorities have yet to disclose the outcome, prompting questions whether any investigation was, in fact, carried out."  Those weren't the last attacks.  They were the last attacks while the residents were labeled as terrorists by the US State Dept.  (September 28, 2012, the designation was changed.)   In spite of this labeling, Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) observed that "since 2004, the United States has considered the residents of Camp Ashraf 'noncombatants' and 'protected persons' under the Geneva Conventions."  So the US has an obligation to protect the residents.  3,300 are no longer at Camp Ashraf.  They have moved to Camp Hurriyah for the most part.  A tiny number has received asylum in other countries. Approximately 100 were still at Camp Ashraf when it was attacked Sunday.   That was the second attack this year alone.   February 9, 2013, the Ashraf residents were again attacked, this time the ones who had been relocated to Camp Hurriyah.  Trend News Agency counted 10 dead and over one hundred injured.  Prensa Latina reported, " A rain of self-propelled Katyusha missiles hit a provisional camp of Iraqi opposition Mujahedin-e Khalk, an organization Tehran calls terrorists, causing seven fatalities plus 50 wounded, according to an Iraqi official release."  They were attacked again September 1, 2013.   Adam Schreck (AP) reported that the United Nations was able to confirm the deaths of 52 Ashraf residents.  In addition, 7 Ashraf residents were taken in the assault.  Last November, in response to questions from US House Rep Sheila Jackson Lee, the  State Dept's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Brett McGurk, stated, "The seven are not in Iraq."  McGurk's sworn testimony wasn't taken seriously.  Once a liar and a cheater . . .

    The US government refuses to honor its legal obligation to protect the Ashraf community and Jonathan Winer, the person appointed to oversee resettlement  of the Ashraf community to places outside of Iraq, is either unable or unwilling to do the job.  While the foot dragging continues, the Ashraf community is at risk.  Maybe even more so when Nouri wants Iran to back him for a third term as prime minister?