Thursday, December 17, 2025. They're going after Jasmine now -- not
the GOP, the fake-asses who pretend to be Democrats, the first to jump
from the sinking ship of the USS CHUMP FAILURE emerges, Pam Bondi's
going after transgender people and those who support them, and much
more.
Lets start with Jasmine Crockett.
Some
people are not going to be highlighted for their YOUTUBE programs. I'm
not in the mood to watch you White assholes attack another Black woman
the way you did Kamala. Are you 'progressives' just wanting for
everyone to see you as the racists you truly are?
I'm
not in the damn mood. I do know Texas voters. Not only do we have a
huge amount of community members in Texas, I speak there regularly and
not just starting this year. So screw you if you're trying to argue
Jasmine can't win or that "We need Jasmine in the House."
When
Democrats in Congress were shaking in their boots at the start of this
year, Jasmine pushed back. Jasmine gave the others courage to speak
out.
Women in Texas will -- and have --
crossed party lines. They'll do it for a workhorse -- Ann Richards or
Annette Straus to name but two. They won't do it for a Barbie doll not
even if she's called Abortion Barbie. But for a woman they see working,
that they see taking the powerful on? They'll cross the party line.
Brian Tyler Cohen? We don't need you in this community and a lot of the rest of you can find that out as well.
And
you're racist and you're sexist if you're saying, "We need her in the
House.' WTF you piece of trash BTC viewer. Truth be told, Texas needs
White boy to keep his ass in the state legislature so that maybe Texas
Democrats can really fight back for a change.
And he's done nothing but be White. That's why you love him. He's White and he's got a cock.
And that trumps all the leadership Jasmine's shown -- to you racists and sexists at least.
We will be pruning from the list of people we used to highlight YOUTUBE videos from
I'm not going along with the trashing of Jasmine.
Shame on those who do and who take part in it.
It's
amazing that these racists-sexists -- they're both -- think they can
tell a Black woman "Now is not your time" to clear the field for a
woefully unqualified White man.
You already
did that by treating Gaza as the most important issue in the US. It
isn't. It wasn't. It ain't never going to be.
What was it? The first real opportunity to build consensus and push for change.
But
Gaza Freaks destroyed that. They attacked Kamala with lies. They
supported the White man -- because the majority of them were White --
that includes Rashida -- Arab is considered White you racist and
uneducated bigots. And Chump's continued that war and did you miss his
non-stop praise this week? He conflates Jewish with Israel. And, no,
they aren't the same thing. One is a religion and one is a
nation-state. But he's the one you supported, the one too stupid in
2023 (or since) to get what so many others finally grasped -- Jewish and
Israel are not the same thing, many Jews around the world disapprove of
Netanyahu's actions. And we were building on that, those of us who
truly care about the Palestinians, we saw it was the moment, we knew the
history and knew this was the time.. But Gaza Freaks (Socialists in
closets who lie about everything including pretending to be Democrats)
you had to f**k everything up and give it to Chump and now you same Gaza
Freaks are too damn scared to protest him and call him out. You're too
damn scared to fight for the Palestinian people. You brought this on
the Palestinians and it's your fault and that includes Palestinian
Americans who attacked Kamala.
And you Gaza
Freaks didn't just attack Kamala, you attacked Black people in the US.
It's the detail that Sam Seder forever 'forgets' in his never ending
'analysis.'
"Keep Palestinians names out of
your mouth!" Fine. You're on your own now. And we see you do what?
Not a damn thing. Because you honestly didn't do that much to begin
with
Grifter Jill Stein was never a choice.
The election was between Kamala and Chump. And Kamala wasn't good
enough for you. We would have had a different policy under Kamala. And
we could have protested during a Kamala presidency.
But a bunch of cheap, racists- sexists idiots put Chump back in the White House.
Do you know how many Palestinians have died since Chump was inaugurated?
No, you don't. You don't know much of anything.
You just cower.
And whine.
And then attack Chuck Schumer for that sort of behavior this year -- as though you're not doing the same.
Jasmine stood up and spoke out and is a leader.
I'm
not going to let you rip her apart as you advance a White man because
-- with no polling to back you up -- you think it's an easy win for him.
Really?
You think the rumors that the GOP spreads -- takes to the parking lots
of Trade Day Weekend (a huge, monthly giant swap meet in Canton, Texas)
aren't going to touch your wonder boy. Do you not know the rumor mill
the GOP runs in Texas? Or how Ken Paxton stays in the race after
cheating on his wife? Because people can relate to that -- mainly due
to John Cornyn being too chicken to really go after Ken and send him
packing from the GOP primary.
Cornyn's allowed Paxton to set the terms.
And people an relate to marital problems.
Many
people in Texas will not relate to a 36-year-old unmarried male, never
married male. Whose most recent statement further created problems as
he claimed that his work had been his focus.
That's not a message most people are going to relate to.
It's
cute to watch your 'progressives' (Socialists) who attacked Chuck
Schumer in the early part of this year because you're now doing
basically what you accused Chuck of: doing the easy thing and not
fighting back.
And you better be worried right
now. Because the Black community -- having already seen the attacks on
Kamala -- are not going to rush to the polls to support a party that hid
behind Jasmine for basically the whole year -- they did, that's others
in Congress, that's Democrat rank-in-file -- and let her be out there
alone and now wants to act as though all she did this year didn't count?
A
number of us walked away. A number are still on vacation and may not
come back in time for the mid-terms. You screw Jasmine over and you are
playing with fire. I respect those who went on vacation but you screw
over Jasmine and I no longer have any solid reason to make the case for
voting Democrat -- especially when speaking to Black audiences -- you
know, the people the bulk of YOUTUBERS can't get to watch your White
White videos. We'll circle the wagons on this because enough is
enough. Kamala was attacked repeatedly. Black people? We were
attacked for supporting her. I'm not talking about Chump or the GOP.
I'm talking about Socialists posing as Democrats were attacking us. We
weren't allowed a minute of pride for the moment, for Kamala's historic
campaign. And you think you can get away with this again with regards
to Jasmine? You think you can attack her and, worse, you think you're
so cleaver we won't understand what's going on.
You
insult her with statements about how she's needed in the House and
should drop out. You think we don't see you trashing a Black woman when
you do that. Jasmine's in Congress. James isn't. James is a lowly
state legislator with no real power and no real image other than the
crafted b.s. that his enablers have pimped. And I didn't say a word
about that prior to today. Not one word.
But now there's online army going after Jasmine.
Look
around, we're largely avoiding your No Kings protests. (I have
participated and will continue to do so.) We're avoiding your mass
actions because we know you're hiding behind us. We're the ones who'll
be the first to be attacked at any protest. Because of skin color. And
elected Democrats who are White largely hid behind Jasmine and lets her
take the attacks.
You don't understand how we see
it. And that's because you don't want to. What we saw and continue to
see? It's out in public. I'm sorry that you're Sam Seder won't cover
it. It's been covered in the Black blogosphere. So if at this late
date, you don't know about it, it's honestly because you don't want to
know about it.
Here's Roland Martin talking about what's going on.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
Murray, lawmakers:
“We urge you to promptly review these concerns and take immediate steps
to improve conditions and practices at NWIPC… Violations of the law or
any abuse of human rights will not go unnoticed or unchallenged.”
ICYMI:
Senator Murray Condemns Egregious Use of Force by ICE as Constituent is
Mauled by Attack Dog, Demands Release from NWIPC to Receive Appropriate
Medical Care
KUOW: Inside the black box of ICE detention in Tacoma, she watched her wedding day come and go
Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, led Members
of the Washington state Congressional delegation in a letter
to Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Todd Lyons, expressing grave concerns with conditions at the Northwest
ICE Processing Center (NWIPC) in Tacoma, Washington and demanding
answers to a long list of questions regarding overcrowding and lack of
access to medical services, food, and legal counsel for individuals
detained at the facility. The population at NWIPC has ballooned over the
past year under the Trump administration’s indiscriminate and cruel
mass deportation campaign, nearing—and at times exceeding—the facility’s
maximum capacity of 1,575.
Joining Senator Murray in sending the letter to ICE were: Senator
Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and U.S. Representatives Suzan DelBene (D, WA-01),
Rick Larsen (D, WA-02), Emily Randall (D, WA-06), Pramila Jayapal (D,
WA-07), Kim Schrier (D, WA-08), Adam Smith (D, WA-09), and Marilyn
Strickland (D, WA-10).
“Our offices have received reports from local service
providers and advocates that conditions and access to services at NWIPC
have deteriorated in the last year as Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) has chosen to detain more individuals at the
facility,” the Members wrote in their letter. “In June,
detained individuals were reportedly transferred to Alaska—far away
from their families and legal representatives—because NWIPC reached
capacity. None of this is remotely acceptable—you and the entire Trump
administration have a basic moral and legal obligation to the people who
have been detained and are under your care.”
“It is well established at this point that this
administration is not prioritizing detaining violent criminals, but
instead is detaining mostly peaceful, law-abiding immigrants with no
criminal record who work hard and contribute to our communities,” the lawmakers continued.
“With this in mind, we urge ICE to release noncitizens who do not pose a
threat to public safety and to ensure necessary staff levels at NWIPC
to protect the safety and basic dignity of the people in its custody.”
In the letter, the Members raise concern over the lack of medical
care for individuals detained at NWIPC and other ICE facilities,
writing: “We are deeply concerned that the facility does not
have sufficient medical staff and dedicated space to adequately provide
medical care to the increased number of detained noncitizens.
Additionally, we are incredibly concerned about challenges detainees
face in accessing behavioral health care and other specialty care.”
Recently, Senator Murray called attention to the violent assault
of Wilmer Toledo-Martinez in Vancouver, Washington—condemning the
officers who sicced an attack dog on Wilmer, despite him not resisting
arrest, and calling for Wilmer to be immediately released from ICE
custody. Wilmer is currently being held at NWIPC, where he has been unable to obtain
adequate medical care. In a visit to NWIPC by Senator Murray’s staff in
August, facility staff indicated that NWIPC only employed four
behavioral health staffers for a population of approximately 1,500
detainees. There were reports of at least two suicide attempts at NWIPC
in April. In July 2024, after the death of a man detained at NWIPC,
Senator Murray requested
a comprehensive review of the quality and accessibility of medical
services for individuals in ICE custody from the Government
Accountability Office (GAO)—that review is currently underway.
The lawmakers’ letter also draws attention to reports from advocates
that at least three pregnant women detained at NWIPC over the past year
have been unable to receive appropriate medical care. Advocates also
shared that at least one pregnant woman was shackled during
transportation, which violates agency policy and raises concerns that
medical information, such as whether a woman is pregnant, is not being
properly documented by the facility. Senator Murray has longfought against the mistreatment of pregnant women in detention, including by pushing for her legislation—the Stop Shackling and Detaining Pregnant Women Act—to end the practice of shackling pregnant women in ICE detention. Murray also led an oversight letter
to ICE in September demanding answers and accountability about the
mistreatment of pregnant women in detention facilities under the Trump
administration.
The Members continued by raising concerns over the inadequate provision of meals at NWIPC and difficulty that detained individuals have in accessing legal counsel, writing: “Attorneys
have faced significant delays to meet with their clients, making
adequate legal counsel more difficult. This has become especially
challenging when immigration courts advance noncitizens’ hearings by
months without sufficient warning. At times, attorneys have had to wait
at the facility for up to 6 hours to see their clients.”
The letter concludes by requesting answers to a list of questions by January 16th
regarding capacity and staffing levels at NWIPC, the provision of food
and medical care, access to legal counsel, treatment of pregnant women,
and recent facility visits. “Please understand that we are paying close
attention to the conditions at NWIPC—and your management of this
facility,” the Members wrote.
“We urge you to promptly review these concerns and take immediate steps
to improve conditions and practices at NWIPC to comply with existing
standards and laws and ensure that people in immigration detention are
being treated with basic dignity and respect. Violations of the law or
any abuse of human rights will not go unnoticed or unchallenged.”
Senator Murray and other members of Washington state’s Congressional
delegation have been conducting oversight of NWIPC throughout this year,
despite the Trump administration’s efforts
to block Congressional oversight of federal immigration detention
facilities. After a protracted legal battle over Washington state’s
ability to enforce health and safety standards at NWIPC, a federal
appeals court ruled
in August that the state should be allowed to enforce such standards at
the detention center, and that failure to comply could result in fines
of up to $10,000 per violation.
Senator Murray has championed comprehensive
and humane immigration reform throughout her time in Congress, and has
consistently pushed for greater oversight of conditions at NWIPC. In
2024 at a Senate Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee hearing,
Murray asked then-DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to commit to an independent investigation
of conditions at NWIPC and pressed him on the overuse of solitary
confinement at ICE detention facilities—which Senator Murray has
consistently spokenout against. While Chair of Appropriations, Senator Murray secured language in the Homeland Security Appropriations bill for
fiscal year 2024—which was signed into law in March 2024—to ensure
stronger oversight of federal detention facilities and provisions to
increase transparency. Senator Murray is also an original cosponsor of
the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, which would set humane standards for detention facilities and increase oversight. Murray was outspoken in her opposition to the Laken Riley Act
earlier this year, arguing it threatened civil liberties and would
divert resources away from detaining true threats to public safety.
The lawmakers’ full letter to ICE is available HERE and below:
None of this is remotely acceptable—you and the entire Trump
administration have a basic moral and legal obligation to the people who
have been detained and are under your care.
You must ensure the
facility complies with the 2011 Performance-Based National Detention
Standards as revised in 2016 (PBNDS 2011) to keep detained noncitizens
safe and healthy while protecting the rights they are entitled to under
law.
It is well established at this point that this
administration is not prioritizing detaining violent criminals, but
instead is detaining mostly peaceful, law-abiding immigrants with no
criminal record who work hard and contribute to our communities. With
this in mind, we urge ICE to release noncitizens who do not pose a
threat to public safety and to ensure necessary staff levels at NWIPC to
protect the safety and basic dignity of the people in its custody.
Medical Care
The federal government has a moral and legal obligation to protect
the health of individuals in its custody. We have had long-standing
concerns about access to medical services in ICE detention facilities.
In recent years, several members of the Washington Congressional
delegation requested that the Government Accountability Office (GAO)
conduct a comprehensive review of the quality and accessibility of
medical services for individuals in ICE custody. At times this year,
NWIPC has exceeded 1,500 individuals in custody, nearing the facility’s
maximum capacity of 1,575 individuals. We are deeply concerned that the
facility does not have sufficient medical staff and dedicated space to
adequately provide medical care to the increased number of detained
noncitizens.
Additionally, we are incredibly concerned about challenges detainees
face in accessing behavioral health care and other specialty care.
During an August 2025 site visit, facility staff indicated the facility
employed only four behavioral health staffers. There were reports of at
least two suicide attempts at NWIPC in April. It is plainly inadequate
to have four behavioral health staff serving the 1,500 detainees under
the facility’s care, especially given the fact that serious behavioral
health issues frequently emerge under the severe stress of detention. We
are also alarmed by reports from advocates with access to the facility
that at least three detained pregnant women at NWIPC have been unable to
receive appropriate medical care, even after they request specialty
prenatal care appointments. Regular exams such as ultrasounds are
necessary to monitor development and ensure a healthy pregnancy.
Advocates also shared that at least one pregnant woman was shackled
during transportation, which violates agency policy and raises concerns
that medical information, such as whether a woman is pregnant, is not
being properly documented by the facility.
Food
The Seattle Times recently reported on the inadequate
provision of meals at NWIPC as the detained population has increased.
Advocates who speak with detainees have shared that meals are provided
late and, in some cases, detainees did not receive three meals per day.
Detainees have made complaints about food and sanitation for many years,
and we urge the facility to be responsive to the nutritional needs of
individuals in its custody. Legal service providers with access to the
facility have also shared that detainees waiting for video
teleconferencing (VTC) hearings may miss meals. We urge the facility to
ensure that all detained noncitizens, including those awaiting hearings
or visits, are provided a minimum of three meals per day, as required by
national detention standards (PBNDS 2011).
Access to Legal Counsel
Access to legal resources for noncitizens in immigration detention
supports their ability to understand their rights and navigate
immigration court, preventing backlogs in the immigration court system.
Detained noncitizens at NWIPC face several concerning barriers to
accessing legal counsel. Attorneys have faced significant delays to meet
with their clients, making adequate legal counsel more difficult. This
has become especially challenging when immigration courts advance
noncitizens’ hearings by months without sufficient warning. At times,
attorneys have had to wait at the facility for up to 6 hours to see
their clients. This August, two of the seven attorney visitation rooms
were being used as Virtual Attorney Visitation rooms (VAVs) and two were
being used for video teleconferencing (VTC) hearings, leaving only
three rooms available for attorneys to meet with their clients in
person. We have also heard from advocates with access to the facility
that, at times, only one visitation room was available and interviews
for facility staff were being conducted in these attorney visitation
rooms.
In the Fiscal Year 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act, Congress
provided $10,000,000 for ICE to improve legal resources for noncitizen
detainees, including to expand video attorney visitation. During an
August 2025 site visit, NWIPC staff indicated that the facility recently
implemented a new scheduling system to reserve attorney visitation
rooms. We ask that the facility work with attorneys to resolve any
issues that arise with the new system expeditiously so as not to delay
access to legal counsel. We urge you to improve access to legal counsel
by ensuring attorney visitation rooms remain available for attorneys to
meet with their clients.
Given these concerns, we request answers to the following questions by January 16, 2026:
What is the maximum capacity of NWIPC, as determined by the fire
marshal? As of November 1, 2025, how many individuals were detained at
the facility?
How many staff were employed by NWIPC on January 20, 2025? Of this
cohort, how many were trained and certified medical services providers
who routinely provided direct medical services?
As of November 1, 2025, how many staff were employed by NWIPC? Of
this cohort, how many were trained and certified medical services
providers who routinely provide direct medical services?
As of November 1, 2025, how many pregnant women were detained at
NWIPC? How often have these women requested, and how often have they
received, prenatal care appointments with a specialist?
How many days in the last six months has the facility not provided three meals each day to every noncitizen in its custody?
Why did the facility not provide three meals each day to every noncitizen?
For each day, for how many noncitizens were three meals not provided?
What is the current status of the Legal Orientation Program (LOP) at
NWIPC? Are noncitizens able to access LOP daily? What are the hours of
availability each day? Outside of hours, are there any other
restrictions on daily LOP access, and if so, what are they and why are
they in place?
How many attorney visitation rooms are currently available for
in-person attorney meetings? How many attorney visitation rooms are
currently available for virtual attorney meetings?
In the last six months, have the attorney visitation rooms been used
for a purpose other than attorney-client meetings (in-person or
virtual) or video teleconferencing (VTC) hearings?
When were the most recent facility visits by the Department of
Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office of Inspector General, DHS Office of the
Immigration Detention Ombudsman (OIDO), the DHS Office for Civil Rights
and Civil Liberties, and ICE oversight personnel (whether the Office of
Professional Responsibility or otherwise)? What, if any,
recommendations were made after each visit? What progress has been made
to implement such recommendations?
OIDO issued a report in November 2024 following an inspection of
NWIPC. While 11 of the recommendations have been addressed, one remains
outstanding. What progress has been made on implementing the remaining
recommendation?
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please understand that we are paying close attention to the conditions at NWIPC—and your management of this facility.
We
urge you to promptly review these concerns and take immediate steps to
improve conditions and practices at NWIPC to comply with existing
standards and laws and ensure that people in immigration detention are
being treated with basic dignity and respect.
Violations of the law or any abuse of human rights will not go unnoticed or unchallenged.
Donald Trump delivered an update on the cost of building his much-hyped White House ballroom on Wednesday.
The
venue, which the president controversially razed the East Wing to make
way for, will now cost $400 million, he revealed during his speech at a
White House Hanukkah reception.
Previously, Trump had talked about the construction project price being $250 million, and then $300 million.
“We’re donating a $400 million ballroom,” Trump said, adding another $100 million to the cost.
He continued:
“Myself
and donors are giving them, free of charge, for nothing, we’re donating
a building that’s approximately 400 millions, I think I’ll do it for
less, but it’s 400. I should do it for less. I will do it for less. But
just in case, I say 400. Otherwise if I go $3 over the press will say,
‘It cost more.’ I build under budget and ahead of schedule … always. I
know how to build under budget. I build good.”
“It’ll
be the most beautiful ballroom,” Trump added. “And it’ll handle
inaugurations. It’s got 5-inch-thick glass windows. It’s impenetrable by
anything but a howitzer. It’s impenetrable. But I will say, if I’m up
making a speech one day and I hear, ‘Ding, ding, ding,’ I’m out of
there.”
Some comments on the article:
DEFEATTHEGREED1
36 minutes ago
I've
been in the building industry for 56 years; I started doing stock work
at 15yrs old. I eventually went to sales and purchasing then worked in
the field in residential and commercial construction. A bad knee and
shoulder drove me back to sales.
Let me tell you this NO ONE makes a 25% error on the cost of the job unless they are completely incompetent.
DEFEATTHEGREED1
35 minutes ago
And the buffoon said:
“Myself
and donors are giving them, free of charge, for nothing, we’re donating
a building that’s approximately 400 millions, I think I’ll do it for
less, but it’s 400. I should do it for less. I will do it for less. But
just in case, I say 400. Otherwise if I go $3 over the press will say,
‘It cost more.’ I build under budget and ahead of schedule … always. I
know how to build under budget. I build good.”
Spoken like a 10 yr old. Incompetent.
sue stigura
4 hours ago
The
orange toddler never donates to any project or charity effort. He is a
total grifter and a miser with his own money but literally spends the
taxpayer money to the tune of 30 million plus on his golf trips and
sporting event adventures.
Arnold Blumbergs
3 hours ago
Now
the GD ballroom will be twice the size of the WH. Started out to hold
500, then 750, then 1,000 now probably 3,000. He has a preoccupation
with size.
Wednesday, December 17, 2025. Crazy Eyes Susie Wiles is all over
the media as Chump continues to destroy the economy and continues his
war on immigrants.
We noted the Susie Wiles VANITY FAIR interview in yesterday's snapshot -- we also posted multiple videos on the topic throughout the day and this morning.
There
are a lot of e-mails about that and I'm going to make a few points and
that may be it for that interview. This is nothing new for me and when I
make these comments people often get mad. You have been warned.
Wiles remarks are news.
They deserve to be covered.
The White House response is also news and deserves to be covered.
There are no 'good guys' versus 'bad guys' here.
Chump is not a bad person!!!! Of course he is, but that's all we've got here: Bad guys.
The writer's not a good guy.
He did his job and it was news that he provided. But he wasn't a good guy.
ALL
THE PRESIDENT'S MEN and the more recent follow up with Meryl Streep
(remember when she was telling us today's WASHINGTON POST was so
wonderful?) are not films on journalism. Their glorification myths.
The most honest film or TV movie on journalism starred Valerie
Bertinelli, 1986's ROCKABYE. Valerie's child goes missing. A
journalist makes a thousand promises. In the end, the journalist is
just focused on the job.
Susie Wiles is an idiot and that's what's revealed by this matter.
I
do not get 'seduced' in interviews. I know the profession and I know
that they will suck up to you and lie. That's fine. I know that their
story is the most important to them and that it's why they get paid. I
know that entertainment coverage has impacted non-entertainment coverage
in a very bad manner but that even without its influence, journalism
would still be what it is today.
There
are reporters who do outstanding work. They are few and far between.
There are journalist who don't do outstanding work but do needed work.
They will leave out things intentionally because they know what the
heads of their outlet want and don't want. Then their are the bad
reports who just don't know what to do and will never know. Then you've
got the reporter who is going to flash it up and get attention --
whether the produced work is worthy or not -- because it's al about the
reporter's vanity.
Wiles
is an idiot. She got seduced -- kind words and sucking up convinced
her this was like a conversation with a friend. It's not. She let her
guard down and talked and talked. 11 interviews. And she said what was
reported. She's whining context. 11 interviews? Did you think this
was going to be a transcript piece? Everything you said was never going
to be printed. The most attention getting remarks would make it into
the article. You provided good copy. That's all you did and you're an
idiot for not realizing that before you agreed to it.
Yeah, the reporter tricked her!!!
I can applaud that because she's a bad person working for a bad person.
I'm not going to turn that into, "He's not an asshole."
Because he is. Chris Whipple is an asshole Here is on THE DAILY BEAST podcast.
Approximately 11 minutes in, this exchange takes place.
Joanna Coles : And yet she found the time to sit with you or talk to you for 11 interviews. What's that about?
Chris Whipple: I don't know. I-I can't read her mind. I cannot [. . .]
About 23 minutes and fifty seconds in, this exchange took place.
Joanna Coles: But I didn't really understand what she meant by that. What do you think she meant by that?
Chris Whipple: Well, listen, I can't read her mind, but look --
Joanna Coles: You keep saying that but you interviewed her 11 times. You must have an idea.
Chris Whipple: Uhm, no, I said I couldn't read Trump's mind. I don't think I said that [about Wiles] before that.
Um, yes. You did say it.
And that was so stupid.
First
off, the piece is under attack and you give an interview where you say
something on camera and then about ten minutes later you say you didn't
say that.
Do you have dementia?
Can we trust anything you say or that you've written?
His
ego betrayed him. And the arrogance with which he tells Joanna that
she's wrong. And she wasn't wrong. He looks like an idiot.
And
note what I did above. I quoted what I wanted, what I thought was
pertinent. That's what Chris did. Wiles said what she said. Context?
There's no missing context. This is what she said in the interviews to
a professional journalist and the journalist determined what to quote
by what was newsworthy.
We'll
note the VF interview from time to time (in fact, later in the snapshot
today) but we're not obsessing over it. Next topic.
Sam Sutton and Victoria Guida (POLITICO) add, "For
now, Trump administration officials say they’re optimistic that the
labor market will turn around next year once the effects of the
president’s business-friendly tax and regulatory policies kick in. The
capital investments that have helped push the U.S.’s gross domestic
product above 3 percent — a level that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
previously identified as vital to the country’s fiscal outlook — are
also expected to push up payroll growth over the next year."
Combined
with other factors, President Donald Trump’s big tariffs on Chinese
goods are costing Ohio farmers and their counterparts in other states
heavily, according to a new report.
The report shows Ohio farmers lost nearly $76 million of their exports to China this year compared to one year earlier.
Tariffs
are taxes on imports, and since the start of his second term, Trump has
imposed a shifting array of them on every country in the world — except
Russia for some reason, according to the Atlantic Council’s Tariff
Tracker.
Economists have said the
unpredictability of the measures has slowed some business investment
because decision-makers can’t plan. And surveys conducted by the Federal
Bank of Cleveland show that regional businesses are seeing higher input
costs from them and many are raising prices for their customers.
That’s not helpful as Republicans struggle to deal with a national affordability crisis.
Farmers have faced a double whammy. They’ve seen many of their costs go up because of the import taxes.
Meanwhile,
China — the country’s third-largest trading partner — stopped purchases
of American soybeans in May before resuming them last month. The
stoppage was in retaliation for the tariffs Trump imposed that now are
at 20%, according to the tariff tracker.
Higher prices are forcing Americans to cut back on holiday presents this year, a new poll has found.
A total of 41 percent of Americans plan to spend less on presents this year, CNBC reported.
That’s
a six-point jump compared to 2024 and the most significant increase
since the 2022 inflation surge, according to the new CNBC All-America
Economic Survey,
Of those who reported they would
be spending less, 46 percent said the reason was the “high cost of
goods,” a 10-percent increase from last year’s survey.
The
survey results come as almost half of Americans say the cost-of-living
crisis is the worst they’ve ever seen, with voters increasingly blaming
President Donald Trump’s policies.
Manufacturers may also have to cut production if sales don’t pick up soon, S&P said.
Tariffs
were blamed once again. S&P said businesses raised prices at one of
the fastest rates in the past three years to cover their own higher
costs. And no part of the economy was spared.
“Higher
prices are again being widely blamed on tariffs, with an initial impact
on manufacturing now increasingly spilling over to services to broaden
the affordability problem,” Williamson said.
Big
picture: It doesn’t seem like the economy will enter 2026 with a strong
dose of momentum. Companies hope the trade disputes will settle down,
but tariffs hang over the economy like the Sword of Damocles.
This
morning on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS, Ben notes the awful economy and he also
notes 'peace' poser Chump is at war right now. Illegal war. War
Crimes And that it's about oil (whcih
Sara
had been preparing for a radio interview earlier this month to promote
her plans to open an at-home child care center in Central Texas when she
learned that a new federal immigration order rendered her ineligible
for legal status.
Sara, an undocumented
Venezuelan who applied for asylum earlier this year, canceled the
interview and indefinitely put her plans on hold.
Now,
Sara, her husband and two sons follow strict rules: curtains must stay
shut and doors locked at all times. If someone knocks on the door, they
won’t answer. They don’t get together with friends unless it’s an
emergency. For trips to the grocery store, they go individually, in
shifts.
In an instant, the work — and hope —
that the family had invested toward economic stability and living
lawfully in the U.S. for nearly a decade disappeared.
“We
don’t understand this administration’s reasons for leaving us in limbo
like this,” said Sara, who asked to be identified by her first name
because she fears being targeted by immigration authorities. “I came to
contribute to this country. Why take those possibilities away and force
us to leave and put us through this trauma? It deprives you of sleep,
takes away your peace, it takes away everything, your dignity as a
person.”
Tension and energy fill the squad car as OFFICER NOLAN looks at DETECTIVE LOPEZ.
NOLAN: Ready?
Lopez nods. The two pull dark masks over their faces and throw open the doors of their squad car
EXT. TREE LINED STREET -- DAY
Nolan and Lopez run towards a 2024 blue Ford Crown Victoria.
INT. CROWN VICTORIA - DAY
MASON, 25, sits in parked car listening to music and finishing some french fries when a big thud is hear.
EXT. TREE LINED STREET - DAY
NOLAN: Roll down the window!!!
Nolan and Lopez stand beside the parked car yelling.
NOLAN: Roll down the window!
Lopez
looks at Nolan. He nods. He breaks the window with his gun, reaches
inside and grabs Mason by the t-shirt collar. Lopez reaches in and
grabs Mason by the neck, joining Nolan in pulling a scared Mason out of
the car.
MASON: What's going on! What did I do?
DETECTIVE HARPER runs over towards them as Nolan and Lopez hurl Mason to the ground.
LOPEZ: Down! Stay down!
MASON: Who are you?
NOLAN: Shut up!
Lopez begins tazing Mason while Nolan and Harper kick him.
Would you accept that scene on THE ROOKIE?
[. . .]
THE ROOKIE scenario above?
George
Retes. That's the name of the man this actually happened to. In
California. And he's not an immigrant. He's a US citizen and, in fact,
an Iraq War veteran. And when ICE began attacking him, they didn't
listen and they didn't care. Olga R. Rodriguez (AP) notes
"It
took two officers to nail my back and then one on my neck to arrest me
even though my hands were already behind my back," Retes said.
[. . .]
Retes
was taken to the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles,
where he said he was put in a special cell on suicide watch and checked
on each day after he became emotionally distraught over his ordeal and
missing his 3-year-old daughter's birthday party Saturday.
He
said federal agents never told him why he was arrested or allowed him
to contact a lawyer or his family during his three-day detention.
Authorities never let him shower or change clothes despite being covered
in tear gas and pepper spray, Retes said, adding that his hands burned
throughout the first night he spent in custody.
On Sunday, an officer had him sign a paper and walked him out of the detention center. He said he was told he faced no charges.
"They
gave me nothing I could wrap my head around," Retes said, explaining
that he was met with silence on his way out when he asked about being
"locked up for three days with no reason and no charges."
George was on CBS EVENING NEWS yesterday talking about what he endured.
Again,
this was done to an American citizen. No one should have that done to
them. This is not what we expect in the United States when it comes to
someone being taken into custody.
You
do not have the right to beat someone whose hands are behind their
back. You do not not need to be breaking windows. You do not need to
be terrorizing and you do not need to be hidden behind masks.
It is a very slippery slope. You accept it from ICE, you better believe it's going to transfer over to the police.
One
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent’s knee was on his neck,
another’s was grinding his back. Drenched with tear gas and pepper
spray, George Retes might have wished that his 137 pounds were back in
Kirkuk, Iraq, one of his Army deployments. Herewith a glimpse of your
tax dollars at work.
Born 26 years ago in Ventura, California,
where his mother was born, he enlisted after high school and calls the
Army “the best job ever,” adding, “I love the infantry.” He married a
woman he deployed with, thereby acquiring a stepson, soon a daughter,
and a reason to leave the Army: to avoid long absences from his
children.
[. . .]
The ICE men were presumably
looking for undocumented immigrants. Retes’s driver’s license, which he
says the ICE men never asked to see, identifies him as “Veteran Army.”
His license plate includes “DV”: disabled veteran. While ICE’s warriors
were trying and ultimately succeeding in smashing his driver’s-side
window (the better to pepper spray him), they apparently did not notice
his rear window’s “Iraq Combat Veteran” sticker.
Amid
a torrent of shouted and contradictory ICE men commands, and after he
asked for an agent’s badge number, he says, Retes was dragged from his
car, his wrists were zip-tied behind his back, and he was seated on the
roadside ground for four hours.
My
name is George Retes. I'm 26 years old, born and raised in Ventura,
California. I'm a U.S. citizen and an Iraq combat veteran. As of writing
this, it has been a little over 5 months since I was wrongfully
detained, stripped of my rights, and held down by officers kneeling on
my neck and back. I was thrown in jail for three days and three nights
and placed on suicide watch - without any explanation, charges, or
apology.
pick up below
Nearly two months later, I wrote an op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle
detailing my ordeal and what had happened to me. My message was simple:
if this can happen to me - a U.S. citizen and Iraq combat veteran - it
can happen to anyone. I urged people to take responsibility, to stand
together, and to make sure our rights aren't stripped away right in
front of us.
In response to my op-ed, the Department of Homeland Security posted the following statement on X (formerly Twitter):
"As
CBP and ICE agents were executing criminal search warrants on July 10
at the marijuana sites in Camarillo, CA, George Retes - a U.S. citizen -
became violent and refused to comply with law enforcement. He
challenged agents and blocked their route by refusing to move his
vehicle out of the road. CBP arrested Retes for assault.
U.S.
citizens are NOT ‘wrongfully' being arrested by ICE. DHS enforcement
operations are highly targeted and are not resulting in the arrest of
U.S. citizens. We do our due diligence.
We know who we are targeting ahead of time.
These
types of smears are designed to demonize and villainize our brave ICE
law enforcement. This kind of garbage has led to a more than 1,000%
increase in assaults on enforcement officers."
It's
statements like this - painting everyday people as if they're the
problem - that truly demonize and villainize ICE. When agents mask up
and run through towns violating people's rights, they create this image
themselves.
On Dec. 9th, 2025, I had the honor
of testifying at a shadow hearing led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a
Connecticut Democrat. I spoke not just for myself, but for every person
who believes that our constitutional rights should never be optional.
What happened to me should never happen to anyone, and the fact that it
did shows that our system is failing the very people it's meant to
protect.
We're back to Susie Wiles. Idiots
fall for flatter. We see that every day with Chump. But it's equally
true of Susie Wiles. Every word VANITY FAIR published as a quote came
out of her mouth yet she wants to pretend otherwise or insist that she
was taken out of context. She said what she said about Musk (drug
addict), Donald Chump, etc. Greta Bjornson (PEOPLE) notes:
Susie
Wiles spoke to Vanity Fair for a two-part series about Trump's first
year back in the White House, during which she addressed the
long-awaited Epstein files, which have plagued Trump, 79, during his
second term.
The Trump administration resisted
releasing all files related to the investigation of disgraced financier
Jeffrey Epstein for months before Congress passed an act in November
demanding that they publicly share as many files as possible.
Wiles, 68, reportedly said to Vanity Fair that Trump is in "the Epstein file."
"We
know he’s in the file. And he’s not in the file doing anything awful,”
she said, noting that the president “was on [Epstein’s] plane ... he’s
on the manifest."