Alien Musk. The weirdo and
creep who turned against his own child because he's just that awful.
Alien Musk. So dubbed by C.I. to note that this menace was not an
American. He's White and South African. That's where he was born and
where he was raised and where he would have stayed had apartheid not
fallen. He also was Canadian via his mother. Then he decided he wanted
to be American -- and broke some of the rules but he got away with it
because he's Anglo White. People were ignoring that and ignoring the
White South Africans orbiting Chump -- idiots like Eon Higgins.
Well C.I. doesn't need to remind that Alien's not an American now because Alien's doing that all by himself. James Carter reports:
Tesla
is facing scrutiny again over its hiring practices in the United
States. A class-action lawsuit recently filed in San Francisco alleges
that the electric car giant has been giving preferential treatment to
H-1B visa holders over American citizens in an attempt to slash labor
costs. The suit also claims that when it came time to trim the
workforce, American employees were disproportionately laid off.
The
lawsuit alleges that in 2024, Tesla brought on board about 1,355
skilled workers with H-1B visas while simultaneously cutting over 6,000
American jobs. The plaintiffs argue this amounts to discriminatory
hiring and termination practices, and they’re seeking damages on behalf
of affected U.S. citizens.
The suit shines a
spotlight on specific cases of American workers who claim they got the
short end of the stick. Scott Taub says he was told that certain
positions were reserved for H-1B visa holders, leading him to withdraw
his application. He then struck out when trying to secure interviews for
other roles. Another plaintiff, Sofia Brander, claims that despite
having worked twice as a Tesla contractor, she was unable to secure an
interview when pursuing a full-time position. Both insist they were
disadvantaged simply for being American citizens.
The lawsuit
accuses Tesla of exploiting a loophole that allows companies to pay
H-1B visa holders lower wages—a practice often referred to as wage theft
within the industry.
Refusing
to hire American workers for jobs in the US? Does it get more
unAmerican? Alien's own brother has stated publicly that he and Alien
violated the rules when they got their green cards. If people are going
to be told they can't stay in the US because they didn't do this or
they did something wrong with their paperwork or whatever? Then make it
fair and strip Alien of his citizenship -- of his US citizenship. He
can still be a citizen of South Africa and a citizen of Canada. He
doesn't need to be a citizen of the US.
And
from now on, stop giving citizenship to people who already have
citizenship in another country. If they want to renounce their, say,
French citizenship and become American citizens? Great. Otherwise, they
don't need to be US citizens.
JJ Yonce
7 hours ago
AI
said, California tax credits to Tesla. $15 million tax credit package
based on job creation. From 2009 to 2022, Tesla received an estimated
$3.2 billion in subsidies from California through various programs,
including trading environmental credits. So, did H1-B and India pay for
these incentives or taxpaying Californians.?
Tesla's
U.S. electric vehicle market share fell to 38% in August. This is the
first time the company’s share has dropped below 40% since October 2017.
This recent data comes from the Cox Automotive research firm and was
shared exclusively with Reuters.
The drop is a
sharp one from earlier in the year. Tesla's market share in June was
48.7%, dropping to 42% in July. The 4.7-point drop from July to August
was the steepest single-month decrease since Ford's Mustang Mach-E came
out in March 2021.
Tesla
has agreed to settle a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from a fatal
crash in 2019. It’s the latest case to involve Autopilot, Tesla’s
advanced driver assist system that the company claims will serve as the
foundation for its future in self-driving cars and robotics.
The
case centers around the death of 15-year-old Jovani Maldonado, who was
riding in a truck with his father in California when they were struck by
the driver of a Tesla Model 3 traveling at over 60 mph. The driver was
using Autopilot, Tesla’s driver assist system that purports to control
braking and steering on highways. According to a recording of the crash
reviewed by The New York Times, the driver did not slow down until a
fraction of a second before impact.
But there's another question. Who is going to buy his Teslas now?
Musk
has burned many a bridge since he built up the company to a world
force. Tesla was once the great green energy hope, offering an elegant
way to replace planet-warming fossil fuels with cleaner electric power.
Recall that the Obama administration extended the company a $465 million
federal loan because Teslas had made electric vehicles cool.
But
then Musk spent over a quarter-billion dollars getting Donald Trump
elected in 2024, angering his environmentalist consumers. As head of the
Department of Government Efficiency, Musk gleefully went after
environmental funding, including grants to universities and services
tied to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Overnight,
Teslas became uncool. Some Teslas were torched, showrooms attacked and
even charging stations set on fire. Embarrassed Tesla owners put
stickers on their vehicles reading things like, "I bought this before we
knew Elon was crazy."
Wednesday, September 17, 2025. Ka$h Patel disgraces himself before a
Senate committee as he whine he's doing the best he can ("But I was
doing the best I could!"), Donald Chump is greeted loudly -- if not
warmly -- in the UK, Senator Patty Murray is calling for the HHS Acting
Inspector General to review Junior Kennedy's dangerous actions at HHS,
Chump continues to wreck the economy, and much more.
That's Ben with MEIDASTOUCH NEWS setting up this morning for you.
Yesterday
the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing with the goal of
fulfilling their duty to provide oversight on the FBI. Looking hung
over and possibly strung out, tiny Ka$h Patel toddled into the hearing
in a suit that seemed to swallow his tiny body and plopped down on the
chair that left him sitting lower than anyone else in the room. What?
No one thought to bring a booster chair for Little Ka$h? There's no way
he's five feet and eight inches by the way. The diminutive FBI
Director alternated in the hearing between looking bored as he pondered
when recess started and being agitated as though he forgot to go
pee-pee before he showed up to testify.
Senator Chuck
Grassley is the Committee chair, Senator Dick Durbin is the ranking
member. It was a loud and combative hearing and when Ka$h finally left
the Dirksen Senate Office Building later that morning, there was no
juice box in the world big enough to drown his sorrows.
A
number of senators noted last week's murder in Utah and how Ka$h seemed
lost throughout. Senator Dick Durbin specifically noted, "Director
Patel again sparked mass confusion by incorrectly claiming on
social media that the shooter was in custody, which He then had to walk
back with another social media post. Mr. Patel was so anxious to take
credit for funding Mr. Kirk's assassin that he violated one of the
basics of effective law enforcement at critical stages of investigation:
shut up and let the professionals do their job." At moments like these,
Ka$h seemed to turtle and sink lower in his chair and deeper into his
too large suit jacket.
But he could neither disappear
nor disappear the fact that (a) he got it wrong, (b) the killer was on
social media talking about plans ahead of the shooting, (c) the FBI did
not capture the killer, the killer walked in and turned himself in.
Senator Peter Welch was among the Committee members raising this point.
Senator
Peter Welch: Director Patel, at one point, you made an announcement
that the suspect was in custody -- 'we got our man.' It turned out that
was not true. In fact, I think that was about 27 hours before the
person now in custody was apprehended. Why did you make that statement?
Ka$h
Patel: I appreciate you letting me address this. What the FBI does is
not just locate and find suspects. We also participate in eliminating
subjects. And what we had at the time was a subject custody in relation
to this investigation. So, in my commitment to work with the public to
help identify subjects and suspects, I put that information out. And
then when we interviewed him, I put out the results of that. And could I
have been more careful in my verbiage and included a subject instead of
subject? Sure, in the heat of the moment. But I was doing the best I
could.
Senator Peter Welch: You know, in
all candor, I don't quite get that. Because if we have our man, that
would suggest to the public that everybody can rest and relax, and not
then continue providing information to local law enforcement and to you.
So, that was a mistake.
"But I was doing the best I could."
How sad.
There
is no victory for Little Ka$h. Give him a participation trophy if you
like -- for incompetence -- but don't pretend he did his job because he
didn't and -- Republican or Democrat -- most weren't willing to play
along in the hearing for the sake Ka$h's ego.
Let's note some of the exchange between Ka$h and Senator Cory Booker.
Senator Cory Booker: Mr. Patel, I want to start off where
we left off last time. I asked you whether you had any knowledge or
discussions about removing FBI officials and installing political
personnel before you were confirmed to that position. And I wonder did
you then understand or have conversations with the White House about the
intentions to do so?
Ka$h Patel: Before I was confirmed?
Senator Cory Booker: Yes.
Ka$h Patel: Yes, sir. Did I have discussions with the White House to remove FBI personnel?
Senator Cory Booker: Yes.
Ka$h Patel: No.
Senator
Cory Booker: So you're saying that you had no discussions with the
White House before you were in the position about the removal of any of
the personnel from the agency?
Ka$h Patel: As I was preparing for my confirmation hearing, I had numerous
conversations involving the type of people that would be employed and
those that were failing to meet the mark at the FBI would no longer be
employed if I were --
Senator Cory Booker: And I'm assuming that mark had to do with loyalty to the Trump administration.
Ka$h Patel: No. You're wrong.
Senator
Cory Booker: Ok. I'd like to revisit from that hearing. Did you --
did you testify -- Excuse me. You did testify before the Grand Jury
that President Trump had declassified the documents at issue in the
Mara-Lago classified documents case. Is that correct?
Ka$h Patel: I don't have the Grand Jury transcript. That's why I released it. Whatever it says is the best evidence.
Senator
Cory Booker: You know, that's what you said to Senator Whitehouse --
that you're Grand Jury testimony was publicly released. It has not
been. In fact, in July, a court denied a news outlet's bid to get that
transcript. But you said -- But the court said quite clearly that you
are free to discuss your Grand Jury testimony. So I ask you again: Did
you testify before the Grand Jury that President Trump to classify the
documents at issue in the Mara-Lago classified document case?
Ka$h Patel: And that is why I took your invitation to work with the department in
the court -- to have that transcript released. And the transcript is
the best evidence of what I said --
Senator Cory Booker: So you're saying right now to this Committee can have access to what you said before the Grand Jury?
Ka$h Patel: To whatever was released under my understanding, Senator, that the department --
Senator
Cory Booker: You and I both understand the law. Let me finish. You and
I understand under Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Procedure, a Grand
Jury witness -- in this case, you -- is not barred from sharing their
Grand Jury testimony. This is an oversight hearing This is germaine to
your integrity and your credibility. You know right now whether or not
you testified that President Trump declassified the documents at issue
in the Mara-Lago classified documents case. Why are you refusing to
answer that simple yes or no question right now?
Ka$h Patel: Because the premise of your question is inaccurate --
Senator Cory Booker: There is no premise to my question other than trying to get an order of what is truth or not.
Ka$h Patel: How do you know? How do you know what was asked in the Grand Jury if you weren't there?
Senator Cory Booker: Mr. Patel,
Ka$h Patel: This is a mockery that you're making of this hearing and this simple question. If you have --
Senator
Cory Booker: Mr. Patel, during your confirmation, you promised that
"all FBI employees will be protected against political retribution."
When I ask you: Are you aware of any plans or discussion to punish -- in
any way, including termination -- FBI agents or personnel associated
with the Trump administration, you specifically said -- under oath --
that you were not aware of any plans to punish FBI agents associated
with criminal investigations of Donald Trump. I don't believe you were
truthful. Firing FBI employees based solely on the cases that they are
investigating -- their case assignments -- is illegal. And you know
that. A new lawsuit that's been discussed numerous times -- filed by 3
FBI officials -- alleges that you carried out Donald Trump's "campaign
of retribution" against FBI employees for "failure to demonstrate
sufficient political loyalty." One of those plaintiffs has been
discussed today: Brian Driscoll. Now we know 20 years of distinguished
service to the FBI before you terminated him, Special Agent in Charge of
the FBI's Newark field office where he operated with distinction.
Medal of Valor winner, Shield of Bravery Award, he's a patriot. You
terminated Driscoll via a letter dated October 8, 2025. And in that
letter, you said that you were firing him pursuant to Article 2 of the
Constitution. Well, you are not President of the United States and so
I'm wondering under what authority you were allowed to terminate him?
Ka$h Patel: That matter is under litigation and I'm not able to discuss it.
Senator
Cory Booker: Ok. Well discuss this: Did you have discussions with
Stephen Miller about firing this particular person or about his
continuance in the FBI?
Ka$h Patel: Not that I recall?
Senator Cory Booker: How often do you speak to Stephen Miller?
Ka$h Patel: Frequently on our Homeland Security Task Force.
Senator
Cory Booker: You frequently talk with Stephen Miller about subjects
other than Homeland Security Task Force Issues correct?
Ka$h Patel: I frequently talk to Mr. Miller about Homeland Security Task Force.
Senator Cory Booker: Has Stephen Miller ever given you his opinions on how to run your agency?
Ka$h Patel: Mr. Miller's inter-agency contributions are invaluable to the FBI. That's what we talk about.
.
Senator
Cory Booker: So you frequently discuss your job and your
responsibilities with Stephen Miller and Pam Bondi, I imagine, as well?
Ka$h Patel: Absolutely. She's the Attorney General.
Senator
Cory Booker: Ok. Donald Trump promised to make us all safer. You have
pushed out senior FBI agents with decades of knowledge and experience.
In fact, this is the first time in FBI history that neither the
director nor the deputy director have any experience with the FBI.
You've shifted the agency's priorities primarily to pursuing Donald
Trump's immigration enforcement agenda. According
to ICE data, the Cato Institute -- which is a conservative think tank
-- found that 20% of all agents have been diverted from their work to do
assist ICE immigration enforcement. 20%. Part of this operation is
the work of mass law enforcement who jump out of
cars, snatch people off the streets at churches, schools and their jobs
and hospitals. Have their been any FBI agents who investigate crimes
against children that have been assigned to immigration enforcement?
Yes or no?
Ka$h Patel: The premise of what you say --
Senator Cory Booker: Have their been enough FBI agents to investigate foreign or domestic terrorists?
Ka$h Patel: No, no, no! You don't get to say --
And
this is where it got tense.
This?
Yes. If all that came before was tense
-- and it was -- this is where it really got heated. Prior to this,
Ka$h was able to gobble down his water whenever it appeared he was suffering from
a case of the vapors. This was the end of it for Ka$h.
He
became a
strident, shrieking nightmare that probably only served to remind
America that last week's big shooting happened after the FBI had
information about it. The louder he shrieked and the more he protested,
the more it became obvious he had a lot to cover up. He yapped away
like a hysterical poodle and we all know what they say about the guilty
dog. And he looked so weird -- for example, when Cory Booker noted he
believed that Patel has made the country weaker and less safe -- as
Ka$h began to become so excited that he was bouncing up and down in his
chair. I think all of us present were afraid Patel was about to piddle
on the carpet.
Cory noted, "You've
been purging thousands of serious law enforcement professionals who
spent their careers keeping us safe only to lower the hiring standards
in order to find anyone to replace them. And shockingly you admitted in
this hearing -- to Senator Coons -- that it would take 14 years to fill
the vacancy at your agency -- many that are the result of your purge.
20% of FBI agents are doing low level immigration enforcement instead of
mission critical work."
And that really was the takeaway.
There
were many important exchanges in the hearing -- all the Committee
members appeared to bring their A game with the exception of southern
belle Miss Lindsey Graham.
But the exchange between Cory and Ka$h really got to the heart of the problem: The FBI is not functioning.
That
is why the keep missing signals ahead of time -- signals in public --
before shootings. That's why they can't protect the American people.
It's
not the fault of the agents, as Cory noted. It's that they've been
pulled off the work they're supposed to be doing to work on Chump's
deportation scheme, it's that experienced agents have been fired, it's
that standards have been lowered to fill empty slots.
This is not the faul of any agent serving in the FBI.
It is the fault of the person overseeing the FBI.
That would be Ka$h.
And
he had no experience. As Cory Booker pointed out, this is the first
time in our country's history where neither the Director of the FBI, nor
the deputy director has any prior FBI experience. None at all.
And this is what incompetence and ignorance results in.
Ka$h
Patel was on the hot seat yesterday. But it could have been Junior
Kennedy and how he's putting public health at risk because he's not
qualified to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. Or is could be
Kristi Noem and how she's putting the country's security at risk because
of her mistaken belief that getting her hair styled and putting on a
costume will count towards securing the nation. Or it could be Tulsi
Gabbard -- Director of No Intelligence who is 100% unqualified for the
job she holds.
The country needs to be paying attention
to this. Chump has put TV personalities, nuts and cult members in
charge of important agencies that exist to protect the American people.
His nominees were never qualified and each day they prove they're not
up for the job.
They put the country at risk.
Heaven
forbid we have an attack on domestic soil but if that happens we need
to be prepared to get honest about how a bunch of idiots should never
have been nominated and that they have already demonstrated -- right
now, as this point -- that months later they're still not qualified for
the positions they hold.
Today, Ka$h Patel appears
before the House Judiciary Committee. I don't expect that it will go
any better. We've focused on the big issues of safety for today's
snapshot but please be aware that the Committee also touched on
corruption and abuse. One example, this exchange.
Senator
Peter Welch: You were rightly critical of the way that the previous FBI
Director used the FBI jet. You said you wanted to, "ground Chris Wray's
private jet travel that he pays for with taxpayer dollars to hop around
the country." [. . .] On April 5th, you attended a hockey game in New
York City -- you don't live there, right?
Ka$h Patel: No, I don't.
Senator Peter Welch: By the way, everyday FBI agents who are assigned in Washington don't get to fly home on a private jet.
Ka$h Patel: Well, this is a great point. Do you know why I have to use a private jet? Because Congress made it mandatory.”
Senator Peter Welch: Well, we didn't make it mandatory that you go to UFC games with Mel Gibson.
U.S.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said Monday that the USDA is
evaluating whether farmers may need economic assistance this fall.
Why
it matters: Family farms are facing their worst crisis since the 1980s,
both Rollins and Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders told a crowd.
[. . .]
The
bottom line: Both touted Trump administration relief programs, new
trade deals and biofuel expansion as efforts to stabilize the farm
economy, though many changes won't take effect until 2026.
Translation,
Huckabee Sanders and Rolling lied. There is no help coming in 2025.
This as farmers realize how much help that they need right now. Frank Yemi (INQUISITR) explains:
He
voted for Donald Trump three times, but now Pennsylvania dairyman John
Painter says the dream has curdled. “The whole thing is screwed up. We
need people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do,” the organic
milk producer from Westfield said, describing a season of sleepless
nights, empty milking stalls, and help-wanted signs that never get
answered. His frustration mirrors a broader farm-country revolt as the
labor crunch worsens under stepped-up immigration enforcement.
Across
northern Pennsylvania, producers say they are selling off cattle and
letting crops go unpicked because crews have vanished. Dairy farmer Tim
Wood, who sits on the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau board, put it bluntly,
“If we don’t get more labor, our cows don’t get milked and our crops
don’t get picked.”
The
numbers tell the same story. Agricultural employment fell about 6.5
percent from March to July, a sharp swing from the small gains seen in
the same span the prior two years. At the same time, estimates suggest
the immigrant share of the labor force dropped by more than 750,000
workers between January and June 2025, a sudden contraction that is
rippling through farm towns.
On
the ground, farmers connect those losses to on-farm enforcement that
has spooked entire crews. Reports detailed actions that left fields idle
and produce rotting, with some operations reporting 70 percent of
workers no-showing after raids. “We don’t have enough workforce in the
United States to do the manual work,” one advocate warned, predicting
higher prices and shuttered farms if nothing changes.
Three
times he voted for Chump. The same Chump who won't do anything to help
the farmers right now. The same Chump who is more interested -- as
Mike noted last night -- in playing the whiny cry baby and ignoring the
Constitution than he is in helping the American farmers. At THE HILL, Lindsey Granger points out:
Immigration
is one of those topics that always gets reduced to soundbites and
slogans. But here’s the reality: it’s not just a political debate. It’s a
workforce crisis that’s threatening the very foundation of America’s
economy.
If you eat food in this country, this issue touches you.
In
Pennsylvania — yes, the swing state President Trump won with 50 percent
of the vote in 2024 — farmers are desperate for workers. They’re
literally watching their livelihoods collapse because they can’t find
enough people to milk cows, pick crops or keep farms alive. One farmer,
John Painter, told Politico, “The whole thing is screwed up. We need
people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do.” That’s not
coming from a progressive activist; that’s from a lifelong Republican
farmer who voted for Trump three times.
And
that’s the irony here: the very communities that backed Trump the
hardest are now being squeezed the hardest by his immigration
crackdown.
Deportations and red tape are
slashing the supply of farmworkers. Economists say the U.S. lost 155,000
agricultural jobs in just a few months — and that’s before Trump’s
latest promises to deport millions more. The Economic Policy Institute
estimates that if he follows through, we’ll lose not only millions of
immigrant workers but also millions of jobs for U.S.-born workers whose
roles are tied to immigrant labor.
Let's join Rebecca in teaching everyone to sing along with the Cher song we all need to know "When The Money's Gone."
Ford raised prices in May on some models produced in Mexico, Reuters reported based on a notice sent to dealers.
Bloomberg also reported
that the automaker planned to raise prices on new gas and electric cars
starting in May unless Trump gives the industry some relief from
tariffs.
Ford, in a memo to dealers viewed by
Bloomberg, said that the company anticipates "the need to make vehicle
pricing adjustments in the future, which is expected to happen with May
production." Prices won't change for vehicles in inventory now.
On
April 14, Trump told reporters that he was contemplating a temporary
tariff exemption for autos to give manufacturers more time to move
production to the US — but no blanket exemption has yet been instituted.
The
stock market is flashing a handful of signs that the latest rally may
be about to reverse course, one of Bank of America's top technical
strategists said.
Paul
Ciana, the global chief technical strategist at BofA, said in a client
note on Monday that the market looks like it is facing a handful of "key
risks" from a technical perspective. Those factors could challenge the
recent rally that's pushed the market to all-time highs.
"After
reaching our 6,500 summer target, the SPX rose to another new high. Our
6,625 secondary/overshoot target is within striking distance," Ciana
wrote.
Nupur Anand (REUTERS) notes, "Some
U.S. consumers are showing increased signs of stress as inflation and
higher interest rates are affecting affordability and leading to
financial strain on borrowers, credit scoring company Fair Isaac
Corporation, widely known as FICO, said on Tuesday."
Convicted Felon Donald Chump is in the UK. And they're letting him know they see him.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
ICYMI:
Senator Murray, WA Health Secretary, Doctors Speak Out Against RFK Jr.
Blocking Vaccine Access and Wreaking Havoc at CDC, Lay Out State of
Vaccine Access in WA
ICYMI: Senator Murray Calls for HELP Committee Hearing with RFK Jr. on Campaign of Destruction at CDC and Beyond
ICYMI:
On Senate Floor, Senator Murray Demands Immediate Firing of RFK Jr.:
“This Man is Burning Down Our Public Health System from the Inside”
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, sent a letter
to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Acting Inspector
General Juliet Hodgkins requesting an independent, comprehensive review
of recent actions taken at HHS to limit access to vaccines and recent
personnel changes at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC). In the letter, Senator Murray calls for the HHS Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) to initiate an independent investigation into
the events that led to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to
fire the newly confirmed CDC Director, Dr. Susan Monarez, and the
subsequent departure of four senior CDC career scientists. Murray also
requested an OIG analysis of the events that led to the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA)’s recent move to dramatically narrow access to the
updated COVID-19 vaccines.
“Access to evidence-based vaccines is one of the best tools
we have for preventing disease and death. Until recently, the American
people have relied on HHS to evaluate the evidence and issue vaccine
recommendations based on science, rather than political agendas,” wrote Senator Murray.
“Now, following Secretary Kennedy’s destructive actions, millions of
families may struggle to obtain or afford vaccines, given insurance
coverage requirements are linked to CDC’s vaccine recommendations. I
therefore request that the OIG investigate the events that led to
Secretary Kennedy’s effort to fire CDC Director Monarez and his
attempted ousting of other top leadership at CDC.”
“In addition, I am extremely concerned by Secretary Kennedy’s
changes to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),
including the dismissal of all committee members in June, and the lack
of transparency around the conflicts of interest and backgrounds of
newly installed committee members,” Senator Murray continued. “The
committee is scheduled to meet next on September 18 and 19 to review,
and vote on, recommendations related to vaccines for COVID-19; Hepatitis
B; and measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (MMRV). Former CDC Director
Monarez alleged that Secretary Kennedy and his leadership attempted to
force her to pre-approve the recommendations ahead of any opportunity to
review the evidence. This is a serious allegation that would illustrate
direct political interference in the vaccine approval process, and
indicate that the ACIP’s vaccine recommendations were pre-manufactured
based on a political agenda, rather than based on the scientific
evidence as reviewed by independent health experts.”
“Undermining public trust in vaccines and vaccine
availability will cause more families to suffer from preventable
illnesses and deaths. Millions of Americans could also see their health
care costs rise, as CDC undermines insurance coverage requirements for
lifesaving vaccines, forcing families to pay out-of-pocket. Given the
importance of vaccines in protecting our health and safety, I believe it
is critical that an independent investigation be undertaken to
determine where political interference at HHS has undermined the science
and impeded vaccine access,” Senator Murray concluded.
Senator Murray, a longtime congressional leader on health care who has led hearings on addressing vaccine hesitancy, has been a leader in raising the alarm over RFK Jr.’s nomination since the beginning—speaking out on the Senate floor, holding numerous events, raisingthe alarm after meeting with him, and hammering the threat he poses to Americans’ health nonstop. She ledtheoppositionto
the Trump administration’s disastrous plan to dismantle HHS and fire
tens of thousands of staff in critical positions across CDC, NIH, FDA,
and other agencies, and spoke out forcefully against RFK Jr.’s ousting of the entire CDC vaccine advisory board, including one ACIP member from Washington state. Senator Murray has held countlessevents across Washington state and in Washington, D.C. with doctors, patients, and former HHS officials to lift up how Trump and Republicans’ attacks on health care will be devastating for families.
Senator Murray recently took to the Senate floor to reiterate her call for RFK Jr. to be fired immediately; she also praised the launch
of the West Coast Health Alliance to provide evidence-based public
health guidance for Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. Last
week, Senator Murray called for
Chair Bill Cassidy (R-LA) to compel RFK Jr. to testify publicly before
the HELP Committee, as well as for the committee to hear from Susan
Monarez and other former CDC officials. On Friday, Murray held a virtual press conference
with Washington state health leaders on RFK Jr.’s increasingly
dangerous attacks on vaccines and America’s public health
infrastructure.
The full text of the letter is available HERE and below.
Dear Acting Inspector General Hodgkins,
I write today to request a comprehensive review of recent actions
taken at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to limit
access to vaccines, as well as the recent personnel changes at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In particular, I am
requesting that the HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) initiate
an independent review into the events that led to HHS Secretary Robert
F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to fire the newly confirmed CDC Director, Dr.
Susan Monarez, and the subsequent departure of four senior-level CDC
career scientists. Further, I am seeking the OIG’s analysis of the
events that led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issuing a
restrictive authorization for the COVID-19 vaccine for this upcoming
fall and winter season, and whether that authorization was based on
science and evidence, or was due to political pressure from the
Secretary or other HHS political appointees.
It has been publicly reported – and Dr. Monarez has verified – that
Secretary Kennedy, alongside political appointee Stefanie Spear,
attempted to force CDC Director Monarez to resign from her post – less
than a month after she was confirmed by the Senate. Secretary Kennedy
directed Dr. Monarez to endorse vaccine recommendations before they had
undergone scientific review and to dismiss career officials responsible
for vaccine policy. After she refused, Secretary Kennedy demanded her
resignation. Access to evidence-based vaccines is one of the best tools
we have for preventing disease and death. Until recently, the American
people have relied on HHS to evaluate the evidence and issue vaccine
recommendations based on science, rather than political agendas. Now,
following Secretary Kennedy’s destructive actions, millions of families
may struggle to obtain or afford vaccines, given insurance coverage
requirements are linked to CDC’s vaccine recommendations. I therefore
request that the OIG investigate the events that led to Secretary
Kennedy’s effort to fire CDC Director Monarez and his attempted ousting
of other top leadership at CDC.
Further, I am seeking the OIG’s analysis of all actions Secretary
Kennedy has taken to-date to limit vaccine access and whether or not
those decisions were based on the best available science and evidence.
On May 27, 2025, Secretary Kennedy announced on social media that the
COVID-19 vaccine had been removed from the CDC recommended immunization
schedule for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. Several months
later, on August 27, 2025, the FDA released a much narrower
authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine than in previous years, since the
vaccine’s initial development under President Trump’s Operation Warp
Speed. This decision limits access to the updated COVID-19 vaccine and
removes individual and provider choice in determining who can be
vaccinated. As part of its investigation, I ask the OIG to examine the
decision making around recent changes in vaccine authorizations and
recommendations, with a particular focus on the basis for such
decisions. I request the OIG examine whether these decisions were based
in changes in science or were based in political or ideological
interference from Secretary Kennedy or any other political leadership in
the Trump Administration.
In addition, I am extremely concerned by Secretary Kennedy’s changes
to CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), including
the dismissal of all committee members in June, and the lack of
transparency around the conflicts of interest and backgrounds of newly
installed committee members. The committee is scheduled to meet next on
September 18 and 19 to review, and vote on, recommendations related to
vaccines for COVID-19; Hepatitis B; and measles, mumps, rubella,
varicella (MMRV). Former CDC Director Monarez alleged that Secretary
Kennedy and his leadership attempted to force her to pre-approve the
recommendations ahead of any opportunity to review the evidence. This is
a serious allegation that would illustrate direct political
interference in the vaccine approval process, and indicate that the
ACIP’s vaccine recommendations were pre-manufactured based on a
political agenda, rather than based on the scientific evidence as
reviewed by independent health experts. I also ask the OIG to review the
firings of the former ACIP members, who were dismissed before their
terms ended, and to investigate the vetting process used for installing
the new ACIP members and whether all federal laws and regulations were
adhered to. Additionally, I request the OIG examine whether there were
efforts by Secretary Kennedy and other political leadership to
pre-determine the ACIP recommendations and to bypass scientific review.
The Department plays a critical role in securing the health and
safety of the American people. Families and health care providers need
to be able to trust the guidance coming from the FDA, CDC, and all HHS
agencies. Under Secretary Kennedy’s leadership, access to vaccines has
been restricted, without regard for the evidence or the consequences for
American families. Undermining public trust in vaccines and vaccine
availability will cause more families to suffer from preventable
illnesses and deaths. Millions of Americans could also see their health
care costs rise, as CDC undermines insurance coverage requirements for
lifesaving vaccines, forcing families to pay out-of-pocket.
Given the importance of vaccines in protecting our health and safety,
I believe it is critical that an independent investigation be
undertaken to determine where political interference at HHS has
undermined the science and impeded vaccine access. Thank you for your
prompt attention to this matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment